摘 要
本研究旨在探討「Mary Wollstonecraft的女權思想及其在兩性平等教育上的應用」，希望藉此對我國目前欲推行的兩性平等教育有所裨益。因此，本文的主要內容以Wollstonecraft的女權思想及其教育主張為主。並以此為基礎，提供一些有關兩性平等教育措施上的意見。
本論文主要之研究目的為：（一）分析Wollstonecraft思想的時代背景、寫作歷程、及其女權思想之形成與開展。（二）探討Wollstonecraft之女權思想，及其時代意義和影響。（三）探討Wollstonecraft女權思想中主要的教育主張。（四）綜合研究成果，析論Wollstonecraft的思想及其在兩性平等教育上的應用。
綜合前述之探究，本研究有以下結論：一、挑戰父權中心的女權思想，包含以理性駕馭感性、破除刻板女性形象，建立兩性和諧圖像、爭取女性教育權、工作權及參政權。二、教育是使女性擺脫壓迫、依賴，達成獨立自主的重要關鍵，男女混合之國民教育是達成性別平等的第一步、以理性教育解放女性、以「獨立」為主的女性教育；三、在兩性平等教育上的應用，政府應從立法及政策面以積極態度落實兩性平等教育、建構兩性平等之學校文化、建構不以性別為導向的課程設計。
總而言之，兩性平等的提昇自十八世紀以來雖有進展，但因為各種意識型態固著的現象不易打破，致使其成果大受影響；雖然如此，持續的提倡及努力，特別是在教育上的耕耘，終有使理想實現的一天。期盼吾人能從Wollstonecraft等先知的精神與理念，共同為女性和男性開創一個雙贏的未來。

Mary Wollstonecraft’s Thoughts about the Rights of Woman and
Its Implications on Gender Equity Education
Hui-wen Huang
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to discuss Mary Wollstonecraft’s thoughts about the rights of woman and its’ implications on gender equity education with the hope that it would be helpful for the gender equity education propelled in Taiwan. The thesis is mainly about Wollstonecraft’s thoughts about the rights of woman and her educational ideas, and wishes to provide some suggestions.
The purposes of this thesis are as follows: (1) to analyze the background of Wollstonecraft’s time, her writing process and how she germinate the thought of the rights of woman. (2) to discuss Wollstonecraft’s thoughts about the rights of woman and its’ influence. (3) to discuss Wollstonecraft’s educational thoughts. (4) to explore the applications of Wollstonecraft’s thoughts to gender equity education.
Based on the results above, the conclusions of this study are as follows:
(1) Challenge the idea of patriarchy, including the ability of reason, and the stereotype of female and fight for the rights of education, work and politic for women.
(2) The key point of liberating women from oppression and being independent is “education”. The first step to achieve gender equity is to adopt “co-education”.
(3) The government should implement the gender equity education actively in respect of legislation and policy. Schools should build the culture of gender equity, and the curriculum should not based on gender.
To sum up, although there has been some progress about the promotion of gender equity since 18 century, it is still not easy to change the ideology of gender stereotype. Therefore, we should continue to advocate the idea of gender equity, especially on education, and with the spirit and ideas of Wollstonecraft and other prophets, we will create a bright future for all women and men.

參考文獻
一、中文部份
刁筱華譯（民85）。Rosemarie Tong著，女性主義思潮，台北：時報。
刁曉華譯（民87）。Rosalind Miles著，女人的世界史，台北：麥田。
王曾才（民78）。西洋近世史。台北：正中書局。
王蓁（1995）。女權辯護。北京：商務印書館。
伍厚愷（民88）。寂寞啊，盧梭。台北：牧村。
朱侃如譯（民84）。Watkins Susan Alice著，女性主義。台北：立緒。
江金太（民72）。法國大革命對英國的衝擊及其政治意義。國立政治大學歷史學報，第一期，頁1-28。
行政院教改會（民85）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院。
何穎怡譯（民89）。Joy Magezis著，女性研究自學讀本。台北：女書。
李元真（民79）。婦女開步走。台北：婦女新知基金會。
李令儀譯（民84）。女性迷思。Betty Friedan著。台北：月旦。
李平漚譯（民78）。J. J. Rousseau著，愛彌兒。台北：五南。
林玉體（民69）。西洋教育史。台北：文景。
俞智敏、陳光達、陳素梅、張君玫譯（民84）。Pamela Abbott and Claire Wallace著，女性主義觀點的社會學。台北：巨流。
施叔青（民64）。從女人到人。台北：拓荒者。
胡祖慶譯(民85)。Touchard著，西洋政治思想史。台北：五南。
張玗（民86）。兩性平等教育的精神與目標。發表於推動大專院校兩性平等教育學術研討會。台北：台大人口研究中心婦女研究室。
張岩冰（1998）。女權主義文論。濟南：山東教育出版社。
張金鑑（民73）。西洋政治思想史。台北：三民。
張福建譯著（民73）。政治自由的堡壘—柏克。台北：時報文化。
曹愛蘭（民78）。新時代台灣婦女觀點。台北：前衛。
梁天詠譯（民28）。Gabriel Compayre著，Rousseau與自然教育，台北：中華書局。
梁雙蓮（民78）。婦女與政治參與。台北：婦女新知基金會。
莊明貞（民87）。教育與性別。輯於陳奎熹主編。現代教育社會學。台北：師大書苑。
楊文利（1993）。點亮理性之光--啟蒙運動文學。海南出版社。
楊美惠（民77）。女性‧女性主義‧性革命。台北：合志。
潘慧玲（民87）。教育中的性別議題。教育研究集刊，41輯：1-13。台北：國立台灣師範大學教育學系。
潘慧玲（民88）。教育學發展的女性主義觀點：女性主義教育學。發表於教育科學：國際化或本土化國際學術研討會。台北：國立台灣師範大學教育學系。
錢撲譯（民84）。Sara Delamont著，博學的女人：結構主義和菁英的再造。台北：桂冠。
簡成熙、侯雅齡（民86）。關懷倫理學及教育—姬莉根與諾丁思想初探。屏東師院學報，10期：133-164。
謝小岑、王秀雲（民83）。國中健康教育教科書之性別意識型態分析。發表於兩性教育與教科書研討會。嘉縣：中正大學成人與繼續教育研究所。
謝臥龍（民87）。兩性平等教育的意涵與反思。高市文教，64期：38-43。
謝臥龍、駱慧文（民87）。追求兩性平權，教育應扮演的角色。測驗與輔導，148期: 3058-3060。
蘇永明（民87）。社會正義與教育。載於伍振鷟等合著：教育哲學。台北：五南。
蘇芊玲（民88）。兩性平等教育的本土發展與實踐。台北：女書。
顧燕翎主編（民85）。女性主義理論與流派。台北：女書。

二、英文部份
Brailsford, H.N. (1954). Shelley, Godwin, and their Circle. London: Oxford University Press.
Bridenthal, R. & Koonz, C. & Stuard, S. eds.(1987). Becoming Visible: Women in European History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, Second Edition.
Burke, E.(1757). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. by James T. Boulton（1958）. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd..
Burke, E.(1790). Reflections on the Revolution in France. Ed. by Conor Cruise B’brien.(1969). New York: Penguin Books.
Carswell, J. (1973). From Revolution to Revolution: England 1688-1776. New York: Charles Scribners Sons.
Clark, A.(1992). Working life of Women in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Kelley.
Cole, G. D. H. & Postgate, R.(1949).The Common People: 1746-1946. London: Methuen & Co. OTD.
Conger, S. M.(1994). Mary Wollstonecraft and the Language of Sensibility. London: Associated UP.
Coole, D. H. (1993). Women in Political Theory: From Ancient Misogyny to Contemporary Feminism. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, second edition.
De, Beauvoir S.(1974). Memoirs of a Dutiful Daughter. New York: Harper & Row.
Dickens, Charles(1994).　A Tale of Two Cities.　London: Penguin Books.
Eisenstein, Z. R.(1993). The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. Boston : Northeastern University Press.
Falco, M. J. ed.(1996). Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft. Pennsylvania State university Press.
Ferguson, M.(1993). Mary Wollstonecraft and the Problematic of Slavery. In Colonialism and Gender Relations from Mary Wollstonecraft to Jamaica Kincaid. New York: Columbia UP.
Ferguson, M. & Todd, J.(1984). Mary Wollstonecraft. Boston:G. K., Hall & Company.
Firestone, S.(1971). The Dialectic of Sex. New York: Bantam.
Gatens, M.(1991). Feminism and Philosophy. Polity Press.
Gatens, M.(1986). Rousseau and Wollstonecraft: Nature vs. Reason. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, supplement to vol.64.
Godwin, W.(1798). Memoirs of the Author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. London: Joseph Johnson.
Green, K.(1995). The woman of reason : feminism, humanism, and political thought . Cambridge : Polity Press.
Griffin, C. L.(1994). Rhetoricizing Alienation: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Rhetorical Construction of Women’s Oppression. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80: 293-312.
Gutek, G. L.(1997). Mary Wollstonecraft: Proponent of Women’s Rights and Education. Historical and Philosophical Foundations of Education: A Biographical Introduction. Prentice Hall.
Houston, B.(1994). Should Public Education be Gender Free? In Lynda Stone ed. The Education Feminism Reader. New York: Routledge.
Hulling, M.(1976). Montesquieu and the Old Regime. Berkeley : University of California Press.
John, A. V. ed.(1986). Unequal Opportunities: Women’s Employment in England,1800-1918. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Jones, V. ed..(1990). Women in the Eighteenth Century: Construction of Femininity. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
Jump, H. D.(1994). Mary Wollstonecraft: Writer. New York: Harvester Whearsheaf.
Kaplan, C.(1983). Wild Nights: Pleasure/Sexuality/Feminism. In Formations of Pleasure. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kelly, G.(1992). Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft. London: Macmillan.
Lewis, J.(1984). Women in England 1870-1950: Sex Divisions and Social Change. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd..
Lorch, J.(1990). Mary Wollstonecraft: The Making of a Radical Feminist. New York: Berg Publishers Limited.
Manus, A. L.(1995). Schooling, the Dissenters, and Wollstonecraft. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. CA: San Francisco.
McMillan, C.(1982). Women, Reason, and Nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Measor, L. & Sikes, P.(1992). Gender and Schools. New York: Cassell.
Mitchell, J. & Oakley, A. eds.(1986). What is Feminism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd..
Noddings, N.(1994). An Ethic of Caring and Its Implications for Instructional Arrangements. In Lynda Stone ed. The Education Feminism Reader. New York: Routledge.
Peterson, J. S.(1972). The Victorian Governess. In Suffer and be still; women in the Victorian age. Edited by Martha Vicinus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Poovey, M. (1984). The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer, Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pope, B. C.(1987). The Influence of Rousseau’s Ideology of Domesticity. In Jean Quataert and Marilyn Boxer (eds.), Connecting Spheres: Women in the Western World, 1500 to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pinchbeck, I.( 1969). Women workers and the Industrial Revolution, 1750-1850. London : Cass.
Rousseau, J. J.(1762). Emile. Translated by Barbara Foxley (1948). New York : Dent.
Reiss, T. J.(1989).Revolution in bounds: Wollstonecraft, Women and Reason. Gender & Theory: Dialogues on feminist criticism. New York: Blackwell.
Sadker D. ＆ Sadker M.(1997). Sex Equity: Assumptions and Strategies. In Lawrence J. Saha ed.(1997). International Encyclopedia of the Sociology of Education. UK: Pergamon.
Sapiro, V. (1992). A Vindication of Political Virtue: the Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schneir, M. (1972). Feminism: The Essential Historical Writings. New York: Vintage Books.
Schwartz, J.(1984). The Sexual Politics of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Chicago: The University o fChicago Press.
Scott, J. & Tillly, L.(1975). Women’s Work and the Family in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17: 34-36.
Shorter, E.(1975). The Making of the Modern Family. New York : Basic Books.
Taylor, G. R. S. (1969). Mary Wollstonecraft: A Study in Economies and Romance. New York: Haskell House Publishers Ltd..
Todd, J.(1989). A Wollstonecraft Anthology. Cambridge: Polity.
Todd, J. & Butler, M.(1989). The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. London: Pidkering & Chattle Limited.
Tomalin, C.(1974). The Life and Death of Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: Penguin Books.
Tomaselli, S. ed.(1995). The Vindication of the rights of Men and the Vindication of the Rights of Woman by Mary Wollstonecraft. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, O. N. C.(1991). The Other Reasons: Female Alterity and Enlightenment Discourse in Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. The Yale Journal of Criticism, 5.1:129-149.
Wardle, R. M.(1951). Mary Wollstonecraft: A Critical Biography. University of Nebraska Press.
Wollstonecraft, M.(1787). Thoughts on the Education of Daughters. Ed. by Woodstock Books(1994).
Wollstonecraft, M. (1790). A Vindication of the Rights of Man. In Todd, J. & Butler, M. ed.(1989). The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. London: Pidkering & Chattle Limited. Vol.Ⅴ.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. by Poston, C. H. (1975). New York: Norton & Company, Inc..
Wollstonecraft, M.(1796). Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, Denmark. In Janet Todd & Marilyn Butler eds., The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, vol. VI.
Wollstonecraft, M.(1798). The Wrongs of Woman: Or, Maria. in Janet Todd & Marilyn Butler eds., The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, vol. I.
Woolf, V.(1932). The Second Common Reader. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co..