研究生: |
羅智銘 Rufe, James H. |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
外國腔語音感知實驗與頻譜分析 - 以北美籍華語學習者為例 Foreign Accent Perception and Spectral Analysis of North American Learners of Mandarin |
指導教授: |
曾金金
Tseng, Chin-Chin |
口試委員: |
陳菘霖
Chen, Sung-Lin 張箴 Zhang, Felicia 曾金金 Tseng, Chin-Chin |
口試日期: | 2022/07/08 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
華語文教學系 Department of Chinese as a Second Language |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 128 |
中文關鍵詞: | 頻譜分佈 、音質 、外國腔 、發音設定 、發聲設定 、共鳴 |
英文關鍵詞: | voice quality, speech acoustics, spectral analysis, vocology, accents |
研究方法: | 實驗設計法 、 比較研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201757 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:121 下載:17 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
華語學習者在學習中文的過程中,經常伴隨著聲調、語調或語音不 準確等問題, 於是出現典型的「洋腔洋調」, 而「洋腔洋調」不只是發 音上的一大問題, 同時也涉及了「聲調」和「腔調」二個層面。 綜觀華 語教學領域, 絕大多數的口語研究著重於語音教學和聲調教學, 但本研 究者發現, 有些華語學習者, 就算能夠準確掌握語音或聲調, 但還是可 以從其發音聽出所謂的「外國腔」。 「外國腔」的確是個複雜又涉及不 同層面的問題, 但除了語音和聲調之外, 到底還有哪些因素會導致所謂 的「外國腔」呢?
本語音實驗為腔調感知測試,本研究者假設在大於 2,000 Hz 的聲音 高頻區, 是影響聽辨外國腔的重要區帶, 倘若諧波能量過大, 則會產生 明顯的外國腔;反之,若過濾 2,000 Hz以上的高頻區,臺灣母語者則較無 法聽辨出外國腔,或者會猶豫一下才能判斷。
準備語音材料階段,本研究者邀請了 36 位(18 位男性、18 位女性) 擔任錄音人員,各組分別有 8 位北美人,5 位中國人和 5 位臺灣人。首先 請每位錄音人員錄製一段音檔, 內容為「一、二、三、四、五、六、七、 八、九、十」,要求每個數字之間有適當的停頓,共取得 18 段音檔,其 中, 本研究者特別確認北美籍錄音人員的音檔沒有任何聲調上的錯誤, 以控制聲調的變項;後續複製這 16 位北美籍錄音人員(8 位北美男性、8 位北美女性)的音檔,並將 2000 Hz 至 20,000 Hz 之間的頻率範圍過濾掉, 再與原本的 18 段音檔隨機排序並合併成 26 段的測試材料。
本實驗邀請 29 位臺灣母語者擔任審聽人,採取「盲測」,審聽人在 不知道錄音人員語言背景的前提下, 由本研究者播放音檔, 請審聽人針 對每段音檔進行感知區辨:「臺灣腔」、「中國腔」、「外國腔」、或 「不確定」,結束後填寫問卷。
iii 研究發現,審聽人在感知北美男性錄音人員的腔調,原始音檔的準 確度未達到 50%(48%),過濾版之準確度更低,只有 39%,而審聽人在 感知北美女性錄音人員的腔調,原始音檔的準確度為 55%,過濾版之準 確度有 48%。這明顯的差距,證明了大於 2,000 Hz 的高頻頻率區的確會 影響華語母語者對美國華語學習者的「腔調」感知。
從審聽人的問卷分析,審聽人在判斷「外國腔」的主要因素,聲音 或音色(共鳴位置、鼻音重、太大聲)佔 46.4%,聲調 32.2%,聲母或韻 母 17.9%,以及音尾 3.6%;將近一半的審聽人反應「外國腔」之罪魁禍 首其實是「洋腔」,而不是「洋調」。
As learners of Chinese are learning the language, it is quite common for Chinese language learners (especially from Western countries) to have general performance issues with their Chinese phonetics, tones, intonation, prosody, etc. Native Chinese language teachers will often describe this phenomenon as 洋腔 洋調 (yáng-qiāng yáng-diào), which can be roughly translated as “Western accent, Western tones.” “yáng-qiāng yáng-diào” is not just a phonetic and tone performance issue – voice quality has significant implications on a Western learner’s overall Chinese accent performance. Based on a general overview of past Chinese pronunciation pedagogy research, it is evident that the majority of research focuses on Chinese phonetic and tone instruction, virtually ignoring voice quality. Based on this researcher’s observations, even when learners of Chinese have achieved proficiency in Chinese phonetics and tones, they often will still have a foreign accent. This issue begs the question – other than phonetic and tone performance, what other issues lead to foreign accents in Chinese language learners?
