簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 杜家安
Tu, Chia-An
論文名稱: 工作記憶作業中的干擾程度和干擾比例對 alpha 振盪之影響
How Distractor Strength and Distractor Ratio in Working Memory Task Modulate Alpha Oscillations
指導教授: 許禕芳
Hsu, Yi-Fang
口試委員: 陳昱君
Chen, Yu-Chun
劉惠美
Liu, Huei-Mei
許禕芳
Hsu, Yi-Fang
口試日期: 2024/06/14
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 40
中文關鍵詞: 工作記憶alpha振盪干擾Sternberg範式腦電波
英文關鍵詞: working memory, alpha oscillations, distractor, Sternberg paradigm, electroencephalography
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401082
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:69下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • alpha波為人類大腦8Hz至12Hz的神經振盪活動,其振盪的增強可能反映神經系統抑制無關訊息的歷程,同時也涉及對工作記憶的保護,故許多工作記憶研究常透過alpha波來切入(Jensen & Mazaheri, 2010; Pfurtscheller et al., 1996)。Bonnefond與Jensen(2012)為了瞭解alpha波抑制工作記憶中干擾的機制,透過視覺通道呈現改編的Sternberg範式,發現到強干擾的發生會伴隨alpha振盪的增強。但後續使用類似架構的研究,卻發現干擾程度對alpha波的影響不一致,強干擾的發生除了可能伴隨振盪的增強,卻也可能造成振盪的減弱(Weisz et al., 2020)或是無顯著影響(Sghirripa et al., 2021)。本研究推論可能是因為這些後續實驗設計在調整後出現干擾刺激和欲記憶刺激間的時間間隔,讓看似相同的實驗程序藏有潛在的混淆因素。除此之外,過去研究因干擾比例在操弄上的複雜性,而少去討論干擾比例對alpha波的影響。本研究欲從概念上改編Bonnefond與Jensen的Sternberg範式,操弄工作記憶作業中的干擾程度和干擾比例,提出一個新的實驗程序。本研究以登錄階段須忽略刺激的採樣點是否被打亂來操弄干擾程度(包含強干擾和弱干擾2個水準),利用登錄階段欲記憶刺激和須忽略刺激之比例來控制干擾比例(包含高干擾比例和低干擾比例2個水準),為一2×2二因子的實驗設計。22位參與者需記憶登錄階段的欲記憶刺激並忽略干擾,再於提取階段以按鍵判斷目標刺激是否為登錄階段的欲記憶刺激之一。結果發現在低干擾比例下,額葉、中央腦區、和枕葉的alpha波在強干擾出現前後增強,顯示出抑制強烈無關訊息時的alpha波可能同時反映了預備性抑制和反應性抑制。但該效果在高干擾比例下消失,推測是因高干擾比例促使alpha波變化達天花板效應,顯示出alpha波因應工作記憶作業中干擾時背後的複雜性。

    Alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz) are one of the most dominant rhythm in human electroencephalography (EEG). It is proposed to serve the function of inhibition to protect items in working memory from distracting information (Pfurtscheller et al., 1996; Jensen & Mazaheri, 2010). In a modified Sternberg paradigm, Bonnefond and Jensen (2012) found that alpha power increased at the anticipation of strong compared to weak distractors, reflecting the active gating of distracting information from interfering with the memory trace. However, there was a lack of evidence supporting the inhibition account of alpha oscillations in later studies using similar experimental design. While some research found that alpha power decreased at the anticipation of strong compared to weak distractors (Weisz et al., 2020), some research reported null results (Sghirripa et al., 2021). We speculated that the discrepancy might be related to the greater temporal disparity between the encoding phase and the presentation of the distractors in these later studies, which might have dampened the demands for inhibition. To conceptually replicate the study of Bonnefond and Jensen, here we designed a modified Sternberg paradigm where distractors were sandwiched between targets in the encoding phase to ensure that they compete for working memory resources. We manipulated distractor strength with 2 levels, including strong distractors (using original stimuli) and weak distractors (using scrambled stimuli). We additionally manipulated distractor ratio with 2 levels, including a context of less distractors and a context of more distractors. Participants (N = 22) were asked to remember the targets and ignore the distractors in the encoding phase, and to press a key to the probe in the retrieval phase to indicate whether it was one of the targets presented earlier. We found that alpha power increased for strong compared to weak distractors, from frontal to occipital electrodes. The effect was present throughout the encoding phase, not only upon the presentation of distractors but also before and after the presentation of distractors, providing evidence for both proactive and reactive inhibition of distractors. Meanwhile, the effect was restricted to the context of less but not more distractors; in the context of more distractors, it seems that both strong and weak distractors were properly suppressed. The results suggest an adaptive mechanism might underlie the generation of alpha oscillations to protect working memory against distractors.

