簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳妍彣
Chen, Yen-wen
論文名稱: 以華語為母語的孩童對請求策略的理解與使用
L1 Children's Comprehension and Production of Requests in Mandarin Chinese
指導教授: 陳純音
Chen, Chun-Yin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 112
中文關鍵詞: 第一語言習得言語行為請求策略華語
英文關鍵詞: first language acquisition, speech act, request, Chinese
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000550
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:224下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討華語為母語的兒童對於請求策略的理解與應用。議題包含直接與間接請求策略間的差異、社會距離與地位的影響、句型與策略的使用、以及不同年齡間的差異。本研究設計兩項測驗來探究受試者的表現:一為理解測驗,二為情境對話測驗。研究對象包含實驗組的四十八位五至十歲孩童,依其就讀的年級分為三組:幼兒園大班、小學二年級、四年級,每組各十六位;另外有對照組成人十六位。
    研究結果發現如下:
    一、五至十歲孩童皆具備成人母語者對於直接與間接請求策略的理解能力,但八歲以下孩童還無法像成人般表達請求。
    二、對於孩童與成人,社會距離對請求策略的理解與使用影響不顯著。
    三、孩童與成人對於請求策略的理解與應用皆受到社會地位的影響。他們與社會地位較高的人互動時,理解與使用都已具備成人母語者的程度;在與同輩或是地位較低的人互動時,他們皆比預期中更為客氣。
    四、五至八歲的孩童使用大量的祈使句來做請求,而九至十歲的孩童則如同成人,使用較多的疑問句。但孩童至十歲時都還無法像成人般使用陳述句來提出請求。
    五、五至十歲孩童已能夠使用多種請求策略,但各策略使用的多寡有別。不過,值得一提的是,各組皆有明顯趨勢,使用較多的語氣導出型(Mood derivable)和探詢型(Query preparatory)策略。

    The present study investigated L1 children’s comprehension and production of requests in Mandarin Chinese. Two tasks were designed to elicit children’s performance: a comprehension task and a production task. The issues addressed between direct and indirect requests included the effect of directness, the influences of social distance and relative power, syntactic structures and strategy use as well as age effect. A total of 48 participants were recruited from an elementary school in Taipei and they were further divided into three age groups (i.e., kindergartners, Grade 2, Grade 4). Besides, 16 adults participated in the current study as the control group. The major findings are summarized as follows:
    1. The children aged 5 to 10 showed adult-like understanding of requests, however, they were not able to make adult-like requests before the age of 8.
    2. The effect of social distance was not obvious to both the children and adults in their comprehension and production of requests.
    3. The participants were all affected by social power. All age groups of children performed adult-like when interacting with people with higher power. They were more polite than expected when making a request to their peers and those with lower power.
    4. Our children aged 5 to 8 produced requests with imperatives the most, while those aged 9 to 10 made requests with interrogatives the most as the adults. Nonetheless, they were not able to produce requests with declaratives until they were 10 years old.
    5. Our children were able to produce various types of requests. However, a similar tendency of strategy use was found in every group. Mood derivable and query preparatory were the two strategies the most frequently use.

    Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i CHINESE ABSTRACT iii ENGLISH ABSTRACT iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF FIGURES xi CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Questions 5 1.3 Significance of the Study 5 1.4 Organization of the Thesis 6 Chapter Two Literature Review And A Classification Of Chinese Requests 7 2.1 Types of Requests 7 2.1.1 The Syntactic Perspective 8 2.1.2 The Pragmatic Perspective 11 2.1.3 Summary 16 2.2 Social Factors 17 2.2.1 Social Distance 17 2.2.2 Social Power 20 2.2.3 Summary 23 2.3 Age and Children’s Request Performance 23 2.4 A Classification of Chinese Requests 29 2.5 Summary of Chapter Two 35 Chapter Three Research Design 36 3.1 Participants 36 3.2 Methods and Materials 38 3.2.1 The Production Task 39 3.2.2 The Comprehension Task 43 3.3 Procedures 46 3.3.1 Pilot Study 46 3.3.2 Formal Study 47 3.4 Summary of Chapter Three 49 Chapter Four Results And Discussion 50 4.1 Direct and Indirect 50 4.1.1 Overall Findings 51 4.1.1.1 The Comprehension Task 51 4.1.1.2 The Production Task 52 4.1.2 General Discussion 54 4.2 Social Distance and Directness 56 4.2.1 Overall Findings 57 4.2.1.1 The Comprehension Task 57 4.2.1.2 The Production Task 59 4.2.2 General Discussion 61 4.3 Social Power and Directness 63 4.3.1 Overall Findings 64 4.3.1.1 The Comprehension Task 64 4.3.1.2 The Production Task 67 4.3.2 General Discussion 71 4.4 Syntactic Structures and Strategy Use 73 4.4.1 Overall Findings 73 4.4.1.1 Syntactic Structures 73 4.4.1.2 Strategy Use 76 4.4.2 General Discussion 79 4.5 Age 81 4.6 Summary of Chapter Four 85 Chapter Five Conclusion 86 5.1 Summary of the Major Findings 86 5.2 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Future Research 88

    Alsulami, Sumayyah. 2015. The Effectiveness of Social Distance on Requests. Arab World English Journal 6.3:382-395.
    Anisfeld, Moshe, and Tucker, G. Richard. 1967. English pluralization rules of six-year-old children. Child Development 38.4:1201–1217.
    Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Babelot, Géraldine, and Haydée Marcos. 1999. Comprehension of directives in young children: influence of social situation and linguistic form. First Language 19: 165-186.
    Barton, Michelle E., and Michael Tomasello. 1991. Joint attention and conversation in mother infant-sibling triads. Child Development 62.3:517–529.
    Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11.2:131-146.
    Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Brenda Danet, and Rimona Gherson. 1985. The language of requesting in Israeli society. In Joseph P. Forgas (ed.), Language and Social Situation. New York: Springer Verlag: 113-141.
    Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain. 1984. Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5.3:196-213.
    Bock, J. Kathryn, and Hornsby, Mary. E. 1981. The development of directives: How chidren ask and tell. Journal of Child Language 8.1:151-163.
    Brown, Penelope, and Sephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Camras, Linda A., Pristo, Toni M., and Brown, Mari J. 1985. Directive choice by children and adults: Affect, situation, and linguistic politeness. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 31.1:19-31.
    Carrell, Patricia. 1981. Children's understanding of indirect requests: comparing child and adult comprehension. Journal of Child Language 8.2:329-345.
    Chen, Shu-Chu, and Shu-Hui Eileen Chen. 2007. Interlanguage Requests: A Cross-Cultural Study of English and Chinese. The Linguistics Journal 2.1:33-52.
    Clark, Eve V., and Barbara F. Hecht. 1983. Comprehension, Production, and Language Acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology 34:325-349. Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.
    Dixon, Sally. 2015. Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!: Object requests, ownership and entitlement in a children’s play session. Journal of Pragmatics 82:39-51. 
    Dore, John. 1974. A pragmatic description of early language development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 3.4:343-350.
    Elrod, Mimi Cobb Milner. 1987. Children's Understanding of Indirect Requests. The Journal of Genetic Psychology 148.1:63-70. 
    Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. 1976. Is Sybil there? the structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5.1:25-66. 
    Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. 1982. Ask and it shall be given unto you: Children’s requests, In H. Byrnes (eds.), Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics 235-245. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
    Ervin-Tripp, Susan M., and David P. Gordon. 1986. The development of children's requests.In Richard L. Schiefelbusch (ed.), Communicative Competence: Assessment and Intervention 61-96. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
    Gao, Hong. 1999. Features of request strategies in Chinese (Working Papers, Lund University, Department of Linguistics).
    Garvey, Catherine. 1974. Requests and responses in children’s speech. Journal of Child Language 2:41-63.Gleason, Jean Berko. 1975. Father and other strangers: Men’s speech to young children. Developmental Psycholinguistics: Theory and Application, ed. by Daniel Dato, 289-297. Georgetown University School of Language.
    Gleitman, R., and Wanner E, 1982. Language Acquisition: The State of the State of the Art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Han, Kuei-Hsiang, Mei-Chih Li, and Kwang-Kui Hwang. 2005. Cognitive Responses to Favor Requests from Different Social Targets in A Confusian Society. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22.2: 283-294.
    Holtgraves, Thomas. 1999. Comprehending Indirect Replies: When and How Are Their Conveyed Meanings Activated?. Journal of Memory And Language 41.4:519-540.
    Hong, Wei. 1996. An empirical study of Chinese request strategies. International Journal of The Sociology of Language 122:127-138.
    Ingram, David. 1974. The relationship between comprehension and production. In Richard L. Schiefelbusch and Lyle L. Lloyd (eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. University Park Press.
    James, Sharon L. 1978. Effect of Listener Age and Situation on the Politeness of Children’s Directives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 7:307-317.
    Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1977. More about the same: children’s understanding of post-articles. Journal of Child Language 4.3:377-394.
    Lawson, Michael A. 2003. School-Family Relations in Context: Parent and Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement. Urban Education 38.1:77-133.
    Ledbetter, Patricia J., and Cathy H. Dent. 1988. Young children's sensitivity to direct and indirect request structure. First Language 8.24:227-245. 
    Malone, Mary J., and Guy, Rebecca F. 1982. A comparison of mothers' and fathers' speech to their 3-year-old sons. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11.6:599–608.
    McTear, Michael F. 1985. Developing conversation in young children. Children’s Conversation 1.2:162-171.
    Nicolopoulou, A., Geliki, and Elizabeth S. Richner. 2004. ‘When Your Powers Combine, I am Captain Planet’: The Developmental Significance of Individual- and Group-Authored Stories by Preschoolers. Discourse Studies 6.3:347-371.
    Nippold, Marilyn A., Laurence B. Leonard, and Arthur Anastopoulos. 1982. Development in the Use and Understanding of Polite Forms in Children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 25:193-202. 
    Ogiermann, Eva. 2015. In/directness in Polish children's requests at the dinner table. Journal of Pragmatics 82:67-82. 
    Pedlow, Robert, Roger Wales, and Ann Sanson. 2001. Children’s Production and Comprehension of Politeness in Requests Relationships to Behavioral Adjustment in Middle Childhood. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 20:23-60.
    Piaget, Jean. 1926. The language and thought of the children. Harcourt, Brace & Co.
    Piaget, Jean. 1964. Cognitive Development in Children: Piaget Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2:176-186.
    Schulze, Cornelia, Michael Tomasello. 2015. 18-month-olds comprehend indirect communicative acts. Cognition 136:91-98. 
    Schumann, John. 2006. Social Distance as a Factor in Second Language Acquisition. Language Learning 26.1:135-143.
    Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in The Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Sell A., Marie, Roger J. Kreuz, and Lori Coppenrath. 1997. Parents’ use of nonliteral language with preschool children. Discourse Processes 23.2:99-118. 
    Shatz, Marilyn, and Gelman, Rochel. 1973. The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38.5:1–37.
    Song, Lee-Wong. 1994. Imperatives in requests. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of The International Pragmatics Association 4.4:491-515. 
    Wang, Shengli. 2011. Request Strategies in Contemporary Chinese Teledramas: A Corpus-Based Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1.9:1139-1149.
    Wootton, Anthony J. 2005. Interactional and sequential features informing request format selection in children’s speech. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Hakulinen and Margret Selting, 185-207. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    Yao, Shun-xia, and Tian-he Qiu. 2003. The Comparison of the Strategies of Request Between English and Chinese. Journal of Pingdingshan Teachers College 18.3:73-76.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE