簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 熊屏生
論文名稱: 榮民參加公共職業訓練學習動機、學習障礙及學習滿意度之研究
The Research on the Learning Motivation, Disorder and Satisfaction of Veterans Attending Public Vocational Training Program
指導教授: 徐昊杲
Hsu, How-Gao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 201
中文關鍵詞: 榮民公共職業訓練學習動機學習障礙學習滿意度
英文關鍵詞: Veterans, public vocational training, learning motivation, learning disorder, learning satisfaction
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:193下載:27
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探究榮民參加公共職業訓練學習動機、參與障礙及學習滿意度,其目的包括瞭解榮民參加公共職業訓練學習動機、學習滿意度之現況、比較不同背景變項的榮民參加公共職業訓練其學習動機、學習障礙及學習滿意度差異情形及探討榮民參加公共職業訓練「學習動機」與「學習障礙」兩者預測「學習滿意度」之相關程度,最後根據研究發現提出具體建議,以作為相關單位參考依據。
    本研究依據文獻資料、相關實證研究及參考國內外相關量表,發展「榮民參加公共職業訓練學習動機、學習障礙及學習滿意度調查問卷」,對退輔會訓練中心92年至94年接受日間四個月以上養成訓練具榮民身分的學員抽樣進行問卷調查,並以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、簡單迴歸分析、多元迴歸及典型相關等方法進行資料處理與分析,獲致結論如下:
    壹、榮民參加公共職業訓練有強烈的學習動機,其中以「求知興趣」的動機最高,其次分別為「社交關係」、「逃避與刺激」和「外界期望」;而以「職業進展」的動機最低。
    貳、抽樣調查分析發現其感受整體學習障礙影響程度不高;就學習障礙各層面而言,「意向障礙」影響程度最高,而「情境障礙」對榮民學習影響的程度最低。
    參、榮民參加公共職業訓練的整體學習滿意度普遍認同程度高,就學習滿意度各層面而言,以「教師教學」的滿意程度最高,各層面之滿意程度均達顯著水準。
    肆、榮民參加公共職業訓練的學習動機因不同背景變項而有所不同;其中「性別」、「年齡」、「有無領取月退俸」、「學歷」、「軍種」、「軍階」、「取得參訓訊息」等變項之榮民在「整體學習動機」表現上,沒有顯著差異。在「學習動機各層面」表現上,亦無顯著差異。
    伍、榮民參加公共職業訓練的學習滿意度因不同背景變項而有所不同,其中「性別」、「年齡」、「家庭總收入」、「有無領取月退俸」、「學歷」、「年資」、「居住地區」、「軍種」等變項在「整體學習滿意度」表現上,沒有顯著差異,各滿意度層面亦均無顯著差異。
    陸、榮民參加公共職業訓練的學習動機與學習滿意度之間具有正相關,學習障礙與學習滿意度之間具有負相關。
    柒、使用簡單迴歸分析法,利用「學習動機」對「學習滿意度」進行預測,可得到簡單直線迴歸方程式: =.507X-42.339。進一步使用多元迴歸方式,利用「學習動機」與「學習障礙」預測「學習滿意度」,得到直線多元迴歸方程式 =.514X1-.157X2+45.832。
    捌、利用典型相關(canonical correlation)分析:以學習動機各層面五個變項為控制(預測)變項,學習滿意度各分層面四個變項為效標變項,可得到四個典型變量。此外以學習障礙各層面三個變項為控制(預測)變項,學習滿意度各層面四個變項為效標變項,可得到一個典型變量。
    最後,依本研究結論提出三大項,十二點建議,以供公共職業訓練主管機關(退輔會)、訓練機關(退輔會訓練中心)及後續研究者三方面參考。

    關鍵詞:榮民、公共職業訓練、學習動機、學習障礙、學習滿意度

    Abstract

    The study explores the learning motivation, disorder, and satisfaction of veterans attending public vocational training and pursues several objectives: finding the current status of learning motivation of the veterans attending public vocational training; finding the current status of learning satisfaction of the veterans attending public vocational training; comparing the difference in learning motivation, learning disorder and learning satisfaction respectively between the veterans of different backgrounds as variance attending public vocational training; discovering the correlation between learning motivation and learning satisfaction of veterans attending public vocational training; and also discovering the correlations between the prediction of learning satisfaction on the basis of learning motivation and prediction of learning satisfaction on the basis of learning disorder. At last the study offers some concrete suggestions on the basis of the results found in the study, to serve as reference for the pertinent agencies and parties.
    To ensure the said objectives are met, method wise, the study adapts literature review and questionnaire survey. First the study began with collecting and organizing all literatures regarding the theme available from domestic and overseas sources ; describing the current conditions of the veterans attending the public vocational training; analyzing the significance, theories, and aspects of learning motivation, learning disorder and learning satisfaction, so as to serve as theoretical foundations and empirical research framework. Next, the study developed and formulated a “Questionnaire on the learning motivation, learning barrier and learning satisfaction of veterans attending public vocational training” according to the literatures and the pertinent empirical researches reports and making uses of the related measurement scales and grading sheets from domestic and overseas sources; and conducted the planned questionnaire survey taking 1200 persons as specimens by random sampling from learners as veterans having completed the four-month or plus, full-time, skilled trades training programs at Training Center of Veterans Affairs Commissions, Executive Yuan, Taiwan ROC, during the period from 2003 through 2005. The questionnaire survey won 678 valid responses after excluding disqualified and unfinished questionnaires from the returned and thus obtained 56.5% valid response rate. Further, the study conducted data processing and analysis on the said survey results by applying the statistic and analysis tools including Descriptive Statistic Analysis, T-test, One Way Analysis of Variance, Pearson Product Moment Correlation, Simple Regression Analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis as well as Canonical Correlation, etc. and finally came to the conclusions as the follows:

    1. Among the veterans attending public vocational training – PVT - with strong learning motivation, those pursuing “fun of knowledge” showed the highest motivation, and those pursuing “social relationship”, “shelter or excitement” and “meeting expectation of others” respectively followed, and those pursuing “Vocational Progress” demonstrated the lowest motivation.
    2. To the statistic analysis results of the sampling survey it is found that the overall affection of learning disorder perceived by the veterans attending PVT was rather low; in terms of various aspects of learning disorder, affection of “intention disorder” ranked the highest, while, in contrast, affection of “environmental barrier” the lowest.
    3. The veterans attending PVT mostly accepted the overall learning satisfaction. In terms of various aspect of learning satisfaction “teachers’ teaching performance” won the highest satisfaction, besides, the satisfaction in respective aspect also reached well above average level.
    4. The veterans attending PVT demonstrated different learning motivations – varied to the different background variances respectively; among others the variances such as “Gender, Age, With/without Retirement Pension, Education Level, Army Branch, Rank, and Access to Training Information” demonstrated no significant difference in their manifestation of “overall learning motivation”. Besides, their manifestation of “learning motivation aspects” demonstrated no significant difference either.
    5. The “Learning Satisfaction” of the veterans attending PVT varied to the specific background variance respectively; among others the variances such as “Gender, Age, Household Income, With/without Retirement Pension, Education Level, Seniority, Residing Region, Army Branch, etc” demonstrated no significant difference in their manifestation of “overall learning satisfaction”. Besides, their manifestation of learning satisfaction aspects, namely teachers’ teaching performance, learning course, learning environments, demonstrated no significant difference either.
    6. The “Learning Motivation” and “Learning Satisfaction” of the veterans attending PVT demonstrated a positive correlation, while, on the contrary their “Learning Disorder” and “Learning Satisfaction” demonstrated a negative correlation.
    7. When conducting a prediction of the “Learning Satisfaction” on the basis of “Learning Motivation” through Simple Regression Analysis, a simple linear regression equation as follows is obtained:
    =.507X-42.339。
    When further conducting a prediction of the “Learning Satisfaction” on the basis of “Learning Disorder” through Multiple Regression Analysis, a multiple linear regression equation as follows is obtained:
    =.514X1-.157X2+45.832.
    8. By conducting analyzed with Canonical Correlation analysis: taking the five variables of learning motivation aspects as control (prediction) variable, and at the same time taking the four variables of learning satisfaction sub-aspects as criterion variables, four Canonical variates will be obtained as the resultants. Furthermore, taking the three variables of learning disorder aspects as control (prediction) variable, and at the same time taking the four variables of learning satisfaction sub-aspects as criterion variables, only one Canonical variates will be obtained as the resultants.

    Finally this study offered some suggestions coming in three categories falling into twelve items on the basis of the research conclusions to serve as reference information for public vocational training authorities (Veterans Affairs Commissions for example), training agencies (Training Center of VAC for example) and the researchers interested in the domain.

    Keywords:Veterans, public vocational training, learning motivation, learning disorder, learning satisfaction

    總 目 錄 謝誌………………………………………………………………………... Ⅰ 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………... Ⅲ 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………... 總目錄……………………………………………………………………... 表目錄………………...…………………………………………... Ⅴ Ⅸ ⅩⅠ 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………... ⅩⅦ 第一章  緒論…………………………………………………………... 1 第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………....... 1 第二節 待答問題與研究假設…………………………………... 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制…………………………………....... 6 第四節 重要名詞釋義………………………………........... 8 第二章 文獻探討………………………....................... 11 第一節 公共職業訓練體系與發展……………………………... 11 第二節 榮民基本結構分析……………………………………... 15 第三節 榮民參加公共職業訓練之現況 ……………………... 22 第四節 成人學習動機相關理論及其研究……………………... 27 第五節 成人學習障礙相關理論及其研究……………………... 46 第六節 成人學習滿意度相關理論及其研究…………………... 53 第三章 研究設計與實施……………………………............... 59 第一節 研究架構與方法…………………………………....... 59 第二節 研究對象……………………………………........... 64 第三節 研究工具………………………………………………... 66 第四節 研究歩驟與實施流程………………………………...... 86 第五節 資料分析方式……………………………………........ 88 第四章 研究結果與分析…………………………………….......... 91 第一節 參加公共職業訓練榮民樣本之資料分析…………...... 92 第二節 榮民學習動機、學習障礙與學習滿意度之分析……... 98 第三節 榮民背景變項與學習動機之差異分析………………... 103 第四節 榮民背景變項與學習滿意度之差異分析…………...... 125 第五節 榮民學習動機、學習障礙及學習滿意度之相關分析.... 145 第六節 榮民學習動機、學習障礙及學習滿意度典型相關分析 151 第七節 綜合討論…………………………………………...... 161 第五章 結論與建議………………………………………….......... 171 第一節 結論…………………………………………………...... 171 第二節 建議……………………………………………………... 176 參考文獻………………………………………………………….......... 181 壹、中文部份………….................................. 181 貳、英文部分………………………………………………..……….. 187 附錄一 榮民參加公共職業訓練學習動機、學習障礙及學習滿意度之研究(預試問卷).............................193 附錄二 榮民參加公共職業訓練學習動機、學習障礙及學習滿意度之研究(正式問卷)................................. 198

    參 考 文 獻
    壹、中文部分
    于民寧(民76)。考試焦慮、成就動機、學習習慣與學業成績之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    王全得(民92)。成人教育的學習型態,動機和滿意度相關性研究,以國立高雄餐旅學院推廣教育技藝班為例。義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    朱慧凡(民89)。臺灣榮民住院利用之分析研究。國立陽明大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文。
    江綺雯(民83)。高雄市成人學生中途輟學理由調查研究。台北:教育部社會教育司
    吳婉如(民80)。臺灣地區長青學苑教師教學型態與學員學習滿意度之研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    吳慎慎(民78)。台北市婦女國體成員參與動機及其相關因素之研究。台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    呂秀玲(民87)。眷村的社會流動與社會資源—一個榮民社區之田野研究。東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
    李麗美(民90)。松年大學學員自我導向學習傾向與學習滿意度關係之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    邢小萍(民83)。成年婦女參與繼續教育活動及其家庭相關因素之研究。台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    林麗惠(民85)。成人參與在職進修訓練的自評成效及其相關因素之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    紀茂嬌(民92)。公立大學行政人員訓練意願影響因素之研究。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
    夏天倫(民93)。我國碩士在職專班回流教育成效之調查研究—研究生學習動機、參與障礙及學習滿意度之探討。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    徐昊杲、邱佳椿(民91)。技職教育研究教戰手冊—SPSS基礎篇。台北:師大書苑。
    徐昊杲、邱佳椿(民91)。技職教育研究教戰手冊—SPSS進階篇。台北:師大書苑。
    翁志遠(民88)。1990年台灣地區人口之婚姻狀況分佈的省籍差異探討。國立政治大學社會學系。
    馬芳婷(民77)。社教機構短期研習教師教學行為與學生學滿意度之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    張世民(民90)。在職碩士研究生的學習障礙及其因應策略之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    張春興(民85)。現代心理學,台北:東華。
    張緯良(民92)。榮民在職場競爭優劣勢暨企業僱用榮民意願探討之研究。行政院國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會委託研究成果報告。
    張瓊瑩(民82)。成人學習活動參與者、非參與者在參與障礙、教育態度之比較研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文。
    郭卜樂(民87)。動機。今日心理。2003年1月20日,引自http://www.cptoday.net
    郭泓溪(民93)。我國行政院國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會訓練中心組織再造之研究。國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
    郭蘭(民92)。國民中學教師參與在職進修動機與教學效能關係之研究--以臺灣中部四縣市為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳志樺(民91)。成人技職繼續教育參與動機與障礙因素之相關研究。彰化師範大學工業教育學系博士論文。
    陳容芯(民88)。成人參與電腦第二專長教育學習滿意度之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳國恩(民86)。空中大學學生學習風格與學習滿意度、學習成就關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳碩琳(民92)。目標導向、學習滿意度與學習績效關係之研究~以國立空中大學高雄學習指導中心為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳慧美(民80)。我國國小補校學生學習障礙之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    傅郁芳(民94)。台北市社區大學學員學習動機與學習滿意度之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。
    彭和妹(民82)。國立空中大學學生學習障礙及其相關因素之研究。隔空教育論叢,5,183-222。
    黃玉幸(民84)。家庭主婦參與非正規成人教育的動機與成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人與繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃玉湘(民91)。我國社區大學學員學習動機與學習滿意度之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育學系碩士論文。
    黃益松(民90)。技職院校在職進修部學生學習動機、學習滿意度與學習後行為關係之研究-以嶺東技術學院為例。中華大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
    黃富順(民73)。成人參與繼續教育動機取向及相關因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
    黃富順(民74)。成人學習動機-成人參與繼續教育動機取向之探討。高雄:復文書局。
    黃富順(民78)。成人心理與學習,台北:師大書苑
    黃富順(民79)。成人教育的意義、性質及其相關的名詞,載於教育部社教司主編之成人教育。台北:台灣書店,頁1-18。
    黃富順(民85)。增強成人學習者的學習動機。成人教育,第34期,頁2。
    黃富順主編(民91)。成人學習,台北:五南出版社。
    黃馨慧(民75)。台北市成年婦女家庭生活教育學習要求與生活型態之研究。台灣師範大學家政系。
    鄒秀惠(民85)。嘉義地區婦女生活型態與參與繼續教育動機關係之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    廖志昇(民92)。研究生學習動機與學習滿意度關係之研究—以師院在職進修碩士班為例。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    賈馥茗編著(民80)。教育心理學。台北:國立空中大學。
    劉信吾(民75)。空中學校留校與離校學生個人背景和心理因素之比較研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
    蔣震夷(民90)。以公共職業訓練促進中高齡失業者再就業之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    蔡秋貝(民92)。成人在職學生自我導向學習傾向、參與障礙對網路教學學習動機關係之研究。國立雲林科技大學資訊管理系碩士班碩士論文。
    蔡如婷(民86)。大學企業推廣教育班學員參加動機及選擇行為之研究。國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    鄭田(民83)。交通部電信訓練所學員覺察之學習滿意度調查研究。國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    鄧運林(民81)。自我導向學習對成人學生學習行為、學業成績影響之實驗研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
    韓進之(民80)。大陸關於兒童、青少年個性傾向性發展的研究。載於楊中芳、高尚仁(合編):中國人、中國心:發展與教學篇(頁85-158)。台北:遠流。
    韓諾萍(民91)。國小教師參與學士後在職進修之動機與其專業發展情形之研究。台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
    顏金郎(民93)。嘉義縣山區原住民參與成人教育活動的學習動機與滿意度之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    羅大涵(民81)。第二專長職業訓練之基本理念。就業與訓練,10(2),3-7。

    貳、西文部分
    Anderson, R.E. & Darkenwald, G.G.(1982). The Adult part-time learner incolleges and universities: A Clientele Analysis. Research in Higher Education, 10(4), 357-370.
    Babbie, E.(1994). The Practive of Social Research, Seventh Edition.
    Betz,N.E.(1970). Prevalence,distribution,and correlates of math anxiety in collage student.Journal of Counseling Psychology,25, 441-448.
    Bielby , D.D.V. (1980). Preferences, barriers, and facilitators for postsecondary education in a southern California urbanized area. Santa Barbara:California University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 198 473).
    Boshier, R. W. (1971). Motivational Orientations of Adult Education Participants: A Factor Analytic Exploration of Houle’s Typology, Adult Education,Vol.21,No.2,pp3~26.
    Boshier, R. W. (1973). Educational participation and dropout: A theoretical model. Adult Education, Vol.23, No.4, pp255~282.
    Brophy, J. E. (1988). On motivations student. In D. Berliner &B. Rosenshine (Eds):Talks to Teachers. New York:Randon House.
    Brown, H.D. (1989). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N J:Prentice-Hall
    Burgess, P. (1971). Reasons for Adult Participation In-Group Educational Activity, Adult Education.Vol22, No.1,pp3~29.
    Carp, A;Peterson, R.;and Roelfs, P.(1976). "Adult Learning Interests and Experience" In K.P. Cross and J.R. Valley, & Associates (Eds.), Planning nontraditional Programs:An analysis of the issues for postsecondary education. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    Cross, K .P.(1981),Adults as learners : Increasing participation and facilitation learning, san Francisco : jossey-Bass.
    Cross, K .P.(1986), Adults as learners , San Francisco : Jossey-Bass
    Darkenwald, G.G.&Hayes, E. R.(1986).Adults’ attitudes towards continuing education. Paper presented at the National Conference of the American Association for Adult and Continuing Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 276887)
    Darkenwald, G.G.. & Merriam, S.B. (1982). Adult education:Foundations of practice. New York:Harper &Row.
    Field, H.S. & Giles, W.G.(1980).Student satisfaction with graduate education: Dimensionality and assessment in a school of business.Education Research Quarterly,5(2),66-73。
    Fooet, E.(2000).Community colleges:General information and resources. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. Retrieved from http://ericae.net/edo/Ed411929.htm
    Governanti, M.P.(1980). A study of the motivational orientations of adults attending a comprehensive community college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
    Hendary, A.M.(1983).Measuring adult student satisfaction a model. Canadian Vocational Journal,19(1),47-50.
    Hiemstra,R.(1975).The older adult and learning. Lincoln:Department of adult and continuing education, University Nebraska.(ERIC document reproduction service No.ED117371)
    Hocklander, David Michael. (1999). Perceptions of age-related memory loss as a barrier to adult education. University of IDAHO. ISBN: 0-599-40329-2. DAI-A 60/07, p.2325
    Houle, C. O (1980).Continuing Learning in the Profession. San Fancisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
    Jaeger, R.M. (1978). About educational indicators:Statistics on the conditions and trends in education. Review of Research in education, 2(3), 276-315
    Johnstone, J. W.& Rivera, R. J. (1965). Volunteers for Learning. Chicago. IL:Adline.
    Joseph, H. J. (1980). The influence of selected socio-demographic factors and motivational orientation on enrollment persistence of adult part-time students in university courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University at Raleigh.
    Klinger , K. & Marieneau , C. (1977). An anthropogical approach to the study of adults at the postsecondary level (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 141 511).
    Long, H.B. (1983). Adult Learning. New York:Cambridge. 156-157.
    Leaunda, H.(2001).Providing learns with individualized learning strategies. Tech Trends,45(1),40.
    Malin, J.T., Bray, J.H., Dougherty, T.w. & Skinner,W.K.(1980).Factors affecting the performance and satisfaction of adult men and women attending college. Research in Higher Education,13(2),115-130.
    Mangano, J.A. & Corrado, T.J.(1979).Adult students’ satisfaction at six two-year colleges.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED180 563)
    Mellow, G.O.(2000).The history and development of community colleges in the United States. Paper presented at the combined seminar of the Inter-American Development Bank and Harvard Graduate School of Education(Cambridge, MA, September 4-8).
    Merriam, S. B. & R. S.Caffarella,(1999),Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Miller, H.L.(1967),Participation of adults in Education: A Force-Field Analysis, Boston: Center for the study of Liberal Education for Adults, Boston University.
    Ordors, D.G.(1980). Models for motivation for participation in adult education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
    Rezabek,R.J.(1998).A study of the motives. Barries, and enablers affecting participation in adult distance education classes in an lowa community college. University of Northern Iowa. ISBN:0-599-30294-1. DAI-A60/05,1434.
    Scanlan & Darkenwald(1984).Identifying Deterrents to Participation in Continuing Education. Adult Education Quarterly, 34(3),155-166
    Scanlan,(1982)Factors Deterring Allied Health Professional From Continuing Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.
    Schofield, L.F., & Caple, R.B. (1971). Self-concepts of mature and young woman student, Journal of College Student Personal, 12,p.297-302.
    Sheffield, S. B.(1964),The Orientation of Adult Continuing Learners, In D. Solomon(ED),The Continuing learners. Chicago:Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adult.
    Shipp, T. &Mckenzie, L.(1981)Adult Learns, Demographic Characteristics as an Indicator of Psychographic Characteristics. Adult Education, No.31 187-198.
    Tittle, C.K. & Denker, E.R.(1977).Re-entry women:a selective review of the educational process ,career choice and interest measurement. Review of Educational Research,47.
    Tough, A. (1982). Intentional Changes, Chicago:Follett.

    QR CODE