運動員在競技場上挑戰極限、追求卓越的精神常感動人心，但在追求更高、更強、更遠的過程中是否真誠？其中「運動禁藥」更有可能讓場上英雄在一夕之間被翻轉成為千夫所指的欺騙者，有鑑於此，研究者亟欲探究國內頂尖運動員，特別是奧運級國手的運動禁藥認知情形，因此提出以下三個研究問題：（一）2008年北京奧運中華代表隊選手對運動禁藥規範的認知為何？（二）2008年北京奧運中華代表隊選手禁藥使用的態度為何？（三）2008年北京奧運中華代表隊選手對於國內禁藥的管制宣導是否充分了解？透過本研究不只可以反映出運動員的態度，研究結果更將是探討國內運動員對運動禁藥認知的基礎。
　　本研究於2008年6月15日至7月30針對2008年北京奧運中華代表隊選手進行問卷調查，一共發出80份問卷，回收問卷達66份，並以社會人口變項做為自變數，含括受訪者的性別、年齡、學歷、參加的運動種類、運動禁藥藥檢次數及曾經參與的比賽等六大類，與問卷的兩大主軸 (對禁藥的認知與藥物使用態度)做為應變數來進行交叉分析，其中在運動禁藥認知部分，66名選手依據答題成績分為低分組、中級分組及高分組，透過Pearson卡方檢定，觀察三個組別與六大人口變項之間的關係發現，在學歷及當選國手次數上，30名落在中級分組的選手表現明顯比低分組及高分組選手在禁藥認知的程度上表現優異；而在運動禁藥的態度上，經過因素分析萃取出5個全新構面，分別命名為「謹慎用藥態度」、「禁藥推廣教育」、「鑽漏洞用禁藥」、「了解禁藥規範」、及「戰績重於一切」，統計結果發現，在14個禁藥使用態度題項中，平均分數最高的是「國家代表隊成員身分，讓我更注意用藥習慣」(Mean=4.50)。至於得分最低的題項則是「為了贏得比賽，我一定要做弊」(Mean=1.38)，這表示國手們清楚表現出為了贏得比賽不一定要作弊的態度。
　　透過本研究可以發現：(一) 2008年北京奧運中華代表隊選手們清楚認知身為中華隊國手必須小心用藥，也知道自己所參與的比賽項目有哪些禁藥規範；(二)運動禁藥認知與使用態度之間並無明顯的相關性存在，僅在鑽漏洞的態度上呈現低度負相關，代表選手對運動禁藥認知愈高者，愈明白不可「鑽漏洞」；(三)2008年北京奧運中華代表隊認同運動禁藥宣導與防治需要專職機構來推行。以上結果可提供行政當局在運動禁藥的宣導和執行時做為參考。

In the arena, Athletes’ essence of challenging the extreme, the pursuit of excellence touch people’s heart, but, in the pursuit of higher, stronger and farther, is honesty in the process? The “doping” issue makes heroes turn into cheaters overnight; in view of this, the researchers is keen to explore the country's top athletes, especially the National Olympic athletes’ cognitive on dping. The following are the three research questions: (1) What’s 2008 Beijing Olympics Chinnese Taipei athletes’ cognitive towards doping control? (2) What are the attitudes that 2008 Chinese Taipei Olympic athletes have towards the usage of illegal drugs? (3) Is the 2008 Chinese Taipei Olympic team athletes are fully aware of the domestic doping control advocacy? Through this study, not only reflects the attitudes of the athletes, but also explores their basic cognitive on doping.
　　A questionnaire survey was conducted between June 15th, 2008 and July 30th for 2008 Beijing Olympic team athletes , total of 80 questionnaires were issued, out of which 66 questionnaires were returned, and also to socio-demographic variables as independent variables, including 6 major categories, encompass the respondents by sex, age, education, categories participated in, the number of doping and the categories that were participated in. With the two main axes of the questionnaire, (for doping awareness and their attitudes toward drug usage) as the dependent variable to carry out cross-analysis.
　　The part on cognitive on doping, based on the answers from 66 athletes were divided into lower level group, medium level group and higher level group. Through the Pearson’s test, observed the relationship between three groups and six demographic variables, terms of qualifications and the number of the selected national Olympian, 30 athletes falls on the performance of medium level group were significantly higher than the lower level group and higher level group in the doping with outstanding performance on the cognitive on doping.
　　Attitude toward doping, after factor analysis extracted five new dimensions, such as "prudent drug attitude," "Doping promote education," "loopholes used drugs," "Understanding Doping Code," and "Performance is more important than everything else," Statistical results showed that in the 14 categories, the attitude from the ones who has the highest average score is “As national team athletes, I have to pay more attention to drug habit" (Mean=4.50). But as for those who has the lowest score is “In order to win, I have to cheat” (Mean=1.38). This shows the athletes’ attitude towards winning is that don’t necessary to have to cheat to win.
　　As one can see the result from this research: (1) 2008 Beijing Olympics Chinese Taiei team athletes’ already have a clear understanding that they must be careful when it comes to drug usage when they are representing Chinese Taipei., and also they are fully aware of which Doping code are prohibit for the categories they participate in; (2) there is no obvious correlation between the existence of their cognitive and their attitude towards the use of illegal drugs, they only showing mild negative correlation towards loopholes, the athletes who has better understanding knows that they mustn’t and shouldn’t be sneaky; (3) the athletes’ agrees that it is necessary to implement a full-time organization for the movement of advocacy and prevention of doping. The result above can be referred to the administration for anti-doping education and advocacy of using doping.

王翠敏、許美智（1998）。台灣區運動會83-86年選手用藥之調查研究。中華體育，12（2），120-128。
何應志（2001）。口服甲基麻黃鹼後尿液中之含量變化。未出版碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園。
李茂政（1984）。大眾傳播新論。台北：三民書局。
李乾瑋（2006）。優秀選手運動禁藥知識調查。未出版碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園。 　　　　　　　　　　　
李詠吟（1998）。認知教學-理論與策略。台北市：心理出版社。
林永富（2000）。民國九十年全國大專運動會及全國中學運動會得牌選手運動禁藥認知調查研究。未出版碩士論文，台北市立體育學院，台北。
林淑芳、陳漢瑛、楊忠祥、闕月清、曾玉華（2007）。台北縣市高中職運動員對運動禁藥之教育需求研究。國北教大體育，2，52-66。
林輝雄（2000）。運動禁藥管制。國立台灣體育學院競技運動學系系刊，4，7-24。
祁崇溥、許美智（1997）。害他性類固醇藥理性質與運動表現之關係。中華體育，11（1），49-56。
祁學溥、許美智（1997b）。β阻斷劑的藥理意義及其和運動表現之關係。大專體育31，60-64。
邵源（1989）。違禁藥品的藥理效應及對人體的副作用。體育與科學，18-19。
許美智（1996）。運動員禁藥與檢驗。國民體育季刊，25（1），49-54。
許美智（2000）。運動與禁藥。台北市：合計圖書出版社。
許美智、詹貴惠（2005）。運動藥物學。高雄市：春橋田股份有限公司。
陳美如（2003）。運動禁藥知識測驗之編製與應用。未出版碩士論文，國立體育學院，台北。
陳怜利、許美智（2001）。運動禁藥生長激素與類胰島素生長因子。大專體育，62，129-135。
陳俊忠（1991）。奧會禁藥管制的最近趨勢。體育與運動，74，63-67；75，102-108。
陳耕、韓佐生、夏玨（1993）。運動藥物的種類、機理及其危害。寧夏體育科研，27-34。
答邦俊（2000）。談運動員服用興奮劑問題。南陽師範學院學報，28-30。
黃秀瑄、林瑞欽（1991）。認知心理學。台北：師大書苑。
楊志弘、莫季雍（1996）。傳播模式。台北：正中書局。
詹貴惠、許美智（1997）。從禁藥的角度談運動員的感冒用藥。大專體育，34，116-120。
國立體育學院、中華民國奧林匹克委員會（2001）。運動禁藥宣導手冊-常見含運動禁藥之西藥製劑。台北市：行政院體育委員會。
國立體育學院、中華奧林匹克委員會（2002）。運動禁藥宣導手冊（2）-運動員適用治療藥物手冊。台北市：行政院體育委員會。
賈寶山（1995）。運動員禁藥的檢驗。體育與運動，92，7-12。
劉乃灝（1997）。興奮劑瀰漫國際體壇。體育博覽，1，26。
劉春英、許美智（1998）。認識運動員禁藥-興奮劑。中華體育，12（3），85-93。
潘建林（1995）。體壇魔影-興奮劑。體育文史，1，30-33。
潘家慶（198３）。傳播與國家發展。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所，初版。
蔡錦雀、許美智（1998）。國內運動員禁用藥物管制現況與展望，中華體育，12（4），77-84。
鄭瑞澤（1987）。社會心理學。台北市：中國行為科學社。
鄭斌（1998）。英國反興奮劑數據庫調查資料摘要。中國大陸國家體育總局體育信息研究所內部刊物「國外體育動態30」，247-248。
Ahmann , J . S. P＆ Glock , M. D . (1981). Evaluatingstudent prgress:Principles Of testsandmeasurement(6th ed ).Boston : Allyn and Bacon. Aiken , L.R . (1982) . Psychologicaltesting and assessment ( 4th ed .) Boston : Allynand Bacon.
Bandura, A. (1988). Organizational Application of Social Cognitive Theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), 275-302.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist,44, 1175-1184.
Campbell,S.R. (1971) . Consumer education in an age of adaptation . Chicago : Sear ,Roebuck .
Edwards, S. D.& McNamee, M. J. (2006).Why sports medicine is not medicine. Health Care Analysis, 32，513-8.
Eiser, J.R. (1994). Attitudes, chaos, And the connectionist mind. Oxford: Blackwell.
Graumann, G. (1986).Computers and Geometry Teaching. In: P.Kupari, (Ed.). Mathematics education research in Finland. Yearbook 1985, 61 – 79.
Gordon, W. Allport(1935). Attitudes.In Handbook of Social Psychology,Murchison, Worcester, M. A., Clark University Press.
Hardy,K.J. , McNeil,J.J.,＆Capes,A.G.(1997).Drug doping in senior Australian rules football : a survey for frequency. Br J Sports Med 1997;31:126-128 Holt,Mottram , D.R .(1996)：Drugs in sports（2nd.）.London：E & FNSPON, 166-170 , 204 - 213 , 232 -233.
IOC (2007). Olympic movement anti - doping code . Retrieved August 24, 2007,from The World Anti-Doping Agency Web Site: http://www.wada-ama.org/en/World-Anti-Doping-Program/Sports-and-Anti-Doping-Organizations/The-Code/Jaspars, J.,& Fraser, C. (1984). Attitudes and social representations. In R.M. Farr and S. Moscovici(Eds), Social representations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kindlundh, A.M.S., Isacson D.G.L., Berglund L., &Nyberg F. (1999). Factors associated with adolescent use of doping agents: Anabolic androgenic steroids, Addiction, 543-553.
Kanayama, G., Boynes, M., Hudson, J.I., Field, A.E.,& Pope Jr. H.G. (2007) Anabolic steroid use among teenage girls: An illusory problem?Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 156-162.
Laure, P. (1997) . General practitioners and doping in sports :knowledge and attitudes.Sante Publique ( Vandoeuvre - Les -Nancey ) , 9 (2) , 145 - 156.
Laure, P. (2000) . Doping : Epidemiological studies. Presse Medicale , 29 (24) , 1365 - 1372.
Laure, P,＆Reinsberger, H. (1995) . Doping and high – level endurance walkers . Knowledge and representation of a prohibited practice . Journal of Sports Medicine ＆Physical Fitness, 35 (3) , 228 - 231.
Laure,P,Thouvenin,F,＆Lecerf, T. (2001) . Attitudes of coaches towards doping.Journal of Sports Medicine＆Physical Fitness,41(1) , 132 - 136.
Laure, P., Binsinger, C.,& Lecerf, T. (2003) General practitioners and doping in sport: attitudes and experience。British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37,335-338.
Mehens,W. A,＆Lehmann, I . J . (1978) . Measurement and education in education and psychology.
Melia P., Pipe A., &Greenberg L. (1996). The use of Anabolic Androgenic Steroids by Canadian students。Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 9-14.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The myth of the lonely paradigm: A rejoinder. Social Research, 51(4),939-967.
Mottram,D.R.(1999)：Banned grugs in sport . Sports Medicine , 27（1), 1 -10.
Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Miller, Katherine (2005). Communication theories: perspectives, processes, and contexts (2nd ed.). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Methods, (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Somerville, S. J.,& Lewis, M. (2005). Accidental breaches of the doping regulations in sport: Is there a need to improve the education of the sportspeople? Br J Sports Med, 39, 512-516.
Steven Ungerleider(2001): Faust's gold: Inside the east german doping machine,35-43.
Stryker, S, & Statham.A.(1985). Symbolic Interaction and Role Theory" Pp. 311-378 in G.Lindzey, and E. Aronson (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology.
Thomas, W. I. ,& Znaniecki. (1918). The polish peasant in Europe and American. Boston:Badger.
Thurstone, L.L.(1928). Attitudes Can Be Measured. The American Journal of Sociology, 36(4), 529-554.
World Anti-Doping Agency(2008)。PROHIBITED LIST。Retrieved August 24, 2007, from The World Anti-Doping Agency Web Site:
http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/2008_List.pdf
World Anti-Doping Agency(2008).Annual Report. Retrieved August 24,2007, from The World Anti-Doping Agency Web Site:
http://www.wada-ama.org/en/dynamic.ch2?pageCategory.id=453
World Anti-Doping Agency（2007）. WADA Laboratory Statistics. Retrieved August 24,2007, from The World Anti-Doping Agency Web Site: http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/LABSTATS_2007.PDF