研究生: |
陳肇勳 Chen, Chao-Hsun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台灣地區住宅建築設計健康促進指標建構之研究 Research on the Construction of Health Promotion Indicators for Residential Building Design in Taiwan |
指導教授: |
胡益進
Hu, Yih-Jin |
口試委員: |
胡益進
Hu, Yih-Jin 李子奇 Lee, Tzu-Chi 陳政友 Chen, Cheng-Yu 林曉薇 Lin, Hsiao-Wei 江益璋 Chiang, Yi-Chang |
口試日期: | 2024/07/05 |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
健康促進與衛生教育學系 Department of Health Promotion and Health Education |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 360 |
中文關鍵詞: | 健康促進 、健康住宅 、建築設計 、設計指標 |
英文關鍵詞: | Health promotion, Healthy housing, Architectural design, Design indicators |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401290 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:66 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自2019年底COVID-19疫情爆發以來,全球對居家環境與健康彼此的關係日益重視。本研究作者為開業建築師,曾接受完整的建築教育,自省執業20餘年所執行的建築案件,揆諸設計過程,針對人們在室內空間中所面臨的健康問題,欠缺整體的健康促進設計思維以及可運用的指標工具。因此,本研究希望能建構具備健康促進特色的台灣地區住宅建築設計健康促進指標,期能提供相關政策、建築教育及建築設計者運用參考。
本研究採用德懷術研究法,通過三回合問卷調查,收集30名專家有效問卷,最後建構完成的設計指標包括10個構面、31個項目、118個細項及201個補充說明。其中,構面及項目分述如下,構面一 空氣環境:室外進氣、通風性、室內空氣。構面二 供水環境:供水設備、供水水質、水資源再利用。構面三 光環境:自然採光、人工照明。構面四 熱環境:室內溫度、室內濕度、熱傳導、熱對流、熱輻射。構面五 電磁輻射環境:外部輻射源、內部輻射源。構面六 噪音與振動環境:外部音源、內部隔音、減振設施。構面七 心理支持環境:隱私性、裝修材質與色彩。構面八 衛生環境:病原傳播、排水衛生、垃圾處理、空間維護。構面九 安全環境:防災設施、無障礙設施、防墜設施、消防設施、保全設施。構面十 社區交流環境:救護與保健空間、交誼空間、運動空間、庭園空間。
本研究提出以下建議,1.建築政策的制定:建築主管機關應檢討現行政策及法令,納入健康促進議題,制定健康促進建築設計指標,並建立評估體系、分級評鑑及獎勵措施。2.建築教育的推廣:建築教育單位可根據本研究建構之指標,建置健康環境課程,培養設計者具備健康促進的觀念、知識及健康建築設計技能。3.建築產業的落實:相關職業公會和業者可參考本研究成果進行職業訓練及產品改良,提供設計者更多資源及選擇。4.建築設計流程的導入:由建築設計者操作健康促進設計指標查核表,按設計手法、建築材料、建築設備三個面向,檢討個案適用指標範圍及作法,以完備整體健康促進的住宅建築設計。5.後續研究:未來可進行台灣地區健康促進建築評估指標的建構研究,逐步建立完整的健康建築設計及評估指標體系。
透過本研究,期望促成台灣地區住宅建築設計朝向更健康、更符合現代需求的方向發展,提高國人生活品質與健康福祉。
Since the outbreak of COVID-19 at the end of 2019, the world has paid increasing attention to the relationship between home environment and health. The author of this study is a practicing architect who has received a complete architectural education. He has self-reflected on the architectural cases he has practiced for more than 20 years. Based on the design process, he lacks overall health promotion design thinking and the health problems faced by people in indoor spaces. Indicator tools available. Therefore, this study hopes to construct health promotion indicators for residential building design in Taiwan with health promotion characteristics, and to provide reference for relevant policies, architectural education, and architectural designers.
