本研究目的在發展職前科學教師之數位遊戲知能，設計數位遊戲知能培訓課
程並探討培訓課程對於職前科學教師之數位遊戲知能之影響。發展一般及學習遊
戲篩選表以選擇適當遊戲作為職前科學教師數位遊戲知能培訓之教材，並依據所
選出的遊戲發展各個遊戲之指引手冊以作為培訓課程之教材。
培訓課程實施過程請有修中等教育學程之 6 名職前科學教師利用每次 4 小時
進行一般遊戲及學習遊戲培訓課程，為期二周共三次 12 小時。研究者紀錄參與
者活動資料並收集參與者一般遊戲知能量表前後測以及學習遊戲問卷之填答結
果，以描述統計檢視職前科學教師在參與數位遊戲知能培訓課程後，在一般遊戲
知能的變化以及對學習遊戲的看法。
研究結果顯示，雖然部分職前科學教師在一般遊戲知能量表之後測分數低於
前測分數，但討論與分享活動有助於幫助職前科學教師了解遊戲特色；學習遊戲
培訓課程可增加職前科學教師對學習遊戲應用在科學學習之正面看法。

The purpose of this research was to develop the digital game literacy of pre-service science teachers, to design a digital game literacy training, and to explore the influence of the digital game literacy training on the pre-service science teachers. Selection checklists of general digital game and science learning game were developed to select appropriate games as the training materials, and the guidebooks of selected games were also developed.
This training invited 6 pre-service science teachers who are with educational program for secondary school to participate the training of the general digital games
and science learning games. Each time of the training took 4 hours, and there’s 3 times of training in 2 weeks, with overall 12 hours of training time. The researcher collected
the results of pre-test and post-test of the general digital gaming literacy scale and the science learning games questionnaire to see the changes of these pre-service science teachers in general games literacy and opinions on science learning games after the digital game literacy training.
The results showed that although some participants scored lower marks in the post-test of the general digital gaming literacy scale, discussing and sharing did help
pre-service science teachers understand the characteristics of games. The science learning game training did increase the positive opinions of the pre-service teachers on the application of learning games in the learning of science.

中文部分：
王金國(民 89 年)。簡介小組討論教學法，教育研究，8，137-147.
李峻德(民 94 年)。從可玩性觀點探討多人線上遊戲之人機互動設計原則研究。行
政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號：NSC
93-2520-S-009-007)，未出版。
詹志禹(民 92 年)。討論教學法之行動研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫
成果報告(報告編號：NSC92-2413-H-004-005-)，未出版。

英文部分：
Adams, P. C. (1998). Teaching and Learning with SimCity 2000. Journal of Geography, 97(2), 47-55.
Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (1991). Computer-based instruction: Methods and development (2nd ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J., & Adams, C. (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: Identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 311-321.
Clark, D., Nelson, B., Sengupta, P., & D’Angelo, C. (2009). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence. Learning science: Computer games, simulations, and education
workshop, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. 1-71.
de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & 102 Education, 46(3), 249-264.
Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., & Toth, J.A. (2004). Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. CHI2004, April 24–29, Vienna, Austria. <http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?DisplayLang=en&FamilyI
D=3b882eb1-5f06-41d9-baba-d39ad13bc3ff>.
Dondi, C., & Moretti, M.(2007). A methodological proposal for learning games selection and quality assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 502-512.
Feldon, D. F., & Kafai, Y. B. (2008). Mixed methods for mixed reality: Understanding users’ avatar activities in virtual worlds. Education Technology Research & Development, 56(5-6), 575-593.
Friel, T., Britten, J., Compton, B., Peak, A., Schoch, K., & VanTyle, W. K. (2009).
Using pedagogical dialogue as a vehicle to encourage faculty technology use. Computers & Education, 53(2), 300-307.
Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R.(2009).
Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79.
Gros, B. (2007). Digital games in education: the design of games based learning environments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40(1), 23–38.
Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45.
Hight, J., & Novak, J. (2007). Game development essentials : Game project management (1nd ed.). NY: Delmar Cengage Learning.
Hong, J. C., Cheng, C. L., Hwang, M. Y., Lee, C. K., & Chang, H. Y. (2009).
Assessing the educational values of digital games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 423-437.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Cheng, C. L., Lu, C. H., & Lee, Y. C. (2009). Playfulness-based design in educational games: A perspective on an evolutionary contest game. Interactive Learning Environments, 13, 55–63.
Jang, S. J., & Chen, K. C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564.
Kebritchi, M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational computer games: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256-270.
Ketelhut, J., Nelson B., Clarke J., & Dede, C. (2010). A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. British Journal
of Educational Technology, 41(1), 56-68.
Lim, C. P., Nonis, D., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: engaging students in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 211-231.
Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, C. H. (2009). Developing evaluative indicators for educational computer games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 174-178.
Malone, T.W. (1982). Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. In John C. Thomas and Michael L. Schneider (Eds.),
Human Factors in Computing Systems, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
Novak, J. (2004). Game development essentials: an introduction. NY: Delmar Cengage Learning.
Ray, B., & Coulter, G. A. (2010). Perceptions of the value of digital mini-games: Implications for middle school classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 26(3), 92-100.
Rapeepisarn, K., Wong, K. W., Fung, C. C., & Khine, M. S. (2008). The Relationship between Game Genres, Learning Techniques and Learning Styles in Educational Computer Games. Technologies for e-Learning and Digital Entertainment 2008, Nanjing, China, 497-508.
Sardone, N. B., & Devlin-Scherer, R. (2010). Teacher candidate responses to digital games: 21st-century skills development. Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 42(4), 409-425.
Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experiences. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19-29.
Tuzun, H., Yılmaz-Soylu, M., Karakuş, T., İnal, Y., & Kızılkaya, G. (2009). The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & Education, 52(1), 68-77.
Welty, W. M. (1989). Disscussion method teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 21(4), 40-49.
Zapalska, A. M., & Brozik, D. (2008). A model for developing and evaluating games and simulations in business and economic education. Journal of Economics and Business, 26(2), 345-368.