不論從傳統國際衛生或新興全球衛生研究觀察，在眾多國際公共衛生議題中，最受國際社會關注的往往是傳染病議題。傳染病的系列議題主要包括疾病爆發、監測、通報、新藥研發、新藥上市商品化、藥物取得以及國際衛生援助等。本論文以傳染病議題為研究對象，尤其聚焦於新興與再現傳染病與被忽略熱帶疾病議題。本論文分別從國際關係領域的自由主義、現實主義、制度主義與世界主義這四個重要理論典範來分別探究傳染病控制、傳染病治療以及國際衛生援助這三個重要面向，並試圖為傳染病議題提供一個跨學科領域的理論論述。
就傳染病控制的疾病監測通報而言，本文透過愛滋病的衛生安全化作為個案分析來反思全球衛生安全這個主流概念的真正符號內涵。本文以為，現實主義所詮釋的全球衛生安全乃是指涉全球衛生的國家安全化，尤其反映西方大國的國家安全利益。現實主義與安全研究社群透過衛生安全化將某些新興傳染病賦予全球衛生安全位階成為高度政治議題，比如著名的「三大疾病」(the big three)。本文認為，全球衛生安全其實並不是現實主義所指稱的傳染病被衛生安全化，而是某些少數被西方大國所選定的新興傳染病被衛生安全化。
就傳染病治療的藥物可及性而言，本文以為，透過自由主義雖可詮釋藥物研發的技術創新以提供有療效新藥來治癒病患，但自由主義卻仍無法合理解釋藥物可及性及衛生資源落差所造成的市場失靈。本文採用制度主義論點，分別從全球衛生治理、全球衛生公共產品與全球衛生協力關係這些制度觀點來檢證熱帶疾病的藥物可及性爭議。本文以為，雖然熱帶疾病的全球衛生協力關係如今逐漸成為全球衛生治理的具體實踐模式，但仍須避免全球衛生協力關係所產生的課責性與合法性這些制度缺失。
就國際衛生援助的大國衛生責任而言，本質上就是一場全球正義與權力利益的責任主體論戰。西方大國透過對國際衛生援助的大量資源投入藉此強調對傳染病議題的重視以及爭取全球衛生領導地位的主導權。本文指出，現實主義對於國際衛生援助是以大國為關注對象，所反映的仍是大國自身的安全、政治及經濟利益。本文以為，從歐巴馬全球衛生宣言來觀察，不僅反映對聯合國千禧年發展目標的政治承諾，也凸顯大國責任已逐漸傾向世界主義援助觀點，呈現一種融合自利主義與利他主義的新興國際衛生援助思維。
本論文的研究貢獻與建議如下。首先，本文採用制度主義與世界主義論點提出新興的全球衛生政治論述，藉以批判與反思主流國關社群所詮釋的國際衛生政治。一方面，全球衛生政治反映新興傳染病與熱帶疾病兩者間的嚴重落差，也凸顯兩者在權力及資源分配上的不對稱性；另一方面，全球衛生政治應該被視為國家與非國家角色這些多元的全球衛生行為體在國際衛生制度下的垂直與水平衛生治理行為，而非僅是國家之間所壟斷的水平衛生治理。
其次，本文發現目前傳染病所面臨的困境是：由於政府與市場的雙重失靈，導致傳染病監測通報與藥物可及性出現重大爭議。面對這些爭議，本文認為制度主義與世界主義比較具有論述優勢。制度主義一方面跳脫出自由主義與現實主義面對傳染病論述的極端化與各執己見，並超越單純只以國家或市場觀點來理解傳染病。另一方面，制度主義加入全球市民社會這個第三部門，透過國家、國際藥廠與全球市民社會組織這三個全球衛生行為體的多元化制度互動，建立新興的全球衛生治理系統來處理傳染病議題。
最後，如果僅透過國際衛生制度與全球衛生協力關係來治理傳染病議題，有時仍無法有效解決傳染病反而創造出課責性、透明性與合法性這些制度風險。因此本文採用世界主義來彌補制度主義的論述困境。由於全球衛生研究是對全球衛生不平等的重視，世界主義對傳染病議題強調全球衛生倫理與全球衛生正義的規範性面向。有鑑於此，本文建議可透過世界主義對世界貧困、衛生分配正義與衛生不平等的道德關注，來填補制度主義無法合理詮釋的全球衛生不平等議題。

Assessing from the perspectives of traditional international health or emerging global health studies, infectious diseases have received considerable attention over these decades in international community. Infectious diseases are usually used to refer to a serious process of involving diseases outbreak, surveillance, notification, research and development of drugs, drugs commercialization, access to medicine and international health assistance. The research objects of this dissertation are those diseases regarding Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID) and Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) in particular. The author adopts four theories relating to liberalism, realism, institutionalism and cosmopolitanism in the fields of IR and IPE to analyze and examine current infectious diseases debates on diseases control, diseases cure and international health assistance. Given that previous studies had failed to consider theoretical discourses of infectious diseases, this study tries to offer a complete and cross-disciplinary theoretical discourse for infectious diseases.
In regard to surveillance and notification of diseases control, this study makes an attempt at adopting HIV/AIDS as a case study to analyze the core meaning of global health security which has been constructed by realism and security scholarship. The study argues that global health security should be interpreted as national securitization of diseases so as to make some specific EID become high politics issue, such as famous the big three diseases. More importantly, global health security doesn’t mean that diseases are health securitized, but rather that some EID which great powers had decided are health securitized on the basis of great power’s power and interests.
As far as the access to medicine of diseases cure is concerned, this study has argued that although liberalism can interpret the technology innovation on research and development of drugs as to provide curative effect drugs, it still failed to rationalize the debates over market failure of access to medicine on NTD caused by the gap of extremely international health resources in the world. In order to examine the access to medicine debates on NTD, this study is concerned with these perspectives on global health governance, global health public goods and global health partnerships. This study claims that even though global health partnership for NTD is regarded as a concrete business model in practice based on global health governance, it needs to avoid those democratic deficits that institutionalism fails to justify, such as accountability, transparency, and legitimacy.
In matters of great power's responsibilities on international health assistance, this study claims that this controversy is essentially contested on basis of global health justice and power allocation. Great powers place emphasis on infectious diseases and global health by means of drawing attention to increasing international health assistance funding. This study argues that mainstream arguments of realism regarding international health assistance still focused on great power’s security, political and economic interests. As far as Obama's global health declaration is concerned, it not only presents political commitments for UN Millennium Development Goals, but also shows emerging foreign aid thinking based on integration between self-interest and altruism.
Rested on the above depictions, this study offers some suggestions as follows:
First of all, from the perspectives of institutionalism and cosmopolitanism, this study offers a new discourse about global health politics by criticizing the extant arguments of international health politics that has been illuminated by the mainstream of international relation community. On the one hand, the global health politics is suffering from dual deficits, that is, it not only presents a critical gap between EID and NTD, but it demonstrates an unsymmetrical allocation of health power and resources. On the other hand, global health politics should be characterized as both horizontal and vertical health governance between states and non-state actors.
Secondly, this study finds that current diseases dilemma is caused by the double failures, that is, government failure and market failure, and these failures have generated some controversies on disease control and cure dimensions. Facing these controversies, the author is convinced that the arguments of institutionalism and cosmopolitanism will be more persuasive than other theories. For institutionalism, on the one hand, it is able to offer health institutional construction arguments beyond dichotomy between state-oriented realism and market-oriented liberalism. On the other hand, institutionalism tries to construct an emerging system of global health governance which is constituted of states, pharmaceutical industry and global civil society organizations so as to interpret and solve disease’s double failures dilemma. On the other hand, because institutionalism takes global civil society into consideration, an institutional network, in which states, pharmaceutical industry and global civil society organizations interact with each other, will be made for solving the disease’s double failures dilemma.
Finally, this study finds that if we attempt to govern the disease issues simply relying on the international health institutions such as global health partnerships, it may be in futility on the one hand, and probably generate some institutional risks, such as accountability, transparency, and legitimacy on the other hand. For this reason, this study makes up for institutional deficits by adopting the perspectives of cosmopolitanism. Given that the emerging global health studies have focused on the issues of global health inequalities, the cosmopolitanism, by emphasizing normative dimensions relating to global health ethics and health justice, will play a complementary role in the global health governance system. Consequently, this study suggests that the theoretical loophole of global health inequalities that institutionalism has made might be filled by the arguments of cosmopolitanism, such as world poverty, health distributional justice, and health equality demands.

中文文獻
中研院（2011）。因應新興感染性疾病政策建議書。台北市：中央研究院。
王偉鴻（2008）。從國際衛生條例IHR2005審視大陸公衛法律體系對人權保障的規範理性，2008年國際關係學會年會學術研討會。台灣大學：國際關係學會。
王偉鴻（2009）。全球衛生政治下的南北衝突，2009年中國政治學會年會暨學術研討會-「金融海嘯下的全球化、民主化與民主治理」。臺北大學：中國政治學會。
王偉鴻（2010a）。全球化、全球不平等與全球正義：世界主義之論點，2010年中國政治學會年會暨「能知的公民？民主的理想與實際」學術研討會。中山大學：中國政治學會。
王偉鴻（2010b）。全球化、全球不平等與貧困之論述，第二屆發展研究年會。台灣大學：發展研究年會。
王偉鴻（2010c）。重新思考全球治理之理論建構：規範性的研究途徑，2010年台灣政治學會年會暨「重新思考國家：五都之後，百年前夕！」學術研討會。東吳大學：台灣政治學會。
王偉鴻（2010d）。藥品專利 vs. 生命健康：從全球正義論全球衛生不平等，國際關係學會第三屆年會—「理論與實務的對話」。政治大學：國際關係學會。
王偉鴻、陳文政（2009）。全球衛生治理下世界衛生組織的角色變遷，台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會—「全球化下新公共管理趨勢與挑戰－理論與實踐」研討會。國立中山大學： 2009年台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會 (TASPAA)。
包宗和（2009a）。衛生安全的理論建構與實踐。臺北市：遠景基金會。
包宗和（2009b）。衛生安全與我國衛生外交發展之展望。在包宗和編著，衛生安全的理論建構與實踐。臺北市：遠景基金會。
左正東 (2011)。國際政治經濟學的典範問題與經濟民族主義的再檢視。國際關係學報(32)，51-90。
甘逸驊（2009）。國家安全中的衛生安全面向省思。在包宗和編著，衛生安全的理論建構與實踐。臺北市：遠景基金會。
江啟臣（2005a）。APEC架構下反恐議題發展之研究。政治科學論叢（25），29-66。
江啟臣（2005b）。坎昆會議下的WTO角色：主要國際關係理論的詮釋。政治科學論叢（23），133-167。
江啟臣（2009）。國際組織與全球治理槪論。台北市：五南。
冷則剛（2009）。國家、全球化，與兩岸關係。在包宗和、吳玉山編著，重新檢視爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。台北市：五南。
宋學文（2001）。全球化與全球治理對我國公共政策研究之影響：並兼論對兩岸關係研究之意涵。中國大陸研究，44（4），1-31。
宋學文（2004）。全球化與全球治理之互動之模型分析：以人文與社會科學之「科技整合」為例。理論與政策（67），59-75。
邱亞文（2009）。傳染性疾病與衛生安全。在包宗和編著，衛生安全的理論建構與實踐。臺北市：遠景基金會。
邱亞文、李明亮（2006）。我國參與全球衛生體系策略之探討：以世界衛生組織及亞太經濟合作會議為例。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，25（6），405-418。
邱亞文、李明亮（2009）。我國衛生安全之實踐：以抗SARS為例。在包宗和編著，衛生安全的理論建構與實踐。臺北市：遠景基金會。
邱亞文、黃靜宜、張雅貞（2011）。兩岸衛生安全之挑戰與展望：以傳染病為例。遠景基金會季刊，12（2），1-42。
金傳春（2009）。新型H1N1流感的防疫策略與國際合作。臺灣民主季刊，6（2），229-240。
晉繼勇（2008a）。公共衛生安全：一種全球公共產品的框架分析。醫學與社會（09），7-19。
晉繼勇（2008b）。全球公共衛生問題安全化：以世界衛生組織規範變遷為例。國際論壇，10（2），20-24。
晉繼勇（2009）。全球公共衛生問題安全化的路徑分析。武漢大學學報(哲學社會科學版)（02），225-229。
晉繼勇（2011）。世界貿易組織與全球公共衛生治理：以TRIPS協定為例。浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版)（03），112-121。
袁鶴齡（2003）。全球治理與國際合作：論其策略與困境。全球政治評論（4），25-45。
張亞中（2001）。全球治理：主體與權力的解析。問題與研究，40（4），1-24。
曹俊漢（2003）。行政現化化的迷思 : 全球化下台灣行政發展面臨的挑戰。臺北縣新店市：韋伯文化。
曹俊漢（2009）。全球化與全球治理：理論發展的建構與詮釋。台北縣永和市：韋伯文化。
莫大華（1998）。「安全研究」論戰之評析。問題與研究，37（8），19-33。
曾怡仁 (2007)。國際政治經濟學三大研究途徑-經濟民族主義、經濟自由主義與馬克思主義之比較分析。全球政治評論(19)，53-86。
郭承天（1996）。國際建制與國際組織。台北市：時英出版社。
郭承天（2009）。後現代政治經濟學與新制度論。社會科學論叢，3（1），1-30。
詹長權、黃文鴻（2007）。國際衛生與未來展望。在陳拱北預防醫學基金會編著，公共衛生學(上冊)（修訂四版版）。台北市：陳拱北預防醫學基金會。
蕭全政(2003)。何謂政治經濟學？。政治學報(35)，1-34。
蕭全政（2004a）。經濟發展與臺灣的政治民主化。臺灣民主季刊，1（1），1-25。
聶建剛、熊昌娥（2010）。全球治理下的衛生國際合作現狀分析。醫學與社會（4），6-8。
龔向前（2006）。傳染病全球化與全球衛生治理。國際觀察(3)，24-29。

英文文獻
Aginam, O. (2004). Globalization of Infectious Diseases, International Law and the World Health Organization: Opportunities for Synergy in Global Governance of Epidemics. New England Journal of International and Comparative Law, 11, 59-74.
Aginam, O. (2005). Global Health Governance: International Law and Public Health in a Divided World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Altman, D. (2003). AIDS and Security. International Relations, 17(4), 417-427.
Angell, M. (2004). The Truth about The Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do about It. New York: Random House.
Balaam, D. N., & Veseth, M. (2008). Introduction to International Political Economy (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Barry, C., & Pogge, T. W. (2005). Introduction: Global institutions and responsibilities. Metaphilosophy, 36(1-2), 1-2.
Beck, U. (2009). Critical Theory of World Risk Society: A Cosmopolitan Vision. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical & Democratic Theory, 16(1), 3-22.
Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2006). The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), 405-436.
Bull, H. (2002). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Hampshire.
Buse, K., Drager, N., Fustukian, S., & Lee, K. (2002). Globalization and Health Policy: Trends and Opportunities. In K. Lee, K. Buse & S. Fustukian (Eds.), Health Policy in a Globalising World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Buse, K., & Walt, G. (2000). Global Public-Private Partnerships: Part II-What are the Health Issues for Global Governance? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(5), 699-709.
Buzan, B. (1983). People, States, and Fear: The National Security problem in international relations. Brighton, Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.
Buzan, B. (2004). The United States and the great powers: world politics in the twenty-first century. Cambridge ; Malden, MA: Polity.
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & Wilde, J. d. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Pub.
Bynum, W., & Porter, R. (2008). The World Health Organization and Its Work. American Journal of Public Health, 98(9), 1594-1597.
Cáceres, S. B. (2011). Global health security in an era of global health threats. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17(10), 1962-1963.
Caines, K., Buse, K., & Carlson, C. (2004). Assessing the impact of global health partnerships. London: DFID Health Resource Centre.
Chirac, P., & Torreele, E. (2006). Global framework on essential health R&D. Lancet, 367, 1560-1561.
Condon, B. J., & Sinha, T. (2008). Global lessons from the AIDS pandemic: economic, financial, legal, and political implications. Berlin: Springer.
Coupland, R. (2007). Security, Insecurity and Health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(3), 181-184.
Cox, R. W. (1986). Social Forces, State and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. In R. O. Keohane (Ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Daniels, N., Kennedy, B., & Kawachi, I. (2004). Why Justice is Good for Our Health: The Social Determinants of Health Inequalities. In S. Anand, F. Peter & A. Sen (Eds.), Public Health, Ethics, and Equity. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Delisle, H., Roberts, J. H., Munro, M., Jones, L., & Gyorkos, T. W. (2005). The role of NGOs in global health research for development. Health Research Policy and Systems, 3, 3-21.
Denoon, D. J. (1995). IMF, World Bank programs hinder AIDS prevention. AIDS weekly, 8-10.
Dixon, J. (2000). Social Determinants of Health. Health Promotion International, 15(1), 87-89.
Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal human rights in theory and practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Easterly, W. (2006). The white man's burden: why the West's efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.
Elbe, S. (2006). Should HIV/AIDS Be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Linking HIV/AIDS and Security. International Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 119-144.
Falger, V. S. E. (1994). Biopolitics and the study of international relations: Implications, results and perspectives. In A. Somit & S. A. Peterson (Eds.), Biopolitics and the Mainstream: Contributions of Biology to Political Science. Greenwich, Conn. ; London: Jai Press.
Feachem, R. (2001). Globalization is good for your health. British Medical Journal, 323, 504-506.
Ferree, K. S. (2010). Donor Organizations: What You Need to Know. In P. A. Gaist (Ed.), Igniting the Power of Community: The Role of CBOs and NGOs in Global Public Health. New York: Springer.
Fidler, D. (2004). SARS, Governance and the Globalization of Disease Houndmills New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fidler, D. P. (1997). The Globalization of Public Health: Emerging Infectious Diseases and International Relations. Indiana Journal of Global Studies, 5(1), 11-52.
Fidler, D. P. (2003). SARS: Political Pathology of the First Post-Westphalian Pathogen. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31(4), 485-505.
Garrett, L. (2007). The Challenge of Global Health. Foreign Affairs, 86(1), 14-38.
Garrett, L., & Schneider, K. (2009). Global Health: Getting it Right. In A. Gatti & A. Boggio (Eds.), Health and Development: Toward a matrix approach. Basingstoke [England] ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Giovannini, M. J., & Brownlee, A. T. (1982). The contribution of social science to international health training. Social Science & Medicine, 16(9), 957-964.
Global Forum for Health Research. (2002). The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2001-2002. Geneva: The Global Forum for Health Research.
Gostin, L. O. (2000). Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint University of California Press
Gostin, L. O., & Hodge Jr, J. G. (2007). Global health law, ethics, and policy. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 35(4), 519-525.
Grieco, J. M. (1990). Cooperation among nations: Europe, America, and non-tariff barriers to trade. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gwatkin, D., & Guillot, M. (2000). The Burden of Disease among the Global Poor. Washigton, D.C.: The World Bank.
Haar, E. v. d. (2009). Classical liberalism and international relations theory: Hume, Smith,Mises, and Hayek. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Harris, P. G. (2007). Global Politics and HIV/AIDS: Local, National, and International Perspectives. In P. G. Harris & P. D. Siplon (Eds.), The Global Politics of AIDS. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Harrison, M. (2004). Disease and the Modern World: 1500 to Present Day. Cambridge ; Malden, MA: Polity.
Harrison, M. (2006). Disease, diplomacy and international commerce: the origins of international sanitary regulation in the nineteenth century. Journal of Global History, 1(02), 197-217.
Hook, S. W. (1995). National interest and foreign aid. Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers.
Hotez, P., Bethony, J., Brooker, S., & Albonico, M. (2005). Eliminating neglected diseases in Africa. The Lancet, 365(9477), 2089.
Hotez, P. J. (2008). Neglected Infections of Poverty in the United States of America. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2(6).
Hotez, P. J., Molyneux, D. H., Fenwick, A., Kumaresan, J., Sachs, S. E., Sachs, J. D., & Savioli, L. (2007). Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(10), 1018-1027.
Hough, P. (2008). Understanding Global Security (2nd ed.). London ; New York: Routledge.
Kanbur, R., & Vines, D. (2000). The World Bank and poverty reduction: past, present and future. In C. L. Gilbert & D. Vines (Eds.), The World Bank: structure and policies. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, R., & Singer, D. A. (2007). Health and Security in Foreign Policy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(3), 233-234.
Keohane, R. O. (1986). Neorealism and Its Critics New York: Columbia University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379-396.
Keohane, R. O. (1997). International Relations and International Law: Two Optics. Harvard International Law Journal, 38(2), 487-502.
Keohane, R. O. (1998). International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work? Foreign Policy(110), 82-96.
Keohane, R. O. (2002a). From Interdependence and Institutions to Globalization and Governance. In R. O. Keohane (Ed.), Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London ; New York: Routledge.
Keohane, R. O. (2002b). International Liberalism Reconsidered. In R. O. Keohane (Ed.), Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London ; New York: Routledge.
Keohane, R. O. (2002c). Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World London ; New York: Routledge.
Keohane, R. O. (2005). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (1st Princeton classic ed.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security, 20(1), 39-51.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and Interdependence (3rd Edition ed.). New York: Longman.
Kickbusch, I. (1995). World Health Organization: Change and Progress. British Medical Journal, 310(6993), 1518-1520.
Kickbusch, I., & Matlin, S. (2008). A European Council on Global Health. The Lancet, 371(9626), 1733-1734.
King, N. B. (2002). Security, Disease, Commerce. Social Studies of Science, 32(5-6), 763-789.
Krasner, S. (1996). The Accomplishments of International Political Theory. In S. Smith, K. Booth & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krasner, S. D. (1983). Structural Causes and Regimes Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Labonte, R., & Spiegel, J. (2003). Setting global health research priorities. British Medical Journal, 326(7392), 722-723.
Lacher, H. (2003). Putting the state in its place: the critique of state-centrism and its limits. Review of International Studies, 29(04), 521-541.
Lee, K. (2009b). The World Health Organization (WHO). London ; New York: Routledge.
Lee, K., Fustukian, S., & Buse, K. (2002). An Introduction to Global Health Policy In K. Lee, K. Buse & S. Fustukian (Eds.), Health Policy in a Globalising World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lindsay, S., & Thomas, C. (2000). Mapping and estimating the population at risk from lymphatic filariasis in Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 94(1), 37-45.
MacLean, S. J., & Brown, S. A. (2009). The Social Determinants of Global Health: Confronting Inequities. In S. J. MacLean, S. A. Brown & P. Fourie (Eds.), Health for Some: The Political Economy of Global Health Governance. Basingstoke ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365(9464), 1099-1104.
Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D. (2006). Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. Plos Medicine, 3(11), 2011-2030.
McCormick, D. (2008). China & India as Africa's new donors: The impact of aid on development. Review of African Political Economy, 35(1), 73-92.
McCoy, D., Kembhavi, G., Patel, J., & Luintel, A. (2009). The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's grant-making programme for global health. The Lancet, 373(9675), 1645-1653.
McGrew, A. (2002). Liberal Internationalism: Between Realism and Cosmopolitanism. In D. Held & A. McGrew (Eds.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority, and Global Governance. Cambridge ; Malden, MA: Polity.
McInnes, C., & Lee, K. (2006). Health, Security and Foreign Policy. Review of International Studies, 32(1), 5-23.
Mearsheimer, J. (1995). A Realist Reply. International Security, 20(1), 82-93.
Morgenthau, H. (1962). A Political Theory of Foreign Aid. The American Political Science Review, 56(2), 301-309.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1950). The Mainsprings of American Foreign Policy: The National Interest vs. Moral Abstractions. The American Political Science Review, 44(4), 833-854.
Murphy, C. N. (2000). Global Governance: Poorly Done and Poorly Understood. International Affairs, 76(4), 789-803.
Niklas, D. (1982). Methodological controversies between social and medical sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 16(6), 659-665.
Nixon, S. A. (2006). Critical Public Health Ethics and Canada's Role in Global Health. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 97(1), 32-34.
Normile, D. (2006). Avian influenza. New H5N1 strain emerges in southern China. Science, 314(5800), 742.
Nwaka, S., & Ridley, R. G. (2003). Virtual Drug Discovery and Development for Neglected Diseases through Public--Private Partnerships. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2, 919-928.
Nye, J. S., & Donahue, J. D. (2000). Governance in a Globalizing World Cambridge, Mass. : Visions of Governance for the 21st Century ; Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
OECD. (2007). Development Co-operation Report 2007. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008). Measuring Aid to Health. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009a). Coherence for Health: Innovation for New Medicines for Infectious Diseases. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009b). Development Aid at a Glance 2008: Statistics by Region. Paris: OECD.
Pirages, D. (1997). Ecological Theory and International Relations. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 5(1), 53-64.
Pogge, T. (2005). Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties. Ethics & International Affairs, 19(1), 55-83.
Pogge, T. (2007). Reframing Global Economic Security and Justice. In D. Held & A. McGrew (Eds.), Globalization Theory: Approaches and Controversies. Cambridge ; Malden, Mass.: Polity.
Pogge, T. (2008a). Medicines for the World: Boosting Innovation without Obstructing Free Access. Sur - International Journal on Human Rights, 8, 117-142.
Pogge, T. (2008b). What Is Global Justice? Revista de Economia Institucional, 10(19), 99-114.
Pogge, T. (2008c). World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
Riley , J. C. (2005). Estimates of regional and global life expectancy, 1800–2001. Population and Development Review, 31, 537-543.
Robert L. Ostergard, J. (2007). HIV/AIDS and the Threat to National and International Security. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E.-O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. (2006a). Change, Complexity, and Governance in Globalizing Space. In J. N. Rosenau (Ed.), The Study of World Politics. London ; New York: Routledge.
Rosenau, J. N. (2006b). Change, Complexity, and Governance in Globalizing Space. In J. N. Rosenau (Ed.), The Study of World Politics (Vol. 2: Globalization and Governance). London ; New York: Routledge.
Rosenau, J. N. (2006c). Governance in the Twenty-First Century. In J. N. Rosenau (Ed.), The Study of World Politics (Vol. 2: Globalization and Governance). London ; New York: Routledge.
Rowden, R. (2009). The deadly ideas of neoliberalism: how the IMF has undermined public health and the fight against AIDS. London: Zed Books.
Ruger, J. P. (2006). Ethics and Governance of Global Health Inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(11), 998-1003.
Ruger, J. P. (2007). Global Health Governance and the World Bank. The Lancet, 370(9597), 1471-1474.
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization, 52(04), 855-885.
Siplon, P. D. (2007). Power and the Politics of HIV/AIDS. In P. G. Harris & P. D. Siplon (Eds.), The Global Politics of AIDS. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Sizaire, V., Nackers, F., Comte, E., & Portaels, F. (2006). Mycobacterium ulcerans infection: control, diagnosis, and treatment. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 6, 288-296.
Smith, M. (2010). The Importance of Sustainability in International Public Health NGOs. In P. A. Gaist (Ed.), Igniting the Power of Community: The Role of CBOs and NGOs in Global Public Health. New York: Springer.
Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2008). Alternative Approaches to International Theory. In J. Baylis, S. Smith & P. Owens (Eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Steffen, M., Lamping, W., & Lehto, J. (2005). The Europeanization of Health Policies: An Introduction. In M. Steffen (Ed.), Health Governance in Europe: Issues, Challenges, and Theories. London ; New York: Routledge.
Thylefors, B. (2008). The Mectizan Donation Program (MDP). Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 102(SUPPL. 1), S39-S44.
UN. (2000). Resolution 1308 on Security Council. S/RES/1308: United Nations.
UN General Assembly. (2000). United Nations Millennium Development Goals. 55/2,: General Assembly.
UNAIDS. (2001). AIDS Epidemic Update 2001. Geneva: UNAIDS/WHO.
UNAIDS. (2004). Report on the global AIDS epidemic-2004. Geneva: UNAIDS.
Vanderelst, D., & Speybroeck, N. (2010). Quantifying the Lack of Scientific Interest in Neglected Tropical Diseases. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 4(1), e576.
Vertovec, S., & Cohen, R. (2002). Conceiving cosmopolitanism: theory, context and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Walt, S. M. (1991). The Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211-239.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wapner, P. (1997). Governance in Global Civil Society. In O. R. Young (Ed.), Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Weiss, R. A., & McMichael, A. J. (2004). Social and environmental risk factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Nature Medicine, 10, S70-S76.
WHO. (1981). Global Strategy for Health for All by the Year 2000. Geneva: WHO.
WHO. (2002). Global Defense against the Infectious Disease Threat. Geneva: World Health Organization,.
WHO. (2007). The World Health Report 2007-A Safer Future: Global Public Health Security in the 21st Century. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO & UNAIDS. (2006). Progress on Global Access to HIV Antiretroviral Therapy A Report on 3 by 5 and Beyond: WHO/ UNAIDS.
World Bank. (2004). The Multi-Country HIV/AIDS Program for Africa World Bank .
Young, O. R. (1991). Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization, 45(3), 281-308.
Young, O. R. (1997). Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press
Young, O. R. (1999). Governance without Government. In O. R. Young (Ed.), Governance in World Affairs. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Youngerman, B. (2008). Pandemics and global health. New York: Checkmark Books.
Zacher, M. W. (2007). The Transformation in Global Health Collaboration since the 1990s. In A. F. Cooper, J. J. Kirton & T. Schrechker (Eds.), Governing Global Health: Change, Response, Innovation. Aldershot ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.