This study adopted the Delphi technique research method and collected valid questionnaires from 30 experts through three rounds of questionnaires. The finally constructed design indicators included 10 aspects, 31 items, 118 details and 201 supplementary explanations. Among them, the aspects and projects are described as follows. Aspect 1: Air environment: outdoor air intake, ventilation, and indoor air. Aspect 2: Water supply environment: water supply equipment, water supply quality, and water resource reuse. Facet 3: Light environment: natural lighting, artificial lighting. Aspect 4: Thermal environment: indoor temperature, indoor humidity, heat conduction, heat convection, and heat radiation. Aspect 5: Electromagnetic radiation environment: external radiation sources and internal radiation sources. Aspect 6: Noise and vibration environment: external sound sources, internal sound insulation, and vibration reduction facilities. Aspect 7: Psychological support environment: privacy, decoration materials and colors. Aspect 8: Sanitary environment: pathogen transmission, drainage sanitation, garbage disposal, and space maintenance. Aspect 9: Safety environment: disaster prevention facilities, barrier-free facilities, anti-fall facilities, fire-fighting facilities, and security facilities. Aspect 10: Community communication environment: rescue and health care space, social space, sports space, garden space.
This study puts forward the following recommendations, 1. Formulation of building policies: Building authorities should review current policies and laws, include health promotion issues, formulate health-promoting architectural design indicators, and establish evaluation systems, graded evaluations, and incentive measures. 2. Promotion of architectural education: Architectural education units can build healthy environment courses based on the indicators constructed in this study to cultivate designers with health promotion concepts, knowledge and healthy architectural design skills. 3. Implementation in the construction industry: Relevant professional associations and industry players can refer to the results of this research for professional training and product improvement, providing designers with more resources and choices. 4. Introduction of architectural design process: Architectural designers use the health promotion design indicator checklist to review the scope and methods of applicable indicators for individual cases according to the three aspects of design techniques, building materials, and construction equipment to complete the overall health promotion residential building design. . 5. Follow-up research: In the future, we can conduct research on the construction of health-promoting building evaluation indicators in Taiwan, and gradually establish a complete healthy building design and evaluation index system.
Through this research, we hope to promote the development of residential architectural design in Taiwan towards a healthier and more in line with modern needs, and improve the quality of life and health and well-being of the Chinese people.
一、中文部分
卜澤凱 (2022)。建構防疫型臺灣健康建築評估指標之研究。碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學。
內政部建築研究所(2022)。《綠建築評估手冊-建築能效評估系統》.
王本楷 (2021)。永續健康住宅設計之競爭優勢評估模型。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
成令方,林鶴玲,吳嘉苓譯(2006)。見樹又見林:社會學作為一7種生活、實踐與承諾(原作者:Allan G. Johnson)。台北市:群學出版有限公司。(原著書名:The Forest and the Trees: Sociology as Life, Practice, and Promise)。
李蘭,晏涵文,陳富莉,陸玓玲,吳文琪,江宜珍等(2016)。健康行為與健康教育。新北市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。
李晶譯(2015)。心理物理學綱要(原作者:Gustav Theodor Fechner)。北京:中國人民大學出版社。(原著書名:Elemente der Psychophysik)。
江守山(2017)。如何挑選健康好房子。台北市:新自然主義。
何友鋒 (2007)。都市健康住宅評估指標體系之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立成功大學,臺南市。
