自聯合國於2015推動永續發展目標(SDGs)後，強調人與自然和諧共存的「生態城市」理念，逐漸成為各國都市計劃的核心目標。都市綠地不僅為都市空間的重要組成，更為民眾親近自然及心理復癒的首要場所；然而越綠化的都市公園，是否帶給民眾愈療癒的感受? 近期研究表明，不同景觀結構的都市公園，能帶給使用者不同的感知與心理感受。本研究目為探討: 1. 生態公園異質性差異與使用者景觀異質性感知的關聯；2. 不同社會背景使用者對於異質性感知與文化服務感知的差異3. 使用者異質性感知與文化生態系統服務感知之影響；4. 使用者異質性感知對注意力恢復的影響；5. 使用者文化生態系統服務感知對注意力恢復之影響。以臺北市12座生態公園為研究範圍，共發放426份問卷進行量化統計分析；公園異質性測量部分，首先利用Arc GIS進行地圖數化，接著採用Fragstats軟體測量不同公園間的景觀指數差異。
研究結果表明:(1) 民眾能夠感知公園異質性的差異；測量的異質性與民眾異質性感知有所關聯；(2) 不同年齡、職業以及公園停留時間長短對民眾異質性感知有所差異；(3) 民眾公園異質性感知對「社會價值」、「教育價值」、「精神與靈感價值」以及「審美價值」之文化生態系統服務感知具有正向解釋力；(4) 民眾公園異質性感知對「遠離性」、「魅力性」、「延展性」以及「相容性」之注意力恢復感受具有正向解釋力；(5) 民眾的文化生態系統服務感知會影響他們的注意力恢復。(6) 文化生態系統服務感知為異質性感知對注意力恢復的影響的中介變數。本研究建議，若能加強生態公園內部景觀上的的差異性，並提升園內環境教育價值，有助都市規劃者打造更完善的都市綠色空間，為使用者帶來更佳的環境與心理效益。

Since the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were promoted by the United Nations in 2015, the concept of "eco-city", which emphasizes the harmonious coexistence of people and nature, has gradually become the core goal of urban planning in various countries. Urban green space is not only an important component of urban space, but also the primary place for people to get close to nature and psychological healing. However, will the greening of urban parks bring people a sense of healing? Recent studies have shown that urban parks with different landscape structures can bring users different perceptions and psychological feelings. The purpose of this study is to explore: 1. The relationship between ecological park heterogeneity and users' perception of landscape heterogeneity; 2. Differences in users' perceptions of heterogeneity and cultural services from different social backgrounds The impact of user heterogeneity perception and cultural ecosystem service perception; 4. The influence of user heterogeneity perception on attention restoration; 5. The impact of users' cultural ecosystem service perception on attention restoration. Taking 12 ecological parks in Taipei city as the research scope, a total of 426 questionnaires were distributed for quantitative statistical analysis. In the part of park heterogeneity measurement, Arc GIS was first used for map digitization, and then Fragstats software was used to measure the difference of landscape index between different parks.
The results show that :(1) people can perceive the heterogeneity of parks; The heterogeneity measured was correlated with people's perception of heterogeneity. (2) Different age, occupation and length of park stay have different perceptions of heterogeneity; (3) The heterogeneity perception of public parks has positive explanatory power to the cultural ecosystem service perception of "social value", "educational value", "spiritual and inspiration value" and "aesthetic value"; (4) The heterogeneity perception of the public park has a positive explanatory power on the attention restoration feelings of "distancing", "charm", "extensibility" and "compatibility"; (5) People's perception of cultural ecosystem services will affect their attention restoration. (6) Cultural ecosystem service perception is the mediating variable of the impact of heterogeneous perception on attention restoration. This study suggests that if we can strengthen the difference in the internal landscape of the ecological park and enhance the value of environmental education in the park, it will help urban planners to create a better urban green space and bring better environmental and psychological benefits to users.

一、中文文獻
大安森林公園之友基金會 (2021)。大安森林公園之友基金會簡介。取自: https://www.daanforestpark.org.tw/plus/list.php?tid=10#。
王秀娟 (2001)。民眾參與河濱綠地空間營造與維護管理之領域現象探討。環境與藝術期刊，2 : 121-131。
文宗川 (2008)。生態城市的發展與評價研究。哈爾濱工程大學，哈爾濱。
公益交流站 (2016)。「永續」是種選擇，與經濟發展從不互斥／SDGs-8、9、11（經濟、創新基礎建設與永續城鄉）。取自: https://npost.tw/archives/40615。
中國園林網 (2013)。景觀異質性在景觀規劃設計中的重要性。取自: http://gc.yuanlin.com/HTML/Article/2013-5/Yuanlin_Project_8351.HTML。
中時新聞網 (2018)。士林官邸 賞螢新亮點。取自: https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20180124000644-263201?chdtv。
皮依德(2014)。都市公園使用後評估之研究－以臺北市青年公園為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學運動休閒與餐旅管理研究所。
朱育霆 (2020)。都市公園品質、環境知覺與休閒活動參與對中高齡者主觀幸福感之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系研究所。
好事新聞 (2023)。NEW! 榮星花園螢光爆發 再啟周末導覽 5大樓響應關窗簾行動 火金姑閃耀如星。取自: https://newsday.tw/news/68783。
自由時報 (2022)。外來魚種入侵碧湖、大湖公園 北市公園處舉辦工作坊守護生態。取自: https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3980003。
吳孟珊 (2014)。生態系統服務的定義與特性。林業研究專訊，21(5)，54-57。
吳明隆 (2007)。SPSS統計應用學習實務 : 問卷分析與應用統計。新北市: 加樺國際有限公司
林憲德 (2007)。城鄉生態(增修五版)。臺北: 詹氏書局。
林駿 (2012)。環境規劃與管理 基礎篇與政策篇。台北:鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。
東勁丞 (2015)。自然與都市景觀對創造思考、注意力恢復力及生理反應的影響(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學生物資源暨農學院園藝暨景觀學系研究所。
洪崧連 (2018)。為改善都市熱島效應之都市公園空間分布之研究-以嘉義市為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學景觀學系研究所。
洪詩涵，鐘文翎，張俊彥。(2021)。都市之肺-運用注意力恢復力理論, 偏好矩陣及八種感官知覺探討大安森林公園環境設計與配置. 造園季刊, (93), 28-39。
李瑞陽、林士強 (2006)。利用空間技術與景觀生態指數分析墾丁國家公園土地覆蓋變遷影響之研究。地理學報，46，31-48。
李志中，許嘉錦 (2021)。花園類型與停留時間對注意力恢復之影響。臺中區農業改良場研究彙報, (152), 1-12。
徐磊青、楊公侠 (2005)。環境心理學: 環境, 知覺和行為。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
張俊彥(2000)。從教育觀點談生態公園的景觀設計。博物館學季刊，4，77-85。
鄔建國 (2003)。景觀生態學: 格局、過程、尺度與等級。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
陳青洲 (2006)。從生態觀點探討臺北市都市公園之規劃(碩士論文)。國立台北科技大學建築與都市設計研究。
楊曉婷 (2014)。以生態服務觀點建立都市公園使用後評估(碩士論文)。東海大學景觀學系研究所。
經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所 (2016)。景觀生態學應用於河川規劃之研究(2/3)。
游之穎，陳以萱，張俊彥，林穎萱，林文華，陳季呈。徐煇妃。(2018)。不同休閒農業景觀類型之生心理效益研究. 花蓮區農業改良場研究彙報, (36), 77-90。
曾之力(2011)。使用者觀點之生態公園評估之研究-以台南市巴克禮公園為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學都市計畫研究所。
黃靈明 (2019)。臺北市與廈門市都市公園植物多樣性之比較研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學景觀學系研究所。
謝怡倩 (2015)。台灣地區眺望夜景餐廳之空間位置特性與觀賞者景觀偏好、復癒知覺關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學地理學系研究所。
蔡妙琪(2017)。以景觀生態學評估都市紋理對淹水潛勢之影響-以原台中市為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學都市計畫研究所。
聯合國永續發展知識平台 (2015)。Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 取自: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/intgovmental.html.。
顏亭瑜 (2016)。八德埤塘生態公園對遊客吸引力、滿意度與重遊意願之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學地理學系研究所。
顧祐瑞 (2019)。圖解生態學。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
關琪融 (2018)。都市公園景觀元素與文化服務功能關聯性之探討: 以台北青年公園為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學景觀學系研究所。
臺北市政府工務局公園路燈工程管理處 (2018)。公園走透透 臺北新花樣。https://parks.taipei/parks/index.php。
臺北市政府工務局公園路燈工程管理處(2017)。都市公園新生機 臺北市12座生態公園出爐。取自: https://pkl.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=43E05059FCC72525&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=595F337E292BD61C。
臺北市政府工務局公園路燈工程管理處(2022)。公園生態尋寶趣 探索生態這樣玩 實境解謎在臺北青年公園。取自: https://pkl.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=43E05059FCC72525&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=2D0C88FC4336D063。

二、英文文獻
Assment, M. E. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series, 4.
Ayala-Azcárraga, C., Diaz, D., & Zambrano, L. (2019). Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 27-35.
Andersson, E., Tengö, M., McPhearson, T., & Kremer, P. (2015). Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability. Ecosystem Services, 12, 165-168.
Apfelbeck, B., Snep, R. P. H., Hauck, T. E., Ferguson, J., Holy, M., Jakoby, C., Scott MacIvor, J., Schär, L., Taylor, M. & Weisser, W. W. (2020). Designing wildlife-inclusive cities that support human-animal co-existence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200.
Boyd, J. & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), 616-626.
Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50.
Bae, J. & Ryu, Y. (2017). Spatial and temporal variations in soil respiration among different land cover types under wet and dry years in an urban park. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167:378-385.
Bertram, C., & Rehdanz, K. (2015). Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: Comparing attitudes, perception, and use. Ecosystem Services, 12, 187-199.
Buchel, S., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosystem Services, 12, 169-177.
Cranz, G. (1982). The politics of park design. A history of urban parks in America. The politics of park design. A history of urban parks in America.
Cranz, G., & Boland, M. (2004). Defining the sustainable park: a fifth model for urban parks. Landscape journal, 23(2), 102-120.
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1): 129-138.
Castree, N. (2005). Nature. London，New York: Routledge.
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg,K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. G., Paruelo, J., Raskin,R., Sutton,P., Raskin, R. G. & Belt, M. V. B. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253.
Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., Agrimi, M., Portoghesi, L., Semenzato, P.& Sanesi, G. (2015). Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 221-228.
Coldwell, D. F., & Evans, K. L. (2018). Visits to urban green-space and the countryside associate with different components of mental well-being and are better predictors than perceived or actual local urbanisation intensity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, 114-122.
Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L. & Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37: 100925.
Campell, L. K., Svendsen, E. S., Sonti, N. F., & Johnson, M. L. (2016). A social assessment of urban parkland: Analyzing park use and meaning to inform management and resilience planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 34-44.
Cabana, D., Ryfield, F., Crowe, T. P., & Brannigan, J. (2020). Evaluating and communicating cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 42: 101085.
Daily, G. C. Eds. (1997). Nature’s Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington.
Dronova, I. (2017). Environmental heterogeneity as a bridge between ecosystem service and visual quality objectives in management, planning and design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 163, 90-106.
Demuzere, M., Orru, K., Heidrich, O., Olazabal, E., Geneletti, D., Orru, H., Ajay, B., Mittal, N., Feliu, E., Faehnle, M. & Faehnle, M. (2014). Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 107-115.
Ebenezer Howard.(1902). Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: S. Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd.
Forman, R. T. T. & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape ecology. New York: Chichester.
Farina, A. (1998) Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology Chapman & Hall London, UK.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology letters, 3(4).
Faludi, A. (1985). A decision-centred view of environmental planning. Landscape Planning, 12(3), 239-256.
Finisdore, J., Rhodes, C., Haines-Young, R., Maynard, S., Wielgus, J., Dvarskas, A., Houdet, J., Quétier, F., Lamothe, K. A., Ding, H., Soulard, F., Houtven, G. V. & Rowcroft, P. (2020). The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems. Ecosystem Services, 45:101160.
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3-4), 264-275.
Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. (2007). The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, 22(7), 959-972.
Gill, C., Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2018). Applying attention restoration theory to understand and address clergy’s need to restore cognitive capacity. Journal of religion and health, 57(5), 1779-1792.
Humpel, N., Owen, N., & Leslie, E. (2002). Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: a review. American journal of preventive medicine, 22(3), 188-199.
Hovardas, T., & Poirazidis, K. (2006). Evaluation of the environmentalist dimension of ecotourism at the Dadia Forest Reserve (Greece). Environmental management, 38, 810-822.
Hansmann, R., Hug, S.-M., & Seeland, K. (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 213-225.
Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G., Bowler, P.A., 1997a. Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness.(Working Paper No. 5) In: Institute for Housing and Urban Research. Uppsala University, Gävle, Sweden.
Hartig, T., Van den berg, A. E., Hagerhall, C. M., Tomalak, M., Baner, N. Hansmann, R., Ojala, A., Syngollitou, E., Carrus, G., Herzele, A. V., Bell, S., Podesta, M. T. C. & Waaseth, G. (2010). Health Benefits of Nature Experience: Psychological, Social and Cultural Processes. Forests, Trees and Human Health, 127-168.
Hernández-Morcillo, M., Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2013). An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecological Indicators, 29, 434-444.
Hoyle, H., Hitchmough, J., & Jorgensen, A. (2017). All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 109-123.
Jeon, J. Y. and H. I. Jo (2020). Effects of audio-visual interactions on soundscape and landscape perception and their influence on satisfaction with the urban environment. Building and Environment, 169.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective: CUP Archive.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
Kowarik, I. (2011). Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental pollution, 159(8-9), 1974-1983.
Kolasa, J., Pickett S. (Eds.) (1991). Ecological Heterogeneity. Ecological Studies No 86, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Kim, M. (2017). A Healing Environment Study focused on Attention Restoration Theory for Healthy Environmental Planning and Design-A Case Study of Cheonggyecheon. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 45(1), 94-104.
Ko, H. and Y. Son (2018). "Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces: A case study in Gwacheon, Republic of Korea." Ecological Indicators 91: 299-306.
Kang, Y., & Kim, E. J. (2019). Differences of restorative effects while viewing urban landscapes and green landscapes. Sustainability, 11(7), 2129.
Kong, L., et al. (2022). "How do different types and landscape attributes of urban parks affect visitors' positive emotions?" Landscape and Urban Planning 226.
Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 31-44.
Li, H., Reynolds, J.F. (1995). On Definition and Quantification of Heterogeneity. Nordic Society Oikos, 73(2), 280-284.
Larson, L. R., Keith, S. J., Fernandez, M., Hallo, J. C., Shafer, C. S., & Jennings, V. (2016). Ecosystem services and urban greenways: What's the public's perspective? Ecosystem Services, 22, 111-116.
Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F. J., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B., & MacIvor, J. S. (2017). Biodiversity in the City: Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation. BioScience, 67(9), 799-807.
Livingstone, S. W., Cadotte, M. W., & Isaac, M. E. (2018). Ecological engagement determines ecosystem service valuation: A case study from Rouge National Urban Park in Toronto, Canada. Ecosystem Services, 30, 86-97.
McHarg, I. (1969). Design with nature. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 127-152.
Meyer-Grandbastien, A., Burel, F., Hellier, E., & Bergerot, B. (2020). A step towards understanding the relationship between species diversity and Attention Restoration of visitors in urban green spaces using landscape heterogeneity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 195.
McGarigal, K. (1995). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure (Vol. 351). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Norling, J. C., et al. (2008). "Perceived Restorativeness for Activities Scale (PRAS): development and validation." J Phys Act Health 5(1): 184-195.
Moran, D. (2019). Back to nature? Attention restoration theory and the restorative effects of nature contact in prison. Health & Place, 57, 35-43.
Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in evolution: an introduction to the town planning movement and to the study of civics. London, Williams.
Parris, K. M., Amati, M., Bekessy, S. A., Dagenais, D., Fryd, O., Hahs, A. K., Hes, D., Imberger, S. J., Livesley, S. J., Marshall, A. J., Rhodes, J. R., Threlfall, C. G., Tingley,R., Ree, R. V. D., Walsh, C. J., Wilkerson, M. L. & Williams, N. S. G. (2018). The seven lamps of planning for biodiversity in the city. Cities, 83, 44-53.
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadensso, M.L. (1995). Landscape Ecology: Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecological Systems. Science, 269(5222), 331-334.
Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J., Peron, E. M., & Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or preferences for landscape? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(3), 195-209.
Peter, B., Dasmann, R. (1978). “Afterward: Reinhabiting California.” Reinhabiting a Separate Country: A Bioregional Anthology of Northern California. San Francisco: Planet Drum Foundation, 1978. 217-20.
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Bieling, C. (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land use policy, 33, 118-129.
Qiu, M., Jin, X., & Scott, N. (2021). Sensescapes and attention restoration in nature-based tourism: Evidence from China and Australia. Tourism Management Perspectives, 39, 100855.
Restoration, C. (2001). Principles, Processes, and Practices, 10/98. Iowa, The Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group–FISRWG, 2-87.
Rega-Brodsky, C., C. & Nilon, C., H. (2016). Vacant lots as a habitat resource: nesting success and body condition of songbirds. Ecosphere, 7(11).
Rouhi, M., Forsat, M., & Monfared, M., R. (2017). Measuring Public Satisfaction on Urban Parks (A Case Study: Sari City). Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 5(4): 457.
Sandifer, P. A., Sutton-Grier, A. E., & Ward, B. P. (2015). Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services, 12, 1-15.
Shwartz, A., et al. (2014). Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: An experiment. Biological Conservation 171: 82-90.
Southon, G. E., Jorgensen, A., Dunnett, N., Hoyle, H., & Evans, K. L. (2018). Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and well-being impacts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 172, 1-10.
Troll, C. (1939). Luftbiltplan und okologische Bodenforschung. Z. Ges. f. Erdkunde z. Berlin, kundliches Wissen, 3, 241-311.
Ulrich, R.S. (1981). Natural Versus Urban Scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects. Environmental and behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R, F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
Until, E. (2013). World Population Prospects: 2012 Revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, NY, USA.
Voigt, A. and D. Wurster (2015). Does diversity matter? The experience of urban nature’s diversity: Case study and cultural concept. Ecosystem Services 12: 200-208.
Wang, X., Palazzo, D., & Carper, M. (2016). Ecological wisdom as an emerging field of scholarly inquiry in urban planning and design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 100-107.
Zube, E. H. (1986). Local and extra-local perceptions of national parks and protected areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 11-17.