In this accent perception experiment, the researcher hypothesizes that the foreign accents (or voice qualities) of North American learners of Chinese primarily originate from frequency bands above 2,000 Hz. If there is sufficient harmonic energy in this bandwidth region, Taiwanese Mandarin speakers should detect a foreign accent. In contrast, if this bandwidth region is filtered out using low pass filters in Praat, the researcher hypothesizes that Taiwanese Mandarin speakers will have more difficulty detecting foreign accents in North American speakers of Chinese.
The results of this experiment overall support this hypothesis. When listening to the unfiltered original audio files of the North American male subjects, 48% of Taiwanese listeners detected foreign accents. However, when listening to the low-pass filtered audio files of the North American male subjects, only 39% of Taiwanese listeners detected foreign accents. When listening to the
v unfiltered original audio files of the North American female subjects, 55% of Taiwanese listeners detected foreign accents. However, when listening to the low-pass filtered audio files of the North American male subjects, only 48% of Taiwanese listeners detected foreign accents.
Furthermore, in a post-experiment survey, Taiwanese listeners were asked to specify the main factors they utilized in detecting foreign accents of the audio subjects. Out of the various factors listed, the most cited factor for accent detection was voice quality (46.4%), followed by tones (32.2%) and finally phonetics (17.9%). It is clear that voice quality plays a major role in the overall perception of accents, and has important implications for learners of Chinese, who wish to achieve higher performance in pronunciation and overall accent quality.
Abercrombie, David. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Arnold, R., & Hansen, K. (1975). Englische Phonetik. Hueber.
Aruffo, C. (2012). Learning dialects and accents. TEDxMcMasterUhttps://youtu.be/TDxFrwkiHIw
Awan, S. N., & Frenkel, M. L. (1994). Improvements in estimating the harmonics to-noise ratio of the voice. Journal of Voice, 8(3), 255-262.
Borissoff, C. (2012). Basis of articulation or articulatory setting. Speak Out, 46, 912.
Bozeman, K. W. (2013). Practical vocal acoustics. Pedagogic Applications for Teachers and Singers (Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2013).
Braun, A. (1995): Fundamental frequency: how speaker- specific is it? Studies in Forensic Phonetics 64, 9-23.
Byrne, D.; Dillon, H.; Tran, K.; Arlinger, S.; Wilbraham, K.; Cox, R.; Hagerman, B.; Hetu, R.; Kei, J.; Lui, C.; Kiessling, J.; Kotby, M.N.; Nasser, N.H.A.; El Kholy, W.A.H.; Nakanishi, Y.; Oyer, H.; Powell, R.; Stephens, D.; Meredith, R.; Sirimanna, T.; Tavartkiladze, G.; Frolenkov, G.I.; Westerman, S.; Ludvigsen, C. (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 96: 2108–2120
Catford, J. C. (1964). Phonation types: the classification of some laryngeal components of speech production. In David Abercrombie, et al (Eds), In honor of Daniel Jones. London: Longmans, 26-37.
Chasaide, A. N., & Gobl, C. (2004). Voice quality and f0 in prosody: towards a holistic account. In Speech Prosody 2004, International Conference.
Chomsky N. & Halle M. (1968). The sound pattern of english. Harper & Row.
Chou, P. T. M. (2012). A pilot study on the potential use of Tomatis Method to improve L2 reading fluency. Teaching English with Technology, 12(1), 2037.
Chung , K. (2017). Chapter 9: "Teaching Pronunciation to Adult Learners of English" of Asian English Language Classrooms: Where Theory and Practice Meet. Handoyo Puji Widodo, Alistair Wood, Deepti Gupta, eds. London & New York: Routledge, 2017. p. 131-149.
Coadou, M (2007). Qualité de voix et accents régionaux en britannique. Unpublished PhD thesis. Aix-Marseille University.
Collins, B., & Mees, I. M. (1995). Approaches to articulatory setting in foreignlanguage teaching. Studies in General and English Phonetics: Essays in Honour of Professor JD O’Connor. New York: Routledge, 415-424. Cruttenden, Alan. (2001). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. London: Routledge Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL quarterly, 39(3), 379-397. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1997). Pronunciation Instruction for Fossilized Learners. Can it Help?. Applied Language Learning, 8(2), 21735.
