簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊逸婷
Yang, Yi-Ting
論文名稱: 以事件相關腦電位探討跨文化的幽默分析:臺灣受試者對美式諷刺的反應
An ERP Study on Cross-Cultural Humor: Taiwanese Subjects' Response to American Sarcastic Insults
指導教授: 詹曉蕙
Chan, Shiao-Hui
口試委員: 陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
廖招治
Liao, Chao-Chih
詹曉蕙
Chan, Shiao-Hui
口試日期: 2022/07/27
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 69
中文關鍵詞: 跨文化語用學文化接觸事件相關電位幽默處理母語諷刺幽默三階段模型
英文關鍵詞: cross-cultural pragmatics, cultural exposure, event-related potentials, humor processing, native language, sarcasm, three-stage model of humor
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201304
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:186下載:30
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 過去的跨文化研究認為,幽默(包含本研究所探討的諷刺性侮辱)因不同文化而異(Kalliny et al., 2006)。諷刺性侮辱雖然在美國文化中有創造力和娛樂性(Huang et al., 2015),但在台灣文化中卻被認為是間接攻擊個人並製造敵意的工具(Liao, 2001; Liao & Chang, 2006)。然而,隨著越來越多的社群媒體與西方喜劇的接觸,台灣人的幽默感可能已經被跨文化影響所改變。本研究藉由事件相關電位技術(ERP)探討文化接觸是否會影響一個人對幽默的感知。過去的事件相關電位研究聲稱,幽默處理背後的神經機制是一個「三階段模型」:由 N400 偏轉反映的「不協調檢測」、由 P600 效應表示的「不協調解決」和由 Late Positive Component 反映的「闡述」(LPC)(Canal et al., 2019; Coulson & Kutas, 2001; Ku et al., 2017)。本研究想了解跨文化的幽默理解是否也遵循此「三階段模型」。
    我們調查了兩個文化群體,美國人和台灣人,並操弄了兩個因素:1)母語(英語和普通話)和 2)喜劇接觸(少接觸和常接觸)。我們分析了44名參與者,包括19名英語母語人士和 25 名中文為母語人士。參與者首先完成一份文化接觸問卷,我們會根據該問卷對他們對於美國文化的接觸程度進行評分。接著我們呈現66個實驗刺激給參與者(33個笑話和33個非笑話),並指示他們按下按鈕來判斷刺激是否好笑,並同時記錄他們的腦電波反應。
    結果顯示,參與者的幽默欣賞會隨著文化差異而不同。首先,語言背景不影響幽默的腦波反應,但會影響幽默的行為反應:雖然美國人認為自己語言的諷刺笑話不是那麼好笑,但台灣人卻被逗樂,表現出台灣人對學習美式幽默的渴望。相反地,喜劇接觸會調節一個人的腦波反應,但不會影響他的行為反應:一個人接觸美國娛樂節目的次數越多,越能容忍充滿攻擊性的笑話。最後,我們發現大腦對諷刺性侮辱的反應並未遵循幽默處理的三階段模型。

    Past cross-cultural research has argued that humor, which encompasses sarcastic insults, varies by society (Kalliny et al., 2006). However, while heavily relied on in the American culture for creativity and entertainment (Huang et al., 2015), sarcastic insults in the Taiwanese culture are considered to indirectly attack an individual and create hostility (Liao, 2001; Liao & Chang, 2006). Nevertheless, with growing exposure to social media and Western comedy, Taiwanese humor perception and production may have been altered by cross-cultural influence. This present study explores whether cultural exposure may influence a person’s perception of humor with the Event-Related Potential (ERP) technique. Previous ERP studies have claimed that the neural mechanisms underlying humor processing is a three-stage model: “incongruity detection” reflected by an N400 deflection, “incongruity resolution” indicated by a P600 effect, and “elaboration” reflected by a Late Positive Component (LPC) (Canal et al., 2019; Coulson & Kutas, 2001; Ku et al., 2017). It would be informative to find out whether humor perception in cross-cultural individuals also follows this model.

    We investigated two cultural groups, Americans and Taiwanese, with two factors manipulated: 1) native language (English and Mandarin Chinese) and 2) comedy exposure (low exposure and high exposure). 44 participants were analyzed, including 19 English native speakers and 25 Chinese native speakers. They first had to finish a cultural exposure questionnaire, which scored them according to their degree of exposure to the American culture. They were then shown 66 stimuli (33 jokes and 33 non-jokes) and were instructed to judge the funniness of the stimuli by button press with their brainwave response being recorded.

    The results showed that cultural parameters could differentially affect participants’ humor processing and appreciation: while language background does not affect the ERP response in online humor processing, it influences the offline funniness rating of sarcastic insults; in contrast, comedy exposure modulates how one’s brain reacts to aggressive humor, but it does not affect the appreciation of it. Although the Americans were less amused by the sarcastic jokes of their own language, the Taiwanese were more amused, displaying the Taiwanese eagerness to acquire the American humor in their second language. In addition, the more exposure a person had to American entertainment shows, the more tolerant he/she became to aggression as a device of jocularity. Finally, the brain response to sarcastic insults did not follow the three-stage model of humor processing despite the cultural factors.

    Acknowledgement i Abstract in Mandarin iii Abstract in English iv Table of Contents v List of Tables vii List of Figures viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 2 2.1 Types of humor 2 2.1.1 The definition of sarcasm 4 2.2 The influence on the forms of humor 6 2.2.1 Power distance 6 2.2.2 Cultural tightness 7 2.2.3 Collectivism-individualism 8 2.2.4 Cultural values 9 2.3 Theories of humor processing 11 2.3.1 The incongruity theory 11 2.3.2 The comprehension and elaboration theory 11 2.3.3 The cognitive theory 12 2.3.4 The psychoanalytic theory 12 2.3.5 The superiority theory 13 2.4 The three-stage model: Electrophysiological studies on humor 13 2.5 Research questions of the present study 16 Chapter 3 Methods 18 3.1 Participants 18 3.2 Materials 18 3.3 Procedure 19 3.4 Data acquisition and analysis 21 Chapter 4 Results 24 4.1 Native language 25 4.1.1 Behavioral data 25 4.1.2 ERP data 29 4.2 Comedy exposure 35 4.2.1 Behavioral data 36 4.2.2 ERP data 40 Chapter 5 Discussion 47 Chapter 6 Conclusion 54 References 55 Appendix A 61 Appendix B 68 Appendix C 69

    Ball, D. (1981). Sarcasm as Sociation. G.P. Stone & H.A. Farberman (Eds.), Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction (pp. 147–153). New York: John Wiley.

    Baron, R. A. (1978). The influence of hostile and nonhostile humor upon physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 77–80.

    Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Males and Females, Scientists and Mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17.

    Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Hertfordshire, United Kingdom: Granada Pu.

    Bell, N. D. (2007). Humor comprehension: Lessons learned from cross-cultural communication. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 20(4), 367–387.

    Ben-Amos, D. (1973). The "Myth" of Jewish Humor. Western Folklore, 32(2), 112–131.

    Berger, A. A. (1987). Humor: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 30(1), 6–15.

    Berkowitz, L. (1970). Aggressive humor as a stimulus to aggressive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 710–717.

    Bitterly, T. B., Brooks, A. W., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2017). Risky business: When humor increases and decreases status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 431.

    Byrne, D. (1961) The relationship between humor and the expression of hostility. Journal of Personality and Abnormal Social Psychology, 53, 84–89.

    Canal, P., Bischetti, L., Di Paola, S., Bertini, C., Ricci, I., & Bambini, V. (2019). ‘Honey, shall I change the baby?–Well done, choose another one’: ERP and time-frequency correlates of humor processing. Brain and Cognition, 132, 41–55.

    Chang, Y., Ku, L., & Chen, H. (2018). Sex differences in humor processing: An event-related potential study. Brain and Cognition, 120, 34–42.

    Cheang, H. S., & Pell, M. D. (2008). The sound of sarcasm. Speech Communication, 50(5), 366–381.

    Collinson, D. L. (2004). Humor and Leadership. In G. R. Goethals, G. Sorensen, & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership (pp. 689–694). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316(2), 71–74.

    Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2004). Handedness, hemispheric asymmetries, and joke comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(3), 275–288.

    Coulson, S., & Williams, R. F. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetries and joke comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 43(1), 128–141.

    Dai, C. C. (1997). Ni shih youmo gao-shou ma? [Are you a master of humor?]. Taipei, Taiwan: China Times Publishing Company.

    Davis, M. S. (1993). What's so funny?: The comic conception of culture and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Drenhaus, H., Demberg, V., Köhne, J., & Delogu, F. (2014). Incremental and predictive discourse processing based on causal and concessive discourse markers: ERP studies on German and English. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36, 403–408.

    Du, X., Qin, Y., Tu, S., Yin, H., Wang, T., Yu, C., & Qiu, J. (2013). Differentiation of stages in joke comprehension: Evidence from an ERP study. International Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 149–157.

    Duncan, J. (1985). The superiority theory of humor at work: Joking relationships as indicators of formal and informal status patterns in small, task-oriented groups. Small Group Behavior, 16(4), 556–564.

    Feng, Y., Chan, Y., & Chen, H. (2014). Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying the three-stage model in humor processing: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 32, 59–70.

    Ferguson, M. A., & Ford, T. E. (2008). Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 21(3), 283–312.

    Fleming, P. (2005). Workers’ playtime? The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(3), 285–303.

    Freud, S. (1976). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. London, United Kingdom: Penguin Books.

    Gibbs, R. W. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 3–15.

    Gibbs, R. W., & O’Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 523–530.

    Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239–264.

    Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic Bibliography), 8(3), 183–206.

    Golden, H. (1972). The golden book of Jewish humor. New York: Putnam.

    Greengross, G., & Miller, G. F. (2008). Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects of status, personality, and sex on the short-term and long-term attractiveness of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 393–408.

    Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol . 3). Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Holmes, J., & Hay, J. (1997). Humour as an ethnic boundary marker in New Zealand interaction. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 18(2), 127–151.

    Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2002). Having a laugh at work. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1683–1710.

    Hoption, C., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2013). “It's not you, it's me”: Transformational leadership and self‐deprecating humor. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(1), 4–19.

    Huang, L., Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The highest form of intelligence: Sarcasm increases creativity for both expressers and recipients. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 162–177.

    Kalliny, M., Cruthirds, K. W., & Minor, M. S. (2006). Differences between American, Egyptian and Lebanese Humor Styles. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(1), 121–134.

    Kazarian, S. S., & Martin, R. A. (2006). Humor styles, culture-related personality, well-being, and family adjustment among Armenians in Lebanon. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 19(4), 405–423.

    Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374–386.

    Ku, L., Feng, Y., Chan, Y., Wu, C., & Chen, H. (2017). A re-visit of three-stage humor processing with readers' surprise, comprehension, and funniness ratings: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 49–62.

    Kuiper, N. A., Grimshaw, M., Leite, C., & Kirsh, G. (2004). Humor is not always the best medicine: Specific components of sense of humor and psychological well-being. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 135–168.

    Lampert, M. D., & Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (2006). Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(1), 51–72.

    Landi, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). An electrophysiological investigation of semantic and phonological processing in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. Brain and Language. 102(1), 30–45.

    Landy, D., & Mettee, D. (1969). Evaluation of an aggressor as a function of exposure to cartoon humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 66–71.

    Lao, K. (1987). Youmo ren-sheng [A lifestyle of humor]. Taipei, Taiwan: Li-Ming Publishers.

    Leckey, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2020). The P3B and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 57(7), 1–15.

    Liao, C. C. (2001). Chapter 2. Theoretical Framework. In Taiwanese perceptions of humor: A sociolinguistic perspective (pp. 17–50). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publishing Company, Ltd.

    Liao, C. C., & Abe, G. (2001). A Comparison of Taiwanese and Japanese Appreciation of English Jokes. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 181–206.

    Liao, C. C., & Chang, T. C. (2006). Sense of humor: Americans versus Taiwanese, 18th ISHS Conference, July 3–7. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish University of Education.

    Marinkovic, K., Baldwin, S., Courtney, M. G., Witzel, T., Dale, A. M., & Halgren, E. (2010). Right hemisphere has the last laugh: Neural dynamics of joke appreciation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(1), 113–130.

    Martin, C. D., Garcia, X., Breton, A., Thierry, G., & Costa, A. (2014). From literal meaning to veracity in two hundred milliseconds. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 40.

    Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75.

    Mayerhofer, B., & Schacht, A. (2015). From incoherence to mirth: Neuro-cognitive processing of garden-path jokes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 550.

    Mintz, L. E. (1985). Standup comedy as social and cultural mediation. American Quarterly, 37, 71–80.

    Morreall, J. (2009). Humor as Cognitive Play. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 241–260.

    Mueller, C., & Donnerstein, E. (1977). The effects of humor-induced arousal upon aggressive behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 11(1), 73–82.

    Mueller, J. L. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of Second language processing. Second Language Research, 21(2), 152–174.

    Oring, E. (1983). The People of the Joke: On the Conceptualization of a Jewish Humor. Western Folklore, 42(4), 261–271.

    Penolazzi, B., Hauk, O., and Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 74(3), 374–388.

    Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2002). Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes, 33(3), 199–217.

    Pinheiro, A. P., Galdo-Alvarez, S., Sampaio, A., Niznikiewicz, M., and Gonçalves, O. F. (2010). Electrophysiological correlates of semantic processing in Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6), 1412–1425.

    Reid, V. M., Hoehl, S., Grigutsch, M., Groendahl, A., Parise, E., & Striano, T. (2009). The neural correlates of infant and adult goal prediction: Evidence for semantic processing systems. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 620–629.

    Robert, C. (2005). Why would a duck walk into a bar? A theoretical examination of humor and culture in organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2005(1), u1–u6.

    Romero, E., & Cruthirds, K. (2006). The use of humor in the workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 58–69.

    Rosten, L. (2000). The joys of Yiddish. New York: Pocket Books.

    Ryan, K. M., & Kanjorski, J. (1998). The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles, 38(9), 743–756.

    Sabatinelli, D., Keil, A., Frank, D. W., & Lang, P. J. (2013). Emotional perception: correspondence of early and late event-related potentials with cortical and subcortical functional MRI. Biological psychology, 92(3), 513–519.

    Sawahata, Y., Komine, K., Morita, T., & Hiruma, N. (2013). Decoding humor experiences from brain activity of people viewing comedy movies. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e81009.

    Schneider, S. C. (1988). National vs. corporate culture: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 27(2), 231–246.

    Schnurr, S., Marra, M., & Holmes, J. (2007). Being (im)polite in New Zealand workplaces: Maori and Pakeha leaders. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 712–729.

    Seckman, M. A., & Couch, C. J. (1989). Jocularity, sarcasm, and relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,18(3), 327–344.

    Shardakova, M. (2016). American learners’ comprehension of Russian textual humor. The Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 466–483.

    Shibata, M., Terasawa, Y., Osumi, T., Masui, K., Ito, Y., Sato, A., & Umeda, S. (2017). Time course and localization of brain activity in humor comprehension: An ERP/sLORETA study. Brain research, 1657, 215–222.

    Simon, E. (1945). Notes on Jewish wit. In Jewish frontier anthology, 1934-1944 (Vol. 42). New York: Jewis Frontier Association.

    Singer, D. L. (1968). Aggression arousal, hostile humor, catharsis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 8(1p2), 1–14.

    Suls, J. M. (1972). A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-Processing Analysis. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues (pp. 81–99). New York: Academic Press.

    Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 11(2), 161–216.

    Wang, R., Chan, D. K., Goh, Y. W., Penfold, M., Harper, T., & Weltewitz, T. (2017). Humor and workplace stress: A longitudinal comparison between Australian and Chinese employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(2), 175–195.

    Wells, H. W. (1971). Traditional Chinese humor a study in art and literature. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). So that's what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage, 62(1), 356–366.

    Wyer, R. S., & Collins, J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99(4), 663.

    Yanagita, K. (1964). Warai no hongan [The desire for laughter]. Teihon Yanagita Kunio Shu. (Vol. 7). Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE