研究生: |
陳謙仁 Chien-Ren Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
夫妻關係協調工作坊方案助益分析 Benefits from Workshop Programs of Couple Group Therapy: Self -Relation Coordination Counseling model for Chinese Couple in Marriage |
指導教授: |
陳秉華
Chen, Ping-Wha |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 253 |
中文關鍵詞: | 婚姻諮商 、紮根理論資料分析法 、夫妻關係協調 |
英文關鍵詞: | Marriage Counseling, Grounded Theory Data Analysis, Couple Coordination |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:151 下載:16 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在分析六對夫妻參與「夫妻關係協調工作坊」的助益。工作坊由本土婚姻諮商師設計與帶領,融合本土與西方婚姻諮商概念。研究參與夫妻年齡介於27 至42歲,婚齡0.5至3.5年,學歷學士碩士各半。本研究透過訪談法,以及紮根理論資料分析中的開放與類別編碼程序,進行質性分析。研究結果將夫妻在「工作坊剛結束」與「六週後」兩個時間點回饋對夫妻關係協調的助益,統整歸納為五大主要助益類別,以及十八項次要助益與其中面向。五大主要助益類別如下:(一)覺察了解與接納個人自我;(二)覺察與表達情感性關係自我;(三)了解接納與回應配偶的個人自我;(四)覺察與了解關係互動與衝突因應模式;(五)面對問題進行自我協調或與配偶溝通協調。以及統整出大團體歷程的四大主要助益類別及十二項次要助益,四大主要助益類別如下:(一)自我坦露與團體成員間經驗分享;(二)團體開放分享氣氛與團體領導者態度;(三)成員間人際學習與回饋;(四)團體參照與社會比較效用。在研究結果討論中,研究者比對原先工作坊預設目標,說明各活動及整體工作坊是否有當下、延宕或持續效果。在結論與限制中,研究者依據研究發現的助益,對原來工作坊設計理念「伴侶/夫妻關係協調諮商模式」中的諮商任務,做出回饋、修正以及具體建議,也針對本研究的限制提出說明及對未來研究建議。
The Aims of the study were to find out benefits from the couple workshop. The leaders used self-relation coordination counseling model to help six Chinese couples coordinate with their spouses. They were married for 0.5-3.5 year, aged 27-42, 50% got bachelor degree and 50% got master degree. They were interviewed right after the end of the workshop and 6 weeks after the workshop again. The Grounded Theory was adopted to open-code and conceptualize the qualitative data. benefits were induced and categorized into 5 major benefits and 18 subordinate benefits. 5 major benefits were as follows: (1) Being aware and accepting individual self, (2) Being aware and expressing affectionate relational self, (3) Understanding, accepting, and responding to spouses’ individual self, (4) Being aware and understanding their interaction, communication, and conflict coping behavior, (5) Acknowledging problems and then self-accommodating or coordinating with their spouses. The help from the group dynamic process were also induced and categorized into 4 major benefits and 12 subordinate benefits. 4 major benefits were as follows: (1) Self disclosure and experience sharing, (2) Open group atmosphere and the leader’s attitude, (3) Interpersonal learning and feedback, (4) Social reference and contrast. In discussion, the researcher compared benefits with the goals of each individual programs and the whole workshop, to show the immediate, postponed, or put-off effects of the workshop. Finally, the researcher revised the self-relation coordination counseling model used in Chinese couples, and made some suggestions with regard to the counseling practice and further studies.
一、中文部份
Boyatzis, R. E.(2005)。質性資料分析-如何透視質性資料 (王國川、翁千惠譯)。台北:五南。(原著作出版年:1998年)
Flick, U.(2007)。質性研究導論(李政賢、廖志恒、林靜如譯)。台北:五南。(原著作出版年:1995年)
Glesne, C.(2006)。質性研究導論(莊明貞、陳怡如譯)。台北:高等教育。(原著作出版年:1999年)
Greenberg, L. S. (2004)。情緒焦點治療(鍾瑞麗、曾琼蓉譯)。台北:天馬文化。(原著作出版年:2002年)
Punch, K. F.(2005)。社會科學研究法(林世華、陳柏熹、黃寶園、傅瓊儀、趙如錦譯)。台北:心理。(原著作出版年:1998年)
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.(2001)。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法(吳芝儀、廖梅花譯)。嘉義:濤石文化。(原著作出版年:1998年)
伍育英、鄭玉英、杜長齡(2009)。多重夫妻支持團體模式之初探-以高風險家庭尤例。教育心理學報(諮商實務與訓練專刊),41,463-488。
林美珣(2008)。諮商歷程中兩對兩性伴侶情感關係衝突協調之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
林萬億、董秀珍、楊連謙(2005)。上帝把最艱鉅落實兩性平權的重任交給了家庭治療師?!應用心理研究,25,20-22。
內政部統計處(2009)。九十八年第二十二週內政統計通報:97年離婚者按結婚年數統計。內政統計通報。台北:內政部。
利翠珊(2000)。婚姻親密情感的內涵與測量。中華心理衛生學刊,12(4),29-51。
周玉慧、黃宗堅、謝雨生(2004)。家人關係中社會支持獲取策略之運用及其影響。中華心理學刊,46(4),329-347。
周麗端(2005)。生命歷程中的夫妻互動:丈夫必須是經濟靠山?應用心理研究,25,3。
洪雅琴(2006)。婚姻中的轉折:跨國婚姻中夫妻衝突因應過程之對偶分析。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
胡幼慧(1996)。質性硏究:理論、方法及本土女性硏究實例。台北:巨流。
范嵐欣(2009)。華人夫妻關係衝突之人我關係協調諮商改變歷程研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課:首航初探之旅。高雄:麗文文化。
莊雅婷、陳秉華(2006)。大學生情侶對「薩堤爾模式」溝通方案的改變知覺及改變影響來源之研究。教育心理學報,37(3),297-316。
翁開誠(2004)。當Carl Rogers遇上了王陽明:心學對人文心理與治療知行合一的啟發。應用心理研究,23,157-200。
鈕文英(2006)。教育研究方法與論文寫作。台北:雙葉書廊。
梁淑娟(2005)。婚姻諮商改變歷程分析研究-案家夫妻之觀點。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所博士論文,未出版,彰化市。
梁淑娟、趙淑珠(2005)。婚姻治療改變歷程之研究:以情感性疾患夫妻為例。中華輔導學報,17,69-104。
郭麗安(2009)。伴侶、婚姻與家族治療的在地經驗與反思。論文發表於伴侶、婚姻與家族治療學術研討會-在地治療經驗交流,國立彰化師範大學主辦,彰化市。
陳秉華(2001)。華人社會自我與關係的協調。測驗與輔導,168,3511-3515。
陳秉華、李素芬、林美珣(2008)。諮商中伴侶關係的自我協調歷程。本土心理學研究,29,117-182。
陳秉華、林美珣、李素芬(2009)。人我關係協調之伴侶諮商研究。教育心理學報,40(3),463-488。
陳秉華、游淑瑜(2001)。台灣的家庭文化與家庭治療。Asian Journal of Counseling(亞洲輔導學報),8(2),153-174。
陳秉華、楊國樞(2005)。「人我關係協調諮商模式的建構」專題研究計畫(計畫編號:NSC94-2413-H003-034)。行政院國家科學委員會。
陳秉華、蕭淑惠(2006)。「夫妻關係協調諮商小團體」工作手冊。未出版,國立台灣師範大學,台北。
陳秉華、蕭淑惠、楊國樞(2006)。「夫妻關係協調諮商小團體對婚姻滿意之效果研究」專題研究計畫(計畫編號:NSC95-2413-H-003-031)。行政院國家科學委員會。
陳秉華、蕭淑惠、楊國樞(2007)。「夫妻關係協調諮商小團體對婚姻滿意之效果研究」研究成果報告(計畫編號:NSC95-2413-H-003-031)。行政院國家科學委員會。
陳建良(2005)。家庭談判桌的參與成員:夫妻對偶決策機制的幾點省思。應用心理研究,25,14-18。
陳斐虹(2005)。老年夫妻婚姻生活經驗:關係的互動與發展。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系博士論文,未出版,彰化市。
黃宗堅、葉光輝、謝雨生(2004)。夫妻關係中權力與情感的運作模式:以衝突因應策略為例。本土心理學研究,21,3-48。
楊國樞(2002)。華人心理的本土化研究。台北:桂冠。
楊國樞(2004)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究,22,11-80。
楊國樞(2005)。本土心理學的意義與開展。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上)(1-52頁)。台北:遠流。
甄曉蘭(1996)。從典範轉移的再思論的研究崛起的意義。嘉義師院學報,10,119-146。
趙文滔(2006)。台灣婚姻與家庭治療實務之發展:十一個案例的分析比較。本土心理學研究,26,73-107。
趙淑珠(2005)。從獨舞到雙人舞。應用心理研究,25,1-3。
劉惠琴(2005)。夫妻之舞隨人跳。應用心理研究,25,10-12。
駱淑華(2005)。薩提爾模式親職成長團體對國小兒童父母輔導效果之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
二、英文部份
Chen, C. R., & Chen, P. H. (2008). A case study of existential-humanistic approach counseling: A Taiwanese male client with 16 counseling sessions. Paper presented at the 5th World Congress of Psychotherapy, Beijing, China.