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language learning, 48(3), 393-410. du Plessis, W., Burger, S., Munro, M., Wissing, D., & Nel, W. (2001). Multimodal enhancement of culturally diverse, young adult musicians: a pilot study involving the Tomatis method. South African Journal of Psychology, 31(3): 35-42.
Epstein, M. A. (2002). Voice quality and prosody in English. University of California, Los Angeles.
Erazmus, E. T. (1980). Articulatory setting and language teaching. Mid-America Linguistics Conference.
Erazmus, E. T. (1982). A New Look at a Cause of Foreign Accent. American Language Journal, 1(1), 57-70.
Erazmus, E. T. (1983). Teaching the Phonology via Articulatory Settings.
Esling, J. H. (1987). Methodology for voice setting awareness in language classes. Revue de phonétique appliquée, (85), 449-473.
Esling, J. H. (2000). Crosslinguistic aspects of voice quality. Voice quality measurement, 25-35.
Esling, J.H. (2010) Phonetic notation. In Hardcastle, Laver, and Gibbon (eds.), 678702.
Esling, J. H., & Wong, R. F. (1983). Voice quality settings and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL quarterly, 17(1), 89-95.
Esling, J.H. & Edmondson, J. (2011) Acoustical analysis of voice quality for sociophonetic purposes. In Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror (eds.), Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge, 131–148. Esling, J., Moisik, S., Benner, A., & Crevier-Buchman, L. (2019). Voice Quality The Laryngeal Articulator Model (No. 1). Cambridge University Press. Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production, s’-Gravenhage. Mouton and Co.
Ferrand, C. T. (2017). Speech science: An integrated approach to theory and clinical practice. Pearson; 4th edition (January 9, 2017) Flege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 692-707.
Flege, J. E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 708-721.
Fouche, P. (1937). French Phonetics Today II. Review of Courses and Conferences 15th , p.38 Fries, Charles C. 1945. Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press Frøkjær-Jensen, B., & Prytz, S. (1976). Registration of voice quality. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics University of Copenhagen, 9, 237-251.
Gick, B., Wilson, I., Koch, K., & Cook, C. (2004). Language-specific articulatory settings: Evidence from inter-utterance rest position. Phonetica, 61(4), 220233.
Gilmor, T. M. (1989). The Tomatis method and the genesis of listening. Pre-& perinatal psychology, 4, 9-26.
Mompeán-González, J. A. (2003). Pedagogical tools for teaching articulatory setting. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: Barcelona (pp. 1603-1606).
Greschner, D. (2013). Ingo R. Titze and Katherine Verdolini Abbott, Vocology: the science and practice of voice habilitation. Journal of Singing, 70(1), 113-115. Hammarberg, B., Fritzell, B., Gaufin, J., Sundberg, J., & Wedin, L. (1980).
Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice qualities. Acta otolaryngologica, 90(1-6), 441-451.
Hardcastle, W. (1976). Physiology of Speech Production, London: Academic Press. Henton, Caroline and Bladon, Anthony. (1985). “Breathiness in normal female speech: inefficiency versus desirability”, Language and Communication 5(3), 1985: 221-227.
Henton, Caroline and Bladon, Anthony. (1988). “Creak as a Sociophonetic Marker”.
In L. M. Hyman and C. N. Li (eds.), Language, Speech and Mind: Studies in honour of Victoria A. New York / London: Routledge Hillenbrand, J., & Houde, R. A. (1996). Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality:
Dysphonic voices and continuous speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39(2), 311-321.
Holder, W. (1669). Elements of Speech. London: T. N. for F. Martyn Printer. Hollien, H. (2014). Vocal fold dynamics for frequency change. Journal of Voice, 28(4), 395-405.
Hollien, H., & Coleman, R. F. (1970). Laryngeal correlates of frequency change: a STROL study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13(2), 271-278. Hollien, H., & Hicks Jr, J. W. (1979). Mechanisms for the control of vocal frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65(S1), S23S23.
Honikman, B. (1964). Articulatory settings (pp. 73-84). na.
Howell, I. (2016). Parsing the spectral envelope: Toward a general theory of vocal tone color. New England Conservatory of Music.
Howell, I. (2017). Necessary roughness in the voice pedagogy classroom: The special psychoacoustics of the singing voice. VOICEPrints, 14(5), 4-7.
Hsiao, W. (2021).【臺灣變雙語國家】第三集:口音和腔調,完全不一樣!臺 灣人,你知道我們說的美語,是臺灣口音?還是臺灣腔調? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceVstgA12Fg&t=313s
Husson, R. (1957). Physiologie de la phonation. Exposé récents. Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica, 50(2), 123-139.
Jenner, B. (1992). The English Voice. Approaches to Pronunciation Teaching. London: Macmillan, 38-46.
Jenner, B. R. (1987). Articulation and phonation in non-native English: The example of Dutch-English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 17(2), 125-138.
Jenner, B., & Bradford, B. (1982). Teaching pronunciation. Modern English Teacher, 10, 2-38.
Jespersen, Otto. (1989). The articulations of speech sounds represented by means of analphabetic symbols. Marburg: Elwert.
Jones, R. H., & Evans, S. (1995). Teaching pronunciation through voice quality. ELT Journal, 49(3), 244-251.
Keating, P. A., Garellek, M., & Kreiman, J. (2015, August). Acoustic properties of different kinds of creaky voice. In ICPhS (Vol. 2015, No. 1, pp. 2-7). Kedrova, G. E., & Borissoff, C. L. (2013). The concept of ‘basis of articulation’in Russia in the first half of the 20th century. Historiographia linguistica, 40(1), 151-197.
Kelz, H. P. (1971). Articulatory basis and second language teaching. Phonetica, 24(4), 193-211.
Kent RD, Kim Y. (2009) Acoustic Analysis of Speech. The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics. 360-380.
Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(2), 820-857.
Knowles, G. (1974). “Scouse: the spoken dialect of Liverpool.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Leeds.
Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. R. (2012). Perceptual interaction of the harmonic source and noise in voice. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 492-500.
Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Garellek, M., Samlan, R., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Toward a unified theory of voice production and perception. Loquens, 1(1), e009. Ladd, D.R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laver, J. (1975). Individual features in voice quality. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Laver, J. (1978). The concept of articulatory settings: an historical survey. Historiographia Linguistica, 5(1-2), 1-14.
Laver, J. (1979) Voice Quality: A Classified Bibliography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics London, 31, 1-186.
Laver, J. D. (1968). Voice quality and indexical information. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3(1), 43-54.
Laver, J., & John, L. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge university press. Laver, J., & Mackenzie-Beck, J. (2007). Vocal profile analysis schemeVPAS. Queen Margareth University College-QMUC, Speech Science Research Centre, Edinburgh.
Lowie, W., & Bultena, S. (2007, August). Articulatory settings and the dynamics of second language speech production. In Proceeding of the 2007 PTLC Conference. Wright, R., Mansfield, C., & Panfili, L. (2019). Voice quality types and uses in North American English. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Linguistics, (27).
McGregor, A. (2018). Teaching tip the tic tac trick to teach the american english articulatory setting. In pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference (ISSN 2380-9566) (p. 245).
Mackenzie-Beck, Janet M. “Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality: the Place of Vocal Profile Analysis”. In W. J. Hardcastle & J. M. Mackenzie-Beck (eds.), A Figure of Speech: a Festchrift for John Laver. London: Laurence Erlbaum, 2005: 285-322.
Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., & Docherty, G. (2007). Pitching it differently: A comparison of the pitch ranges of German and English speakers. In 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
Mennen, I., Scobbie, J. M., de Leeuw, E., Schaeffler, S., & Schaeffler, F. (2010).
Measuring language-specific phonetic settings. Second Language Research, 26(1), 13-41.
Messum, P. R. (2009). Grounding stress in expiratory activity. Speak Out!
(Whitstable, IATEFL), 41, 12-16.
Messum, P. R. (2010). Understanding and teaching the English articulatory setting. Speak Out, 43, 20-24.
Messum, P., & Young, R. (2017). Bringing the English articulatory setting into the classroom:(1) The tongue. Speak out, 29-39.
Molholt, G. (1988), Computer-Assisted Instruction in Pronunciation for Chinese Speakers of American English. TESOL Quarterly, 22: 91-111.
Molholt, G. (1990). Spectrographic analysis and patterns in pronunciation. Computers and the Humanities, 24(1), 81-92.
Molholt, G., Hwu, F., Holland, V., & Fisher, F. (2008). Visualization of speech patterns for language learning. The path of speech technologies in computer assisted language learning, 91-122.
Moriya, Y. (1988). English Speech Rhythm and Its Teaching to Non-Native Speakers.
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Burgess, C. S. (2003, August). The detection of foreign accent in backwards speech. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 535-538). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Noguchi, J. (2014). Contrastive analysis between Japanese and American English sound systems: From an articulatory setting perspective. The Journal of Kanda University of International Studies, 26, 293-309.
Nolan, Francis J. (1983) The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Connor, J. D. (1973). Phonetics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Obert, Kerri. (2020). Vocal Tract Contributions To Ring and Twang In Voice Qualities. http://getvocal-now.com/ Orion, G. F. (1988). Pronouncing American English: sounds, stress, and intonation (Vol. 1). Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Paget, Richard (1930). Human Speech: Some Observations, Experiments and Conclusions as to the Nature, Origin, Purpose, and Possible Improvement of Human Speech. Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (20):633-636.
Panfili, L. (2018). Cross-linguistic acoustic characteristics of phonation: A machine learning approach (Doctoral dissertation).
Parry, J.J.; Burnett, I.S.; Chicharo, J.F (2000)..: Language-specific phonetic structure and the quantisation of the spectral envelope of speech. Speech Commun. 32: 229–250 Perkell, J. S. (1969). Physiology of speech production: Results and implications of a quantitative cineradiographic study. MIT research monograph, No 53.
Perlmutter, M. (1989). Intelligibility rating of L2 speech postintervention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68(2), 515-521.
Roach, P. (2014). A practical course of English phonetics and phonology. (14th Impression).
Rosenbaum, D.A.; Loukopoulos, L.D.; Meulenbroek, R.G.J.; Vaughan, J.; Engelbrecht, S.E.: Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychol. Rev. 102: 28–67 (1995).
Schwarz, D. (1998). Spectral envelopes in sound analysis and synthesis (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, Fakultät Informatik).
Shue, Y. L. (2010). The voice source in speech production: Data, analysis and models. University of California, Los Angeles.
Sievers, E. (1876). Grundzüge der lautphysiologie zur einlührung in das studium der lautlehre der indogermanischen sprachen. Breitkopf und Hartel.
Skalozub, L. G. (1963). Palatogrammy i rentgenogrammy soglasnych fonem russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Izdat. Kievskogo Univ..
Stillitano, C., Rosati, N., Cisternino, S., Fioretti, A., Iaconelli, S., & Eibenstein, A.
(2017). The Effects of the Tomatis Method on the Artistic Voice. International Journal of Listening, 31(2), 113-120.
Stuart-Smith, Jane. “Glasgow: accent and voice quality”. In P. Foulkes & G.
Docherty (eds.), Urban Voices (Accent Studies in the British Isles). London: Arnold: 1999, 203-222.
Svantesson, J. O. (1984). Vowels and Diphtongs in Standard Chinese. Working papers/Lund University, Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, 27.
Sweet, H. (1877). A handbook of phonetics (Vol. 2). Clarendon Press.
Sweet, H. (1890). A primer of phonetics. Clarendon Press.
Thompson BM, Andrews SR. An historical commentary on the physiological effects of music: Tomatis, Mozart and neuropsychology. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science : the Official Journal of the Pavlovian Society. 2000 Jul-Sep;35(3):174-188.
Thornbury, S. (1993). Having a good jaw: Voice-setting phonology. ELT Journal, 47(2), 126-131.
Titze, I. (2010). Fascinations with the human voice. University of Iowa.
Titze, Ingo. (2000). Principles of Voice Production, Second Printing. National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa City, IA. 245-251.
Tomatis, A. (1974). Vers l'écoute humaine. Science de l'éducation.
Tomatis, A. (2013). Learning through the ear.
Tomatis, A., & Keeping, F. (2005). The ear and the voice. Scarecrow Press. Tomatis, L. A. (1975). The Assimilation of Modern Languages. Paris: AIAPP. Tomatis, A. (1954). Studies of auditory selectivity. Bulletin of the SFECMAS Medical Study and Research Centre.
Trudgill, P., Trudgill, S., Anderson, S. R., & Huddleston, R. (1974). The socialdifferentiation of English in Norwich (Vol. 13). CUP archive.
Weiss, W. (1985). Long-term average spectra of continuous speech before and after
Tomatis andio-vocal training. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78(S1), S56-S56.
Wilhelm, S. (2019). Voice Quality in British English. Its Nature, Functions and
Applications. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Linguistics, (27). Wilkins, John (1668) An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London: John Martyn.
Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold. Wilson, I. L. (2006). Articulatory settings of French and English monolingual and bilingual speakers. University of British Columbia.
Wittig, K. (1956). Phonetik des Amerikanischen Englisch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. Wright, R., Mansfield, C., & Panfili, L. (2019). Voice quality types and uses in North American English. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Linguistics, (27).
Wu, Z. J. (1986). The spectrographic album of mono-syllables of Standard Chinese. Beijing, China: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
Zemlin, W.R. (1998). Speech and hearing science: Anatomy and physiology (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon