動物領養觀念已成為大眾認同的重要議題，雖然人們有意飼養寵物時，已將待領養動物作為重要選項，各動物收容處的領養率也有所提升，但仍然有很大的進步空間。再者，在網路快速的發展之下，對動物領養宣傳有很大的幫助，除了使該訊息快速廣泛且多元化的傳達給大眾，也增加了待領養動物的曝光度，獲得更多與潛在領養者接觸的機會。過去研究雖已針對動物送養文如何有效引起民眾注意與其領養意願進行相關探討，但少有研究專注於擬人化人稱視角與訊息量的角度，且過去學者僅以單一因子討論，尚缺乏綜合各因素進行討論。因此，本研究藉由準實驗法，探討動物送養文之不同擬人化人稱視角與訊息量對領養意願的影響。
本研究採準實驗法二因子組間設計，自變項為2（擬人化人稱視角：第一人稱、第二人稱）x3（訊息量：低、中、高）。依變項為動物領養意願。研究結果顯示，送養文之不同擬人化人稱視角對民眾領養意願有顯著差異，以第一人稱視角的擬人化敘述之領養意願較高；送養文之不同訊息量對領養意願並無顯著差異，另外，不同擬人化人稱視角與訊息量的組合，會產生交互作用影響領養意願，以第一人稱搭配低訊息量的組合對人們的領養意願最高。因此，建議未來人們有撰寫動物送養文需求時，可以注意擬人化人稱視角與訊息量的運用。

The concept of animal adoption has become an important issue recognized by the public. Although people have taken the animals to be adopted as an important option when they intend to raise pets, and the adoption rate of various animal shelters has also increased, there is still much room for improvement. Furthermore, with the rapid development of the Internet, it is a great help to the publicity of animal adoption. The convenience of the Internet not only enables the message to be quickly, widely and diversified to the public, but also increases the exposure of the animals to be adopted and access to more potential adopters. Although past researches have conducted related discussions on how animal deliveries can effectively attract people’s attention and their willingness to adopt, few studies have focused on anthropomorphic narratives from the perspective of the person and information contexts. In the past, scholars only discussed this issue with a single factor and lacked comprehensiveness of various factors. Therefore, this study uses a quasi-experimental method to explore the influence of different personification perspectives and information contexts on the willingness to adopt.
This study adopts a quasi-experimental two-factor inter-group design, and the independent variable is 2 (personalized perspective: first person, second person) x 3 (information contexts: low, medium, high). The dependent variable is the willingness to adopt animals. The research results show that the different personification narratives of the animal adoption posts have significant differences in the people's willingness to adopt from the perspective of personification, and the anthropomorphic narratives in the first-person perspective have a higher willingness to adopt; the different information contexts in the animal adoption posts has no significant influence on the willingness to adopt. In addition, the combination of different personification perspectives and information will have an interaction that affects the willingness to adopt. The combination of the first person with a low amount of information has the highest willingness to adopt. Therefore, it is suggested that people should pay attention to the use of personal perspective and information contexts in anthropomorphic narratives when they need to write animal adoption posts in the future.

一、中文文獻
Alice（2020, December 13）。第52集 寫一篇好的送養文把浪浪送養出去吧！擷取自https://animaltalktw.law.blog
Hotpets（2017, November 28）。米克斯汪們的個性及花色調查〔部落格文章〕。擷取自https://www.hotpets.com.tw/米克斯汪們的個性及花色調查/.
TNR.LIFE（2018, August 15）。認養文 / 送養文怎麼寫。擷取自https://www.tnr.life/training/story
We are Social（2020, january 30）。Digital 全球暨各國年度報告。擷取自 https://wearesocial.com/blog/2020/01/digital-2020/
公立動物收容處所管理規則（民104年8月31日）。
王志弘、高郁婷、 葉文琪（2017）。從牲畜到毛孩子：臺灣報紙動物再現的劃界敘事與情感化。新聞學研究，133，43-85。
王更新（2015）。紀錄片的敘述者與敘述視角分析。當代電視，9，27-29。
任文瑗（2021）。以媒體豐富度與網路口碑探討客庄旅遊地行為意圖之研究。臺北城市科技大學通識學報，10，217-240。
行政院農業委員會（2021）。全國動物收容管理系統。擷取自https://asms.coa.gov.tw/AmlApp/App/PetsMap1.aspx
何冬梅（2003）。動物性與人性的劇烈撞擊—評當代小說中的動物敘述視角。遼寧師專學報(社會科學版)，3，14-15。
吳明隆（2011）。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。台北市：易習圖書。
吳雁飛（2017）。此狗非狗也—《一條狗的使命》的敘事特點探析。視聽，4， 64-65。doi:10.19359/j.cnki.1674-246x.2017.04.035
李若晴（2013）。台灣流浪動物保護運動之形成與困境。人類與文化，44，171-178。doi:10.6719/mc.201308_(44).0021
林新沛、吳明峰（2010）。寵物認養網站會員認養寵物意向之研究。戶外遊憩研究，23(3)，39-60。doi:10.6130/jors.2010.23(3)3
邱毓蘋（2001）。資訊豐富度對網路購物意願之研究（碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹。
姜常鵬、陳敏南（2016）。動物題材紀錄片擬人化手法的兩種表現方式。中國電視，11，68-72。doi:CNKI:SUN:ZGDD.0.2016-11-018
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心（2020, December 11）。2020台灣網路報告。擷取自https://report.twnic.tw
動物保護法（民110年2月3日）。
張路（2019）。擬人化角色：意義建構、敘事與消費。當代動畫，2，123-128。
教育部（2018, July 20）。國語辭典。擷取自 http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/
梁吉平（2007）。公益廣告語言的歷時變化。溫州職業技術學院學報，7(3)，54-57。doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8024-C.2006.12.042
許子凡、林品章（2008）。認知風格對不同資訊量的判讀效率與模式特徵：以AIGA圖形符號為例。設計學研究，11(1)，87-105。doi:10.30105/jds.200807.0005
陳信宏、林志鴻、馮秋蓉（2019）。社群網站的資訊豐富度與品牌知名度對消費者購買意願之影響。電子商務研究，17(1)，53-83。
陳貴凰、李惠滿（2012）。餐廳部落格資訊揭露量對資訊傳遞效果、購買意願影響之研究。觀光旅遊研究學刊，7(2)，21-40。doi:10.29689/jttr.201212.0002
陳嬿茹（2020）。以不同購物涉入度探討不同廣告類型與資訊量對美食外送平台APP介面研究（碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學，雲林。
游宗樺（2019, May 26）。收容所面臨超收問題 北市動保處：提升民眾領養率。擷取自https://www.agriharvest.tw/
賀艷、王緣（2019）。影視公益廣告的“擬人化”傳播探析—基于修辭學的理論視角。重慶郵電大學學報（社會科學版），31(4)，117-124。doi:CNKI:SUN:CQYD.0.2019-04-014
黃詩珮（2020）。動物圖像擬人化與產品之相關性廣告效果。設計學報，25(2)，19-40。
楊雨竹（2021）。電影《讓子彈飛》的敘述視角與鏡頭語言分析。西部廣播電視，3，151-153。
葉子明、江季芸、白凢芸（2017）。社群網站使用者「打卡」、「分享」行為對資訊接受者購買意圖之影響。行銷評論，14(4)，391-415。
葉松霖、王年燦（2012）。生物科普動畫擬人化使用之研究探討。藝術論文集刊，19，161-182。doi:10.29480/cpar.201210.0008
董軍華（2016）。淺析地域文化紀錄片《美麗西江》的敘事手法。當代電視，9，33-34。doi:10.16531/j.cnki.1000-8977.2016.09.017
資策會產業情報研究所（2020, September 01）。寵物消費者調查。擷取自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=576
劉欣、謝禮珊、黎冬梅（2021）。旅遊服務機器人擬人化對顧客價值共創意願影響研究。旅遊學刊，36(6)，13-26。doi:10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.06.007
蔡育琳(2020, March 2)。淺談網路發展與動保運動之關聯。擷取自https://www.lca.org.tw/column/node/7605
魏淑惠、石振國（2017）。政府推動認養代替購買寵物之政策行銷分析。中華行政學報，20，151-168。doi:10.6712/jcpa.201706_(20).0009
二、英文文獻
Abernethy, A. M., & Franke, G. R. (1996). The Information Content of Advertising: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Advertising, 25(2), 1-17. doi:10.1080/00913367.1996.10673496
Ahn, H.-K., Kim, H. J., & Aggarwal, P. (2014). Helping Fellow Beings: Anthropomorphized Social Causes and the Role of Anticipatory Guilt. Psychological Science, 25(1), 224-229. doi:10.1177/0956797613496823
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akerman, S. (2019). Best Practices for Building Empathy Through Live Animal Encounters. Journal of Museum Education, 44(1), 89-95. doi:10.1080/10598650.2018.1496388
Beer, A., Rogers, K. H., & Letzring, T. D. (2019). Effects of escalated exposure to information on accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Research in Personality, 83, 103864. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103864
Bir, C., Widmar, N., & Croney, C. C. (2017). Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition. Animals, 7(8), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080059
Bradley, J., & Rajendran, S. (2021). Increasing adoption rates at animal shelters: a two-phase approach to predict length of stay and optimal shelter allocation. BMC Veterinary Research, 17(1), 1-16. doi:10.1186/s12917-020-02728-2
Butterfield, M. E., Hill, S. E., & Lord, C. G. (2012). Mangy mutt or furry friend? Anthropomorphism promotes animal welfare. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 957-960. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.010
Cain, C. J., Woodruff, K. A., & Smith, D. R. (2020). Phenotypic Characteristics Associated with Shelter Dog Adoption in the United States. Animals, 10(11), 1959. doi:10.3390/ani10111959
Coates, D. (2003). Watches tells more than time, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R.(2007). Educational research: An introduction(8th ed. ). Boston, MA:Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Gherasim, D. (2011). The Social Implications Of The Publicity. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition, 14(1), 419-427.
Ghirlanda, S., Acerbi, A., & Herzog, H. (2014). Dog Movie Stars and Dog Breed Popularity: A Case Study in Media Influence on Choice. PLoS One, 9(9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106565
Glotova, E. (2014). “A Refusal of Strict Patterns of Interpretation”: Metaphor, Narrative, and Literary Connections in Katherine Mansfield’s “The Fly”. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(4), 78-85. doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.4p.78
Guielford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gunter, L. M., Barber, R. T., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2016). What’s in a Name? Effect of Breed Perceptions & Labeling on Attractiveness, Adoptions & Length of Stay for Pit-Bull-Type Dogs. PLoS One, 11(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146857
Harrington, L. A., Macdonald, D. W., & Neil, D. C. (2019). Popularity of pet otters on YouTube: evidence of an emerging trade threat. Nature Conservation, 36, 17-45. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.36.33842
Hart, P. M., Jones, S. R., & Royne, M. B. (2013). The human lens: How anthropomorphic reasoning varies by product complexity and enhances personal value. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), 105-121. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2012.759993
Hart, P., & Royne, M. B. (2017). Being Human: How Anthropomorphic Presentations Can Enhance Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 38(2), 129-145. doi:10.1080/10641734.2017.1291381
Hazel, S. J., Jenvey, C. J., & Tuke, J. (2018). Online Relinquishments of Dogs and Cats in Australia. Animals, 8(2), 25. doi:10.3390/ani8020025
Hiltunen, K., Björklund, H., Nurmesjärvi, A., Purhonen, J., Rainio, M., Sääskilahti, N., & Vallius, A. (2020). Tale(s) of a Forest—Re-Creation of a Primeval Forest in Three Environmental Narratives. Arts, 9(4), 125. doi:10.3390/arts9040125
Holland, K. E. (2019). Acquiring a Pet Dog: A Review of Factors Affecting the Decision-Making of Prospective Dog Owners. Animals, 9(4), 124. doi:10.3390/ani9040124
Katz, N., & Burchfield, K. B. (2018). Special-Needs Companion Animals and Those Who Care for Them: Stories of Identity and Empathy. Society & Animals, 28(1), 21-40. doi:10.1163/15685306-12341538
Kay, A., Coe, J. B., Young, I., & Pearl, D. (2018). Factors Influencing Time to Adoption for Dogs in a Provincial Shelter System in Canada. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 21(4), 375-388. DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1436917
King, C. A., Smith, T. J., Holman, E., Serpell, J. A., & Grandin, T. (2021). Medical, Behavioral, and Abuse Status Characteristics: Predictors of Perceived Adoptability, Appeal, and Resource Demands of Shelter Dogs. Anthrozoös, 34(4), 507-524. doi:10.1080/08927936.2021.1914435
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management(14th ed. ). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Laband, D. N. (1989). The Durability of Informational Signals and the Content of Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 18(1), 13-18. doi:10.1080/00913367.1989.10673138
Lampe, R., & Witte, T. H. (2015). Speed of Dog Adoption: Impact of Online Photo Traits. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 18(4), 343-354. doi:10.1080/10888705.2014.982796
Liang, X., Hu, X., & Jiang, J. (2020). Research on the Effects of Information Description on Crowdfunding Success within a Sustainable Economy—The Perspective of Information Communication. Sustainability, 12(2), 650. doi:10.3390/su12020650
Libby, L. K., & Eibach, R. P. (2002). Looking back in time: self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 167-179. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.2.167
Libby, L. K., Shaeffer, E. M., Eibach, R. P., & Slemmer, J. A. (2007). Picture yourself at the polls: visual perspective in mental imagery affects self-perception and behavior. Psychological Science, 18(3), 199-203. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01872.x
Malhotra, N. K. (1982). Information Load and Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 419-430. doi:10.1086/208882
Markowitz, D. M. (2020). Putting your best pet forward: Language patterns of persuasion in online pet advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(3), 160-173. doi:10.1111/jasp.12647
Moy, N., Chan, H. F., & Torgler, B. (2018). How much is too much? The effects of information quantity on crowdfunding performance. PLoS One, 13(3), e0192012. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192012
Nakamura, M., Dhand, N. K., Starling, M. J., & McGreevy, P. D. (2019). Descriptive Texts in Dog Profiles Associated with Length of Stay Via an Online Rescue Network. Animals, 9(7), 464. doi:10.3390/ani9070464
Nakamura, M., Dhand, N., Wilson, B. J., Starling, M. J., & McGreevy, P. D. (2020). Picture Perfect Pups: How Do Attributes of Photographs of Dogs in Online Rescue Profiles Affect Adoption Speed? Animals, 10(1), 152. doi:10.3390/ani10010152
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
O'Connor, R., Coe, J. B., Niel, L., & Jones-Bitton, A. (2016). Effect of Adopters' Lifestyles and Animal-Care Knowledge on Their Expectations Prior to Companion-Animal Guardianship. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 19(2), 157-170. doi:10.1080/10888705.2015.1125295
Pauen, M. (2012). The Second-Person Perspective. Inquiry, 55(1), 33-49. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2012.643623
Plante, C. N., Reysen, S., Roberts, S. E., & Gerbasi, K. (2018). “Animals Like Us”: Identifying with Nonhuman Animals and Support for Nonhuman Animal Rights. Anthrozoös, 31(2), 165-177. doi:10.1080/08927936.2018.1434045
Proctor, H. (2012). Animal Sentience: Where Are We and Where Are We Heading? Animals (2076-2615), 2(4), 628-639. doi:10.3390/ani2040628
Protopopova, A., Gilmour, A. J., Weiss, R. H., Shen, J. Y., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2012). The effects of social training and other factors on adoption success of shelter dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 142(1-2), 61-68. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2012.09.009
Pyzer, C., Clarke, L., & Montrose, V. T. (2016). Effects of Video Footage Versus Photographs on Perception of Dog Behavioral Traits. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 20(1), 42-51. doi:10.1080/10888705.2016.1229186
Resnik, A., & Stern, B. L. (1977). An Analysis of Information Content in Television Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 50-53. doi:10.2307/1250490
Rix, C., Westman, M., Allum, L., Hall, E., Pockett, J., Pegram, C., & Serlin, R. (2021). The Effect of Name and Narrative Voice in Online Adoption Profiles on the Length of Stay of Sheltered Cats in the UK. Animals, 11(1), 62. doi:10.3390/ani11010062
Romero, J., Ruiz-Equihua, D., Loureiro, S. M. C., & Casaló, L. V. (2021). Smart Speaker Recommendations: Impact of Gender Congruence and Amount of Information on Users' Engagement and Choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 659994. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659994
Root-bernstein, M., Douglas, L., Smith, A., & Veríssimo, D. (2013). Anthropomorphized species as tools for conservation: utility beyond prosocial, intelligent and suffering species. Biodivers Conserv, 22(8), 1577-1589. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0494-4
Rowan, A., & Kartal, T. (2018). Dog Population & Dog Sheltering Trends in the United States of America. Animals, 8(5). doi:10.3390/ani8050068
Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., Kogan, L. R., & Carney, P. C. (2019). Perception of Cats: Assessing the Differences Between Videos and Still Pictures on Adoptability and Associated Characteristics. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 87. doi:10.3389/fvets.2019.00087
Sinski J. (2016) “A Cat-Sized Hole in My Heart”: Public Perceptions of Companion Animal Adoption in the USA. In: Pręgowski M. (eds) Companion Animals in Everyday Life. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59572-0_6
Stern, B. B. (1991). Who Talks Advertising? Literary Theory and Narrative “Point of View.” Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 9-22.
Stover, J. S. (2007). Making Marketing Work for Your Library Blog. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(4), 155-167. doi:10.1300/J136v11n04_10
Sueur, C., Forin-Wiart, M.-A., & Pelé, M. (2020). Are They Really Trying to Save Their Buddy? The Anthropomorphism of Animal Epimeletic Behaviours. Animals, 10(12), 2323. doi:10.3390/ani10122323
Tam, K. P. (2015). Are anthropomorphic persuasive appeals effective? The role of the recipient's motivations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 187-200. doi:10.1111/bjso.12076
Tam, K.-P., Lee, S.-L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514-521. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001
Touré-Tillery, M., & McGill, A. L. (2015). Who or What to Believe: Trust and the Differential Persuasiveness of Human and Anthropomorphized Messengers. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 94-110. doi:10.1509/jm.12.0166
Vasquez, N. A., & Buehler, R. (2007). Seeing Future Success: Does Imagery Perspective Influence Achievement Motivation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1392-1405. doi:10.1177/0146167207304541
Weiss, E., Miller, K., Mohan-Gibbons, H., & Vela, C. (2012). Why Did You Choose This Pet?: Adopters and Pet Selection Preferences in Five Animal Shelters in the United States. Animals, 2(2), 144-159. doi:10.3390/ani2020144
Wilkie, W. L. (1974). Analysis of Effects of Information Load. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(4), 462-466. doi:10.2307/3151298
Workman, M. K., & Hoffman, C. L. (2015). An Evaluation of the Role the Internet Site Petfinder Plays in Cat Adoptions. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 18(4), 388-397. doi:10.1080/10888705.2015.1043366