Chen, C. R., Christine, & Chen, P. H. (2008). A case study of existential-humanistic approached narrative therapy: A Taiwanese female client with 21 counseling sessions. Paper presented at the 5th World Congress of Psychotherapy, Beijing, China.
Chen, P. H. (2001). A Chinese perspective of self and the implication to mental health. Paper presented at the 2001 North American Society of Psychotherapy Research Conference, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.
Chen, P. H. (2004). The Self-Other Coordination theory for counseling Chinese clients. Paper presented at the 28th International Congress of Psychology, Beijing, China.
Chen, P. H. (2005). The Self-Relational Situation-Coordination Counseling Model for clients with interpersonal conflicts in Chinese Communities. Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Chen, P. H. (2006). Counseling around the world - The development of culture-specific counseling in Taiwan. Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, New Orland, LA.
Chen, P. H. (2009). A counseling model for Self-Relation Coordination for Chinese clients with interpersonal conflict. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 987-1009.
Corey, G. (2005). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (7th ed.). California: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.
English, T., & Chen, S. (2007). Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 478–490.
Feeney, J. A. (2005). Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Exploring the role of attachment and perceptions of personal injury. Personal Relationships, 12, 253-271.
Feld, B. G. (2007a). Couple therapy: Therapy for a group of two. GROUP, 31(3), 134-135.
Feld, B. G. (2007b). The therapeutic effect of triadic interactive regulation on couple therapy. GROUP, 31(3), 171-183.
Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic- A scientifically-based marital therapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Greenspon, T. S. (2007). Desire, vulnerability, and interweaving worlds of experience: An intersubjective systems sensibility in couple therapy. GROUP, 31(3), 154-170.
Guanipa, G. (2003). Sharing a multicultural course design for a marriage and family therapy programme: One perspective. Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 86-106.
Heppner, P. P., & Heppner, M. J. (2004). Writing and publishing your thesis, dissertation, and research- A guide for students in the helping professions. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.
Hill, C. E. (2004). Helping skills: Facilitating Exploration, Insight, and Action (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kirby, J. S., & Baucom, D. H. (2007). Treating emotion dysregulation in a couples context: A pilot study of a couples skills group intervention. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(3), 375-391.
Lu, L. & Yang, K. K. (2004). The emergence, composition, and change of the traditional-modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Chinese societies. Paper presented at the Bicultural self symposium, Hong Kong, China.
Lutz, W., & Hill, C. E. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative methods for psychotherapy research: Introduction to special section. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 369-373.
Moynehan, J., & Adams, J. (2007). What's the problem? A look at men in marital therapy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 41-51.
Nakonezny, P. A., & Denton, W. H. (2008). Marital relationship: A social exchange theory perspective. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 402-412.
Protinsky, H., Flemke, K., & Sparks, J. (2001). EMDR and emotionally oriented couple therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 23(2), 153-168.
Rosenblatt, P. C., & Rieks, S. J. (2009). No compromise: Couples dealing with issues for which they do not see a compromise. The American Journal of Family Therapy,37, 196-208.
Schultheiss, D. E. P. (2003). A relational approach to Career counseling: Theoretical integration and practical application. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81(3), 301.
Seedall, R. B. (2009). Enhancing change process in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy by utilizing couple enactments. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 99-113.
Sharf, R. S. (2006). Applying career development theory to counseling (4th ed.). California: Brooks/Cole.
Sharf, R. S. (2008). Theories of psychotherapy and counseling: Concepts and cases (4th ed.). Australia: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2003). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (4th ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological Issues. Journal of Marriage and the Familiy, November.
Tremblay, N., Wright, J., Mamodhoussen, S., Mcduff, P., & Sabourin, S. (2008). Refining therapeutic mandates in couple therapy outcome research: A feasibility study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 137-148.
Tsai, J. L., Miao, F. F., Seppala, E., Fung, H. H., & Yeung, D. Y. (2007). Influence and adjustment goals:Sources of cultural differences in ideal affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1102-1117.
Waldinger, R. J., Schulz, M. S., Hauser, S. T., Allen, J. P., & Crowell, J. A. (2004). Reading others’ emotions: The role of intuitive judgments in predicting marital satisfaction, quality, and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 58-71.
Wasserman, J. A., Clair, J. M., & Wilson, K. L. (2009). Problematics of grounded theory: Innovations for developing an increasing rigorous qualitative method. Qualitative Research, 9(3), 355-381.
Yalom, I. D. (2004). Every day gets a littel closer: A twice-told therapy. New York: Basic Books.
Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York: Basic Books.