圖書館服務之核心精神在於瞭解並滿足讀者需求，在提供服務的過程中，若能與讀者建立良好之信任與互惠關係，將有助圖書館服務發揮效益。社會資本重視網絡關係，當關係中含有信任、期望等特質，能使個人更有效率地達成目標，於此，圖書館若能累積並善用社會資本的力量，不僅能維持讀者關係，也能提升服務品質。此外，隨著網路社群的概念與應用普及，圖書館除維持既有之實體服務模式，更可透過Facebook粉絲專頁擴展與讀者的關係，進而累積圖書館之社會資本。本研究之主要目的即希望以社會資本觀點，探索大學圖書館經營Facebook粉絲專頁之效益，包括粉絲特性、使用動機、需求及滿意度、與經營策略等。
本研究以臺灣大學圖書館粉絲專頁為研究對象，並參考Nahapiet & Ghoshal（1998）之社會資本架構，研究中採用內容分析、問卷調查、半結構訪談等多元方法。問卷調查法主要為分析粉絲特性與社會資本運用情形；內容分析法主要探討粉絲專頁發表之主題內容、粉絲互動及經營策略等；半結構式訪談法則為瞭解粉絲之實際使用經驗。本研究共蒐集262份有效問卷、分析2960則貼文、964則留言、並訪談臺灣大學圖書館人員、校友等16位粉絲。
以本研究樣本之分析結果發現，就粉絲特性層面，該粉絲專頁以校友與碩、博士研究生為主要粉絲族群，並以獲取資訊為主要使用動機；就使用滿意度，相較實體圖書館，圖書館粉絲專頁之互動程度與滿意度偏低，但值得注意的是，26~35歲之校友族群對於粉絲專頁之滿意度與按讚程度均顯著高於其他身分與年齡層粉絲，顯示該群粉絲頗有助圖書館累積其社會資本。就經營模式層面，粉絲專頁上之貼文主要以傳遞館務資訊為主，而「其他」類型貼文如照片、重要投票等雖數量不多，但頗能促進粉絲產生認同感，顯示該類型貼文對於累積圖書館社會資本也是具有效益。就使用經驗層面，粉絲專頁最主要之社會資本為關係面之社會資本，顯示圖書館透過粉絲專頁與讀者建立信任與認同關係；由於粉絲彼此互動較少，結構面社會資本略顯缺乏，也進一步影響認知面社會資本所能産生的效益受限。基於上述研究結果，本研究針對大學圖書館在經營粉絲專頁提出一些具體的應用建議，以供後續研究之參考。

The core of the library services begin with understanding the needs of clients. In the process of providing services, libraries can establish good relationships with clients such as trust and reciprocity etc., which help it exploit the benefits. Social Capital focus on social network and contain various characteristics including trust and reciprocity, if libraries can accumulate and use Social Capital properly, the benefits not only can maintain the relationships well but also can promote the qualities of services significantly. Nowadays, due to the mature growth of social media, libraries are able to easily expand services via Facebook fan page and maintain intimate relationships with clients, which indicates that they can accumulate Social Capital more efficiently. Hence, the purpose of the study is to explore the operational efficiency of library’s facebook fan page from the perspective of Social Capital theory, including the characteristics of fans, motivations, needs and satisfaction and management strategy etc.
The research takes National Taiwan University Library Facebook fan page as the research object, and uses multiple research method, including content analysis, questionnaire and interview method, with Nahapiet’s & Ghoahal’s Social Capital structure (1998) to complete the research. First of all, the questionnaire survey for investigating the characteristics fans and social capital; secondly, the content analysis method for collecting the operating data and management mode of fan page; finally, the semi-structured interview method for surveying clients’ real experiences of using fan page. The study eventually collected 262 valid questionnaires, 2960 posts, 964 comments as well as interviewed 16 real using experiences from actual users.
According to the samples of research, the results show that the alumni and master, doctoral students are main fans, who consider that ‘accessing to information’ is the main motivation of using fan page. In addition, the fans' interaction and satisfaction of fan page are lower than using physical library; however, the 26 to 35 year-old alumni are more satisfied and favored with fan page than other age groups, showing that the group of fans is more likely to give positive feedbacks. In business model, the study found that ‘delivering library’s information’ is the main type of posts. Furthermore, "other" type of posts, such as photos, important votes, etc., although the number of the posts are rare, it can significantly affect fans to generate the sense of belonging, which reviews that the type of posts are effective for accumulating library’s Social Capital. In terms of real using experiences, the Relational Social Capital is the vital trait of fan page, which presents that the library can create trust and identification through the fan page. In contrast, due to the low interaction between fans, the Structural Social Capital is relatively scarce, which will limit the benefits of Cognitive Social Capital. Based on the findings, the study concludes some practical suggestions for the future management strategies and research.

中文部分
Halpern, D. (2008)。社會資本(黃克先、黃惠茹譯)。臺北市：巨流圖書公司印行。(原著出版年：2005)
王中天（2003）。社會資本 (Social Capital)： 概念，源起，及現況。問題與研究，42(5)，139-163。
王盈文（2006）。圖書館部落格之發展與應用探析。圖書與資訊學刊，(56)，58-73。
王紀幃（2011）。網路社群經營應用於高中圖書館行銷之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學，臺北市。
白榮吉、蕭穎謙、陳楠熹、陳意婷、劉忠輔、黃宛婷、杜育帆（2013）。線上購物網站以社群經營關鍵成功因素之多重個案研究─以Facebook粉絲頁為例。創新研發學刊，9(1)，19-37。
朱國明（2007）。網路社群社會資本與成員間助人行為之相關研究。資訊管理學報，14(2)，169-202。
江明修、鄭勝分（2004）。從政府第三部門互動的觀點析探臺灣社會資本之內涵及發展策略。理論與政策，17(3)，37-58。
何瑞珠（1999）。 家長參與子女的教育: 文化資本與社會資本的鵑釋。教育學報，26(2)，233-261。
林奇秀、陳一帆（2011）。淺析網路社群知識分享實證研究如何構思社會資本概念。圖書資訊學刊，9(2)，55-89。
林南（2004）。教育制度與社會資本。Bulletin of Educational Research，50(4)，1-16。
林南（2007）。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1(1)，1-32。
林奎宏，鍾國煌、邱逸夫、邱建宏、宋哲偉（2015）。影視音內容描述Metadata 規範簡介及Metadata 產生器設計與應用。電工通訊季刊，4，8-17。
林質安、劉蕙苓（2016）。宣傳為先？互動為主？現代劇團經營 Facebook粉絲專頁之公關溝通策略分析。藝術評論，(30)，103-148。
邱筱葳（2013）。Facebook訊息屬性與按「讚」事件對粉絲團專業黏著度影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立成功大學，臺南市。
馬得勇（2008）。社會資本理論的兩大困境。二十一世紀雙月刊，(107)，89-96。
張慈玲、韓竹平（2009）。社交網站的跨文化分析比較：以臺灣的無名小站與美國的My Space為例。電子商務學報，11(3)，611-637。
張惠蓉、曾釔棖（2009）。從使用者角度評估大學圖書館之服務品質：以臺大圖書館為例。大學圖書館，13(2)，136-163。
戚栩僊（2010）。社群網站使用與社群媒體行銷使用者反映─以Facebook廣告與虛擬牌社群為例。陳儒修（主持人），數位影音與行銷溝通。2010數位創世紀：E世代與資訊科技學術實務國際研討會，臺北市立圖書館。
莊宜軒（2012）。企業Facebook粉絲專頁之公關策略分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學，臺北市。
陳一帆（2011）。從線下與線上文化資本及社會資本觀點探索社會性標記行為。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學，臺北市。
陳世智、吳智鴻、吳彥濬、陳靚（2014）。探討影響Facebook粉絲專頁持續使用意圖之因素：社會資本觀點。中山管理評論，22(2)，205-238。
陳玠芝（2010）。臺大醫圖99年第一次讀者滿意度調查結果報告。國立臺灣大學醫學院圖書分館館訊，102，1-11。
陳姿岑（2015）。社區圖書館作為場所與社會資本積累之研究—以嘉義新港閱讀館為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
陳盈蓁（2011）。大學圖書館部落格迴響之研究。大學圖書館，15(2)，124-145。
陳書梅（2006）。鄉鎮圖書館館員工作生活品質之研究。圖書與資訊學刊，(59)，25-39。
傅仰止（2005）。社會資本的概念化與運作：論家人重疊網絡中的「時間投資」機制。 臺灣社會學，(9)，165-204。
曾淑芬、魏婉筑（2013）。社群網站中的社會資本、聲譽管理行為與信任網絡之研究。資訊社會研究，(25)，84-105。
黃源協、劉素珍（2009）。社會資本對臺灣社區發展之政策意涵。行政暨政策學報，(48)，155-192。
黃運圭、楊文繹 、陳重鑠（2014）。圖書館Facebook粉絲專頁持續使用意願之研究。德明學報，38(2)，63-72。
楊美華（2004）。網路時代學術圖書館的資訊服務[電子版]。教育部圖書館事業委員會會訊，50，1-3。
溫達茂、鄭麗敏(2006)。從圖書館與資訊服務的角度看Web2.0的應用。「Web2.0與圖書館學術研討會」發表之論文，淡江大學。
臺灣大學醫學院圖書分館（2014）。103年第一次讀者滿意度調查。檢索時間：2017/12/10，檢自：http://ntuml.mc.ntu.edu.tw/manage/upload/cabfile/f_20141016104701261.pdf。
蔡璧如、吳穎帆、莊苑仙（2016）。網路互動性對網路口碑之影響－Facebook 與 YouTube 的比較。商管科技季刊，17(1)，81-111。
鄭竣丹（2011）。Facebook用戶按「讚」行為之探討。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學，臺北市。
謝寶煖（1998）。行銷圖書館與資訊服務。圖書與資訊學刊，(27)，40-54。

英文部分
AlKindi, S. S., & Al-Suqri, M. N. (2013). Social networking sites as marketing and outreach tools of library and information services. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 13(2). Retrieved November 28, from https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume13/1-Social-Networking-Sites-as-Marketing.pdf
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010). Predicting the future with social media. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 492-499). IEEE.
Ayu, A. R., & Abrizah, A. (2011). Do you Facebook? Usage and applications of Facebook page among academic libraries in Malaysia. The International Information & Library Review, 43(4), 230-249.
Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital.(1986). Cultural Theory: An anthology, 81-93. Retrieved November 28, from https://faculty.georgetown.edu/irvinem/theory/Bourdieu-Forms-of-Capital.pdf
Brewer, A. (1984). A Guide to Marx's' Capital'. Retrieved October 14, from https://books.google.com.tw/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=RyQ4AAAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=Brewer+1984+capital&ots=-IAYUAAiBi&sig=xyxcNQab0L5Q3znql7CRcNH7J34&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Brewer%201984%20capital&f=false
Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011, May). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 571-580). ACM.
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, S95-S120.
Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practice. New Media & Society, 1-20.
Erin, F. (2010). A unique Twitter use for reference services. Library Hi Tech News, 27(6/7), 14-15.
Ferguson, S. (2013). Are public libraries developers of social capital? A review of their contribution and attempts to demonstrate it. The Australian Library Journal, 61(1), 22-33.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1360-1380.
Grgic, I. H. (2013). Croatian school libraries on Facebook: meeting the needs of young library users. New Library World, 114(9/10), 416-427.
Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130-138.
Hansen-Nord, N. S., Skar, M., Kjaerulf, F., Almendarez, J., Bähr, S., Sosa, Ó., ... & Modvig, J. (2014). Social capital and violence in poor urban areas of Honduras. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(6), 643-648.
Hausmann, A., & Poellmann, L. (2013). Using social media for arts marketing: theoretical analysis and empirical insights for performing arts organizations. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(2), 143-161.
Hebrang Grgic, I. (2013). Croatian school libraries on Facebook: meeting the needs of young library users. New library world, 114(9/10), 416-427.
Hendrix, D., Chiarella, D., Hasman, L., Murphy, S., & Zafron, M. L. (2009). Use of Facebook in academic health sciences libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 97(1), 44.
Hillenbrand, C. (2005). A place for all: social capital at the Mount Barker Community Library. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 18(2), 41.
Jacobson, T. B. (2011). Facebook as a library tool: Perceived vs. actual use. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 79-90.
Johnson, C. A. (2012). How do public libraries create social capital? An analysis of interactions between library staff and patrons. Library & Information Science Research , 34, 52-62.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2012). Social media: back to the roots and back to the future. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(2), 101-104.
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251.
Krishnamurthy, S., & Dou, W. (2008). Note from special issue editors: advertising with user-generated content: a framework and research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 1-4.
Lin, N. (1999), Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0?.Retrieved December 28, from http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Probst, L. K. (1996). Libraries in an environment of change: changing roles, responsibilities, and perception in the information age. Journal of Library Administration, 22(2-3), 7-20.
Putnam, R. D. (1995), Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-683.
Putnam, R. D. (2000), Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Culture and Politics, 223-234.
Secker, J. (2008). Case study 5: libraries and Facebook. LASSIE: Libraries and Social Software in Education, Centre for Distance Education, University of London, London.
Shimada (2015). The role of social capital after disasters: An empirical study of Japan based on Time-Series-Cross-Section (TSCS) data from 1981 to 2012. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14(4), 388-394.
Siisiäinen, M. (2003). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 40(2), 183-204.
Statista. (2016). Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of 3rd quarter 2016 (in millions) Retrieved December 28, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/
Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2009, June). Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies (pp. 245-254). ACM
Tarrow, S. (1996), Making social science work across space and time: A critical reflection on Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work. American political science review, 90(2), 389-397.
Vassilakaki, E., Garoufallou, E. (2015). Library Facebook practices for creating and promoting a professional profile. Program, 49(3), 343-359.
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208.
Xiang, Z.,Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31(2), 179-188.
Chen, X., Huang, Q., & Davison, R. M. (2017). The role of website quality and social capital in building buyers’ loyalty. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1563-1574.