在現實生活中，人們習慣直覺性地觀察事物與作品，並與腦內記憶進行比對，以達 到分辨及指認的判斷。因此，掌握設計中的造形與風格運用，乃是作品能夠被判別 的關鍵要素;透過特定規則與特徵的依循，則能夠達到風格相似性之成效。本研究 旨在探討 2016 年普立茲克建築獎獲獎者——Alejandro Aravena 的建築造形風格; 透過相關之文獻探討，以及建築案例之調查與分析，歸納出其建築的造形風格語彙， 並於後續創作予以應用。針對 Alejandro Aravena 的十八件建築案例進行造形風格 之探討，同時歸納其造形風格語彙之特性，如下:(1) 注重點、線、面及體基本元 素，並以幾何、直角、斜面、切削與塊體等造形構建築的單位形。(2) 以重力作為 單位形組合之依據，形塑出堆疊、倚靠及懸臂等結構特性。(3) 單位形組合可分為 力求表面齊平及凸顯單位形各自存在兩種。(4) 個別單位形具有外觀相似性，透過 尺度與比例的規則變化，可見其倍數關係。(5) 保留建築原生質感，尤以水泥為常 用之材質;單位形多以單一質感及色調為主。透過本研究方法與結果，提供具有 Alejandro Aravena 建築造形風格之單位積木創作，共發展出十八款造形積木，並嘗 試以創作體現其風格語彙之建構。本研究創作之積木，可應用於建築與立體空間的 造形概念發想原型，以作為造形風格模組化之參考。

In the real world, people are used to intuitively observing the work and comparing it with the memory in the brain, to achieve the judgment of recognition and identification. Therefore, mastering the use of form and style in design is the key element that can be judged in the work; through the follow of specific rules and characteristics, the effect of style similarity can be achieved. The purpose of this study is to explore the architectural style of Alejandro Aravena, the winner of the 2016 Pritzker Architecture Prize; through related literature discussion, as well as the investigation and analysis of architectural cases, the vocabulary of the architectural style of the building is summarized, and the follow-up creation is applied. Based on Alejandro Aravena's eighteen architectural cases, the style of the building is discussed, and the characteristics of its style of vocabulary are summarized as follows: (1) Focus on the basic elements of lines, planes, and volumes. The unit shape of blocks and other building structures. (2) Using gravity as the basis for the unit shape combination, shape the structural characteristics such as stacking, leaning and cantilever. (3) The combination of unit shapes can be divided into two types: striving for flush surface and highlighting unit shapes. (4) Individual unit shapes are similar in appearance, and the multiple relationship can be seen through the regular change of scale and proportion. (5) Maintain the original texture of the building, especially cement as the commonly used material; the unit shape is mostly single texture and color tone. Through this research method and results, providing unit building blocks with Alejandro Aravena architectural forming style, developed a total of 18 building blocks, and tried to reflect the construction of its style vocabulary through creation. The building blocks can be applied to the prototype of the forming concept of building and three-dimensional space, as a reference for the modularization of the forming style.

中文部分
川添登(1971)。デザインとは何か(何謂設計)。日本東京:角川書店。引用於 佐口七郎著(1990)。設計概論(藝風堂出版社編輯部譯)。台北市:藝風堂出版 社。
王無邪(1997)。立體設計原理。臺北市:雄獅。 尤明慧(2019)。單位積木遊戲提升發展遲緩幼兒表達能力之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中臺科技大學，臺中市。
安邸(2016 年 1 月 16 日)。2016 普里茲克獲獎者 Alejandro Aravena 深度訪談【壹
讀】。取自:https://read01.com/RJ0B2.html 呂清夫(1991)。造形原理。臺北市:雄獅。
吳美姬、周俊良(2017)。積木建構遊戲的歷史演進及其對幼兒教育之影響。人文社會電子學報，13(1)，69-94。
林品章、蘇守政(譯)(1985)。作為基礎造形的構成(原作者:朝倉直巳)。臺北市:藝術家雜誌社。
邱永福(1991)。造型構成心理(原作者:小林重順)。臺北市:藝風堂。
官政能(1995)。產品物徑。臺北市:藝術家。
林崇宏(1995)。造形基礎。臺北市:藝風堂。
林崇宏、郭力維(2004)。包浩斯產品造形法則之探究。東海學報第45卷，19-32。
林崇宏(2009)。設計基礎原理:造形與構成的創意思考。臺北市:全華圖書。
林明宏(2016)。隈研吾弱建築思想環境共生意涵之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 中國文化大學，臺北市。
邱紹雯(2016 年 9 月 15 日)。打造幼兒的想像大世界【親子天下 Baby】。取自: https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5072141-打造幼兒的想像大世界/
施弘晉(2000)。空間連通關係的建築分類演算(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣大學，臺北市。
陳俊智(2001)。以坐椅設計為例探討中西設計風格的認知與判斷。設計學報第6卷，2，79-100。
許弘雨(2008)。論福祿貝爾「遊戲恩物」之教育意義—以球、球體與立方體，及積木為例(未出版之碩士論文)。東吳大學，臺北市。
陳韻如(2017)。探究臺灣五至八年級學生積木方塊三視圖的表現:問卷調查與教學實驗(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
曾旭正(譯)(1990)。建築意向(原作者:Christian Norberg-Schulz)。臺北市，胡氏文化。
楊翔麟(2007)。以造形特徵辨識檢測行動電話之產品識別設計(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
鄒德儂、巴竹師、高軍(譯)(1999)。現代建築史(下冊)(原作者:Leonardo Benevolo)。臺北市:田園城市文化。
鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學。臺北市:桂冠圖書。
歐庭鋼(2005)。消費者對筆記型電腦細節設計之美感評價研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
劉苑育(2006)。建築風格辨識觀點的轉換——數位風格的浮現(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學，新竹市。
[原型(物件類型)prototypes(object genre)(編號 300166391)](1979)。《藝術與建築索引典》。取自 http://aat.teldap.tw/AATFullDisplay/300166391(2020 年 03 月 14 日瀏覽)。

英文部分
Ackerman, J. S. (1963). Style, in Ackerman and Carpenter (eds.), Art and Archaeology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. pp. 174-186.
Alejandro Aravena, Gonzalo Arteaga, Juan Cerda, Víctor Oddó & Diego Torres. (2018). Elemental. London: Phaidon Press.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by Components: A Theory of Human Image Understanding, Psychological Review, 94, pp.115-147.
Cartwright, S. (1988). Play can be the building blocks of learning. Young Children, 43(5), p. 44-47.
Battista, M. T. & Clements, D. H. (1996). Students' understanding of three-dimensional rectangular arrays of cubes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 258-292.
Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Eds.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 420-464). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
Chan, C. S. (1994). Operational definitions of style, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 21. pp. 223-246.
Chen, K. (1997) Form language and style description, Design Studies 18. pp 249-274. Chan, C. S. (2000). Can style be measured, Design Studies 2. pp 277-291.
Chan, C.-S. (2001). An examination of the forces that generate a style, Design Studies, 22(4), pp.319-346.
Clark, R. H. & Pause, M. (2005). Precedents in architecture: analytic diagrams, formative ideas, and partis. Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley.
Dodge, D. T. (1979). Blocks: A creative curriculum for early childhood. Washington, DC: Creative Associates, Inc.
Doblin, J. (1987) Discrimination: the special skills required for seeing, and the curious structure of judgement, Design Processes Newletter 2. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology. pp 1-6.
Dodge, D. T., & Colker, L. J. (1992). The creative curriculum for early childhood. Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies, Inc.
Enkvist, N. E. (1964). On defining style: An essay in applied linguistics, in J. W. Spencer (ed.), Linguistics and Style. London: Oxford University Press. pp 1-56.
Eisentraut, R. / Gunther, J. (1997). Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process, Design Studies 18. pp 369-383.
Eisentraut, R. (1999) Styles of problem solving and their influence on the design process, Design Studies 20. pp 431-437.
Focillon, H. (1948). The life of forms in art. New York: Wittenborn.
Gombrich, E. H. (1961) Psychology and the Riddle of Style, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New York: Pantheon. pp 2-30.
Jupp, J. & Gero, J. S. (2003). Towards computational analysis of style in architectural design, in S. Argamon (ed.), IJCAI03 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Style Analysis and Synthesis. Acapulco: IJCAI. pp 1-10.
Kallehauge, Mette Marie. & Jorgensen, Laerke Rydal. (Eds.). (2018). Elemental: The Architect's Studio. Zurich: Lars Muller Publishers.
Moffitt, M. W. (1996). Children learn about science through block building. In E. S. Hirsch, The block book (pp. 27-34). Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
MacDonald, S. (2001). Block play—the complete guide to learning and playing with blocks. Beltsville, MD: Gryphon House, Inc.
Provenzo, E. F., & Brett, A. (1983). The complete block book. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories, Cognitive Psychology, 4, pp.328-350.
Rosch, E. (1975). “Cognitive Reference Points”, Cognitive Psychology, No.7, pp.535-547.
Rosch, E. (1978). “Principles of Categorization”, in Cognitive and Categorization, Eds.
Rosch, E.; Looyd, B. B. (Lawerence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp.73-86.
R. A. H. Gower, A. E. Heydtmann, and H. G. Petersen (1998). LEGO: Automated Model Construction, 32nd European Study Group with Industry, pp.81-94.
Ragni, M. & Knauff, M. (2013). A theory and a computational model of spatial reasoning with preferred mental models. Psychological review, 120(3), 561.
Schapiro, M. (1961). Style, in M. Phillipson (ed.), Aesthetics Today. Cleveland: World Publishing. pp 81-113.
The Hyatt Foundation. (2016, January 13). Alejandro Aravena of Chile receives the 2016 Pritzker Architecture Prize [Web]. Retrieved from https://www.pritzkerprize.com/cn/届获奖者/yalihangdeluoalaweina
Winner, Ellen. (1982). Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.