研究生: |
王秀苓 Wang Hsiu Ling |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
「邁向藝術」課程模式應用於國小四年級學生音樂創作之研究 A Study of the Arts PROPEL Curriculum Model Applied to Fourth-Graders Music Composing |
指導教授: |
賴美鈴
Lai, Mei-Ling |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
音樂學系 Department of Music |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 165 |
中文關鍵詞: | 評分規準 、國小音樂教學 、音樂創造力 、音樂創作 、邁向藝術 |
英文關鍵詞: | rubric, elementary general music education, music creativity, music composing, Arts PROPEL |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:221 下載:41 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探究「邁向藝術」課程模式應用於國小四年級學生音樂創作。研究對象為臺北市快樂國小(化名)四年級A班學生共三十一人,全班分為五組,進行八週的教學課程。透過個案研究法,蒐集並分析質化與量化資料,研究目的有三:(1)以「邁向藝術」課程模式理論為基礎規劃之國小四年級音樂創作課程;(2)探討「邁向藝術」課程模式中以學生自行演奏學生的音樂創作與運用電腦音樂軟體播放學生音樂創作之成果;(3)探討「邁向藝術」課程模式對於國小四年級學生音樂創作的產出、知覺與反思的影響。
本研究得以下研究結果:(1)「邁向藝術」課程模式應用於國小四年級音樂創作課程任務有包含全班集體節奏創作、小組節奏創作與小組曲調創作;(2)統計結果有70%的學生表示,比較喜歡用自己演奏的方式來表演音樂創作;透過電腦音樂軟體的播放,可彌補學生因為演奏能力的不足而無法聆聽音樂創作之缺憾;(3)學生對於本研究之教學課程持正面態度,透過本研究課程實施可提升學生知覺、產出與反思方面的能力。學生藉由對話討論以及以樂器檢驗創作的反思過程,釐清其美感概念;學生透過電腦音樂軟體的播放產生知覺與產出之間的橫向聯繫;全班有四組(佔80%)的組別均能掌握小組節奏創作的基本技術與原則;所有的組別均能掌握小組曲調創作的基本技術與原則。
The purpose of this study was to investigate music composing of incorporating the Arts PROPEL curriculum model into an elementary school general music program. It took place over eight weeks at an elementary school in Taipei and involved 31 students who divided into 5 groups. Through case studies, both qualitative and quantitative data were gathered and analyzed. The main goals were: (1) To develop music composing curriculum based on the Arts PROPEL model; (2) To investigate the result of performing students’ composition by themselves and playing the composition by computer music software; (3) To investigate the students’ production, perception, and reflection after receiving this instruction.
Conclusions included the following: (1) The music composing curriculum includes three tasks, containing rhythm composing by a class, rhythm composing by groups, and melody composing by groups; (2) 70% of the students preferred performing their composition by themselves to play the composition by software. Using software retrieved incapable of performing. (3) Students took a positive attitude toward this instruction. It is proved that the students have made great progress in production, perception, and reflection of music composing ability after receiving this instruction. The reflective process of conversation and playing the composition while composing let students comprehend the aesthetic concept. Using software to play students’ composition related their perception to production. 80% of the class mastered the basic rhythm composing technique and principle. The entire class mastered the basic melody composing technique and principle.
中文部分
王文中(主編)(2004)。教育測驗與評量─教室學習觀點。臺北:五南。
王文科(1994)。質的教育研究法。臺北:師大書苑。
王文科、王智弘(1986)。教育研究法。臺北:五南。
呂宜親(2001)。視覺創意思考應用於國小音樂教學之研究。國立臺灣師範大學音樂研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
李坤崇(1999)。多元化教學評量。臺北:心理。
林小玉(2002)。與「美」有約:談美學與音樂。美育,128,42-45。
林小玉(2003)。藝術與人文教師應知的創造力五提問與創造力教育七建議。國民教育雙月刊,43(6),50-55。
林小玉(2005)。「邁向藝術」課程模式應用於國小五年級學童編曲創作知能之研究。藝術教育研究,10,87-126。
林偉文、王涵儀、曾敬梅等(譯)(2004)。探索教室中的創造力。臺北:教育部。(Ritchhart, R. & Blythe, T.原著,1999)。
孫德珍(1995)。幼兒音樂創作教學之電腦學習環境之發展與研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC84-2511-S134-004-CL)。
徐端娌(2000)。「邁向藝術」課程方案應用於國小五年級音樂課之質的研究。臺北市立師範學院音樂藝術研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
康嫻純(2005)。運用作曲軟體創作音樂之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學音樂學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
教育部(2001)。創造力教育白皮書。2002年4月17日,取自http://www.creativi-ty.edu.tw/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=1
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要藝術與人文學習領域。臺北:教育
梁寶華(2002)。創思音樂教學模式:如何設計與執行創作音樂活動教學。載於教育暨青年局(主編),創思教學的理論與實踐─論文專集(頁105-114)。澳門:教育暨青年局。
梁寶華(2005)。音樂創作教學:新世紀音樂教育新趨勢。香港:卓思。
郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量(修訂第一版)。臺北:精華。
陳玉玫(2002)。應用電腦輔助國小音樂教學之探討。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
曾佩宜(2004)。應用資訊科技融入音樂科教學設計之實證研究。國立臺灣師範大學音樂學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
黃玉生(2004)。電腦科技在音樂創作上之應用。國立臺北師範學院音樂研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
楊雅惠(1992)。運用電腦輔助之曲調創作教學研究。國立臺灣師範大學音樂學組碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
鄭方靖(1993)。本世紀四大音樂教育主流及其教學模式。臺北:奧福教育。
賴美鈴(2005)。音樂教育碩士學位論文之內容分析(1994-2004)。載於2005藝術教育研究的回顧與展望研討會論文集(頁23-48)。屏東:屏東師範學院視覺藝術教育學系。
西文部分
Bellardo, L. J., & Bellardo, L. L. (1992). A glossary for archivists, manuscript curators, and records managers. Chicago: The Society of American Archivists.
Benson, W. (1967). Creative projects in musicianship. Washington, DC: Music
Educators National Conference.
Brophy, T. S. (2000). Assessing developing child musician: A guide for general music
teachers. Chicago: GIA.
Brophy, T. S. (2001). Building music literacy with guided composition. Music
Educators Journal, 83(3), 15-18
Davidson, L., & Scripp, L. (1990). Tracing reflective thinking in the performance
ensemble. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 1 (1-2), 49-62.
Dirth, K. (2000). Implementing portfolio assessment in the music performance
classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cloumbia University, NY.
Elliott, D. J. (2005). Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues. New York :
Oxford University.
Ernst, K. D. (1968). The nature and nuture of creativity. In Choate, R. (Ed.),
Documentary report of the Tanglewood Symposium(pp.127-130). Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
Frazier, D. M., & Paulson, F. L. (1992). How portfolios motivate reluctant writers.
Educational Leadership, 49 (8), 62-65.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in pratice. New York: Basic
Books.
Gray J., & Scripp, L. (1992). The Arts PROPEL video handbook
【Videocassette】.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Projects Zero.
Hickey, M. (1995). Qualitative and quantitative relationships between children's
creative musical thinking processes and products. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Northwestern University, IL.
Hickey, M. (1999). Assessment rubrics for music composition. Music Educators
Journal, 85(4), 26-33.
Hounchell, R. F. (1986). A study of creativity and music reading as objectives of music
education as contained in statements in the “Music Educators Journal” from 1914
to 1970. (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts
Internationa, 46(12), A3643.
Kennedy, M. A. (2002). Listening to the music: Compositional processes of high school
composers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(2), 94-110.
Kratus, J. (1985). The use of melodic and rhythmic motives in the original songs of
children ages five to thirteen. Contributions to Music Education, 12, 1-8.
Music Educators National Conference. (1994). National Standards for Arts Education:
What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Reston,
VA: MENC.
Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a
portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48, 60-63.
Swanwick, K. & Tillman, J. (1986). The sequence of musical development: A study of
children’s composition. British Journal of Music Education, 3(3), 305-339.
Thompson, K. (2003, November). Assessing music learning. 載於國立臺灣師範大學
音樂學系舉辦之2003音樂教育學術研討會─邁向音樂教育新紀元論文集(頁
21-45),臺北市。
Tillman, J. (1989). Towards a model of the development of children’s musical creativity.
Canadian Music Educator, 30(2), 169-174.
Webster, P. R. (1987). Conceptual bases for creative thinking in music. In Peery, J. C.,
Peery, I. W., & Draper, T. W. (Eds.), Music and child development(pp. 158-176).
New York: Springer.
Webster, P. R. (1988). Creative thinking in music: Approaches to research. In J. T. Gates
(Ed.), Music education in the United States: Contemporary issues. (pp.66-81).
Tuscaloosa Al: University of Alabama press.
Webster, P. R. (1991). Creativity as cretive thinking. In D. Hamann (Ed.), Creativity in
the classroom: The best of MEJ (pp.25-34). Reston, VA: Music Educators National
Conference.
Winner, E. (Ed.). (1991). Arts PROPEL: An introductory handbook. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University press.
Winner, E., Davison, L., & Scripp, L. (Eds.). (1992). Arts PROPEL: A handbook for
music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.