研究生: |
林惠愛 Huei-Ai Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
使用平板電腦閱讀電子書對國小學童閱讀能力與態度影響之研究 A study of the influences of e-book reading on tablet PC on the elementary school children’s reading ability and attitude |
指導教授: |
陳昭珍
Chen, Chao-Chen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2012 |
畢業學年度: | 100 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 135 |
中文關鍵詞: | 電子書 、閱讀能力 、閱讀態度 、閱讀行為 |
英文關鍵詞: | e-books, reading ability, reading attitude, reading behavior |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:319 下載:107 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
面對數位閱讀時代的來臨,國小學童以平板電腦為載具閱讀電子書取代紙本書閱讀對學童會產生何種影響為教育界關心的議題。本研究使國小學童持有已預載有120本電子書的平板電腦自由閱讀其中的電子書,並可使用平板電腦的一切功能,欲藉由為期十週的電子書閱讀實驗,探討使用平板電腦閱讀電子書對於學童閱讀能力與態度的影響,並分析學童的電子書閱讀行為,並瞭解學童本身與家長、教師對學童使用平板電腦閱讀電子書的看法,希望提出有用建議,提供欲推動學童閱讀電子書之相關單位參考之用。
本研究採用混合方法取向,先以實驗法中的單組前後測設計,在實驗前後對參與學童施以識字力檢測及閱讀理解力檢測,亦讓學童填寫閱讀態度問卷,以瞭解參與學童之閱讀能力及閱讀態度是否有顯著改變。又以程式從平板電腦中擷取學童在電子書閱讀軟體上閱讀軌跡,進行閱讀紀錄分析歸納。最後以半結構式訪談,訪談學童及實驗班之導師及圖書教師,瞭解學童及家長對使用平板電腦閱讀電子書之意見;另請學童家長填寫意見回饋單,以調查家長對學童使用平板電腦閱讀電子書的意見。
研究結果發現,(一)使用平板電腦閱讀電子書對學童閱讀能力的影響:1.使用平板電腦閱讀電子書有助於學童識字力的增加。2.使用平板電腦閱讀電子書有助於學童閱讀理解力的提升。3.不同性別學童的電子書閱讀成效沒有顯著差異存在。4.不同年級學童的電子書閱讀成效未必有顯著差異存在,需要進一步研究確認。5.學童的電腦能力對其電子書閱讀識字成效有顯著影響,對理解力成效則無。6.學童的國語成績表現與其閱讀能力高低有正相關。(二)使用平板電腦閱讀電子書對學童的閱讀態度影響:1.學童對於閱讀的態度在使用平板電腦閱讀電子書後有整體性的顯著增加。2.學童對於閱讀的正向認知在使用平板電腦閱讀電子書後有顯著提升。3.學童對於閱讀的喜好程度在使用平板電腦閱讀電子書後有增加。4.學童的閱讀行為趨向在使用平板電腦閱讀電子書後有提升。(三)學童的電子書閱讀行為:1.閱讀過程中出現大量用手指畫過螢幕的滑頁動作。2.閱讀時每頁停留時間短暫,閱讀量雖大,但多瀏覽而少精讀,對閱讀深入理解幫助有限。3.遇到喜歡的讀本時,會逐頁閱讀,並穿插許多滑頁、跳頁的動作,與紙本書閱讀行為差異不大。4.對讀本的選擇主觀而迅速,遇到不喜歡的讀本時,瀏覽幾頁就跳出,內容才是讓學童繼續閱讀的關鍵。5.閱讀電子書時,會有同時聽音樂、上網等多工行為。6.學童還未習慣閱讀工具的使用,閱讀過程中少有工具使用行為。7.學童在閱讀過程中遇到困難時,仍會依其本身的習慣尋求解決的方法,並不會因為平板電腦在手而先想到利用平板電腦的各種功能解決問題。(四)學童、家長及教師對以平板電腦閱讀電子書的意見:1.比起紙本書,學童更喜歡電子書。2.學童認為電子書讓他們更喜歡閱讀,因為多讀而提高了自身的閱讀能力。3.學童認為多工行為不會影響其閱讀專心度,與家長及教師看法不同。4.家長與教師認為用平板電腦閱讀電子書的方便性是其最大優點,而電子書的確也有提高學童對閱讀的興趣,此為家長與教師所樂見。5.家長與教師擔心長期注視螢幕對學童視力造成傷害。6.家長與教師認為平板電腦的各種功能,如上網、下載遊戲等對學童的吸引力很容易大於電子書,須適度管控。7.平板電腦本身硬體缺失及電子書軟體操作問題,是學童、家長及教師共同認為以平板電腦閱讀電子書的缺點。
研究者基於研究結果,對閱讀指導者、電子書閱讀推廣者及電子書及載具製造者提出建議,並對未來研究方向提出建議,期對國小學童電子書閱讀實務與研究領域有所助益。
Facing the emergence of the digital reading era, the education sector is concerned about the impact on the elementary school children when they read e-books on tablet PC rather than paper books. In the present study, an experiment of e-book reading lasting for ten weeks is carried out on the elementary school children who were allowed to freely read 120 e-books downloaded on tablet PC and use all the functions of tablet PC. The present study aims at investigating the influences of e-book reading on tablet PC on the children’s reading ability and attitude, analyzing the children’s reading behavior with respect to e-books and understanding the children’s, the parents’ and teachers’ opinions about the children’s e-book reading on tablet PC in order to give some useful suggestions to the relevant units hoping to promote e-book reading among children.
The present study adopted mixed methods. Firstly, it adopted the single-group pretest and posttest design. Before and after the experiment, the participating children were required to take part in a literacy skills test and a reading comprehension test and fill in a questionnaire related to reading attitude in order to understand whether the participating children’s reading ability and reading attitude were significantly changed. Secondly, it adopted a program to retrieve from the tablet PC the children’s reading traces on the e-reading software in order to analyze and summarize the reading records. Lastly, it adopted the semi-structured interviews with the children, the experiment class teachers and teacher librarians in order to understand the children’s and parents’ opinions about e-book reading on tablet PC; besides, the parents of children were invited to fill in a feedback form in order to investigate the parents’ opinions about school children’s e-book reading on tablet PC.
According to the results of the study, I. the influences of e-book reading on tablet PC on the children’s reading ability are:1. E-book reading on tablet PC helps the children to increase their literacy skills. 2. E-book reading on tablet PC helps the children to enhance their reading comprehension. 3. There is no significant difference between boys and girls with respect to the effectiveness of e-book reading. 4. There is not necessarily a significant difference between children of different grades. Further studies are required to prove this link. 5. The children’s computer self-efficacy produces an important influence on the effectiveness of their literacy skills through e-book reading but no influence on the effectiveness of their reading comprehension. 6. There is a positive correlation between the children’s language score and their reading ability. II. The influences of e-book reading on tablet PC on the children’s reading attitude are: 1. After having the experience of e-book reading on tablet PC, the children’s reading attitude had been significantly and generally improved. 2. After having the experience of e-book reading on tablet PC, the children’s positive cognition with respect to reading had been significantly enhanced. 3. After having the experience of e-book reading on tablet PC, the children’s preference with respect to reading had been increased. 4. After having the experience of e-book reading on tablet PC, the school children’s reading behavior trend had been upgraded. III. The children’s reading behavior on e-book reading are: 1.In the process of reading, they had a lot of acts of sliding the finger across the screen. 2. While reading, they only spent a little time on reading a page. Although they read a lot of books, they often simply skimmed the books and seldom carefully read the books. As a result, it only produced a very limited effect on their reading comprehension. 3. While reading their favorite books, they would read page by page but had many acts of sliding and skipping page. This behavior was not really different from their behavior while reading paper books. 4. They chose the books subjectively and quickly. While facing a book they didn’t like, they would skim through a couple of pages and skipped out quickly. The content of book was the point allowing the children to continue to read. 5. While reading an e-book, they had multiple behaviors at the same time, such as listening to music and accessing Internet. 6. The children were not accustomed to using reading tool so they seldom used tools in the process of reading. 7. When they encountered a problem in the process of reading, the school children would try to find a solution according to their own habits and they would not firstly try to make use of the various functions of tablet PC to solve the problem even though the tablet PC was on their hand. IV. The children’s, the parents’ and teachers’ opinions about e-book reading on tablet PC are: 1. The children preferred e-books to paper books. 2. The children considered that e-books allowed them to more enjoy reading and that their reading ability was improved because they had more reading. 3. The children considered their multiple behaviors at the same time while reading had no influence on their concentration of reading. This viewpoint was different from the parents and teachers. 4. The parents and teachers considered that the main advantage of e-book reading on tablet PC was its convenience and that the children’s interest in reading was really increased because of e-books. This was the point that the parents and teachers were willing to see. 5. The parents and teachers were concerned about looking at the monitor for a long time would cause harm to the children’s eyesight. 6. The parents and teachers considered that the various functions of tablet PC, such as accessing Internet and game download, were more attractive than e-books for the children. An appropriate control or management is required. 7. The school children, parents and teachers all considered that the disadvantages of e-book reading on tablet PC were the hardware defects of tablet PC and the software operation of e-book.
Based on the results of the study, the researcher gives some suggestions to reading guiders and e-book reading promoters, and those who produce e-books and e-readers. The researcher also gives some suggestions about the future study and hopes to be helpful to the practice and research area of elementary school children’s e-book reading.
王瓊珠(2004)。故事結構教學與分享閱讀。臺北市:心理。
王保進(2006)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市:心理。
何薇玲(2011)。電子書產業發展趨勢。研考雙月刊,35(1),13-21。
李央晴(2010)。中文環境閱讀知能評量指標之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:知城數位。
周暐達(2011)。2010年臺灣數位出版業市場概況。在張崇仁總編輯,2011出版年鑑(頁22-31)。臺北市:行政院新聞局。
林宜蓉(2009)。多媒體電子書對英語學習者閱讀態度的影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學英語學系在職進修碩士班,臺北市。
林素琴(2010)。新一代電子書PCB走向HDI。工研院電子報,9901。2011/12/10檢索自http://edm.itri.org.tw/enews/epaper/9901/c02.htm
林寶貴、錡寶香(2006)。中文閱讀理解測驗指導手冊。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。
邱炯友(2000)。電子出版的歷史與未來。佛教圖書館館訊,23,上網日期:2011年 7 月 3 日。檢自:http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/4357
柯華葳(1999)閱讀能力的發展。在增進興主編,語言病理學基礎:第三卷(頁98-115)。臺北市:心理。
柯華葳(2006)。教出閱讀力:培養孩子堅實的閱讀力,打開學習之門。臺北市:天下雜誌。
柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅(2008)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養(PIRLS 2006報告)。桃園縣;國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
柯華葳(2010)。閱讀成分與閱讀發展。在柯華葳主編,中文閱讀障礙(頁25-42)臺北市:心理。
周怡君、伊彬(2008)。電子童書之互動程度對三年級與五年級學童閱讀成效 上之影響。教育資料與圖書館學,45(3),371-401。
胡永崇(1995)。後設認知策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成效之研究。未出版之博士論文,國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所,彰化縣。
祝佩貞(2003)。電子童書與紙本童書對國小學童閱讀理解及閱讀態度之比較研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺中師範學院語文教育學系碩士班,臺中市。
施雅茹(2010)。E-Reader之新興人機界面發展探索。ITIS智網。上網日期:2011年11月10日,檢自:http://www.itis.org.tw/rptDetailFreeEPaper.screen?rptidno=938765451
徐韶君(2008)。電子童書與幼兒閱讀理解之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所,臺北市。
張春興(1991)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華書局。
張春興(2004)。心理學概要。臺北市:東華書局。
張隆慶(2008)。教學網站輔助資訊課程學習對國小學童電腦態度與電腦自我效能之影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立台南大學數位學習科技所論文,台南市。
張媖媜、鐘樹椽(2010)。相互教學法融入多媒體閱讀教學對國小學童閱讀能力之影響。第五屆數位教學暨資訊實務研討會,臺南縣。
陳乃瑋(2006)。兒童閱讀英文電子童書之情境暨需求研究--以TumbleBook電子童書為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
陳佳韻(2004)。台中市國小學童英語學習態度之調查研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台中師範學院語文教育研究所,臺中市。
陳怡妏(2010)。學童讀者電子童書閱讀行為之分析研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
陳昭珍、李央晴、曾品方(2010)。發展適用於我國兒童之閱讀知能指標與評量之研究。研考雙月刊,34(1),48-61。
陳慧卿(2003)。國小二年級學童對電子童書與紙本童書之閱讀能力研究。未出版之碩士論文,朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系碩士班,臺中縣。
國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所閱讀知能與閱讀策略研究團隊(2010)。彩繪閱讀力:閱讀知能指標與檢測。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心。
國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所閱讀知能與閱讀策略研究團隊(2010)。讀出你的悅讀色彩:兒童讀本分級書目。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心。
程蘊嘉(2002)。網路時代的新閱讀風貌--電子書。全國新書資訊月刊,42,8-11。
童敏惠(2002)。當圖書館遇到電子書。臺北市立圖書館館訊,20(2),1-13。
黃秀霜(2001)。中文年級認字量表。臺北市:心理。
黃秀霜(2001)。中文年級認字量表指導手冊。臺北市:心理。
黃國鑫(2006)。國中自然與生活科技職前教師學習風格與電腦網路效能信念之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所,彰化縣。
黃齡瑩、林惠娟(2004)。家庭與幼兒閱讀態度之相關研究–以臺中市為例。朝陽社會人文學刊,2:2,1-56。
黃齡嫻(2009)。紙本與電子繪本教學對國小輕度智能障礙學生閱讀理解學習成效之比較研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系研究所,臺北市。
楊惠菁(2005)。國小學童對於不同媒體形式文本的閱讀理解比較-以紙本童書和電子童書為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺東大學兒童文學研究所,臺東縣。
趙子萱(2010)。中文環境兒童圖書分級指標建立之探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
鄭妃玲(2002)。說明文結構對國小六年級學童閱讀理解的影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義市。
駱英豐(2000)。電子書(eBook)對圖書館的挑戰。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,6。上網日期:2011年3月10日。檢自:http://www.lib.ncku.edu.tw/journal/6/2.htm
魏曉婷(2011)。國小高年級生非互動式英語電子繪本閱讀研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
韓宜娣(2010)。鷹架支持與自我效能對國小學生程式設計學習表現與學習態度之影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1998) 。教學心理學─學習的認知基礎(The Cognitive Psychology of school Learning)(岳修平譯)。臺北市:遠流。(原作1993年出版)
Mayer, R. E. (1997) 。教育心理學─認知取向(Educational Psychology,林清山譯)。臺北市:遠流。(原作1987年出版)
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, M.A. (2005) 。質性研究資料分析(Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook,張芬芬譯)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。(原作1994年出版)
Arning, K. & Ziefle, M. (2009). Effects of age, cognitive, and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance. Behaviour & Information Technilogy, 28(3), 251-268.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading.In P. D. Pearson,R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp.353-394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bandura, A. (1986). Self-efficacy in changes societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Chall. J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: why poor children fall behind? Cambridge, Mass: Havard University Press.
Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skill. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143.
Dauzat, J. A., & Dauzat, S. V.(1981).Reading, the teacher and the learner. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Denzin, N. K.(1978). Sociological methods: A source book (2 nd ed).New York: McGraw-Hill.
Donald T. H.(2000).Electronic Books: a major publishing revolution. Online, 24 (4), p16.
Downing, J., &Leong, C. K. (1982).Psychology of reading.New York: Macmillan.
Druin, A., Weeks, A., Massey, S., & Bederson, B. B. (2007). Children's interests and concerns when using the international children's digital library: A four-country case study. International Conference on DigitalLibraries: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Digital Libraries; 18-23 June 2007,167-176.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research on reading. MA: Addison – Wesley.
Flynt, E. S., & Cooter, R. B. (1998). Flynt-Cooter reading inventory for the classroom. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Merrill.
Goodacre (1979). What is reading: which model? In M. S. J. Roggett, C. Tutt, P. Raggett, Assessment and testing of reading: problems and practices, Chapter 2. London: Ward Lock Educational.
Gunning, T. G. (1996).Creating reading instruction for all children. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Huang, H. S. & Hanley, J.R. (1994). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73-98.
Kerr, M. A. & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text : effects on children’s reading of information material. Reading and Writing, 19 (1), 1-10.
Larson, L. C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in E-book reading and response. Reading Teacher, 64(1), 15-22.
Lee, C. C., Hsieh, M. C. & Huang, H. C. (2011). The Influence of mobile self-efficacy on attitude toward mobile advertising. Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences. 3(3), 100-108.
Liaw, S.S. (2002). Understanding user perception of world-wide web environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 137-148.
Martocchio, J. J. (1994). Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 819-825.
Ren, W-H. (1999). Self-efficacy and the search for government information. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(3), 283-291.
Reutzel, D. R., & Cooter, R. B. (2007). Strategies for reading assessment and instruction: helping every child succeed. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Person/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Shamir, A. (2009). Processes and outcomes of joint activity with e-books for promoting kindergarteners' emergent literacy.Educational Media International, 46(1), 81-96.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading research quarterly, 21, 360-406.
Stokmans, Mia J. W. (1999). Reading attitude and its effect on leisure time reading.Poetics, 26, 245-261.
Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C.(2003).Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50.
Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. H. (2010). Elementary school students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of using PDAs in a ubiquitous learning context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 297-308.
Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407-415.