吳佩珊,楊志成,陳耀文(2023)。後疫情時代多單元住宅的設計與健康策略。建築與規劃研究期刊,12(1),10-20。
李啓銓(2013)。活化自癒力的脊骨神經醫學。台北市:原水文化。
李麗華、張志強(2018)。健康環境與社會福祉之探討。健康促進與教育學報,13(1),23-36。
沈福煦(1993)。人與建築。台北市:臺北斯坦出版有限公司。
杜月香(1992)。建築物理環境。台中市:杜月香。
邱皓政(2017)。量化研究與統計分析SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
邱騰誼(2017)。設計者對「綠建築」之認知及影響「綠建築設計」行為意向因素之研究—以台中地區為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立台中教育大學環境研究所,台中市。
邱意庭 (2020)。建構臺灣健康建築評估指標與驗證之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立成功大學,臺南市。
呂彥億(2008)。以德懷術建構國民中小學美術資優班入學鑑定模式之研究。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
林仁壽、游汝杰、林嘉宏、黃炎昌(2017)。台灣地區PM2.5污染事件及其與氣象要素之關係。中華民國環境保護學會第十一屆年會暨學術研討會論文集,337-342。
林坤誠、張良正、賴信如、曾福全、簡瑞騰(2008)。台灣地區主要河川中重金屬之分布特性。中華民國環境工程學會第十一屆年會論文集,363-370。
洪栩隆,黃松元(2017)。生死心理學。新北市:國立空中大學。
林育民、王偉強(2017)。住宅性能評估與居住者健康:台灣地區的挑戰與機會。《建築研究學報》,23(3),45-58。
陸洛、吳珮瑀、林國慶、高旭繁、翁崇修等譯(2012)。社會心理學(原作者:John D. DeLamater,Daniel J. Myers)。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。(原著書名:Social Psychology)
孫碧鮫(2012)。社區成人健康素養及其相關因素探討-以台中市南屯區為例。未發表之碩士論文,中臺科技大學。
鄭先祐(1992)。國立編譯館(主編),生態環境影響評估學。台北縣:財團法人徐氏基金會。
崔征國譯(1998)。住宅佈局設計。台北市:詹氏書局。
黃瑞琪、 林麗貞(2013)。 健康素養在健康促進中的應用與挑戰。 台灣公共衛生雜誌,32(3), 204-212。
張雅雯、蕭皓仁、吳志明(2016)。室內甲醛污染物之源頭與控制技術。中華民國室內空氣品質學會學術研討會論文摘要集,42-45。6。
張文馨、高玉霞(2012)。健康素養的評估方法與工具應用。 台灣健康管理學報, 10(1), 88-102。
陳宗鵠(2022)。健康住宅設計學。台北市:城邦文化事業股份有限公司,麥浩斯出版。
陳宜秀譯(2021)。設計的心理學(原作者:Donald A. Noman)。台北市:遠流出版公司。(原著書名:The Design of Everyday Things)。
陳冠伶、李奇恩(2008)。半導體廠粉塵暴露對生殖毒性之研究。中華民國職業醫學學會第二十四屆學術研討會論文摘要集,107-108。
陳婉菁、呂秋煌(2011)。都市綠地對改善社區空氣品質之影響。中華民國環境工程學會第十五屆年會論文集,239-244。
陳素芬(2012)。我國健康教育專業人員核心能力與認證制度之建構(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育學系,臺北市。
陳惠玲 (2005)。住宅內部健康評估指標體系之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立成功大學,臺南市。
陳嘉陽(2012)。教育概論(上冊),頁443。教甄策略研究中心。
游能君 (2008)。健康住宅評估指標之研究。教甄策略研究中心。
楊文堯、劉瑞玲(2009)。食品添加物對身體的影響及食品安全。中華民國營養學會第三十四屆年會暨學術研討會論文摘要集,55-56。
蔡志一(2006)。健康管理。績效指標之建構(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育學系,臺北市。
賴明洲,李叡明譯(1997)。植栽配置實務:設計.施工.養護(原作者:進士五十八等)。台北市:地景企業股份有限公司。(原著書名:植栽設計の実際 基本からプランニングまで)
謝臥龍(1997)。優良國中教師特質之德懷術分析。教育研究資訊,5(3),14-28
謝臥龍,駱慧文(2004)。德懷研究。載於 質性研究。台北:心理出版社。
簡茂發、劉湘川(1993)電腦會議式大慧調查法及其在教育上之應用。資訊與教育月刊,35,6-11。
二、英文部分
American Psychological Association (APA). (2017)."The Importance of Social Support." Link
Awada, M., Becerik-Gerber, B., White, E., Hoque, S., O′Neill, Z., Pedrielli, G., Wen, J., & Wu, T. (2022). Occupant health in buildings: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the opinions of building professionals and implications on research. Building and Environment, 207, 108440. Retrieved Feb 11, 2022 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520175/
Babbie, E. (2015). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.
Blas, E , Sivasankara Kurup, A & WHO. (2010). Equity, social determinants and public health programmes / editors Erik Blas and Anand Sivasankara Kurup. World Health Organization. https://iriswho.int/int handle/10665/44289
Brown, M., & Wilson, S. (2019). Strategies for reducing noise in residential buildings: A literature review. Building and Environment,160, 106219.
Chen, Y., & Smith, J. (2018). Thermal comfort in residential buildings: A review of influencing factors and control strategies. Building and Environment, 132, 11-21.
Ernst, J. (2009). Influences on U.S. middle school teachers' use of environment-based education. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 71-92.
ESHI,(2024) Energy Smart Home Improvement,from https://www.paenergysmart.com/service-category/indoor-air-quality
European Environment Agency (EEA). (2007)."Radiation risk from everyday devices assessed."
Faherty,V.(1979).Continuing social work education:results of a Delphisurvey.Journal of education for social work,15(1),12-19.
Hancock, T. (2011). The Ottawa Charter at 25. Health Promotion International, 26(2), ii163-ii167. doi:10.1093/heapro/dar059
Hsu,F.,Chen,W.,Wang,S., & Chen,J.(2018). Factors to consider in residential design: Privacy, ventilation, lighting, and residents' lifestyle habits. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 19(2), 123-136.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior t hrough environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
International WELL Building Institute.IWBI. (2014). WELL Building Standard. IWBI. Retrieved from https://www.wellcertified.com
International. (2024). WELL Building Standard, version 2. International WELL Building Institute from https://v2.wellcertified.com/en/wellv2/overview/#:~:text=Standard%E2%84%A2%20version%202-,(WELL%20v2%E2%84%A2),-is%20a%20vehicle
Johnson, D., & Lee, S. (2018). Strategies for water resource conservation in residential buildings. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(11), 6210-6222.
Johnson, R., & Lee, S. (2019). Effects of vibrations on mental comfort and health of residents in residential settings: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101326.
Leider, J. P., Pineau, V., Bogaert, K., & Ma Q. (2017). The legacy of leaded gasoline: Public health and housing collaboration for primary prevention of lead exposure. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044420
McBeth, W., & Volk, T. L. (2010). The national environmental literacy project: A baseline study of middle grade students in the United States. Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960903210031
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (N.I.E.H.S.) (2021). Air pollution and your health. Retrieved from https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/air-pollution/index.cfm
Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259
Nutbeam, D. (2008). The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science & Medicine, 67(12), 2072-2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050
Raskin,M.S.(1994).The Delphi study in field instruction revisite experts consensus on issues and research. Journal of education for social work,30(1),75-89.
Roberts,T.(2016, December 15). We Spend 90% of Our Time Indoors.Says Who? Retrieved fromhttps://www.buildinggreen.com/blog/we-spend-90-our-time-indoors-says-who
Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution, and directions in the 1990s. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED348235
Salmond S. W. (1994). Orthopaedic nursing research priorities: a Delphi study. Orthopedic nursing, 13(2), 31–45.
Science Direct(2023), Mapping the impact of environmental pollutants on human health and environment: A systematic review and meta-analysis,fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0375674223001723
Smith, J., & Brown, M. (2018). Human health implications of residential lighting design: A literature review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 55-63.
Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2018). Impact of residential building design on occupants' psychological well-being: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 73-85.
Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., Brand, H., & (HLS-EU) Consortium Health Literacy Project European (2012). Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC public health, 12, 80.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Healthy People 2020: Objectives for improving health. Retrieved from from https://www.vipstructures.com/covid-architecture/
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Introduction to indoor air quality. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/introduction-indoor-air-quality
Vip Structures(2020).4 ways COVID-19 may chang Architectural Design for Years to Come. Retrieved World Health Organization (1998 a). Health promotion glossary. World Health Organization.
Wallace, L. A., Pellizzari, E. & Wendel, C. (1991). Total Volatile Organic Concentrations in 2700 Personal, Indoor and Outdoor Air Samples collected in the US EPA Team Studies. Indoor Air, 4(4), 465-477.
WHO (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/
WHO (1998 a). Health promotion glossary. World Health Organization.
WHO (1998 b). Health21: The health for all policy framework for the WHO European Region. Retrieved July 16, 2024, from https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/347602/WHO-EURO-1998-3868-43627-61307-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
WHO (2005). The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/sixth-global-conference/the-bangkok-charter
WHO (2016), August 20). Health promotion. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/health-promotion (World Health Organization (WHO)) (World Health Organization (WHO))
WHO(2018),WHO Housing and health guidelines,from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550376
WHO(2020), WHO Global Burden of Disease Study,from https://globalhealth.org/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwj9-zBhDyARIsAERjds2VLwib1J5DhfWz02TsV9jxyW_w76XyDu9fm4YnzmrLttlA0ijm3LoaApGcEALw_wcB
WHO (2021), Household air pollution and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollution-and-health
WHO(2023),Research on Indoor Air Quality,from https://globalhealth.org/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwj9-zBhDyARIsAERjds2VLwib1J5DhfWz02TsV9jxyW_w76XyDu9fm4YnzmrLttlA0ijm3LoaApGcEALw_wcB
WHO (2024 a). Environmental factors influencing health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/health-topics/environmental-health
WHO(2024 b),WHO Healthy Cities Programme,from https://globalhealth.org/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwj9-zBhDyARIsAERjds2VLwib1J5DhfWz02TsV9jxyW_w76XyDu9fm4YnzmrLttlA0ijm3LoaApGcEALw_wcB