研究生: |
徐志良 Chih-liang Hsu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
馬克吐溫作品中孩童對權威的反應 Children's Responses to Authority in Mark Twain's Works |
指導教授: |
高瑪麗
Mary Goodwin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2006 |
畢業學年度: | 94 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 129 |
中文關鍵詞: | 模範生 、陽剛頑童 、權威 、教育機制 、訓誡措施 、控制機制 、模範生論述 、男孩文化 、陰柔性 、陽剛性 、青少年形象 |
英文關鍵詞: | Model Children, Masculine Urchins, Authority, Educative Mechanisms, Disciplinary Practices, Control Mechanisms, A Discourse on Model Children, Boys’ Culture, Effeminacy, Masculinity, Juvenile Images |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:461 下載:37 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要
藉由分析馬克吐溫三個文本:《湯姆‧索亞歷險記》(1876)、《哈克貝里‧芬恩歷險記》(1884-85)、以及《好孩子倒大楣》(1870),本論文旨在檢視作者筆下的模範生與頑童對權威的反應以及呈現由權威操控策略所發展出的教育機制是如何塑造出四種青少年形象。第一章首先呈現《湯姆‧索亞歷險記》與《哈克貝里‧芬恩歷險記》所描述的各種權威,從中除了顯示家庭、教會、學校與社會四種權威如何操控或壓迫孩童,也會將壓迫孩童的方法分成兩種教育機制。第一種教育機制是包含陰柔行為法則的訓誡措施,其中包括控制機制與模範生論述,其目的是用來訓誡孩童,使他們具有責任感。第二種教育機制是包含陽剛行為法則的男孩文化,其目的是為了塑造具有男子氣慨的孩童。以此兩種教育機制為本論文的架構,第二章研究《湯姆‧索亞歷險記》與《好孩子倒大楣》所呈現出兩種願意接受訓誡措施操縱的模範生—席得與賈格。藉由分析他們如何回應權威的束縛以及檢視訓誡措施對其影響,此章節除了呈現作者如何挑戰訓誡措施,也會揭露模範生的服從的假面具。第三章研究《湯姆‧索亞歷險記》與《哈克貝里‧芬恩歷險記》所呈現的頑童—湯姆與哈克。藉由檢視頑童們如何回應權威束縛與檢視男孩陽剛文化對他們的影響,本章節除了顯示聖彼得堡如何塑造具有男子氣慨的男孩外,也會解釋他們調皮的原因,這些原因可揭露陽剛外表下的真面目。藉由研究馬克吐溫筆下的四個孩童—席得、賈格、湯姆、哈克—本論文最後呈現四種不同青少年形象。
Abstract
This thesis examines how Mark Twain’s two distinctive types of children—model children and masculine urchins—respond to authority and reveals how the two educative mechanisms that develop from the authority’s manipulative strategies fashion four different kinds of juvenile images through the analysis of his three works, including The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (1876), Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884-85), and “The Story of the Good Little Boy Who Did Not Prosper” (1870). Through showing a panorama of different forms of authority described in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, the first chapter of this thesis not only reveals how the four major authorities—family and church, school and society—manipulate or repress the children portrayed by Mark Twain but also categorizes the manipulative ways of these authorities into two educative mechanisms. The first type of the educative mechanism used as a means of imposing discipline and obligation upon children is embodied in a set of disciplinary practices, including control mechanisms and a discourse on model children. These disciplinary practices, which derive from the authorities’ manipulative measures, include a set of effeminate codes of conduct that instruct children how to comport themselves in a socially acceptable way. In contrast to the disciplinary practices whose aim is to civilize children, the second type of the educative mechanism used as a means of training children to become masculine boys is represented by a dominant boys’ culture. This dominant boys’ culture, which develops from the demands of authorities, comprises a set of masculine codes of conduct that teach children how to behave in a masculine manner. By using these two educative mechanisms as a framework of the ensuing chapters, the second chapter of this thesis concentrates upon Mark Twain’s two distinctive types of model children, who are more susceptible to the disciplinary practices, in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and “The Story of the Good Little Boy Who Did Not Prosper.” Through analyzing the ways the model children respond to the shackles of multiple authorities and examining the impact of the disciplinary practices upon the model children, the second chapter not only reveals how Mark Twain undermines the disciplinary practices but also lifts the masks of obedience worn by the “model” boys. The third chapter of this thesis focuses on Mark Twain’s two distinctive types of masculine urchins, who are more susceptible to the dominant boys’ culture, in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. By dint of examining how the masculine urchins respond to the constraints of multiple authorities and analyzing the influence of the masculine boys’ culture upon Mark Twain’s teenage boys, the third chapter not only shows how the fictional society, St. Petersburg, shapes its adolescent boys into masculine men but also elucidates the possible causes of their disobedience in the hope of stripping off the “masculine” armor worn by those masculine urchins. Through studying the impact of the two educative mechanisms upon the model children and masculine urchins, this thesis eventually shows four distinctive juvenile images respectively embodied in Sid, Jacob, Tom, and Huck.
Works Cited
Primary Sources:
Twain, Mark. Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Ed. Thomas Cooley. 3rd ed. New York: Norton, 1999.
---. The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. Ed. and with an intro. and notes. Lee Clark Mitchell. New York: UP of Oxford, 1998.
---. The Autobiography of Mark Twain. Ed. Charles Neider. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.
---. “The Story of the Bad Little Boy Who Didn’t Come to Grief.” The Best Short Stories of Mark Twain. Ed. and with a pref. and notes. Lawrence I. Berkove. Intro. Pete Hamill. New York: Modern Library, 2004. 10-13.
---. “The Story of the Good Little Boy Who Did Not Prosper.” The Best Short Stories of Mark Twain. Ed. and with a pref. and notes. Lawrence I. Berkove. Intro. Pete Hamill. New York: Modern Library, 2004. 29-33.
Secondary Sources:
Aspiz, Harold. “Tom Sawyer’s Games of Death.” Studies in the Novel 27.2 (1995): 141-54.
Barnett, Ola W., Cindy L. Miller-Perrin, and Robin D. Perrin. Family Violence Across the Lifespan. London: Sage, 1997.
Bronson, Martha B. Self-Regulation in Early Childhood: Nature and Nurture. New York: Guilford, 2000.
Brown, Gillian. “Child’s Play.” The American Child: A Cultural Studies Reader. Ed. Caroline F. Levander and Carol J. Singley. N.J.: Rutgers UP, 2003.
Bryant, Clifton D. Deviant Behavior: Readings in the Sociology of Norm Violations. New York: Hemisphere, 1990.
Campbell, Neil. “The ‘Seductive Outside’ and the “Sacred Precincts’: Boundaries and Transgressions in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer.” Children’s Literature in Education 25.2 (1994): 125-38.
Cozy, David. “Huck’s Heresy.” Free Inquiry 24.2 (2004): 51-52.
Cullingford, Cedric. The Inner World of the School: Children’s Ideas about Schools. New York: Cassell, 1991.
Edgar, Andrew, and Peter Sedgwick. Cultural Theory: The Key Thinkers. London: Routledge, 2002.
Edgerton, Robert B. Rules, Exceptions, and Social Order. Berkeley: California UP, 1985.
Fishkin, Shelley Fisher. “Mark Twain and Race.” A Historical Guide to Mark Twain. New York: Oxford UP, 2002. 127-62.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon, 1977.
Gilbert, Rob, and Pam Gilbert. Masculinity Goes to School. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Gore, Jennifer M. “Disciplining Bodies: On the Continuity of Power Relations in Pedagogy.” Foucault’s Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education. Ed. Thomas S. Popkewitz and Marie Brennan. New York: Teachers College, 1998.
Hechter, Michael, and Karl-Dieter Opp, eds. Introduction. Social Norms. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001. xi-xx.
Hullings-Catalano, Virginia. “Physical Abuse of Children by Parents.” The Impact of Violence on the Family: Treatment Approaches for Therapists and Other Professionals. Ed. Dean M. Busby. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1996. 43-74.
Kindlon, Dan and Michael Thompson. Raising Cain: Protecting the Emotional Life of Boys. New York: Ballantine Books, 2000.
Kravitz, Bennett. “Reinventing the World and Reinventing the Self in Huck Finn.” Papers on Language & Literature 40.1 (2004): 3-27.
Martino, Wayne. “‘Powerful People Aren’t Usually Real Kind, Friendly, Open People!’ Boys Interrogating Masculinities at School.’” What About the Boys?: Issues of Masculinity in Schools. Ed. Wayne Martino and Bob Meyenn. Philadelphia: Open UP, 2001.
Martino, Wayne, and Maria Pallotta-Chiarolli. So What’s a Boy?: Addressing Issues of Masculinity and Schooling. Philadelphia: Open UP, 2003.
McNeer, May. America’s Mark Twain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.
Messent, Peter. “Discipline and Punishment in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer.” Journal of American Studies 32.2 (1998): 219-35.
---. Mark Twain. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1997.
Milgram, Stanley. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
Mintz, Steven. “Idealized Notions of Childhood.” Chronicle of Higher Education 51.12 (2004).
Montandon, Cleopatra. “Home and School Constraints in Children’s Experience of Socialisation in Geneva.” Children, Home and School: Regulation, Autonomy or Connection? Ed. Rosalind Edwards. New York: Routledge, 2002. 106-20.
Moore, Kristin A, V. Jeffery Evans, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, and Jodie Roth. “What Are Good Child Outcomes?” The Well-Being of Children and Families: Research and Data Needs. Ed. Arland Thornton. Ann Arbor: Michigan UP, 2001. 59-84.
Nelson, Phillip J, and Kenneth V. Greene. Signaling Goodness: Social Rules and Public Choice. Ann Arbor: Michigan UP, 2003.
Opdahl, Keith M. “‘You’ll Be Sorry When I’m Dead’: Child-Adult Relations in Huck Finn.” Modern Fiction Studies 25.4 (1979/1980): 613-24.
Railton, Stephen. Mark Twain: A Short Introduction. Malden: Blackwell, 2004.
Sanborn, Margaret. Mark Twain: The Bachelor Years: A Biography. New York: Doubleday, 1990.
Sedlak, A. J. National Incidence and Prevalence of Child Abuse and Neglect: 1988. Revised Report. Rockville, MD: Westat, 1991.
Seldon, Ramon. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1985.
Sloan, Gary. “A Connecticut Yankee in God’s Court.” Skeptic 8.4 (2001): 86-89.
Storey, John. An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
Sumner, William Graham. Folkways: A Study of Mores, Manners, Customs and Morals. New York: Dover, 2002.
Trachtenberg, Alan. “The Form of Freedom in Huckleberry Finn.” Huck Finn. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1990. 48-60.
Wolff, Cynthia Griffin. “The Adventure of Tom Sawyer: A Nightmare Vision of American Boyhood.” Mark Twain. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1986. 93-106.
Zuravin, S. J. “The Ecology of Child Abuse and Neglect: Review of the Literature and Presentation of Data.” Violence and Victims 4.2 (1989): 101-20.