    第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 alpha波的抑制時序假說 3 第二節 工作記憶模型和經典範式 4 第三節 alpha波受工作記憶中干擾程度的影響不一致 8 第四節 工作記憶中的干擾會如何影響alpha波 11 第五節 研究問題與假設 12 第三章 研究方法 14 第一節 實驗參與者 14 第二節 刺激材料 14 第三節 實驗設計 15 第四節 實驗程序 16 第五節 資料紀錄和分析 18 第四章 研究結果 21 第一節 行為表現結果 21 第二節 頻譜分析結果 27 第三節 事件相關時頻分析結果 28 第五章 討論與建議 33 第一節 低干擾比例時強干擾會使alpha波增強 33 第二節 高干擾比例時干擾程度不影響alpha波 34 第三節 結論 36 參考文獻 37

    Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
    Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
    Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8(4), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.485
    Baier, B., Karnath, H.-O., Dieterich, M., Birklein, F., Heinze, C., & Müller, N. G. (2010). Keeping memory clear and stable—The contribution of human basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex to working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(29), 9788–9792. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1513-10.2010
    Berger, H. (1929). Über das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 87, 527–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797193
    Bonnefond, M., & Jensen, O. (2012). Alpha oscillations serve to protect working memory maintenance against anticipated distracters. Current Biology, 22(20), 1969–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.029
    Bonnefond, M., & Jensen, O. (2013). The role of gamma and alpha oscillations for blocking out distraction. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 6(1), Article e22702. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.22702
    Brady P. (2011). Ola. MathWorks. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/32684-ola
    Chai, W. J., Abd Hamid, A. I., & Abdullah, J. M. (2018). Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401
    Chen, Y.-N., Mitra, S., & Schlaghecken, F. (2008). Sub-processes of working memory in the N-back task: An investigation using ERPs. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(7), 1546–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.003
    Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychologic Bulletin, 104(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163
    Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277
    Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
    Dosher, B. A. (2003). Working memory. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 569–577). Nature Publishing Group.
    Ellis, D. P. W. (2010, November 14). Time-domain scrambling of audio signals in Matlab. Electrical Engineering. https://www.ee.columbia.edu/~dpwe/resources/matlab/scramble/
    Fodor, Z., Marosi, C., Tombor, L., & Csukly, G. (2020). Salient distractors open the door of perception: Alpha desynchronization marks sensory gating in a working memory task. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 19179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76190-3
    Gutteling, T. P., Sillekens, L., Lavie, N., & Jensen, O. (2022). Alpha oscillations reflect suppression of distractors with increased perceptual load. Progress in Neurobiology, 214, Article 102285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102285
    Hummel, F., Andres, F., Altenmüller, E., Dichgans, J., & Gerloff, C. (2002). Inhibitory control of acquired motor programmes in the human brain. Brain, 125(2), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf030
    Jensen, O. (2024). Distractor inhibition by alpha oscillations is controlled by an indirect mechanism governed by goal-relevant information. Communications Psychology, 2, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00081-w
    Jensen, O., Gelfand, J., Kounios, J., & Lisman, J. E. (2002). Oscillations in the alpha band (9–12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task. Cerebral Cortex, 12(8), 877–882. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/12.8.877
    Jensen, O., & Mazaheri, A. (2010). Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: Gating by inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, Article 186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186
    Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M. G., & Moore, K. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093615
    Kirchner, W. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043688
    Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews, 29(2–3), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3
    Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., & Hanslmayr, S. (2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003
    Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
    Lavie, N., Beck, D. M., & Konstantinou, N. (2014). Blinded by the load: Attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1641), Article 20130205. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0205
    McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008). Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2024
    Melton, A. W. (1963). Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80063-8
    Miller, E. K., Lundqvist, M., & Bastos, A. M. (2018). Working memory 2.0. Neuron, 100(2), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.023
    Noonan, M. P., Adamian, N., Pike, A., Printzlau, F., Crittenden, B. M., & Stokes, M. G. (2016). Distinct mechanisms for distractor suppression and target facilitation. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(6), 1797–1807. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2133-15.2016
    Noonan, M. P., Crittenden, B. M., Jensen, O., & Stokes, M. G. (2018). Selective inhibition of distracting input. Behavioural Brain Research, 355, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.010
    Obleser, J., Wöstmann, M., Hellbernd, N., Wilsch, A., & Maess, B. (2012). Adverse listening conditions and memory load drive a common alpha oscillatory network. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(36), 12376–12383. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4908-11.2012
    Pfurtscheller, G., Stancák, A., & Neuper, Ch. (1996). Event-related synchronization (ERS) in the alpha band — an electrophysiological correlate of cortical idling: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 24(1–2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(96)00066-9
    Roux, F., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2014). Working memory and neural oscillations: Alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010
    Schroeder, S. C. Y., Ball, F., & Busch, N. A. (2018). The role of alpha oscillations in distractor inhibition during memory retention. European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(7), 2516–2526. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13852
    Sghirripa, S., Graetz, L., Merkin, A., Rogasch, N. C., Ridding, M. C., Semmler, J. G., & Goldsworthy, M. R. (2021). The role of alpha power in the suppression of anticipated distractors during verbal working memory. Brain Topography, 34, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-020-00810-4
    Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153(3736), 652–654. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3736.652
    Weisz, N., Kraft, N. G., & Demarchi, G. (2020). Auditory cortical alpha/beta desynchronization prioritizes the representation of memory items during a retention period. eLife, 9, Article e55508. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55508
    Wolach, I., & Pratt, H. (2001). The mode of short-term memory encoding as indicated by event-related potentials in a memory scanning task with distractions. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(1), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00501-0
    Wöstmann, M., Herrmann, B., Wilsch, A., & Obleser, J. (2015). Neural alpha dynamics in younger and older listeners reflect acoustic challenges and predictive benefits. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(4), 1458–1467. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3250-14.2015
    Zhou, Y. J., Ramchandran, A., & Haegens, S. (2023). Alpha oscillations protect working memory against distracters in a modality-specific way. NeuroImage, 278, Article 120290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120290

    下載圖示
    QR CODE