研究生: |
張玉蓮 Yu-Lien Chang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
應用擴增實境行動導覽以提升古蹟襲產參訪者之地方感 Applying augmented reality in mobile guidance to promote the visitors’ sense of place for heritage sites |
指導教授: |
潘朝陽
Pan, Chao-Yang 張國恩 Chang, Kuo-En |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
地理學系 Department of Geography |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 158 |
中文關鍵詞: | 地方感 、地方依附 、擴增實境 、行動導覽 、歷史地理情境脈絡參訪策略 、「人、機、境」互動 |
英文關鍵詞: | Sense of place, Place attachment, Augmented reality, Mobile guidance, historical geo-context-embedded visiting, human–computer–context interaction |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:910 下載:49 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文依據地方感理論與導覽解說的設計原則,發展一套具有歷史地理情境脈絡參訪策略之擴增實境行動導覽系統,作為古蹟襲產導覽教學活動之輔助工具以提升參訪者之地方感。本研究分為兩階段進行,第一階段採取了深度訪談的質性研究,以立意取樣訪談了淡水區文化古蹟襲產的16位參訪者、5位管理人員、1位導遊與17位當地居民,分析其形成地方感的可能因素。第二階段結合歷史地理情境脈絡參訪策略與擴增實境於行動導覽中,並經由實驗探討參訪者在運用擴增實境導覽、語音導覽與無導覽方式的學習成效與地方感效果的差異。研究對象為87位大學生,採用準實驗研究法之前後測不等組設計。研究結果顯示,運用擴增實境導覽的學生在學習成效及地方感效果方面有顯著的促進效果,三組導覽的參訪行為模式各自有其特色,且擴增實境導覽有助於參訪者之專注度的提升,也進行較多的討論與互動,此一現象說明了擴增實境的行動導覽方式,能加深參訪者與其導覽解說人、機、境的互動性。本研究並經由訪談瞭解形成地方感的可能原因,大部分學生也對擴增實境導覽具有正面的使用態度。
Based on the Sense of place (SOP) theory and the design principles of guidance and interpretation, this study developed an augmented reality (AR) mobile guidance system that used a historical geo-context-embedded visiting (HGCEV) strategy. This tool for heritage guidance and educational activities enhanced visitor SOP. The study was divided into two stages; the first stage was investigated by conducting a qualitative study with in-depth interviews. The purposive sampling method was applied to conduct interviews with 16 visitors 、5 management staffs 、1 tour guide and 17 residents to heritage sites in Tamsui District, Taiwan, to identify possible factors of SOP constructs. The second stage integrated HGCEV strategies and augmented reality in a mobile guidance application activity. Experiments were performed with 87 university students divided into 3 visitor groups: AR guidance, audio guidance, and no guidance. A quasi-experimental design was adopted to evaluate whether the sense of place and learning performance were promoted more by AR guidance than by audio guidance or no guidance. The results indicated that visitors who used AR guidance showed significant learning and SOP effects. The visitors who were the most engaged and had interactive discussions with their peers in the heritage sites experience were those who were using the AR guide. This phenomenon illustrates that the integration of HGCEV strategies and augmented reality in a mobile guidance application to promote the human–computer–context interaction (HCCI). Interviews were also employed to determine the possible factors that contribute to the formation of SOP. Finally, a majority of the visitors who participated in the study elicited positive responses and acceptance attitudes.
中文部份
王昶雄,<奔流>,收編於 許俊雅 編 (2002a)。《王昶雄全集—第一冊小說卷》。台北縣:台北縣文化局。頁256。
王國雄(2010)。輔助古蹟寺廟行動學習之多標記擴增實境遊戲的互動模式研
究。大同大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
伊能嘉矩著,楊南郡譯註,《平埔族調查旅行》(台北:遠流出版,1996 年),頁69。
伊能嘉矩(1896)。舊淡水縣平埔蕃十九社分布地圖,東京人類學會雜誌,頁
126。
伊能嘉矩《臺灣文化志》。東京:刀江書局。昭和3 年。
朱天心(2002)。《古都》。台北縣:印刻。頁178-239。。
池永歆(2000)。空間、地方與鄉土:大茅埔地方的構成及其聚落的空間性,
國立台灣師範大學地理學系博士論文。
呂怡儒(2001)。台北近郊森林地方感之研究,國立台灣大學森林學研究所碩
士論文。
吳忠宏(2001)。解說在自然保育上的應用。自然保育季刊,36,pp. 6-13。
余文儀(1962)。續修《台灣府志》,卷之二,文叢第121 種,臺銀本,頁60-61。
李乾朗(1983)。二十世紀前半葉五十年的台灣街屋立面型式之演變,《建築師》,97 期,頁33-40。
余文儀(1993)。《續修台灣府志》。南投:台灣省文獻委員會。
周明德(1995) 。地名「淡水」「滬尾」之興替,《臺灣風物》,45(1),頁9-11。
周宗賢(2007)。《淡水輝煌的歲月》。台北:台灣商務。
林育淳(1998)。《油彩·熱情·陳澄波》。台北:雄獅美術。
林孟輝(1999)。清代臺灣學校教育與儒學教化研究。國立成功大學中文研究
所碩士論文。
林建堯(2009)。台灣國家公園地方依附量表建立與驗證。國立中興大學園藝
學研究所博士論文。
林嘉男 、許毅璿(2007)。《人與環境關係之論述:釐清「地方感」、「地方依附」與「社區依附」在環境研究上的角色》。環境教育研究, 第五卷, 第
一期, 頁41-71 。
卓克華(2003)。《從寺廟發現歷史》,淡水龍山寺—淡水社會經濟變遷的見證者,頁64-68。
林慧姃(1999)。文學中的淡水,《淡水學學術研討會—過去·現在·未來》,淡江大學歷史系主編,頁304。台北縣新店市:國史館。
河原功(2003)。從文學作品鳥瞰日治時代的淡水,《2001 年淡水學學術研討
會—歷史、生態、人文論文集》,淡江大學歷史系主編,頁95-100。台北縣新店市:國史館。
郁永河 原著,楊龢之 譯注(2004)。《遇見三百年前的台灣—『裨海記遊』》。台北:圓神。
姜道章(1961a)。淡水之歷史發展 (上),《大陸雜誌》,23(9),頁293-299。
姜道章(1961b)。淡水之歷史發展 (中),《大陸雜誌》,23(10),頁328-331。
姜道章(1961c)。淡水之歷史發展 (下),《大陸雜誌》,23(11),頁363-366。
姜道章(1963)。淡水之歷史與貿易。台灣銀行季刊,第十四卷三期,頁255-263。
洪致文(2010)。洪以南的淡水歲月 (1913-1927),《第五屆淡水學國際學術研討會—歷史、社會、文化會議手冊暨論文集》,淡江大學歷史系主編,
頁359-376。台北縣:淡江大學歷史系。
連橫(1979)。《台灣通史》。台北:眾文。
莊展鵬 (2001)。《淡水深度旅遊》。台北:遠流。
許俊雅(2002)。臺灣文學中的淡水書寫,《臺灣文學與文化研究學刋》,第1 期,頁124-125。
許俊雅編(2002),《王昶雄全集—第一冊小說卷》。台北縣:台北縣文化局。
揭開紅毛城四百年歷史(論文集)。台北縣:台北縣文化局。
曹勝雄、 孫君儀 (2009)。 建構地方依附因果關係模式。地理學報,55 ,
111,頁43 -63 。
張建隆(2002)。十七世紀至十八世紀初,西、荷及清人對淡水的記述與認知,《臺灣文獻》,53(3),頁209-248。
張建隆(2003)。看見的,和看不見的•淡水-十七世紀和十八世紀初,西、荷
及清人對淡水的記憶與認知,《2001 年淡水學學術研討會—歷史、生
態、人文論文集》,淡江大學歷史系主編,頁47-79。台北縣新店市:
國史館。
張珈(2010)。行動數位渾天儀用於國小天文觀測教學,國立台灣師範大學資
訊教育所碩士論文。
張家慈(2012)。擴增實境行動導覽系統之研製─美術館畫作鑑賞之應用,國
立台灣師範大學資訊教育所碩士論文。
張建隆(1996)。《尋找老淡水》。台北縣:台北縣立文化中心。
張建隆(1999)。 Tamshui History — An Initial Study. The Tamshui History Field Research Workshop (Taipei, Academia Historica Press).
陳培桂(1977)。《淡水廳志》,卷十五(下),附錄二,文徵(下),頁445-447。
陳國棟(1978)。西班牙及荷蘭時代的淡水(上)。台灣人文,第三期,頁27-37。
陳國棟(1978)。西班牙及荷蘭時代的淡水(下)。台灣人文,第四期,頁25-33。
陳國棟(1983)。淡水聚落的歷史發展,《國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》,2(1),頁5-19。
陳國棟(1983)。《淡水紅毛城古蹟區保存計畫,第一章淡水紅毛城的歷史》。台北:台大土木工程研究所都計室規劃。
陳宗仁(2005)。《雞籠山與淡水洋—東亞海域與台灣早期史研究 1400-1700 》。台北:聯經。
陳珮馨(2005)。《流浪到淡水!捷運移動經驗與淡水空間的觀光化》。國立臺
灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
曾慈慧、沈進成、陳麗如 (2011) 。礦業遺產觀光中真實性對意象、地方感 與遊後行為意圖之影響。 戶外遊憩研究 ,24(3) ,79 -111 。
傅錫壬(2003)。王昶雄《驛站風情》中的鄉土情懷,《2001 年淡水學學術研
討會—歷史、生態、人文論文集》,淡江大學歷史系主編,頁81-99。台北縣新店市:國史館。
黃瑞茂(1991)。光復前淡水街的形成與發展,《歷史月刋》,45,頁76-82。
黃瑞茂(1996)。從建築專業的異化到社區建築—淡水社區工作室的「社區建
築」經驗,《建築師》,10 月,頁109-111。
黃瑞茂(1999)。城市生活與河/岸空間—淡水的故事,《文化生活》,7 月,頁25-28。
黃瑞茂(2001)。『都市設計』作為一種專業認知與技術—淡水的實踐經驗,《台灣建築報導雜誌》,6,頁68-73。
黃瑞茂(2003)。淡水、河岸與落日:觀光凝視vs 在地生活,《2001 年淡水
學學術研討會—歷史、生態、人文論文集》,淡江大學歷史系主編,頁101-116。台北縣新店市:國史館。
黃瑞茂(2007)。一個以在地知識建構為基礎的文化資產行動經驗:淡水個案,《社區營造學會電子報》,頁97,新北市文化局。
詹素娟、劉益昌 (1999)。大台北都會區原住民歷史專輯:凱達格蘭調查報告。台北:台北市文獻委員會。
葉振輝先生(1998)。《劉銘傳傳》,台灣先賢先列專輯。台灣省文獻會。
潘朝陽(1987)。地理學方法論中非實證論傳統。地理研究報告,13,國立臺
灣師範大學地理研究所。
潘朝陽(1991)。現象學地理學-存在空間的一個詮釋。中國地理學會會刊,
19,頁73。
潘朝陽(1994)。臺灣傳統漢文化區域構成及其空間性-以貓裏區域為例的文
化歷史地理詮釋,國立臺灣師範大學地理學系博士論文。
潘朝陽( 2005 )。《儒家影響下的傳統生活世界之空間性》,台北:五南。
潘朝陽( 2005 )。地理學與人文關懷,收錄於潘朝陽,現象學地理學:存在空間的一個詮釋,收編於 潘朝陽,2005,《心靈·空間·環境:人文主義
的地理思想》。台北:五南。頁83-84。。頁11-12。
蔡怡文(2011)。淡水老街的慢活,國立臺灣師範大學地理學系博士論文。
蕭瓊瑞(2004)。《台灣近現代藝術11 家》。台北:藝術家。
蕭瓊瑞(2006)。《懷鄉與認同—臺灣方志八景圖研究》。台北:典藏藝術家。
戴寶村(2003)。觀音山與淡水地景意象的形塑發展,《2001 年淡水學學術研
討會—歷史、生態、人文論文集》,淡江大學歷史系主編,頁117-129。台北縣新店市:國史館。
鍾肇政(1998)。《八角塔下》。台北:草根。
蘇文魁(1992)。《滬尾江河》,台北:淡水基督長老教會。
蘇揚期、王柏山 (2005)。《 「地方感」研究觀點的探討-從人本主義地理學、行為地理學到都市意向學派》。社會科教育研究,10,109-136。
滬尾文教促進會、淡水歷史研究室編(1988)。《淡水大事紀》。台北:撰者自印。
淡江大學中國文學系 編(1998)。《一九九八年淡水地區人物誌》。台北:台灣學生書局。
臺北縣立文化中心 著(1994)。《李永沱個展:畫山畫水畫阮淡水》。臺北縣:臺北縣立文化中心。
臺灣創價學會主辦(2006)。《日本畫伯在台灣—木下靜涯改良水墨》。台北:正因。
滬尾文教促進會、淡水歷史研究室編,《淡水大事紀》(台北:撰者自印,1988)。頁31-32。
關稅總局編著(1995)。《中華民國海關簡史》。台北市:關稅總局。
《柯設偕手稿》,淡水鎮立圖書館,未出版。
《淡水人物誌》,淡水鎮立圖書館,未出版。
淡水基督長老教會 編,教育、事奉的人生—故 柯設偕長老故人略歷,收編
於《柯設偕手稿》,淡水鎮立圖書館,未出版。及 淡水出身者,收編於《淡水人物誌》,淡水鎮立圖書館,未出版。
《紅城日不落 英國特展》(2007)。台北縣立淡水古蹟博物館。
《滬尾砲響清法印記 法國年特展》(2008)。台北縣立淡水古蹟博物館。
《滬道日安 日本年特展》(2009)。台北縣立淡水古蹟博物館。
《生活景 空間與歷史的協奏》(2012) 。2012 有形文化資產國際研討會。 新北市政府文化局,新北市立淡水古蹟博物館。
José Engenio Borao 著,李毓中譯(1995)。有關台灣的西班牙史料,《台灣風物》,45(3),頁174-188。
Mackay, G. L. 著,林晚生譯(2007)。《福爾摩沙紀事-馬偕台灣回憶錄》(From far Formosa)。台北:前衛。
英文部份
Agnew, J. A., & Duncan, J. S. (1989). Introduction. In J. A. Agnew & J. S.
Duncan (Eds.), The power of place: Bringing together geographical and sociological imaginations . Boston: Unvvin Hyman.
Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place Attachment. New York, Plenum Press.
Ashworth, G. J. (1995). Heritage, Tourism and Europe: a European future for a European past? In D. T. Herbert (Ed.),Heritage, Tourism and Society, pp.68-84. New York: Mansell.
Australian ICOMOS(1998). Culture heritage places policy. Australia ICOMOS,Canberra.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(4) , pp. 355-385.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S. and MacIntyre, B.(2001). "Recent advances in augmented reality." IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21(6), pp. 34-47.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barber, C., Bristow, H., Cheng, S., Hedley, A., Kuriyama, Y., Lien, M., Pollard, J., & Sorrell, P. (2001). Augmenting museums and art galleries. Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '01), (pp. 439-447). Tokyo, Japan.
Berryman, D. R. (2012). Augmented reality: A review. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 31(2), pp. 212-218.
Billinghurst, M., Belcher, D., Gupta, A., & Kiyokawa, K. (2003). Communication behaviors in colocated collaborative AR interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(3), pp. 395-423.
Beck, L., & Cable, T. T. (2002). Interpretation for the 21st century: Fifteen guiding principles for interpreting nature and culture (2nd ed.). Champaign: Sagamore.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18, pp. 32-42.
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: An historical and conceptual perspective. Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, 21-34. London: Cambridge University Press.
Cabrera, J. S., Frutos, H. M., Stoica, A. G., Avouris, N., Dimitriadis, Y., Fiotakis, G., & Liveri, K. D. (2005). Mystery in the museum: Collaborative learning activities using handheld devices. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services. NY: ACM Press.
Chang, C. L. (1999) Tamshui History — An Initial Study. The Tamshui History Field Research Workshop (Taipei, Academia Historica Press).
Chang C., Shih K. & Chang H. (2006) Some studies on technology support for outdoor mobile learning. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006 (eds E. Pearson & P. Bohman), pp. 1170–1177. AACE, Chesapeake, VA.
Chang, K. E., Chang, C. T., Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., Chao, H. L. & Lee, C. M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an
art museum. Computers & Education 71, pp. 185-197.
Chang, Y. L., Pan, C. Y., & Chang, K. E. (2012) Investigating sense of place through a social world perspective in cultural heritage. The 11th Southeast
Asian Geographers Association Conference (SEAGA 2012), (pp.11-30). Singapore.
Cook, J. (2010). Mobile Phones as Mediating Tools within Augmented Contexts for Development. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 2(3), pp. 1-12.
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: a short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Damala, A., Cubaud, P., Bationo A., Houlier, P., & Marchal I. (2008). Bridging the gap between the digital and the physical: design and evaluation of a mobile augmented reality guide for the museum visit. The 3rd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment
and Arts (pp. 120-127). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Damala, A., Marchal, I., & Houlier, P. (2007). Merging augmented reality based features in mobile multimedia museum guides. Anticipating the Future of the Cultural Past, (pp. 1-6). Athens, Greece.
Davidson, J. W. (1972) The Island of Formosa, Past and Present (Taipei, SMC Publishing).
Davies, S.-J., Collins, T., Gaved, M., Bartlett, J., Valentine, C. and McCann, L. (2010). Enabling remote activity: using mobile technology for remote participation in geoscience fieldwork. Proceedings of the European
Geosciences Union General Assembly 2010 (EGU 2010).
Derr, V. (2002) Children’s sense of place in northern New Mexico. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, pp. 125-137.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2008). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), pp. 7-22.
Epstein, M. and Vergani, S. (2006). History Unwired: Mobile Narrative in Historic Cities. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '06), (pp. 302-305) ACM.
Entrikin, J. N. (1977). Geography’s spatial perspective and the philosophy of ernst cassirer. Canadian Geography, 21(3), pp. 209-222.
FitzGerald, E., Adams, A., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., Mor, Y. & Thomas, R. (2012). Augmented reality and mobile learning: the state of the art. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn 2012), (pp. 62–69). Helsinki, Finland.
Fishwick, L., & Vining, J. (1992). Toward a phenomenology of recreation place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, pp. 57-63.
Fukaya T., Mitsumine H., & Inoue S. (2001). Virtual Scope. The 7th Symposium on Sensing via Image Information, (pp. 211-214). Japan.
Futurelab (2006) Mudlarking in Deptford: mini report. [Online] Available at: http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/project_reports/mini_r eports/mudlarking_mini_report.pdf [Accessed 11 NOV 2013].
Galliano, S. J., & Loeffler, G. M. (1999) Place assessment: how people define ecosystems. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-462. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Gaved, M., Mulholland, P., Kerawalla, L., Collins, T. and Scanlon, E. (2010). More notspots than hotspots: strategies for undertaking networked learning in the real world. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn2010), (pp. 1-4).
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M. & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In Berliner, D. C. & Calfee, R. C. (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.
Gustafson P (2001) Meanings of place: everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, pp. 5-16
Hartshorne, R. (1958). The concept of geography as a science of space, from Kant and Humboldt to Hettner, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 48(2), pp. 97-108.
Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, pp. 5-29.
Hedley, N. R., Billinghurst, M., Postner, L., May, R., & Kato, H. (2002). Explorations in the Use of Augmented Reality for Geographic Visualization. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 11(2), pp. 119-133.
Herbert, D. T. (1995). Heritage places, leisure and tourism. In D. T. Herbert (Ed.),Heritage, Tourism and Society, pp.1-20. New York: Mansell.
Höllerer, T., Feiner, S., Terauchi, T., Rashid, G., & Hallaway, D. (1999). Exploring MARS: Developing indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system. Computers and Graphics, pp. 779-785.
Hou, H. T. (2010). Exploring the behavioural patterns in project-based learning with online discussion: quantitative content analysis and progressive sequential analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), pp. 52-60.
Hou, H. T. (2012). Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG). Computers and Education, 58(4), pp. 1225-1233.
Hull IV, R. B., Lam, M. & Vigo, G. (1994). Place identity: symbols of self in the urban fabric. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28, pp. 109-120.
Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 horizon report.
Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research, 33(7), pp. 14-26.
Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes towards their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, pp. 233-248.
Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2006). A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. Journal of Environmental
Management, pp.79, pp. 316-327.
Kaltenborn, B.P. (1997). Nature of place attachment: A study among recreation homeowners in southern Norway. Leisure Science. 19(3), pp. 175-189.
Kaltenborn, B. P. (1998). Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impacts. Applied Geography, 18(2), pp. 169-189.
Kerstetter, D. L., Confer J. J., & Graefe, A. R. (2001). An exploration of the specialization concept within the context of heritage tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 39(3), pp. 267-274.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives--The Development of an Augmented Reality Platform for Environmental Simulations.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), pp. 203-228.
Knudson, D., Cable, T. & Beck, L. (2003). Interpretation of cultural and natural resources(2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
Kyle, G., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004a). Linking place preferences with place meaning: an examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment, Journal of Environmental Physocology, 24, pp. 439-454.
Kyle, G.T., Graefe, A.R., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004b). Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists’ perceptions of setting density. Journal of Leisure Research, 36, pp. 209-231.
Kyle, G.T., & Mowen, A.J. (2005). An examination of the leisure involvement –Agency commitment relationship. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(3), pp. 342-363.
Kwak, S. Y. (2004). Designing a handheld interactive scavenger hunt game to enhance museum experience. Masters Thesis: Department of Telecommunication, Information Studies and Media, Michigan State University, Michigan.
Lanier, J. (2001). Virtually there. Scientific American, 284, pp. 66-75.
Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: Role of place attachment, cultural capital and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, pp. 381-395.
Lim, M., & Barton, A. C. (2010). Exploring insidedness in urban children’s sense of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, pp. 328-337.
Liu, T. Y. (2009). A Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning Environment for Language Listening and Speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), pp. 515-527.
Liu, H., Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Wang, B. (2009). Mobile Social Service Design for Large-Scale Exhibition. the third International Conference on Online Communities and Social Computing (OCSC 2009), (pp. 72-81).
Liu, T. Y., Tan, T. H., & Chu, Y. L. (2009). Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment.
Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), pp. 161-175.
Low, S. M. (1992). Symbolic Ties That Bind: Place Attachment in The Plaza, In I. Althman, & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (New York, Plenum).
Luckin, R. and Stanton Fraser, D. (2011). Limitless or pointless? An evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 3(5), pp. 510–524.
Lynch, K. (1990). Reconsidering The image of the city(1985). In T. Banerjee and M. Southworth, eds., City sense and city design: Writings and projects of
Kevin Lynch. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mazumdar, S., Mazumdar, S., Docuyanan, F., & McLaughlin, M. C. (2000) Creating a sense of place: The Vietnamese-Americans and little Saigon.
Journal of Environmental Psychology,20, pp. 319 -333.
Mathews, J. M. (2010). Using a Studio-Based Pedagogy to Engage Students in the Design of Mobile-Based Media. English Teaching: Practice and
Critique, 9(1), pp. 87-102.
McCall, R., Wetzel, R., Löschner, J., & Braun, A. K. (2011). Using presence to evaluate an augmented reality location aware game. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(1), pp. 25-35.
Milgram, P. & Kishino’s, F. (1994). IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems Vol.E77-D No.12 pp.1321-1329.
Mills, E. (1920). Adventures of a nature guide and essays in interpretation. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
Moltenbrey, K. (2011). Thinking Outside the Box. Computer Graphics World, 34(5), pp. 56-59.
Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: the case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16, pp. 17–31.
Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment, Journal of Environmental Psychology,30, pp. 11-22.
Mulloni, A., Wagner, D., & Schmalstieg, D. (2008). Mobility and social interaction as core gameplay elements in multi-player augmented reality. 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts (DIMEA '08) (pp. 472-478). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Naismith, L., Sharples, M., & Ting, J. (2005) Evaluation of CAERUS: a context aware mobile guide. In H. van der Merwe & T. Brown, MobileTechnology: The Future of Learning in Your Hands, mLearn 2005 Book of Abstracts, 4th World Conference on mLearning (pp.50). Cape Town: mLearn.
Nielsen-Pincus, M., Hall, T., Force, J. E., et al. (2010). Sociodemographic effects on place bonding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, pp. 443-454.
Norberg-Schultz, C. (1971). Existence, space & architecture. London and New York.
Ofcom (2009). Ofcom 3G coverage maps. [Online] Available at:
http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/spectrum/mobile-wireless-broadban d/cellular/coverage_maps.pdf [Accessed 11 Nov 2013].
Papagiannakis, G., Singh, G., & Magnenat-Thalmann, N. (2008). A survey of mobile and wireless technologies for augmented reality systems. Computer Animation And Virtual Worlds, 19(1), pp. 3-22.
Peet, R. (1998). Modern Geographic Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pitt, S. P., Updike, C. B., & Guthrie, M. E. (2003). Integrating Digital Images into the Art and Art History Curriculum. Journal of Library Administration, 39(2-3), pp. 29-42.
Portalés, C., Lerma, J. L., & Pérez, C. (2009). Photogrammetry and augmented reality for cultural heritage applications. The Photogrammetric Record, 24(128), pp. 316-331.
Pred, A. (1983). Structuration and Place: On the Becoming of Sense of Place and Structure of Feeling, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13(1), pp. 45-68.
Pred, A. (1984). Place as historically contingent process: structuration and the time-geography of becoming place, Annals of the American Geographers, 74(2), pp.279-297.
Prentice, R. C., Guerin, S. & McGugan, S. (1998). “Visitor Learning at a Heritage Attraction: A Case Study of Discovery as a Media Product.” Tourism Management, 19(1), pp. 5-23.
Pretty, G. H., Chipuer, H. M., & Bramston P. (2003). Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in
relation to place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp. 273-287.
Priestnall, G. (2009). Landscape visualization in fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol.33, Supplement 1, pp. S104-S112.
Priestnall, G., Brown, E., Sharples, M. and Polmear, G. (2010). Augmenting the field experience: A student-led comparison of techniques and technologies. In E. Brown (ed.) Education in the wild: contextual and location-based
mobile learning in action. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham: Learning Sciences Research Institute (LSRI), pp. 43-46.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place identity: physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, pp. 57-83.
Qian, Zhu & Liu (2011) Investigating urban migrants’ sense of place through a multi-scalar perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31, pp. 170-183.
Relph, E. (1976) Place and placeness. London, Pion Ltd.
Rogers, Y., Price, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Fleck, R., Harris, E., Smith, H., et al. (2004). Ambient Wood: Designing New Forms of Digital Augmentation for Learning Outdoors. Paper presented at the Third International Conference
for Interaction Design and Children. pp.3-10.
Rose, S., Potter, D., & Newcombe, M. (2010). Augmented reality: A review of available augmented reality packages and evaluation of their potential use in an educational context. Retrieved Oct. 23, 2013, from
http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/augmentedreality/files/2010/11/Augmented-Reality-final.pdf.
Rose, S., Potter, D., & Newcombe, M. (2010). Augmented reality: A review of available augmented reality packages and evaluation of their potential use in an educational context. Retrieved Oct. 23, 2013, from
http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/augmentedreality/files/2010/11/Augmented-Reality-final.pdf.
Ryden, K.C. (1993). Mapping the invisible landscape: folklore, writing, and the sense of place. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
Sandifer, C. (1997). Time-based behaviors at an interactive science museum: Exploring the differences between weekday/weekend and family/nonfamily visitors. Science Education, 81(6), pp. 689-701.
Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open-endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), pp. 121-137.
Sampson, J. R. (1988) Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53, pp. 766-779.
Sampson, K. A. & Goodrich, C. G. (2009). Making Place: Identity Construction and Community Formation through “Sense of Place” in Westland, New Zealand. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 22(10), 901-915.Sánchez, J., & Olivares, R. (2011). Problem solving and collaboration using mobile serious games. Computers & Education 57, pp. 1943-1952.
Schreyer, R., Jacob, G., & White, R. (1981). Environmental meaning as a determinant of spatial behavior in recreation. In R. Schreyer, G. Jacob, & R. White (Eds.), Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences, 4, (pp.294-300). Binghampton, NY: SUNY.
Semper R.&Spasojevic M. (2002) The electronic guidebook: using portable devices and awireless web-based network to extend the museum experience. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web Conference, Boston, MA.
Shen,Y., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2010). Augmentedreality for collaborative product design and development. Design Studies, 31(2), pp. 118-145.
Sparacino, F. (2002). The museum wearable: real-time sensor-driven understanding of visitors’ interests for personalized visually-augmented museum experiences. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web (MW 2002) (pp. 17-20). Boston.
Squire, K. D. (2010). From Information to Experience: Place-Based Augmented Reality Games as a Model for Learning in a Globally Networked Society. Teachers College Record 112(10), pp. 2565-2602.
Stedman, R. C. (2002). Towards a social psychology of place: predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34, pp. 561-581.
Stedman, R. (2003a). Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources, 125
16, pp. 671–685.
Stedman, R. (2003b). Sense of place and forest science, toward a program of quantitative research. Forest Science, 49(6), pp. 822–829.
Stewart, E. J., Hayward, B. M. & Devlin, P. (1998). The "place" of interpretation: a new approach to the evaluation of interpretation. Tourism Management, 19(3), pp. 257-266.
Strickland, A., Fairhurst, K., Lauder, C., Hewett, P., & Maddern, G. (2011). Development of an ex vivo simulated training model for laparoscopic
liver resection. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 25(5), pp. 1677-1682.
Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: a transactional view of settings. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 441–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Hou, H. T., & Chen, P. F. (2010a). Designing an electronic guidebook for learning engagement in a museum of history. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, pp. 74–83.
Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., & Liu, C. K., Chang K. E., (2010b). Mobile Guide System using Problem-solving Strategy for Museum Learning: A Sequential Learning Behavioral Pattern Analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26, pp. 106-115.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting Our Heritage (3rd ed.). North Carolina Press, North Carolina. (First published 1957)
Tuan, Y. F. (1974) Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values (Englewood liffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
Tuan, Y.F. (1976). Humanistic Geography. Annals of Association of American Geographer, 66(2), pp. 266-276.
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and Place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
Tuan, Y. F. (1979). Space and Place: Humanistic Perspective, in Gale, S. & G. Olsson(eds.) . Philosophy in Geography, London: D.Reidel Publishing Company.
Unruh, D. R. (1980). The nature of social worlds. Pacific Sociological Review, 23, pp. 271-96.
Uzzell, D. (1996). Creating place identity through heritage interpretation. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1(4), pp. 219-228.
Vilkoniene, M. (2009). Influence of Augmented Reality Technology upon Pupils Knowledge about Human Digestive System: The Results of the Experiment. US-China Education Review, 6(1), pp. 36-43.
Vlahakis, V., Ioannidis, N., Karigiannis, J., Tsotros, M., Gounaris, M., Stricker, D., Gleue, T., Daehne, P., & Almeida, L. (2002). Archeoguide: An Augmented Reality Guide for Archaeological Sites. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 22(5), pp. 52-60.
Wang, X. (2007). Using Augmented Reality to Plan Virtual Construction Worksite. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 4(4), pp. 501-512.
Wang, X., & Chen, R. (2009). An experimental study on collaborative effectiveness of augmented reality potentials in urban design. CoDesign, 5(4), pp. 229-244.
Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., & Roggenbuck, J.W. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Studies, 14, pp. 29-46.
Williams, D. R. (1995). Mapping place meanings for ecosystem management. A tech. report submitted to the Interior Columbia River Basin Ecosystem Management Project, USDA Forest Service,Washington.
Williams, D.R., & Vaske, J.J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49, pp. 830-840.
Yim, H. B., & Seong, P. H. (2010). Heuristic guidelines and experimental evaluation of effective augmented-reality based instructions for maintenance in nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240(12), pp. 4096-4102.
Zeppal, H., & Hall, C. (1991). Selling art and History: Cultural heritage and tourism. Tourism Studies, 2, pp. 47-55.
Zhang, J., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2012). Designing a Streamlined Viewport Strategy System to Enhance Performance in Context Awareness in Mobile Learning Environments. The 1st IIAI International Conference on Learning Technologies and Learning Environments (IIAI LTLE 2012), (pp. 72-76). Fukuoka, Japan.
Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented realitybased armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education 73, pp. 178-188.
網路資源
台北旅遊網。新北市— 淡水金色水岸,
http://www.taipeitravel.net/user/Article.aspx?Lang=1&SNo=04000730 。瀏覽日期:2010 年6 月5 日。
臺北縣立淡水古蹟博物館。古蹟介紹及歷史與人文。
http://www.tshs.tpc.gov.tw/tai2_2.asp。瀏覽日期:2009 年5 月5 日。
臺北縣立淡水古蹟博物館。揭開紅毛城四百年歷史( 論文集) 。
http://www.tshs.tpc.gov.tw/tai2_2.asp。瀏覽日期:2009 年5 月5 日。
淡北內八景請參閱 陳培桂,《淡水廳志》(台中:台灣省文獻委員會,1977)。
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tamsuitms/article?mid=380
淡水新八景淡水鎮公所秘書李育鈞所撰,曾於1966 年12 月5 日在《徵信
新聞報》 (中國時報前身) 和1976 年8 月4 日在民族晚報刊載。參
閱Mr. Tamsui 淡水開講。大家來選淡水新八景,
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tamsuitms/article?mid=380。瀏覽日期:2012 年7 月8 日。
婦學堂‧ 真樓‧ 校史館。參閱Mr. Tamsui 淡水開講。
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tamsuitms/article?mid=380。瀏覽日期:2012 年7 月8 日。
埔頂三塊厝。參閱Mr. Tamsui 淡水開講。
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tamsuitms/article?mid=145。瀏覽日期:2012 年7 月8 日。
淡江中學的失戀橋。參閱淡江中學校史館。
http://dns2.tksh.ntpc.edu.tw/historyhouse/p-6-16.htm。瀏覽日期:2012 年7 月8 日。
《石牆仔內》訪談李氏第八代子孫, 忠寮李氏宗族聚落
http://www.shi1871.com/INDEX_A.asp。瀏覽日期:2008 年8 月10 日
及2013 年12 月10 日。
台北捷運公司。誕生與成長,
http://www.trtc.com.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1315947&CtNode=24530&mp=122
031。瀏覽日期:2010 年6 月5 日。
轉變中的淡水: 啟動城市創造力─ 「淡水河口藝遊網」計劃,
http://www.rti.org.tw/Program/DispatchContent.aspx?dispatchid=16394&
ProgId=269&UnitId=0&NetId=1&LangId=1。瀏覽日期:2010 年6 月
5 日新北市淡水區公所。
認識淡水— 地理的淡水,
http://www.tamsui.ntpc.gov.tw/web/SG?pageID=39085。瀏覽日期:2011 年9 月28 日。