研究生: |
歐鎮寬 Chen-Kuan Ou |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台北市公立高級工業職業學校學生服務學習的參與態度及其相關因素之調查研究 A Study of Students' Attitudes toward Participating in Service-Learning and Related Factors in Taipei Municipal Vocational Industrial High Schools |
指導教授: |
李基常
Lee, Ji-Charng 彭信成 Peng, Shin-Chen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2003 |
畢業學年度: | 91 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 158 |
中文關鍵詞: | 社區服務 、參與態度 、個人相關因素 、服務學習 |
英文關鍵詞: | community service, service-learning, attitudes toward participations, Personal factors |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:198 下載:36 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在調查及瞭解台北市公立高級工業職業學校服務學習實施的現況與類型,探討學生個人背景因素與服務學習參加的原因對服務學習的參與態度、參與時數的影響,服務學習的參與態度與參與時數之間的相關,以做為往後服務學習實施策略改進之參考。
本研究採「文獻分析」、「問卷調查」研究方法,以九十一學年度台北市公立高級工業職業學校學生共3383人為母群,採分層叢集抽樣方式共抽取11個班級為樣本共370人,以自編「台北市公立高工服務學習參與態度」調查問卷為工具進行調查研究。獲得之資料採用:平均數、百分比、標準差、積差相關、單一樣本平均數考驗(one sample t-test)、及單因子變異數分析(one way ANOVA, F-test)做分析考驗。
本研究獲得重要結論簡述如下:
一、台北市公立高級工業職業學校學生服務學習平均時數均達8小時以上。學生最經常參與的服務學習項目依序是「社區服務」、「休閒服務」、「文化建設」。最經常參與的服務學習機構是「學校」、「社區」。最常參與的服務學習實施模式是「自己安排服務」。
二、台北市公立高級工業職業學校學生參與服務學習的主要原因是「學校規定」,多數學生參與服務學習工作內容與在學校所學專業無關。
三、台北市公立高級工業職業學校不同科別的學生對服務學習參與時數有明顯的差異,不同性別及科別的學生對服務學習參與態度亦有明顯的差異。
四、台北市公立高級工業職業學校學生服務學習參加原因不同,服務學習參與時數及參與態度方面有明顯的差異。
五、台北市公立高級工業職業學校學生服務學習參與時數和參與態度之間的有明顯的相關性。
This research has attempted to investigate and understand the present situation and categories of the practices of service learning in the Taipei municipal public vocational schools. To improve future strategies for service learning practice, the present research has explored the influences of the students’ personal factors and their reasons for participating in service learning on their attitudes toward their participation in service learning and on the duration of their participation. Also, this research has discussed the relationships between their attitudes toward the participation in service learning and the duration of their participation.
This research has employed the methodologies of “documentation analysis” and “questionnaires”, with 3,383 students from the Taipei Municipal public vocational schools in 2002 as the population, and by means of stratified random cluster sampling to select 370 persons from 11 classes. The acquired information has been analyzed and tested according to the “mean”, “percentile” , “standard deviation” , “Pearson’s product-moment correlation” , “one sample t-test” , “one-way ANOVA” and “F-test” .
This research has achieved some important conclusions, summarized as follows:
1. The average hours of the Taipei municipal public vocational school students’ service learning are more than 8 hours. The most frequently participated service learning items are, in order of frequency, “community service”, “leisure service” and “cultural establishments”. The most frequently participated service learning institutes are “schools” and “communities”. The most frequently participated learning service practice mode is “self-arranged service”.
2. The major reason of the Taipei municipal public vocational school students for participating in service learning is “school requirements”. The contents of most of the students’ participation in service learning bear no relation to their studies at schools.
3. The differences in departments among the Taipei municipal public vocational school students result in obvious distinctions in relation to the duration of their participations in service learning. The differences in sex and departments result in obvious distinctions in relation to their attitudes toward their participations in service learning.
4. The different reasons of the Taipei municipal public vocational school students for participating in service learning have obvious influences on the duration of their participations and their attitudes toward their participations.
5. The duration of the Taipei municipal public vocational school students’ participation in service learning obviously relates to their attitudes toward their participations.
參考文獻
一、中文部份
大不列顛百科全書(民78)。台北:丹青。
江雪齡(民88)。服務學習與社區發展。中等教育,50(6),頁26-31。
行政院青年輔導委員會(民84)。推展青年參與社會服務工作手冊。台北:行政院青年輔導委員會。
行政院青年輔導委員會(民90)。服務學習指導手冊。台北:行政院青年輔導委員會。
行政院青年輔導委員會(民92)。青年志願服務概況。上網日期:民92年6月1日。World Wide Web: http://www.nyc.org.tw
行政院教育改革審議委員會(民84)。第二期諮議報告書。台北:行政院。
吳聰賢(民81)。態度量表的建立。楊國樞主編,社會及行為科學研究法上冊。台北:東華書局。
李大偉、王昭明(民78)。技職教育課程發展理論與實務。台北:師大書苑。
沈六(民86)。服務學習。公民訓育學報,第六輯,頁43-60。
林邦傑(民75)。統計方法的選擇與統計套裝軟體的使用:SPSS、SAS、BMDP應用指引。台北:正昇。
林振春(民88)。台灣社區教育發展之研究。台北:師大書苑。
林振春(民89)。終身學習與社區服務。北投社雜誌,第16期,頁9-12。
林振春(民89)。開放學習的理念與社區服務學習的實踐。社教雙月刊,2000年6月,頁42-45。
林清山(民85)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華。
林勝義(民90)。服務學習教育指導手冊。台北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。
林靈宏(民83)。消費者行為學,初版。台北:五南。
金清文(民91)。以學生為主體的教學活動對學生學習態度的影響。國立臺灣師範大學物理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
徐光台(民88)。建構主義與科學教育進步。歐美研究,29(4),頁153-183。
高尚仁(民85)。心理學新論,初版。台北:揚智。
高廣孚(民76)。杜威教育思想。台北:水牛。
張春興(民78)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
張春興(民80)。現代心理學。台北:東華。
張春興、林清山(民78)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
張春興、楊國樞(民82)。心理學,第13版。台北:三民。
張炳煌(民87)。國中生家長學校選擇權之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
張愛卿(民91)。教孩子學會學習,笫2版。台北縣:上游。
張潤書編譯(民79)。組織行為與管理,第4版。台北:五南。
教育部(民92)。教育部統計處主要統計表。上網日期:民92年2月15日。World Wide Web: http://www.edu.tw/statistics/index.htm
許維素(民81)。家庭組型、家庭氣氛對兒童自卑感、社會興趣、生活型態形成之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
郭生玉(民88)。心理與教育測驗,第13版。台北:精華書局。
郭芳妙(民85)。美國中小學服務學習之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
郭金池(民78)。國民小學教師價值觀念進修態度與教學態度之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃友松(民72)。學習心理的理論及其運用。台北師專學報,10,頁145-158。
黃壬來、陳朝平(民84)。國小美勞科教材教法。台北:五南。
黃玉(民90)。服務學習-公民教育的具體實踐。人文及社會學科教學通訊,12(3),頁20-42。
黃安邦編譯(民80a)。社會心理學。台北:五南。
黃安邦譯(民80b)。心理測驗。台北:五南。
黃政傑(民80)。課程設計。台北:東華。
黃炳煌(民78)。教學的基本原理。台北:桂冠。
黃淑芬(民91)。「第十二屆全美服務學習會議」紀要。台灣志願服務國際交流協會 IAVE TAIWAN。上網日期:民92年1月6日。World Wide Web: http://www.iavetaiwan.org/news/international.asp
黃富順(民81)。成人的學習動機。高雄:復文。
黃義俊、黃俊英(民89)。態度、環境態度與生態責任行為之探討。企銀季刊,24(3),頁133-148。
楊昌裕(民91)。服務學習中反思活動的實施。學生輔導,81期,頁60-71。
楊國樞(民78)。普通心理學。台北:桂冠圖書。
楊深坑(民88)。知識形式與比較教育。台北:揚智文化。
溫健蠶(民88)。大學生的服務學習及學生發展之研究。公民訓育學報,8,頁341-408。
葉重新(民81)。心理測驗。台北:三民。
趙長寧(民85)。獻身與參與的背後:美國成人義工服務動機的探討。佛教圖書館館訊,第七期,頁19-23。
劉婉珍(民90)。美術教育領域中的態度研究:北美地區教師態度測量方法初探。現代美術學報,第4期,頁83-103。
劉慶仁(民89)。服務學習與教育改革。教師天地,第104期,頁16-21。
潘詩婷(民91)。國小學童英語學習態度之研究-以大台北地區為例。國立臺灣師範大學三民主義研究所碩士論文,未出版。
潘慧玲(民84)。教學的技術。黃光雄主編,教學原理。台北:師大書苑。
鄭伯薰(民67)。消費心理學。台北:大洋。
鄭淵全(民86)。社經地位、能力、學校教育過程與國小學生學業成就之關係--功能典範與衝突典範之探究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
二、英文部份
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Prediction Social Behavior, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Ajzen, I. (1991). ”The Theory of Planned Behavior“, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Process, Vol.50, pp. 179-211.
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. A. Murchinson (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology. Vol.2, pp. 798-844. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Alliance for Service Learning in Education Reform (1993). Standards of quality for school-based service-learning. ND: ASLER.
Alliance for Service Learning in Education Reform (1995). Standards of quality for school-based and community-base service-learning. MD: ASLER.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bearden, W. O. & Woodside, A. G. (1977). “Testing Variations of Fishbein’s Behavioral Intention Model within a Consumer Behavior Context”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.62,No.2, pp. 39-43.
Bernt, F. M. (1989).Being religious and being altruistic: A study of college service volunteers. Personal and Individual Difference .10, pp. 663-669.
Bettman, J. R. (1974). ”A threshold Model of Attribute Satisfaction Decisions”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.1, Sep.,pp.30.
Bower, G. H. & Hilgard, E. R. (1981).Theories of Learning (5th ed.).New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Boyer, E. L. (1983).High School: A Report on Secondary Education in America. New York: Harper& Row.
Crespi, I. (1965). Attitude Research, Marketing Research Technique Series No. 7, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Dawes, R. M. & Smith, T. L. (1985). Attitude and Opinion Measurement. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp.509-566). New York: Random House.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education .New York: Macmillan.
Duckenfield, M. & Wright, J. (1995).Pocket guide to service learning. SC: National Dropout Prevention Center.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
Eyler, J. & Giles, D. E. Jr. (1999). Where’s the learning in service learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Fertman, C. I., White, G. P. & White, L. J. (1996). Service learning in the middle school: Building a culture of service. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
Fischer, L. R. & Schaffer, K. B. (1993). Older Volunteers : a Guide to Research and Practice. Newbury: Sage.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Gagné, R. M. (1977).The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. L. & Wager, W. W. (1988).Principles of instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Giles, D. E. & Eyler, J. (1994). “The Impact of a College Community Service Laboratory on Students’ Personal, Social and Cognitive Outcomes.” Journal of Adolescence, 17, 327-339.
Gillespie, D. F. & King, A. E. O. (1985).Demographic understanding of volunteerism. Journal of Sociology and Social Work, 12, pp.798-816.
Gravetter, F. J. & Wallnau, L. B. (2000). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. (5th ed.). CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Hamilton, S. F. & Fenzel, L. M. (1987). The effect of volunteer experience on early adolescents’ social development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 282-086).
Havighurst, R. J.(1972).Developmental tasks and education. New York: McKay.
Hollingshed, A. B. (1957). Two Factor Index of Social Position. New Haven: Mimea-graphed.
Ilsley, P. J. (1990). Enhancing the Volunteer Experience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jacoby, B., and others. (1996). Service-learning in higher education: Concept and practices, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jahoda, M. & Warren, N. (Eds.)(1966). Attitudes: Selected readings. Baltimore: Penguin.
Katz, D. (1960).”The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol.24, Summer, pp.163-204.
Kielsmeier, J. C. (2003). Recasting the Role of Youth in the 21st Century Through Service-Learning and Civic Engagement. Paper presented at the meeting of the 2nd Service-Learning Conference in Taiwan: Integrating Theories and Practice, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei County, Taiwan.
Knowles, M.S. (1994). A History of the Adult Education : Movement in the United States. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall.
Kotle, P. (1997). Marketing Management Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
Mayer, R. E. (1982).The Promise of cognitive Psychology. 台北: 雙葉書局.
McClelland, D. C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20, pp. 321-323.
Noll, V. H., Scannell, D. P. & Craig, R. C. (1979). Introduction to Educational Measurement. (4th ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Oliver, R.L. & Bearden, W. O. (1985). ”Crossover Effects in the Theory of Reasoned Action: A Moderating Influence Attempt “, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, Dec., pp.324-340.
Oskamp, S. (1974). Attitudes and Opinion, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Oskamp, S., Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M. & Swanson, D. C. (1991). “Factors Influencing Household Recycling Behavior “, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 23, pp.494-519.
Owen, S. V., Froman, R. D. & Moscow, H. (1981). Educational Psychology. An Introduction (2nd ed.). Boston: Little Brown and Company.
Pearce, J. L. (1993). Volunteers : the Organizational Behavior of Unpaid Workers. London: Routledge.
Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in college years : a scheme. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
Piaget, J. (1967). Six psychological studies (A. Tenzer, Trans.). New York: Random House.
Piaget, J. (1970). The place of the sciences of man in the system of science. New York: Harper & Row.
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Grossman.
Reeder, J. (1991). Service Line, 2(1), Summer.
Rogers, C. R. (1970). On becoming a person : A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin-Sentry Edition.
Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80’s. Columbus , OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Serow, R. C. (1991). “Students and Volunteerism: Looking into the Motives of Community Service Participants.” American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), pp.543-556.
Sigmon, R. (1996). The problem of definition in service-learning. In R. Sigmon and others, The Journey to service-learning. Washington, D.C.: Council of Independent Colleges.
Smith, D. H. (1981).Altruism, Volunteers, and Volunteerism, Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 10:1, pp.21-36.
Stephens, L. S. (1995).The Complete Guide to Learning through Community Service. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stewart, G. M. (1990). Learning styles as a filter for developing service-learning interventions. In Delve, C. I., Mintz, s. D. & Stewart, G. M. (1990).(eds.). Community service as values education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Thomas, W. I. & Znaniecki. (1918). The polish peasant in Europe and American. Boston: Badger.
Waterman, A. S. (Ed.). (1997). Service-learning: Applications from the research. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: Norton.
Weigel, R. H. (1983). ”Environmental Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior”, In. N. R. Feimer & E.S. Geller (Eds). Environmental Psychology : Directions and Perspectives, New York: Praeger.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered. The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, pp.297-333.
Wiche, V. R. & Isenhour, L. (1977). Motivation of volunteers. Journal of Social Welfare, 4, pp.73-79.
Williams, F. M. (1997). Re-engineering a movement: reclaiming youth at risk. An assessment of selected outcomes of community service learning experiences in an urban high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illionis at Urbana-Champaign.
William, O. & Darrol, B. (1994). Learning to service-service to learn. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED367-615).
Winniford, J. C., Carpenter, D. S. and Grider, C. (1995). “ An Analysis of the Traits and Motivations of College Students Involved in Service.” Journal of College Student Development, 1995, 36(1), pp.27-38.