本研究主旨為探討不同空間能力及不同科學態度之學生於擴增實境輔助課後學習之後，在科學中的學習成效、學習興趣及信心為何。本研究發展了一套讓學生在課後使用的擴增實境輔助學習系統，搭配紙本講義，學生自主使用講義及行動載具來輔助學習。最後檢測其學習成效、學習興趣及信心。在本研究中，主要教學課程為生物科的「細胞與染色體」。使用了擴增實境的技術去協助呈現一些較為抽象，甚至需要空間能力來學習的科學概念。以臺灣13歲學生為主要受試者，了解學生在此種輔助學習的方式之下，不同空間能力及不同科學態度的學生是否有不同幅度的輔助效果。
研究結果發現，受試學生透過擴增實境的輔助學習，提升了細胞及染色體的學習成效及學習興趣。此外，也發現低空間能力的學生在使用擴增實境輔助學習的學習成效中較高空間能力學生更有顯著成效。而在科學態度中，低科學態度的學生則是於學習興趣的表現上比高科學態度的學生有更顯著的進步。整體學生對本研究所發展的課後輔助學習方式未來使用意願高。

During the past 50 years, scientific education has granted a great deal of attentions. scientific education is indispensable for an educated modern citizen. The enhancement of scientific literacy becomes one of the nation’s primary goals on science education. Currently, Augmented Reality (AR) is new technology that combines the real word with virtual objects which allows the users to interact between virtuality and reality.
The aim of this study is to develop a set of application with mobile AR and use this application to help students learn science concepts concerning biology. One intact class with 32 junior high school students participate in the study. The quantitative analysis of the questionnaires is conducted through descriptive statistics, t-test and ANCOVA in order to understand the effects on students with different spatial ability and different scientific attitude.
This paper shows that through AR assisted learning, students’ learning achievement and scientific interest are significantly improved. Students with low spatial ability have significant improvement on learning achievement than those with high high spatial ability. Students with low scientific attitude show higher learning interests than those with high scientific attitude. In addition, most students are willing to use this AR application in these future study.

英文文獻
AAAS 2061 Project Retrieved from: http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm
Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267–272.
Azuma. (1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 6(4), 335-385.
Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., &Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536-544.
Bybee, R. (1997). Toward an understanding of scienti literacy. In W. Graber & C. Bolte(Eds.), Scienti literacy, 37-68.
Cuendet, S., Bonnard, Q., Son D. L., &Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Designing augmented reality for the classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 557-569.
Cohen, R. (2013). The development of spatial cognition. Psychology Press. 41.
Correia, P. P. M., Valle, B. X., Dazzani, M., & Malachias, M. E. I. (2010). The importance of scientific literacy in fostering education for sustainability: Theoretical considerations and preliminary findings from a Brazilian experience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 678-685.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
Eijck, M, V., &Roth, W, M. (2010). Theorizing scientific literacy in the wild. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 184-194.
French, J.W. (1965). The relationship of problem-solving styles to the factor composition of tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 9-28. Gardner, H. (1983). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Guilford, J.P., & Lacey, J.I. (Eds.) (1947). Printed classification tests. American air force aviation psychology program research reports, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Lee, Y. H., & Su, I. H. (2012). A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 762-773.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407-416.
Hurd, P.D. (1958) Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13-16.
Jafari,K., & Hashim,F. (2012). The effects of using advance organizers on improving EFL learners' listening comprehension: A mixed method study. System, 40(2), 270-281.
Johnson, J. R. (1989). Technology: report of the project 2061 phase I technology panel. AAAS Books, Dept. 2061. Retrieved from: http://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/1717213
Kelly, T. (1928). Crossroads in the mind. Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press.
Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2013). Augmented reality in education: current technologies and the potential for education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297-302.
Kiyokawa, K., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, B., & Woods, E. (2003). An occlusion-capable optical see-through head mount display for supporting co-located collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality IEEE Computer Society. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=946788
Lin, H., & Chen, T.(2006). Decreasing cognitive load for novice EFL learners: Effects of question and descriptive advance organizers in facilitating EFL learners’ comprehension of an animation-based content lesson. System, 34(3), 416-431.
Lord, T.R. (1987). A look at spatial abilities in undergraduate women science majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(8), 757-767.
Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 344-351.
McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Sources of sex diff erences. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Milgram, P. Takemura, H. Utsumi, A. &Kishino, F., (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum, Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282-292.
Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College, School of Education.72(3).173-182
Millar, R., & OSBORNE, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: King's College London School of Education. Retrieved from: http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Beyond%202000.pdf
Münzer, S., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2009). Learning from multimedia presentations: Facilitation function of animations and spatial abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 481-485.
Münzer, S., Seufert, T., &Brünken, R.(2009). Learning from multimedia presentations: Facilitation function of animations and spatial abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 481-485.
National Academy Press. (1996). National Science Education Standards. NW Washington. Retrieved from: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4962&page=R2
Neven A.M., Sayed, E., Zayed, H. H., Mohamed, I., & Sharawy. S. (2011). ARSC: Augmented reality student card. Computers & Education, 56(4),1045-1061.
Nunnally. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York : Mcgraw-Hill.
OECD, (2013). Draft collaborative problem solving framework. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf
Pella, M. O., O'Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 199-208.
Yalçln, S. A., AçıŞlı, S., & Turgut, U. (2011). Determining the levels of pre-service science teachers’ scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the education faculties about developing scientific literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 783–787.
Suduc, A.M., Bîzoi, M., Gorghiu, G., &Gorghiu, L. M. (2011). Information and communication technologies in science education. Social and Behavioral Sciences,15, 1076-1080.
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., Osman, K.(2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Social and Behavioral Sciences,59(17), 110-116.
Thurstone, L.L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs.

中文文獻

丁振豐（1995）。幾何圖形類比推理題目內容成分分析之研究。臺南師院學報，28（6），84-114。
行政院（2013）。國中小學生學習表現國際評比現況分析與展望。取自http://www.gov.tw/newscenter/pages/detail.aspx?page=47752ce8-28d8-4269-a58f-d16ba9bad8bb.aspx
余鑑、于俊傑、鄭宇珊、張文卿（2012）。有關台灣旅遊業在行動學習的使用意願之研究。中華國際管理評論國際學報，15（3），1-29。
吳鴻（譯）（2002）。擴增實境︰虛擬與實境的無限延伸（原作者：Steven K. Feiner, 2002.）。取自：http://sa.ylib.com/MagCont.aspx?PageIdx=3&Unit=featurearticles&Cate=&id=67&year=
李名揚（2012）。科學素養 學習科學的新態度。科學人雜誌，103。取自
林煥祥（2009）。PISA評量的省思與應用。國立中山大學。
柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅（2008）。台灣四年級學生閱讀素養（PIRLS 2006報告）
科學人雜誌（2012）。科學素養 學習科學的新態度。取自：http://sa.ylib.com/MagCont.aspx?PageIdx=5&Unit=featurearticles&Cate=&id=2096&year
孫維新，張俊彥，劉德祥，卓詠欽（2013）。科學素養白皮書。教育部提升國民素養專案辦公室。
張鳳梅（2004）。資訊融入生物科教學之教材製作與教學策略初探。圖書館學與資訊科學，30（1），55-65。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市：教育部。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市：教育部。
教育部國民教育司（2008）。 97年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。取自：http://140.111.34.54/EJE/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326
陳文典（2005）。科學素養的內涵與解析。教育部暨國立師範大學編印。
陳志銘、蔡雁農（2011）。互動擴增實境系統支援國小圖書館利用教育。臺北市立圖書館館訊，30（3），30-49。
臺灣2015 PISA國家研究中心（2013）。取自：http://pisa2015.nctu.edu.tw/pisa/index.php/tw/
歐陽鍾玲，1983。學生空間概念的發展。國立臺灣師範大學地理學研究報告，9，167-204。
鄭海蓮、陳世玉（2007）。標準化空間能力測驗之建模與驗證。教育研究與發展期刊，3（4），181-216。
薛文珍（2002）。實則虛、虛則實。科學人雜誌，6，45。
魏綺亭、陳依琦（2009）。擴增實境應用於國小九大學科領域之初探研究。碩士論文。
蘇俊欽（2003）。擴增實境應用於中文注音符號學習之研究。成功大學國立工業設計學系博士論文，臺南。