簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 方資貽
Fang, Tzu-I
論文名稱: 社會價值傾向在資源分配上的展現:關係親密度與對立情境的調節
Social value orientations on resource allocation: The moderation analysis of relationship closeness and competitive situation
指導教授: 郭郡羽
Kuo, Chun-Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會教育學系
Department of Adult and Continuing Education
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 111
中文關鍵詞: 社會價值傾向資源分配對立情境關係親密度
英文關鍵詞: social value orientation, resource allocation, competitive situation, closeness
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900291
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:226下載:58
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 人類社會因資源有限而有資源分配的必要性,資源分配是相當複雜的決策歷程,不同個體與不同情境間都存在變異。社會價值傾向即為個體對自己與他人資源分配穩定性偏好的展現。過去研究中多以個體本身的人格特質理解並解釋決策行為,而忽略決策事件對象的影響力。本研究欲更細緻地討論關係親密度以及對立情境是否調節不同社會價值傾向者的資源分配模式。本研究以分解遊戲為工具,作為個體社會價值傾向的指標,並進一步操弄決策者與資源分配對象的關係親密度以及公共議題立場,觀察此二心理變項對不同社會價值傾向者在資源分配時可能造成的影響。實驗一透過系統化地操弄關係親密度,發現關係親密度愈高,親社會傾向的表現比例愈高;實驗二進一步以連續尺度的點數進行資源分配,並計算資源給予、資源剝奪、公平性指標及聯合收益指標,結果發現在關係親密度情境中主要反映資源給予歷程,而當關係親密度愈高,分配給對方的資源愈多。此外,隨著關係親密度愈高,不僅愈追求聯合收益,分配也愈趨於公平。實驗三則操弄自我與對方的立場異同來改變情境,發現對立情境會誘發競爭傾向的展現,相較於非對立情境,給予較少資源,但剝奪較多資源。綜合以上發現,本研究證明關係親密度與立場異同會調節不同社會價值傾向者的資源分配型態。

    Because total resources are limited, resource allocation is a major issue in psychology. The decision-making process underlying resource allocation is complicated and influenced by numerous factors. Social value orientation is a continuous construct to represent the preference for resource allocation. Triple-Dominance Measure of social values orientation is a frequently used instrument to predict real-life behavior. The social value orientations have been treated as a stable psychological attribute across situations. However, the behavior has been widely influential, in which the processes of resource allocation involved considering the closeness between self and others. In the present study, the closeness between self and others was manipulated across the experiments to systematically investigate how closeness affects the processes of resource allocation. The results demonstrated that the allocated resources varied along with the closeness, and individuals with different social value orientation show a different pattern of resource allocation.

    經濟學、社會科學、心理學中的決策歷程 2 影響個體決策歷程的因素 4 決策的個體差異指南 6 社會價值傾向的內涵、測量與實徵研究 12 社會價值傾向的概念發展與內涵 13 社會價值傾向的測量 18 社會價值傾向的實徵研究 29 研究目的 33 關係親密度對不同社會價值傾向者在資源分配上的調節效果 33 對立情境對不同社會價值傾向者在資源分配上的調節效果 35 實驗一 37 實驗二 42 實驗三 72 綜合討論 86 參考文獻 96 中文文獻 96 外文文獻 96 附錄一 108 附錄二 110

    參考文獻
    中文文獻
    張振、張帆、黃亮、袁博、王益文(2014)。決策中社會價值取向的理論與測評方法。心理科學進展,22,48-56。
    外文文獻
    Anderson, W. D., & Patterson, M. L. (2008). Effects of social value orientations on fairness judgments. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 223-245.
    Appelt, K. C., Milch, K. F., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & Weber, E.U. (2011). The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 252-262.
    Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
    Arthur, N., & Flynn, S. (2011). Career development influences of international students who pursue permanent immigration to Canada. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 11, 221-237.
    Au, W. T., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2004). Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In R. Suleiman, D. Budescu, I. Fischer & D. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 71–98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Bogaert, S., Boone, C., & Declerck, C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 453-480.
    Bruch, E., & Feinberg, F. (2017). Decision-making processes in social contexts. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 207-227.
    Brucks, W. M., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2007). When prosocials act like proselfs in a commons dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 750-758.
    Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938-956.
    Burnham, T. C. (2003). Engineering altruism: A theoretical and experimental investigation of anonymity and gift giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50, 133-144.
    Carrillo, L, Pattillo, M., Hardy, E., & Acevedo-Garcia, D. (2016). Housing decisions among low-income hispanic households in Chicago. Cityscape, 18, 109-137.
    Choi, I., Dalal, R., Kim-Prieto, C., & Park, H. (2003). Culture and judgment of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 46-59.
    Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
    Clark, M. S., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 609-672.
    Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
    Coleman, J. S. (1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1309-1335.
    Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S. & Warlop, L. (2011). Are social value orientations expressed automatically? decision making in the dictator game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1080-1090.
    Davis, J. H., Tindale, R. S., Nagao, D. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Robertson, B. (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: Demonstrations with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1003-1012.
    de Cremer, D., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, 5-18.
    de Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Social value orientation moderates ingroup love but not outgroup hate in competitive intergroup conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 701-713.
    de Dreu, C. K. W., & van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
    de Hooge, I. E., Nelissen, R. M. A., Breugelmans, S. M. & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). What is moral about guilt? acting “prosocially” at the disadvantage of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 462-473.
    Declerck, C. H., & Bogaert, S. (2008). Social value orientation: Related to empathy and the ability to read the mind in the eyes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 711-726.
    Deutsch, F. M, & Mackesy, M. E. (1985). Friendship and the development of self-schemas: The effects of talking about others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 399-408.
    Deutsch, M. (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13, 123-139.
    Drolet, A., & Luce, M. F. (2004). The rationalizing effects of cognitive load on emotion-based trade-off avoidance. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 63-77.
    Dror, I. E., Busemeyer, J. R., & Basola, B. (1999). Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models. Memory and Cognition, 27, 713-725.
    Duck, S. (1988). Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. New York, NY: Wiley.
    Ebert, J. E. J. (2001). The role of cognitive resources in the valuation of near and far future events. Acta Psychologica, 108, 155-171.
    Eek, D., & Gäling, T. (2006). Prosocials prefer equal outcomes to maximizing joint outcomes. British Psychological Society, 45, 321-337.
    Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281-317.
    England, P. (1989). A feminist critique of rational-choice theories: Implications for sociology. The American Sociologist, 20, 14-28.
    Erev, I., Bornstein, G., & Galili, R. (1993). Constructive intergroup competition as a solution to the free-rider problem: A field experiment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 463-478.
    Furukawa, Y., Nakashima, K. & Morinaga, Y. (2016). Influence of social context on the relationship between guilt and prosocial behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 49-54.
    Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A., & Jakobsson, C. (2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 1-9.
    Gely, R., & Spiller, P. T. (1990). A rational choice theory of supreme court statutory decisions with applications to the state farm and grove city cases. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 6, 263-300.
    Goldstein, N., Cialdini, R., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472-482.
    Griesinger, D. W., & Livingston, J. W. (1973). Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behavioral Science, 18, 173-188.
    Halamish, V., & Liberman, N. (2017). How much information to sample before making a decision? It's a matter of psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 111-116.
    Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-16.
    Haruno, M., & Frith, C. D. (2009). Activity in the amygdala elicited by unfair divisions predicts social value orientation. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 160-161.
    Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1996). Rational choice, empirical research, and the sociological tradition. European Sociological Review, 12, 127-146.
    Hilbig, B. E., & Glöckner, A. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 529-539.
    Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340.
    Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. Kelley, R. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
    Kanagaretnam, K., Mestelman, S., Nainar, K., & Shehata, M. (2009). The impact of social value orientation and risk attitudes on trust and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 368-380.
    Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66-91.
    Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
    Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G, McCHntock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In Close relationships (pp. 20-67). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
    Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures foe the behavioral science (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
    Kogut, T., & Beyth-Marom, R. (2008). Who helps more? How self-other discrepancies influence decisions in helping situations. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 595-606.
    Kramer, R. M., McClintock, C. G., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of Personality, 54, 576-592.
    Krosnick, J. A., Miller, J. M., & Tichy, M. P. (2004). An unrecognized need for ballot reform: The effects of candidate name order on election outcomes. In A. N. Crigler, M. R. Just & E. J. McCaffery (Eds.), Rethinking the vote: The politics and prospects of American election reform (pp. 51-73). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
    Lerner, J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
    Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 411-429.
    Levy, J. (1997). Prospect theory, rational choice, and international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 41, 87-112.
    Liebrand, W. B. G. & McClintock, C. G. (1988). The ring measure of social values: a computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. European Journal of Personality, 2, 217-230.
    Liebrand, W. B. G. (1984). The effect of social motives, communication and group-size on behavior in an n-person multi-stage mixed-motive game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 239-264.
    Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R., Rijken, V., & Suhre, C. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
    Lin, C.-H., & Lin, H.-M. (2006). Role of social value orientation in the endowment effect. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 210-215.
    Lindenberg, S., & Frey, B. S. (1993). Alternatives, frames, and relative prices – A broader view of rational choice theory. Acta Sociologica, 36, 191-205.
    MacCrimmon, K. R., & Messick, D. (1976). A framework for social motives. Behavioral Science, 21, 86-100.
    Massey, D. S., & Rugh, J. S. (2014). Segregation in post-civil rights America: Stalled integration or end of the segregated century? Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 11, 205-232.
    McClintock, C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement, and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 121-137.
    McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. (1966a). Cross-cultural comparison of interpersonal motives. Sociometry, 29, 406-427.
    McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. (1966b). Reward and score feedback as determinants of cooperative game behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 606-613.
    McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. (1966c). Societal membership, score status, and game behavior. a phenomenological analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 263-279.
    McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. (1967). Prior dyadic experience and monetary reward as determinants of cooperative and competitive game behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 282-294.
    McFadden, D. (2001). Economic Choices. The American Economic Review, 91, 351-378.
    Messick, D., & McClintock, C. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
    Messick, D., & Thorngate, W. (1967). Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 85-101.
    Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63, 81-97.
    Murphy, R. O., & Ackermann, K. A. (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 13-41.
    Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 771-781.
    Pachucki, M., Jacques, P., & Christakis, N. (2011). Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 2170-2177.
    Payne, J., Bettman, J., & Johnson, E. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525-537.
    Perna, L., & Titus, M. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 485-518.
    Pescosolido, B. (1992). Beyond rational choice: The social dynamics of how people seek help. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1096-1138.
    Rebega, O. L., Benga, O. & Miclea, M. (2014). Another perspective on guilt’s moral status: The Romanian case. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 114-118.
    Rosenbaum, M. E. (1986). The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1156-1166.
    Rosenquist, N., Murabito, J., Fowler, J., & Christakis, N. (2010). The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152, 426-433.
    Sattler, D. N., & Kerr, N. L. (1991). Might versus morality explored: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756-765.
    Satz, D., & Ferejohn. J. (1994). Rational choice and social theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 91, 71-87.
    Schultz, P., Wesley, J., Nolan, M., Cialdini, R., Goldstein, N., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological science, 18, 429-434.
    Shiloh, S., Salton, E., & Sharabi, D. (2002). Individual differences in rational and intuitive thinking styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 415-429.
    Shteynberg, G., & Apfelbaum, E. P. (2013). The power of shared experience: Simultaneous observation with similar others facilitates social learning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 738-744.
    Small, M. (2009). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Smeesters, D., Warlop, L., van Avermaet, E., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2003). Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 972-987.
    Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. London, UK: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
    Somers, M. (1998). “We’re no angels”: Realism, rational choice, and relationality in social science. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 722-784.
    Takeshita, T., & Mikami, S. (1995). How did mass media influence the voters' choice in the 1993 general election in Japan? a study of agenda-setting. Keio Communication Review, 17, 27-41.
    Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655.
    Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907-924.
    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
    Utz, S. (2004). Self-construal and cooperation: Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self? Self and Identity, 3, 177-190.
    Utz, S., Ouwerkerk, J. W. & van Lange, P. A. M. (2004). What is smart in a social dilemma? differential effects of priming competence on cooperation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 317-332.
    van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A., & Crone, E. A. (2009). What motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the Trust Game. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 4, 294-304.
    van Kleef, G. A., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2008). What other’s disappointment may do to selfish people, emotion and social value orientation in a negotiation context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1084-1095.
    van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349.
    van Lange, P. A. M., & Agnew, C. P. (1997). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1330-1344.
    van Lange, P. A. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1991). Social value orientation and intelligence: A test of the goal prescribes rationality principle. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 273-292.
    van Lange, P. A. M., Bekkers, R., Chirumbolo, A., & Leone, L. (2012). Are conservatives less likely to be prosocial than liberals? from games to ideology, political preferences and voting. European Journal of Personality, 26, 461-473.
    van Lange, P. A. M., Bekkers, R., Schut, T. N. M., & van Vugt, M. (2007). From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 375-384.
    van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., de Bruin, E. N. M., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746.
    Van Lange, P. A. M., Schippers, M., Balliet, D. (2011). Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 857-870.
    von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.
    Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53-85.
    Wyer, R. S. (1969). Prediction of behavior in 2-person games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 222-238.
    Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group-based trust. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 48-62 .
    Yuki, M. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 166-183.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE