臺南市教育局創建布可星球（Book Planet）線上的閱讀學習平臺，鼓勵閱讀者完成實體書籍閱讀後，到此平臺對這本布可（Book）進行任務探索並獲成就積分。更能將平臺積分換成實體獎勵，透過遊戲的旨趣鼓勵學子閱讀。另一方面，文學圈討論小組教學模式在過往研究中指出除能提升學生閱讀興趣與能力外，亦能同時幫助學生在角色扮演、提問等演譯文本過程中，提升對於文本的閱讀理解能力與分享所學之興趣。因此，本研究旨在探討使用文學圈進行小組討論對提升國小學生閱讀興趣與閱讀理解的效果。研究對象包括20名國民小學三年級學生以文學圈討論教學介入作為實驗組，以及17名自己閱讀的學生作為對照組。研究使用閱讀興趣以及布可星球線上閱讀計分系統進行前後測比較。研究結果顯示，在閱讀理解能力方面，實驗組在五本書的閱讀測驗上表現出顯著的優異表現，而閱讀時間方面兩組之間並無顯著差異。透過文學圈的角色扮演和活動，學生之間的互動和溝通能力得到增強。在分享的過程中，學生有機會學習如何清晰表達問題、答案或文本內容。因此，相較於自己閱讀，文學圈討論小組教學模式能夠更好地幫助學生運用高層次的後設能力。綜合以上結果，本研究結果顯示使用文學圈進行小組討論對於提升國小學生的閱讀興趣和閱讀理解能力具有積極的影響。透過文學圈的教學模式，學生能夠增加對書籍的閱讀理解能力、提升閱讀興趣，並發展與他人互動和溝通的素養。故教育工作者可以考慮將文學圈納入課堂教學中，以促進學生閱讀成就和全面發展。

The Tainan City Education Bureau has developed an online reading learning platform called "Book Planet" （布可星球）, which encourages readers to explore and gain achievement points by completing physical book readings on the platform. Moreover, these points can be exchanged for tangible rewards, thus motivating students to engage in reading through the gamified approach. On the other hand, the literature circle instructional model has been shown in previous research to enhance students' reading interest and comprehension, as well as their understanding of the text and interest in sharing their learning experiences through activities such as role-playing and questioning. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of using literature circles for group discussions on enhancing reading interest and comprehension among elementary school students.

The study included 20 third-grade students from a national elementary school as the experimental group, who received instruction using the literature circle approach, and 17 students who engaged in self-directed reading as the control group. The researchers employed measures such as reading comprehension, reading interest and the Book Planet online reading scoring system to compare pre-test and post-test results.

The results indicated that the experimental group demonstrated significantly better performance in reading comprehension across five books, while there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of reading time. Importantly, students using the literature circle approach exhibited better skills in finding notable sentences in books and sharing them with their classmates compared to students engaged in self-directed reading. Through role-playing and activities in the literature circle, students' interaction and communication skills were enhanced. The sharing process provided opportunities for students to learn how to articulate questions, answers, or textual content clearly. Consequently, the literature circle instructional model proved to be more effective in helping students apply higher-order metacognitive skills compared to self-directed reading.

In summary, the results of this study indicate that using literature circles for group discussions has a positive impact on enhancing reading interest and comprehension among elementary school students. Through the literature circle instructional model, students can improve their understanding of books and develop interpersonal interaction and communication skills. Therefore, educators should consider incorporating literature circles into classroom instruction to promote students' reading achievements and holistic development.

布可星球。取自：https：//read.tn.edu.tw/
吳淑婷（2008）。國小四年級實施文學圈的行動研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學語文與創作學系語文教學碩士班。
巫文娟（2017）。閱讀投入與學習成效關聯之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
卓珈郁（2020）。以文學圈進行小組討論對於高中生英文閱讀能力及興趣影響之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
洪慧萍（2002）。合作學習融入閱讀教學模式對國小六年級學生閱讀理解後設認知閱讀動機影響之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
范寶文（2010）。文學圈應用於國小五年級學童英語閱讀活動之行動研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣海洋大學教育研究所。
侯秋玲、吳敏而（2005）。文學圈之理論與實務。臺北：朗智。
康恩嘉（2017）。運用六何法閱讀理解策略教學提升國小二年級學童閱讀理解能力、閱讀動機之行動研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士在職專班。
張春興（1998）。現代心理學。臺北：東華。
許惠玲（2007）。探討兒童閱讀理解能力－以「文學圈」在國小六年級閱讀討論活動為例〔未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學人資處語文教學碩士班。
許建銓（2015）。彰化縣國小教師與高年級學童對閱讀線上認證系統使用滿意度之分析研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺中教育大學區域與社會發展學系國民小學教師在職進修教學碩士學位班。
許春暉（2016）。繪本教學對國小一年級學生閱讀興趣培養之行動研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學系。
許秀莉（2016）。高雄市國小學童參與「喜閱網」線上閱讀認證系統及其閱讀態度之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩。
陳雅雯（2019）。引導式閱讀教學法對於臺灣六年級學童閱讀能力之影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立彰化師範大學兒童英語研究所。
黃金茂（1999）。開啟國小兒童的閱讀習慣。師友。
馮珮珍（2007）。「文學圈」在國小二年級閱讀教學之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立新竹教育大學人資處語文教學碩士班。
黃偉哲（2022年11月24日）。布可100 創意無限，期許閱讀成為市民的習慣。臺南市政府電子報。https://www.tainan.gov.tw/news_content.aspx? n=13371&s=7928676
黃啟菱（2017年8月18日）。兒童和青少年閱讀習慣調查。未來雜誌Familyhttps：//gvsrc.cwgv.com.tw/articles/index/14765/2
詹蕎瑜（2020）。運用多媒體教學對國小學生英語閱讀能力與學習動機之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。私立康寧大學應用外語研究所。
趙鏡中（1999）。幫助學生成為一個真正的閱讀者-兼論兒童文學在閱讀教學中運用。〔論文集〕。國立臺東師範學院兒童文學研究所研討會，臺東縣，台灣。
賴韻帆（2018）。臺中市某國小推動校園閱讀線上認證系統之現況與影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。私立南華大學國際事務與企業學系亞太研究碩士班。
薛淑珠（2017）。運用共讀提升國小一年級學生閱讀能力之行動研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。私立輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士在職專班。
魏丹尼（2018）。運用合作學習提升國際小學國小五年級學生閱讀能力〔未出版之碩士論文〕。私立康寧大學應用外語研究所。
羅苡芳（2013）。國小一年級學童閱讀興趣培養之研究－以繪本教學為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立屏東教育大學中國語文學系碩士班。
Baker &Wigfield. （1999）.Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading research Quarterly, 34, 452-477. https：//www.jstor.org/stable/748216
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. （1995）. Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children： A2-and3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87（3）, 488-503.https：//doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.488
Chall, J. S. （1967）. Learning to read： The great debate. New York： McGraw-Hill.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. （1997）. Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33（6）, 934-945. https：//doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
Daniels. （1994）.Literature Circle： Voice and Choice in the Student-Centered Classroom.York , ME：Stenhouse Publishers.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. （1985）. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York： Plenum Press.http：//dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. （2000）. Dispositional emotionality and regulation： Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78（1）, 136-157. https：//doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.136
Freebody, P., & Byrne, B.（1988）. Word-reading strategies in elementary school children： Relations to comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 23（4）, 441-453.https：//doi.org/10.2307/747642
Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z.（2017）. Stimulatingand sustaining interest in a language course： An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 461-468.
Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. （2013）. Designing asynchronous online discussion environments： Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44（3）, 469–483. https//doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x
Gottfried, A. E. （1985）. Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77（6）, 631–645. https：//doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.631
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. （1990）. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82（1）, 33-40. https：//doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. （2000）. Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92（2）, 331-341. https：//doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.331
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. （2000）. Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92（2）, 331-341. https：//doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.331
Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. （2003）. The laptop and the lecture： The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15（1）, 46-64.https：//doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
James, W. （1890）. The principles of psychology, Vol. 1. Henry Holt and Co. https：//doi.org/10.1037/10538-000
Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. （2012）. No A 4 U： The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59（2）, 505-514. https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
OECD （2010）. PISA 2009 Results： Overcoming Social Background. Equity in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes （Volume II）. Paris： OECD Publishing. Retrieved January 27, 2011 from https：//doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en
Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. （2006）. Motivation and Its Relationship With Reading Achievement in an Urban Middle School. The Journal of Educational Research, 100（2）, 81-101. https：//doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
Robinson, F. P. （1970）. Effective study （4th ed. ）. New York.
Rogers, C. （1951）. Client-Centered Therapy： Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. London： Constable.
Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. （2006）. Motivation and Its Relationship With Reading Achievement in an Urban Middle School. The Journal of Educational Research, 100（2）, 81-101. https：//doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
Wigfield, A. and Guthrie, J.T. （1997）.Relations of Children’s Motivation for Reading to the Amount and Breadth or Their Reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420-432. http：//dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420