環境行動已經是刻不容緩的議題，在瞭解人們環境行動的成因中，越來越多學者提出以環境認同作為探討的新觀點。偏鄉學校特色課程以在地自然資源、地方文史、社區產業作為特點，打造多元創新的課程內容，有助於學生認識在地並發展認同。本研究以參與社區永續發展計畫中國民小學作為研究場域對象，利用質量混合研究針對在校學生與授課教師進行研究資料收集，探討學生在接受特色課程教育後其環境認同內涵為何，並了解課程內容影響學生環境認同可能相關因素。
透過環境認同問卷發現，參與特色課程後的學生展現出高環境認同，且學生認為藉由特色課程對於瞭解自然非常有幫助。在學生回應與教師觀察中發現，學生的環境認同內涵展現出對於自然的親環境態度，與自主環境行動的產生。透過課程學生對於家鄉產業及文化有更深入的認識之外，也產生對於環境的積極正面情感。與環境的互動中學生增進對自我的認知並培養個人能力，從中逐漸發現環境的重要性、引起保護環境的心態，及認識環境與自我之間的連結。
本研究認為影響學生環境認同建構的相關因素包括：合適的學習環境、結合生活情境的課程內容、讓學生發現自己具有改變環境的行動能力及持續的深刻體驗。

本研究發現特色課程對於學生環境認同的建立與發展深具潛力，並建議未來研究者繼續深入探討課程對學生環境認同的影響及改變。

The relationship between environmental identity and people's action has recently drawn the attention of numerous researchers. The featured curriculum is characterized by natural resources, culture, and industry, creating a diversified and innovative content that helps students understand the hometown and develop their identity. This research uses mixed-methods research to explore the connotation of students' environmental identity and the impact after receiving featured curriculum in rural schools.
The results found the students showed high environmental identity after receiving featured curriculum of rural schools. And the students believed that curriculum was very helpful for understanding nature. The connotation of students' environmental identity shows pro-environmental attitude and autonomous environmental actions. Through the course, students have a deeper understanding of the hometown culture and industry, and they also have positive emotions about the environment. In the process of interacting with the environment, students enhance their self-cognition and develop their environmental abilities, discovering the importance of the environment, understanding the connection between the environment and self, and causing them to want to protect the environment day by day.
This research indicates that the factors affecting the construction of students' environmental identity include: suitable learning environment, curriculum content combined with life situations, long-term and continuous experience, and student’s confidence in their ability to change the world.
Featured curriculum has great potential for the establishment and development of students' environmental identity. It is recommended that future researchers continue to explore in depth the impact and changes of the featured curriculum on students' environmental identity.

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 1-17.
Blatt, E. (2014). Uncovering students’ environmental identity: An exploration of activities in an environmental science course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(3), 194-216.
Blatt, E. N. (2013). Exploring environmental identity and behavioral change in an Environmental Science course. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(2), 467-488.
Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(2), 93-108.
Buttel, F. H., & Humphrey, C. R. (2002). Sociological theory and the natural environment. Handbook of environmental sociology, 33-69.
Cantrill, J. G. (1998). The environmental self and a sense of place: Communication foundations for regional ecosystem management.
Chawla, L. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), 6-23.
Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437-452.
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature, 45-65.
Clayton, S. (2008). Attending to identities: Ideology, group memberships, and perceptions of justice. In Justice (pp. 241-266). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0882-6145(08)25011-3
Clayton, S., Fraser, J., & Burgess, C. (2011). The Role of Zoos in Fostering Environmental Identity. Ecopsychology, 3(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0079
Clayton, S., & Kilinç, A. (2014). Proenvironmental concern and behavior in Turkey: The role of national and environmental identity. Psyecology, 4(3), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119713807749850
Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003a). Introduction: Identity and the natural environment.
Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003b). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and social psychology review, 7(4), 298-310.
Clayton, S. D. (2012). Environment and Identity. The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology, 164.
Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 302-339.
Devine-Wright, P., & Clayton, S. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Place, identity and environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 267-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(10)00078-2
Dresner, M., Handelman, C., Braun, S., & Rollwagen-Bollens, G. (2015). Environmental identity, pro-environmental behaviors, and civic engagement of volunteer stewards in Portland area parks. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 991-1010.
Eames, C., Barker, M., & Scarff, C. (2018). Priorities, identity and the environment: Negotiating the early teenage years. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(3), 189-206.
Freed, A., & Wong, D. (2019). The relationship between university students’ environmental identity, decision-making process, and behavior. Journal of Sustainability Education, 20.
Gebhard, U., Nevers, P., & Billmann-Mahecha, E. (2003). Moralizing trees: Anthropomorphism and identity in children’s relationships to nature. Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature, 91-111.
Green, C., Kalvaitis, D., & Worster, A. (2016). Recontextualizing psychosocial development in young children: a model of environmental identity development. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 1025-1048.
Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and Reliability of the Customer-Oriented Behaviour Scale in the Health Tourism Hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3).
Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001
Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2009). Investigating Environmental Identity, Well-Being, and Meaning. Ecopsychology, 1(4), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2009.0026
Jaksha, A. P. (2013). Environmental Identity: A New Approach to Understanding Students' Participation in Environmental Learning Programs.
Kahn, P. H., & Peter, H. (2003). The development of environmental moral identity. Identity and the natural environment, 113-134.
Kals, E., & Ittner, H. (2003). Children’s environmental identity: Indicators and behavioral impacts. Identity and the natural environment, 135-157.
Kashima, Y., Paladino, A., & Margetts, E. A. (2014). Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 64-75.
Lawrence, E. K. (2012). Visitation to natural areas on campus and its relation to place identity and environmentally responsible behaviors. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(2), 93-106.
McGuire, W. J. (1984). Search for the self: Going beyond self-esteem and the reactive self. Personality and the prediction of behavior, 73, 120.
Meijers, F., Lengelle, R., & Kopnina, H. (2016). Environmental Identity and Natural Resources: A Dialogical Learning Process. Resources, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5010011
Molinario, E., Lorenzi, C., Bartoccioni, F., Perucchini, P., Bobeth, S., Colléony, A., Diniz, R., Eklund, A., Jaeger, C., & Kibbe, A. (2020). From childhood nature experiences to adult pro-environmental behaviors: An explanatory model of sustainable food consumption. Environmental Education Research, 26(8), 1137-1163.
Morrison, D. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1986). Environmentalism and elitism: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Environmental management, 10(5), 581-589.
Olivos, P., & Aragonés, J.-I. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Environmental Identity Scale (EID). Psyecology, 2(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119711794394653
Opotow, S., & Clayton, S. (1998). What is justice for citizens’ environmental groups. International Conference for Applied Psychology, San Francisco,
Payne, P. (2001). Identity and Environmental Education. Environmental Education Research, 7(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620124658
Prévot, A.-C., Clayton, S., & Mathevet, R. (2016). The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: experience in nature matters. Environmental Education Research, 24(2), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1249456
Prévot, A.-C., Clayton, S., & Mathevet, R. (2018). The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: Experience in nature matters. Environmental Education Research, 24(2), 263-279.
Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: exploring implicit connections with nature 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 1219-1247.
Simms, W., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2019). Using reflection to support environmental identity development in the classroom context. Environmental Education Research, 25(10), 1454-1478. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1574717
Sinai, M., Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2012). Promoting identity exploration within the school curriculum: A design-based study in a Junior High literature lesson in Israel. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(3), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.01.006
Stapleton, S. R. (2015). Environmental Identity Development Through Social Interactions, Action, and Recognition. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(2), 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.1000813
Stets, J. E., & Biga, C. F. (2003). Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. Sociological Theory, 21(4), 398-423.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2003). A sociological approach to self and identity. Handbook of self and identity, 128152.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2014). The Development of Identity Theory. In Advances in Group Processes (pp. 57-97). https://doi.org/10.1108/s0882-614520140000031002
Thomashow, M. (1996). Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmentalist. mit Press.
Tugurian, L. P., & Carrier, S. J. (2016). Children's environmental identity and the elementary science classroom. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1191415
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55-63.
Weigert, A. J. (1997). Self, interaction, and natural environment: Refocusing our eyesight. SUNY Press.
Weinreich, P., & Saunderson, W. (2005). Analysing identity: Cross-cultural, societal and clinical contexts. Routledge.
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
Williams, C. C., & Chawla, L. (2015). Environmental identity formation in nonformal environmental education programs. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 978-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1055553
Wilson, R. A. (1996). The development of the ecological self. Early Childhood Education Journal, 24(2), 121-123.
Winter, P. L., & Chavez, D. J. (2008). Wildland recreationists’ natural resource management purposes and preferences: a connection to environmental identity. In: Chavez, Deborah J.; Winter, Patricia L.; Absher, James D., eds. Recreation visitor research: studies of diversity. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-210. Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 163-174. Chapter 14, 210, 163-174.
Zelezny, L. C., & Schultz, P. W. (2000). Psychology of promoting environmentalism: Promoting environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 365-371.
王文科、王智弘（2010）。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報，17，29-50。
王文科、王智弘（2014）。教育研究法。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
王欣蘭（2008）。臺北縣特色學校校長轉型領導行為與學校創新經營關係之研究。淡江大學會計學系碩士班學位論文，1-149。
何俊青（2017）。偏鄉教育問題的迷思。臺灣教育評論月刊， 6（9），15-19。
吳岡旆（2017）。偏鄉特色遊學的環境教育意涵與地方感形塑。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
吳炳銅（2003）。學校本位特色課程發展實務。臺北市中和區：自強國民小學。
吳清山、林天祐（2009）。特色學校。教育資料與研究雙月刊， 88，145-146。
宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），97-130。
李顯榮（2007）。臺北縣小校轉型特色發展差異性探討。國立編譯館館刊， 35（4）， 75-84。
林兵、劉立波（2014）。環境身份: 國外環境社會學研究的新視角。吉林師範大學學報 (人文社會科學版)，5，77-82。
林志成（2010）。臺灣地區特色學校之發展現況及未來展望。學校行政，6，1-19。
林志成（2016）。臺灣地區特色學校計畫的省思與前瞻。教育行政論壇，8(1)，45-59。
林志成（2018）。素養導向特色學校發展之實踐與建議。學校行政雙月刊，118，111-125。
林志成、林仁煥、田耐青、郭雄軍、蔡淑玲、田育昆（2011）。特色學校理論、實務與案例。高等教育。
林志成、陳愛玲（2013）。國民中小學特色發展的困境、認證及策略。學校行政（83），101-120。
林佳儀（2020）。環境教育特色課程之行動研究-以臺北市某國小為例。國立屏東大學生態休閒教育教學碩士學位學程班碩士論文。
林淑馨（2010）。質性研究: 理論與實務。巨流圖書股份有限公司。
姚開屏（1988）。淺談信度與效度。職能治療學會雜誌，6，51-54。
胡國強（2015）。沒了特色的特色學校？。師友月刊，578，33-37。
張進成（2012）。百大特色學校創新經營成效之研究。暨南大學教育政策與行政學系碩士學位論文。
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/1111/67025.pdf
許瑞芳（2016）。偏遠小校推動學校特色課程之困境與因應策略分析。學校行政，105， 1-21。
陳幸仁（2011）。中小學特色學校發展的省思。臺灣教育評論月刊， 1（4）， 67-68。
曾坤輝（2007）。臺北縣特色學校課程發展之研究--偏遠小學的危機或轉機。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
游美惠（2005）。身分認同與認同政治。性別平等教育季刊，31，58-61。
黃彥超（2006）。從學校創新經營談特色學校。南投文教，25，50-53。
黃國彥（2000）。教育大辭書。國家教育研究院雙語詞彙。http://terms. naer. edu. tw/detail/1303274
蔡文川（2009）。自我身分認同與生活環境的關係。中國地理學會會刊，42， 63-81。
鍾乙豪（2017）。特色學校的學校特色，在哪兒？。臺灣教育評論月刊， 6（8）， 140-145。
魏士欽、陳君豪（2017）。以特色遊學發展偏鄉學校亮點。臺灣教育評論月刊， 6（9）， 164-168。