簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 洪郁婷
Hung, Yu-Ting
論文名稱: 教師於社群課程實踐之個案研究:以批判教育學為視角
A Case Study of Teachers' Curriculum Praxis in Professional Learning Community: Perspective of Critical Pedagogy
指導教授: 卯靜儒
Mao, Chin-Ju
口試委員: 吳麗君 周淑卿 甄曉蘭 陳麗華 卯靜儒
口試日期: 2021/05/11
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 課程與教學研究所
Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 157
中文關鍵詞: 批判教育學個案研究教師專業學習社群課程實踐覺醒
英文關鍵詞: case study, conscientization, critical pedagogy, curriculum praxis, professional learning community
研究方法: 個案研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100581
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:304下載:65
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 課程改革相關討論一直備受關注,尤其臺灣實施十二年國教之後,這一波改革對師生而言更是直接的衝擊;不過,即使處在這樣的脈絡之中,教師的課程實踐似乎仍是步履維艱。過往的研究,多從國家機器、教師文化、專業認同等方面對上述現象予以解釋,本文則企圖打破原先的論述框架,新闢教師實踐的論述空間,故嘗試採完全走入教師的脈絡之中,不再讓教師成為被觀看的他者;用批判教育學的視角,從課程意識、師生關係、社會責任三個層面的覺醒歷程,理解教師為何要實踐、如何去實踐,並將教師批判覺醒後的課程實踐予以理論化。
    本文採為時兩年的質性個案研究,深入臺灣北部某縣市都會區的大型完全中學國中部教師專業學習社群,研究對象為此社群其中三位教師;並運用參與/非參與式觀察、回溯性的深度訪談、文件分析,探究教師如何藉由社群建構出多重反思的專業文化場域、教師覺醒的契機與歷程、以及實踐的困境所映射出的結構性問題。
    研究發現,教師的教學作為,往往反映了教育體系中的各方權力關係,故教師通常會在權衡之下,選擇自認為最適合的處理方式,但這不一定具有教育意義;若能打破現存結構對教師的定義,教師賦權的力量便會產生。教師與學生之間的關係則頗為複雜,既是平等的關係,教師須帶著批判反省的力量聆聽學生的聲音;亦是權力不對等的關係,教師須走向解放的權威,方能帶領學生共同建構課程,這對本研究的個案而言,是仍待努力的方向。教師的社會意識則能帶領教師走向覺醒,本研究個案因能與課室中弱勢的學生站在同一陣線,故得以揭露迷思,看見社會結構中的隱形群體,進而期待能藉由課程實踐,消解此結構所帶來的壓迫。
    根據上述的發現,研究結論有五項,分別為:一、社群的交流能讓教師看見多元的課程實踐;二、教師可從自身與課程的連結開始展現主體;三、反省的學習能生成批判性知識並共構課程;四、教師面對基進的改革行動時仍會游移不定;五、納入課程實踐的改革論述使教師賦權增能。而本文亦針對未來關於教師課程實踐的研究以及關於第一線教師的實踐,予以相關建議。

    Issues in curriculum reform are a constant cause of concern. In Taiwan, the wave of reforms, especially after implementing the 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum, greatly impacted teachers and students. Despite this, teachers still find it difficult to think of the curriculum as praxis. Past studies mostly explained this in terms of state machinery, teacher culture, professional identity, and so on. This article breaks away from the original discourse framework and creates a new discourse space for teachers’ praxis. The author delved into the context of teachers, no longer allowing teachers to be viewed just as “the other.” The author explored the conscientization process of curriculum consciousness, teacher-student relationship, and social responsibility from the perspective of critical pedagogy, understanding why teachers should praxis and how-to praxis to outline the curriculum praxis process.
    A two-year case study that delved deep into a professional learning community (PLC) of teachers at a junior high school in a county in northern Taiwan was used. The study participants were three teachers from the PLC. The author used participant and nonparticipant observations, retrospective depth interviews, and literature analyses to explore how teachers construct a multi-reflection professional cultural field by the PLC, the opportunity and process of teachers’ conscientization, and the structural problems reflected by the plight of curriculum praxis.
    Teachers’ teaching behavior often reflects power relationships in the education system. Therefore, teachers usually choose the most suitable way of balancing for them. However, this may not necessarily have educational significance. Breaking the definition of teachers down structurally can help empower the teachers. The relationship between teachers and students is complex. Teachers should listen to students’ voices through critical reflectiveness to ensure equality. However, teachers also have emancipatory authority to allow students to construct curricula. Hence, there are also unequal power relationships. The balance of the teacher-student relationship remained very difficult for the study participants. Teachers’ social awareness can lead them to becoming conscientious. Since our case study highlights the disadvantaged students in the classroom, it can help break the “myth” and see the invisible groups in the social structure, hoping that the curriculum praxis can eliminate the oppression brought about by this structure.
    There are five research conclusions: 1) Communication in PLC allows teachers to see diverse curriculum praxis, 2) teachers can begin to present the subjectivity from the connection between themselves and the curriculum, 3) adding reflective learning in the classroom could continuously generate critical knowledge and co-construct the curriculum, 4) teachers still hesitate in the face of radical reforms, and 5) incorporating the reform discourse of teachers’ curriculum praxis could empower them. This article also provides relevant suggestions for future research on teacher curriculum praxis and teachers’ praxis.

    第一章 緒論 01 前言 在破曉與渾沌之間 01 第一節 研究背景與動機 03 第二節 研究問題與目的 13 第三節 名詞解釋 14 第二章 文獻探討 17 第一節 批判教育學與課程實踐之對話 17 第二節 臺灣課程改革與課程實踐之對話 23 第三節 教師專業學習社群與課程實踐之對話 27 第三章 研究設計與實施 33 第一節 研究架構 33 第二節 研究方法與場域 34 第三節 研究者角色 36 第四節 資料蒐集與整理 37 第五節 研究信實度與倫理 42 第四章 研究發現與討論 43 第一節 實踐的歷程 43 第二節 教師的覺醒 75 第三節 教師課程實踐的理論化 102 第五章 結論與建議 125 第一節 結論 125 第二節 建議 131 參考文獻 136 中文部分 136 西文部分 141

    中文部分
    丁一顧(2012)。國民小學校長教練式領導:理論、實踐與評量工具之研究(I)。
    行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC101-2410-H-133-005),未出版。
    方永泉(2005)。批判取向教育哲學的發展、議題及展望。教育資料與研究雙月刊,66,91-110。
    方永泉(2006)。批判取向的教育哲學發展、議題及展望。載於李錦旭、王慧蘭
    (主編),批判教育學:臺灣的探索(頁23-57)。心理。
    王為國(2007)。從實務社群談課程發展與教師專業發展。課程研究,2(2),41-63。
    王雅玄(2005)。社會領域教科書的批判論述分析:方法論的重建。教育研究集刊,51(2),67-97。
    王慧蘭(2005)。批判教育學:權力抗爭、文本政治和教育實踐。臺灣教育社會學研究,5(2),85-112。
    王儷靜(2009)。課程發展與價值衝突:研究與經驗的啟發。載於卯靜儒(主編),課程改革—研究議題與取徑(頁163-181)。學富。
    卯靜儒(2002)。波克維茲:《教育改革的政治社會學》導讀。載於蘇峰山(主編),意識、權力與教育(頁231-244)。復文。
    卯靜儒(2004)。從新馬克斯到後結構主義─課程社會學研究的再概念化。教育研究集刊,50(1),119-142。
    卯靜儒(2004)。理論化女性教師的性別意識與認同建構過程。通識教育季刊,11(1/2),147-170。
    卯靜儒(2015a)。解開學習共同體實踐歷程中教師專業發展的密碼。中等教育,66(1),6-15。
    卯靜儒(2015b)。學生課程經驗:問題意識與案例發微。教育學術月刊,277,93-106。
    卯靜儒、張建成(2005)。在地化與全球化之間─解嚴後台灣課程改革論述的擺盪。台灣教育社會學研究,5(1),39-76。
    吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。高等教育。
    吳清山、高家斌(2007)。台灣中等教育改革分析:1994-2007年。教育資料集刊,33,1-24。
    吳敏而(2005)。文學圈之理論與實務。朗智。
    吳麗君(2020)。用教科書而不被教科書所用。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(3),1-5。
    宋佩芬、古庭瑄(2015)。歷史觀點的覺察:國中教科書臺灣史之差異敘述。教
    育實踐與研究,28(2),59-88。
    佐藤學(2017)。邁向專家之路—教師教育改革的藍圖[黃郁倫譯]。高等教育。(原著出版年:2015)。
    周珮儀(1999)。當代課程理論的新趨勢—從社會批判到後現代。國教學報,11,259-282。
    周梅雀(2005)。課程改革的成功要素:以敘事探究提升教師的課程意識。當代教育研究,13(2),177-202。
    周梅雀(2006)。教師課程意識覺醒的社會解放潛力。課程與教學季刊,9(4),67-78。
    周淑卿(2002)。教師與學生在課程發展歷程中的處境—系統論與概念重建論的觀點。教育研究集刊,48(1),133-151。
    周淑卿(2002)。誰在乎課程理論?—課程改革中的理論與實務問題。載於周淑卿,課程政策與教育革新(頁199-216)。師大書苑。
    林佩璇(2002)。學校本位課程評鑑的知識基礎——教師實踐知識。教育研究集刊,48(3),183-210。
    林昱貞(2002)。批判教育學在台灣:發展與困境。教育研究集刊,48(4),1-25。
    林昱貞、楊佳羚、張明敏(2004)。性取向污名之建構、抗拒與轉化:一個同性戀議題的教學實踐。教育研究集刊,50(3),91-121。
    林彩岫(2018)。教學文化之研究:以兩所國民小學的教學觀察為例。教育理論與實踐學刊,37,53-78。
    胡幼慧(2008)。轉型中的質性研究:演變、批判和女性主義研究觀點。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁3-19)。巨流。
    姜添輝(2003)。教師是專業或是觀念簡單性的忠誠執行者:文化再製理論的檢證。教育研究集刊,49(4),93-126。
    姜添輝(2010)。批判教學論的要點及其對師生互動的啟示。教育資料與研究雙月刊,95,1-26。
    洪雪玲(2007)。論教師課程批判意識及其在教學上的啟示。課程與教學季刊,10(3),91-104。
    秋田喜代美(2008)。授業の研究・教師の学習。東京,日本:明石書店,引自黃月美、歐用生(2013)。美國大學教學改革的新典範—日本「單元教學研究」的應用。課程與教學季刊,16(2),57-88。
    紀金山(2008)。臺灣師資培育制度改革論述的社會分析。臺灣教育社會學研究,8(2),47-85。
    保羅‧弗雷勒(2019)。受壓迫者教育學[方永泉、張珍瑋譯](2019)。巨流。(原著出版年:1970)。
    徐國棟(2010)。課程領導與學校發展:回顧與展望。教育曙光,58(2),83-92。
    張芬芬(2019)。十二年國教的統整課程與分科課程:對立?取代?互補?臺灣教育評論月刊,8(1),195-200。
    張芬芬、陳麗華、楊國揚(2010)。臺灣九年一貫課程轉化之議題與因應。教科書研究,3(1),1-40。
    張建成(2002)。批判的教育社會學研究。學富。
    張新仁(主編)(2009)。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊。教育部。
    張德銳、王淑珍(2010)。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報,41(1),61-90。
    教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。教育部。
    教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。教育部。
    教育部(2019)。議題融入說明手冊。教育部。
    章五奇(2007)。臺灣第一套鄉土教育課程標準之課程史探究。載於白亦方(主編),課程改革2016回顧與展望(頁39-60)。五南。
    莊明貞(2001)。當前台灣課程重建的可能性:一個批判教育學的觀點。國立台北師範學院學報,14,141-162。
    許誌庭(2002)。教師做為轉化型知識份子的可能性、限制與實踐方向。教育研究集刊,48(4),27-52。
    陳文彥(2016)。跨越教室的力量:教師學習領導之領導實踐分析。當代教育研究季刊,23(1),65-98。
    陳伯璋(2005)。從課程改革省思課程研究典範的新取向。當代教育研究季刊,13(1),1-3。
    陳伯璋(2010)。臺灣國民核心素養與中小學課程發展之關係。課程研究,5(2),1-25。
    陳佩英(2009)。一起學習、一起領導:專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育,60(3),68-88。
    陳美如(2001)。教師作為課程評鑑者:從理念到實踐。課程與教學季刊,4(4),93-112。
    陳美如(2007)。課程理解—教師取向之研究。五南。
    單文經(2000)。析論抗拒課程改革的原因及其對策——以國民中小學九年一貫課程為例。教育研究集刊,45,15-34。
    單文經(2013)。試釋學習領導的意義。教育研究月刊,229(1),5-17。
    湯仁燕(2015)。全球化脈絡下的師生互動與關係再造:Paulo Freire的解放教學觀點。教育學誌,33,1-31。
    黃月美、歐用生(2013)。美國大學教學改革的新典範—日本「單元教學研究」的應用。課程與教學季刊,16(2),57-88。
    黃政傑(1997)。教學研究與教學革新。載於黃政傑(主編),教學原理(頁439-
    465)。師大書苑。
    黃政傑、張嘉育(2010)。讓學生成功學習:適性課程與教學之理念與策略。課
    程與教學季刊,13(3),1-22。
    黃鴻文、湯仁燕(2005)。學生如何詮釋學校課程。教育研究集刊,51(2),7-18。
    黃騰(2005)。從「角色」到「自我」—論教師改變的歷史困境與可能。教育
    研究集刊,51(4),89-116。
    黃騰、李文富(2010)。國家課程與教學推動網絡的困境與想像:以地方國教輔
    導團為例。教育研究集刊,56(4),59-93。
    黃顯華、徐慧璇(2006)。臺灣課程改革理論基礎再思。課程研究1,(2),21-45。
    楊思偉(2006)。推動十二年國民教育政策之研究。教育研究集刊,52(2),1-31。
    甄曉蘭(2000)。新世紀課程改革的挑戰與課程實踐理論的重建。教育研究集刊,44,61-90。
    甄曉蘭(2003a)。教師的課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊,49(1),63-94。
    甄曉蘭(2003b)。課程行動研究:實例與方法解析。師大書苑。
    甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務:解構與重建。高等教育。
    甄曉蘭(2007)。偏遠國中教育機會不均等問題與相關教育政策初探。教育研究集刊,53(3),1-35。
    臺灣PISA國家研究中心(2011)。臺灣PISA 2009結果報告。心理。
    歐用生(2002)。中小學課程改革與教學革新。高等教育。
    歐用生(2003a)。誰能不在乎課程理論?─教師課程理論的覺醒。教育資料集刊,28,373-387。
    歐用生(2003b)。課程典範再建構。麗文文化。
    歐用生(2004)。課程領導:議題與展望。高等教育。
    歐用生(2006)。課程理論與實踐。學富。
    歐用生(2007)。一綱一本教科書政策的論述分析。載於中華民國課程與教學學會(主編),教科書制度與影響(頁27-47)。五南。
    歐用生(2010)。建構「三峽」課程發展機制。課程研究,5(2),27-45。
    歐用生(2012)。教師的課程理論化:從詩性智慧到 A/r/t。教育學報,40(1),15-30。
    歐用生(2019)。課程語錄。五南。
    潘世尊(2014)。教育行動研究的困境與挑戰。教育理論與實踐學刊,30,119-147。
    潘慧玲、陳佩英、張素貞、鄭淑惠、陳文彥(2014)。從學習領導論析學習共同體的概念與實踐。市北教育學刊,45,1-28。
    蔡清田(2011)。行動研究的理論與實踐。國家文官學院 T & D 飛訊,118,1-20。
    蔡清田、雲大維(2011)。透過課程領導經營教師專業學習社群之研究。教育資料與研究雙月刊,101,107-134。
    蔡瑞君、熊同鑫(2008)。省思國小自然與生活科技領域教科書之意識形態:以K版及N版為例。課程研究,4(1),23-40。
    鄭圓鈴、許芳菊(2013)。有效閱讀—閱讀理解,如何學?怎麼教?親子天下。

    西文部分
    Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Erlbaum.
    Althusser, L. (1971/2003). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In Brewster, B. (Trans.), Lenin and philosophy, and other essays (pp. 85-126). Monthly Review Press.
    Angrosino, M. V., & Mays de Perez, K. A. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 673-702). Sage.
    Aoki, T. T. (2005). Toward curriculum inquiry in a new key. In W. F. Pinar & R. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key (pp. 89-110). Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
    Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Apple, M. W. (1985). Teaching and "women's work": A comparative historical and ideological analysis. Teachers College Record, 86(3), 455-473.
    Apple, M. W. (1988). Economics and inequality in schools. Theory into Practice, 27(4), 282-287.
    Apple, M. W. (1990). Ideology and curriculum. Routledge.
    Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. Routledge.
    Apple, M. W. (2003). Strategic alliance or hegemonic strategy: Conservatism among the dispossessed. London Review of Education, 1, 47-60.
    Apple, M. W., Au, W., & Gandin, L. A. (2009). Mapping critical education. In Apple, M. W., Au, W., & Gandin, L. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 3-19). Routledge.
    Apple, M. W. & Christian-Smith, L. K. (1991). The politics of the textbook. In Apple, M. W. & Christian-Smith, L. K. (Eds.), The politics of the textbook (pp. 1-21). Routledge.
    Applebee, A. N., and Langer, J. A. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60(2), 168-175.
    Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C, & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), pp. 14-17, 20-22, 43-46.
    Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for Teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
    Bercaw, L. A. & Stooksberry, L. M. (2005). Teacher education, Critical pedagogy, and standards: An exploration of theory and practice. Essays in Education, 12(2), 1-13.
    Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Bernstein, B. (1982). Code, modalities and the process of cultural reproduction: A model. In Apple, M. W. (Ed.), Cultural and economic reproduction in education: essays on class, ideology and the state (pp. 304-355). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Routledge.
    Bottery, M. (2010). Contexts for leadership at the beginning of the 21st century. In Peterson, P., Baker, E., & McGaw, B. (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Education (pp. 704-709). Elsevier Science.
    Bowers, C. A. (1980). Curriculum as cultural reproduction: An examination of metaphor as a carrier of ideology. Teachers College Record, 82(2), 267-289.
    Bowers, C. A. (2010). Educational reforms that foster ecological intelligence. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(4), 9-31.
    Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded edition). National Academy Press.
    Breunig, M. (2005). Turning experiential education and critical pedagogy theory into praxis. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(2), 106-122.
    Breunig, M. (2011). Problematizing critical pedagogy. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 2-23.
    Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass.
    Buckingham, D. (1996). Critical pedagogy and media education: a theory in search of a practice. Journal of curriculum Studies, 28(6), 627-650.
    Bullough, B. V., Gitlin, A. N., & Goldstein, S. L. (1984). Ideology, teacher role, and resistance. Teacher College Record, 86(2), 339-358.
    Cammarano, C. & Stutelberg, E. (2020). Seeing through serpent and eagle eyes: Teachers as handlers of Memories. Teacher College Record,122(4), 1-24.
    Canella, G. (2001). Natural born curriculum: Popular culture and the representation of childhood. In Jipson, J. A. & Johnson, R.T. (Eds.), Resistance and representation: Rethinking childhood education (pp. 16-22). Peter Lang.
    Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. The Falmer Press.
    Clandinin, J., & Connelly, M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In Jackson, P. (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). Macmillan.
    Clay, W. C. (2001). Coming to know my place. In Zeni, J. (Ed.), Ethical issues in practitioner research (pp. 24-34). Teachers College Press.
    Clifton, R. A. & Roberts, L. W. (1990). The authority of teachers: A sociological perspective. In Miranda, E. O. & Magsino, R. F. (Eds.), Teaching, schools and society (pp. 381-403). Falmer Press.
    Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11.
    Conelly, M. & Clandinin, J. (1988). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), pp 2-14.
    Cook-Sather, A. (2007). Resisting the impositional potential of student voice work: Lessons for liberatory educational research from poststructuralist feminist critiques of critical pedagogy. Education Program Faculty Research and Scholarship, 28(3), 389-403.
    Cornbleth, C. (1990). Curriculum in context. Falmer.
    Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American
    classrooms, 1890-1980. Longman.
    Culpan, I., & Bruce, J. (2007). New Zealand physical education and critical pedagogy: Refocusing the curriculum. International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 5, 1-11.
    Cunliffe, A. L. (2002). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33(1), 35-61.
    Daoud, N., Mwangi, C. A. G., English, S., & Griffin, K. A. (2018). Beyond stereotypes: Examining the role of social identities in the motivation patterns of black immigrant and black native students. American Journal of Education, 124(3), 285-312. Davis, 1997
    Davis, B. (2014). Listening to children: Being and becoming. Routledge.
    Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (Patton, P. Trans.). Continuum.
    Dempster, N. (2009). Leadership for Learning: A framework synthesizing recent research. The Australian College of Educators.
    Dillabough, J. (2000). Degrees of freedom and deliberations of “self”: The gendering of identity in teaching. In Trifonas, P. P. (Ed.), Revolutionary pedagogies: Cultural politics, instituting education and the discourse of theory (pp. 312-351). Routledge.
    Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. Teachers College Press.
    Donmoyer, R. (1996). Educational research in an era of paradigm proliferation: What's a journal editor to do? Educational Researcher, 25(2), 19-25.
    DuFour, R. & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. National Educational Service.
    DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”? Schools as Learning Communities, 61(8), 6-11.
    Eisner, E. W. (1985). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Macmillan.
    Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
    Eisner, E. W. (2005). Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot W. Eisner. Routledge.
    Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-324.
    Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 179-186.
    Erickson, H. L., Lanning, L. A., & French, R. (2017). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom. Corwin Press.
    Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1992). Students’ experience of the curriculum. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 465-485). Macmillan.
    Field, K., Holden, P., & Lawlor, H. (2000). Effective subject leadership. Routledge.
    Fisher, A. (2001). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
    Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. Seabury.
    Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the city. Continuum.
    Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Ramos, M. B. Trans.). Bloomsbury Publishing. (Original work published 1970).
    Freire, P. (1997). Mentoring the mentor: A critical dialogue with Paulo Freire. Peter Lang.
    Freire, P. (2009). A critical understanding of social work. (Moch, M. Trans.). Journal of Progressive Human Services, 20(1), 92-97. (Original work published 1990).
    Fullan, M. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. Teachers College Press.
    Gee, J. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 714-725.
    George, A. (2001). Critical pedagogy: Dreaming of democracy. In Tate, G., Rupiper, A., & Schick, K. (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (pp. 92-112). Oxford UP.
    Ghiso, M. P. & Burdick-Shepherd, S. A. (2020). Inquiring into notions of educational improvement by teaching where we think: Philosophical meditations as a practice of teacher education. Teachers College Record, 122(4), 1-26.
    Giles, C. & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124-156.
    Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257-293.
    Giroux, H. A. (1988). Schooling and the struggle for public life: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. University of Minnesota Press.
    Giroux, H. A. (1989). Schooling as a form of cultural politics: Toward a pedagogy of and for difference. In Giroux, H. A. & McLaren, P. L. (Eds.), Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle (pp. 125-151). SUNY Press.
    Giroux, H. (1991). Toward a postmodern pedagogy. Section of the introduction to postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics. State University of New York press.
    Giroux, H. A. (1992). Language, difference, and curriculum theory: Beyond the politics of clarity. Theory into Practice, 31(3), 219-227.
    Giroux, H. A. (1994). Doing cultural studies: Youth and the challenge of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(3), 278-309.
    Giroux, H. A. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope. Westview.
    Giroux, H. A. (2000). Public pedagogy as cultural politics: Stuart Hall and the “crisis” of culture. Cultural Studies, 14, 341-360.
    Giroux, H. A. (2010). Bare pedagogy and the scourge of neoliberalism: Rethinking higher education as a democratic public sphere. The Educational Forum, 74(3), 184-196.
    Goodlad, J. (1979). Curriculum enquiry: The study of curriculum practice. McGraw-Hill.
    Goodson, I. F. (1985). Conclusion: Subjects for study. In Goodson, I. F. (Ed.), Social histories of the secondary curriculum: Subjects for study (pp. 343-368). The Falmer Press.
    Goodson, I. F. (1988). Teachers life history and studies of curriculum and schooling. In Goodson, I. F. (Ed.), The making of curriculum: Collected essays (pp. 71-92). The Falmer Press.
    Goodson, I. F. (1995). The story so far: Personal knowledge and the political. In Hatch, J. A. & Wisniewski, R. (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp.89-98). London, UK: The Falmer Press.
    Gore, J. M. (1992). What we can do for you! What can ‘we’ do for ‘you’? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In Luke, C. & Gore, J. (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 54-73). Routledge.
    Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. International Publishers.
    Greene, M. (1973). Teacher as stranger: Educational philosophy for the modern age. Wadsworth Press.
    Grumet, M. R. (1978). Curriculum as theater: Merely players. Curriculum Inquiry, 8(1), 37-64.
    Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. Philadelphia.
    Hairon, S. & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Journal Educational Review, 64(4), 405-424.
    Hallam, P. R., Smith, H. R., Hite, J. M., Hite, S. J., & Wilcox, B. R. (2015). Trust and
    collaboration in PLC teams: Teacher relationships, principal support, and
    collaborative benefits. NASSP Bulletin, 99(3), 193-216.
    Harber, C. (1990). Education for critical consciousness? Curriculum and reality in
    African social studies education. International Journal of Educational Development, 10(1), 27-36.
    Harris, A. & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13(2), 172-181.
    Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. Journal British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 253-267.
    Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 249-271). Routledge.
    Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teacher’s topic specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.
    Holland, P. E. & Garman, N. B. (2008). Watching with two eyes: The place of the mythopoetic in curriculum inquiry. In Leonard, T. & Willis, P. (Eds.), Pedagogies of the imagination: Mythopoetic curriculum in educational practice (pp. 11-29), Springer.
    Holmberg, B., Shelley, M., & White, C. (2005). Distance education and languages: Evolution and change. Multilingual Matters.
    hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
    Hopkins-Gillispie, D. (2011). Curriculum & schooling: Multiculturalism, critical multiculturalism and critical pedagogy. South Shore Journal, 4, 1-14.
    Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: What are they and why are they important. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Issues…about change, 6(1), 1-9.
    Irwin, R. L. (2004). A/r/tography: A metonymic métissage. In Irwin, R. L. & de Cosson, A. (Eds.), A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 27-38). Pacific Educational Press.
    Kanpol, B. (1997). Issues and trends in critical pedagogy. Hampton Press.
    Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. Consortium Book Sales & Dist.
    Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). The knowledges of teacher education: Developing a critical complex epistemology. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(1), 49-66.
    Kirk, D. & Tinning, R. (1990). Introduction: Physical education, curriculum and culture. In Kirk, D. & Tinning, R. (Eds.), Physical education, curriculum and culture: Critical issues in the contemporary crisis (pp. 1-21). Falmer.
    Kliebard, H. M. (2002). Changing course: American curriculum reform in the 20th century. Teachers College Press.
    Kumagai, A. K., & Lypson, M. L. (2009). Beyond cultural competence: Critical consciousness, social justice, and multicultural education. Academic Medicine, 84, 782-787.
    Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. Routledge.
    Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820-830.
    Leung, W. L. (2008). Teacher concerns about curriculum reform: The case of project learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 75-97.
    Lewis, C. (2009). What is the nature of knowledge development in lesson study?
    Educational Action Research, 17(1), 95-110.
    Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Sage.
    Liston, D. P. & Zeichner, K. M. (1987). Critical pedagogy and teacher education.
    Journal of Education, 169(3), 117-137.
    Liston, D. P. & Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Teacher education and the social conditions of schooling. Routledge.
    Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
    Louie, N. L. (2016). Tensions in equity- and reform-oriented learning in teachers' collaborative conversations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 10-19.
    Louis, K. S. (2006). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning, and trust. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 477-489.
    Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. The Wallace Foundation.
    McBride, R. (1995). Critical thinking in physical education...an idea whose time has come! Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 66(6), 21-52.
    McDaniel, C. (2006). Critical literacy: A way of thinking, a way of life. Peter Lang.
    McLaren, P. (1989). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (2nd ed.). Longman.
    McLaren, P. (1994). Critical pedagogy, political agency, and the pragmatics of justice: The case of lyotard. Educational Theory, 44(3), 319-340.
    McLaren, P. (2003). Critical pedagogy and class struggle in the age of Neoliberal globalization: Notes from history's underside. Democracy & Nature, 9(1), 65-90.
    McLaughlin, M. W. & Talbert, J. E. (2010). Professional learning communities: Building blocks for school culture and student learning. Voices in Urban Education, 27, 35-45.
    McTighe, J. & Wiggins, G. (2013). Essential questions: Opening doors to student understanding. ASCD.
    Meyer, J. W. & Kamens, D. H. (1992). Accounting for a World Curriculum. In Meyer, J. W., Kamens, D. H., & Benevot, A. (Eds.), Social Knowledge for the Masses (pp. 165-179). The Falmer Press.
    Miranda, R. J. & Damico, J. B. (2015). Changes in teachers' beliefs and classroom practices concerning inquiry-based instruction following a year-long RET-PLC program. Science Educator, 24(1), 23-35.
    Miskovic, M. & Hoop, K. (2006). Action research meets critical pedagogy: Theory, practice, and reflection. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 269-291.
    Monchinski, T. (2008). Critical pedagogy and the everyday classroom. Springer.
    Morrissey, M. S. (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
    Mulvey, L. (1989). Visual and other pleasures. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Munro, P. (1998). Subject to fiction: Women teachers' life history narratives and the cultural politics of resistance. McGraw-Hill Education.
    Nehring, J. & Fitzsimons, G. (2011). The professional learning community as subversive activity: Countering the culture of conventional schooling. Professional Development in Education, 37(4), 513-535.
    Nelson, T. H. (2008). Teachers’ collaborative inquiry and professional growth: Should we be optimistic? Science Education, 93, 548-580.
    Nelson, T. H. & Slavit, D. (2007). Collaborative inquiry among science and mathematics teachers in the USA: professional learning experiences through cross‐grade, cross‐discipline dialogue. Journal of In-Service Education, 33(1), 23-39.
    Ning, H. K., Lee, D., & Lee, W. O. (2015). Relationships between teacher value orientations, collegiality, and collaboration in school professional learning communities. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 337-354.
    O’Neill, J. (1986). The disciplinary society: From Weber to Foucault. The British Journal of Sociology, 37(1), 42-60.
    Paechter, C. (2002). Educating the other: Gender, power and schooling. Routledge.
    Pagliarini Cox, M. I. & De Assis-Peterson, A. A. (1999). Critical pedagogy in ELT: Images of Brazilian teachers of English. Tesol Quarterly, 33(3), 433-452.
    Parkes, R. J. (2011). The new curriculum history. In Parkes, R. J. (Ed.), Interrupting
    history: Rethinking history curriculum after ‘The End of History’ (pp. 21-42). Peter
    Lang.
    Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum. Peter Lang.
    Phelps, G. (2009). Just knowing how to read isn’t enough! Assessing knowledge for teaching reading. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 21(2), 137-154.
    Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. Teachers College Press.
    Popkewitz, T. S. (1991). A political sociology of educational reform: Power/Knowledge in teaching, teacher education and research. Teachers College Press.
    Prior, L. (2003). Basic themes: Use, production and content. In Prior, L. (Ed.), Using documents in social research (pp. 1-29). Sage.
    Qi, J. (2009). War and beyong: Twentieth century curriculum reform and the making of a fellower, a citizen, and a worker. In Baker, B. (Ed.), New curriculum history (pp. 273-294). Sense Publishers.
    Rahman, S. M. H. (2011). Influence of Professional Learning Community (PLC) on secondary science teachers’ culture of professional practice: The case of Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 1-22.
    Ruiz, B. M. & Fernandez-Balboa, J. M. (2005). Physical education teacher educators’ personal perspectives regarding their practice of critical pedagogy. Teaching in Physical Education, 24(3), 243-264.
    Rychen, D. S. & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and well-functioning society. Hogrefe Publishing.
    Sage, G. (1993). Sport and physical education and the new world order: Dare we be agents of social change? Quest, 45, 151-164.
    Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
    Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81(4), 501-522.
    Scimecca, J. A. (1980). Education and Society. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Servage, L. (2008). Critical and transformative practices in professional learning communities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 63-77.
    Shank, M. J. (2006). Teacher storytelling: A means for creating and learning within a collaborative space. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(6), 711-721.
    Shor, I. & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Greenwood Publishing Group.
    Shor, I. (1992). Culture wars: School and society in the conservative restoration. University of Chicago Press.
    Shor, I. (1999). What is critical literacy? Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism & Practice, 1(4), 1-32.
    Short, K. G. (1986). Literacy as a collaborative experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
    Short, K. G., Harste, J. C., & Burke. C. L. (1996). Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers. Heinemann.
    Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
    Skilbeck, M. (1990). School based curriculum development. Harper & Row.
    Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern' era. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    Smyth, J., Down, B., & McInerney, P. (2014). The socially just school: Making space for youth to speak back. Springer.
    Sockett, H. (1987). Further comment: Has Shulman got the strategy right? Harvard Educational Review, 57(2), 208-220.
    Spady, W. G. (1974). The authority system of the school and student unrest: A theoretical exploration. In Gordon, C. W. (Ed.), Uses of the sociology of education (pp. 36-77). University of Chicago Press.
    Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R. & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
    Stanley, W. B. (1992). Curriculum for Utopia: Social reconstructionism and critical pedagogy in the postmodern era. SUNY Press.
    Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221-258.
    Stub, H. R. (1968). The professional prestige of classroom teachers: A consequence of organizational and community status. In Bell, R. R. & Stub, H. R. (Eds.), The sociology of education (pp. 236-267). Dorsey Press.
    Tam, A. C. F. (2014). Exploring teachers’ beliefs about teacher learning in professional learning communities and their influence on collegial activities in two departments. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(3), 422-444.
    Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. (1990). History of the school curriculum. Macmillan.
    Thompson, S. C., Gregg, L., & Niska, J. M. (2004). Professional learning communities, leadership, and student learning. Research in Middle Level Education, 28(1), 1-15.
    Tishman, S. & Perkins, D. N. (1995). Critical thinking and physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 66(6), 24-30.
    Tomlinson, C., Brimijoin, K., & Narvaez, L. (2008). The differentiated school: Making revolutionary changes in teaching and learning. ASCD.
    Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2007). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91.
    Wang, X., Kim, B., Lee, J. W. Y., & Kim, M. S. (2014). Encouraging and being encouraged: Development of an epistemic community and teacher professional growth in a Singapore classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 12-24.
    Watts, R. J. & Hipolito-Delgado, C. P. (2015). Thinking ourselves to liberation? Advancing sociopolitical action in critical consciousness. The Urban Review, 47, 847-867.
    Willis, G. (1975). Curriculum theory and the context of curriculum. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualist (pp. 427-442). McCutchan.
    Young, M. F. D. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. Collier Macmillan.
    Zeichner, K. (1990). Changing directions in the practicum: Looking ahead to the 1990s. Journal of Education for Teaching International research and pedagogy, 16(2), 105-132.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE