研究生: |
楊淑嬪 YANG, Shu-Pin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
近代中國教會史知識本體建構方法之研究: 以二十世紀初The Chinese Recorder為例 |
指導教授: |
葉建華
Yeh, Jian-Hua |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 91 |
中文關鍵詞: | 教務雜誌 、教务杂志 、知識本體 、本體知識 、本體論 、知識組織 、語意網 、語義網 、隱性主題發掘 、主題分群 、知識表徵 |
英文關鍵詞: | The Chinese Recorder, Ontology, Knowledge Organization, Semantic Web, OWL, Latent Topic Discovery, Topic Clustering |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:174 下載:10 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
歷史文件包含的知識內容豐富且廣泛,因此有許多研究將焦點放在知識分類架構的產生,但以往許多研究往往只產出了內容分類架構,稱之為 taxonomy。但是這種分類架構大部分只是表達出樹狀的基本分類結構,而少了概念之間的多樣性關係;也就是說,這樣的分類結構並沒有包含更複雜的知識表徵。本研究的目的就是要發展出一套有效且自動的建構程序來產生領域知識本體(Ontology)架構,一方面可以減輕人工介入的成分與專家的負擔,另一方面則可以加速知識本體架構的產出速度與規模。本研究以一個特殊又具有歷史研究意義的資料集,稱為The Chinese Recorder,做為實驗對象。藉著定義並建構出The Chinese Recorder此標的領域的知識表徵,表達出這些歷史文件中更豐富的知識內涵。同時本研究也以語意網路中描述知識本體的標準OWL來進行知識本體的表達。
The purpose of this research is to develop an effective and automatic construction process to generate the ontology of a knowledge domain. A historical document always contains very rich and extensive knowledge. Therefore, much research has focused on the generation the classification structure of knowledge; however, most of the research only generated content classification framework known as taxonomy. This kind of classification framework only expresses the basic classification tree structure, but lacks diversified conceptual relationships, in other words, this kind of classification structure does not contain sophisticated knowledge features. Based on a very special and historical meaningful dataset called “The Chinese Recorder” as an experimental target, this study develops an automatic ontology construction process to reduce individual manual intervention and burden of experts. Furthermore, it can accelerate the output speed and scale of the ontological knowledge framework. By defining and constructing the knowledge representation of the domain ontology of the Chinese Recorder, this study expresses the rich knowledge content of the historical document. Meanwhile, it also produces a semantically-oriented and OWL-based ontology.
1. Google學術搜尋(2008)。教務雜誌。2008年6月5日,取自http://www.google.com.tw/search?hl=zh-TW&q=%E6%95%99%E5%8A%A1%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97&btnG=Google+%E6%90%9C%E5%B0%8B&meta=&aq=-1&oq=
2. 王文君(2004)。初探Ontology。2008年2月24日,取自http://www.bp.ntu.edu.tw/WebUsers/ftlin/course/phisci/Ontology%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2040727.pdf
3. 全國圖書書目資訊網(2008)。2008年5月6,取自 http://nbinet.ncl.edu.tw:2082/search*cht
4. 余以胜((2005)。智能信息系統中的知識組織研究。圖書情報知識(6),102-104。
5. 吳梓明、陶飛亞(2007)。晚清傳教士對中國文化的研究。2008年5月2日,取自http://www.zwwhgx.com/article/show.asp?id=663&Page=3
6. 吳孟淞、許軒睿、簡仁宗(2007)。貝氏主題混合資訊檢索模型。Paper presented at the Rocling-2007,台北市台灣大學圖書館國際會議廳。
7. 林治平(1981)。近代中國與基督教論文集。台北市:宇宙光。
8. 邱子恆(2006)。知識管理與知識組織。台北市:文華。
9. 張志惠(2006)。閱讀中國:《中國叢報》(Chinese Repositrory,1832-1851)與新教傳教士關於中國的理解與書寫。國立台灣大學,台北市。
10. 張培才(2007)。以知識本體為基礎來建構達悟語中英文詞語轉換系統。靜宜大學,台北市。
11. 華通資訊股份有限公司(2008)。虹光(Avision)FB2080E A4零邊距平台掃瞄器。 2008年7月2日,取自http://www.infoacer.com.tw/left_link/infoocr.htm
12. 楊秋芬、陳僑新(2002)。Ontology方法學綜論。計算機應用綜論(4),5-7。
13. 楊衛華(2006)。被中國人遺忘的“中國記錄”。四川档案(132),44-45。
14. 賈同興(1996)。知識組織的進步。國外情報科學(2),36-38,42。
15. 蔣永福、付小紅(2000)。知識組織論:圖書情報學的理論基礎。圖書館建設(4),14-17。
16. 蔣永福、李景正(2001)。論知識組織方法。中國圖書館學報(1),3-5。
17. Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern Information Retrieval: Addison-Wesley.
18. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web:A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43.
19. Bray, T., Paoli, J., & Sperberg-McQueen, C. M. (1999). Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. Retrieved 06.16, 2008, from http://www.renderx.com/Demos/fo2html/xml.pdf
20. Brickley, D., & Guha, R. V. (1999). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification. Proposed Recommendation World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved 06.18, 2008, from http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-schema
21. Decker, S., van-Harmelen, F., Broekstra, J., Erdmann, M., Fensel, D., Horrocks, I., et al. (2000). The Semantic Web: the roles of XML and RDF. IEEE Internet Computing, 4(5), 63-73.
22. Girolami, M., & Kaban, A. (2003). On an equivalence between PLSI and LDA. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.
23. Google Scholar (2008). The Chinese Recorder. Retrieved 06.03, 2008, from http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=THE+CHINESE+RECORDER&btnG=Google+Search
24. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.
25. Gruninger, M., & Fox, M. S. (1995). Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. Retrieved 06.19, 2008, from http://209.85.175.104/search?q=cache:UuN0iaTJlYoJ:www.eil.utoronto.ca/public/method.ps+Methodology+for+the+Design+and+Evaluation+of+Ontologies.&hl=zh-TW&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=tw
26. Guarino, N. (1998). Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference (Vol. 6). Trento, Italy: Amsterdam, IOS Press.
27. Hendler, J., & McGuinness, D. L. (2000). The DARPA Agent Markup Language. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(6), 67-73.
28. Horridge, M., Knublauch, H., Rector, A., Stevens, R., & Wroe, C. (2004). A Practical Guide To Building OWL Ontologies Using The Prot´eg´e-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE ToolsEdition1.0. Retrieved 06.23., 2008, from http://www.co-ode.org/resources/tutorials/ProtegeOWLTutorial.pdf
29. Humphreys, B. L., & Lindberg, D. A. B. (1993). The UMLS project: making the conceptual connection between users and the information they need. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 81(2), 170.
30. Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999). Data Clustering: A Review. ACM Computing Surveys, 31, 264-323.
31. Learning, G. C. (2008). The Chinese Recorder, 1867-1941. Retrieved 01.28, 2008, from http://www.gale.cengage.com/servlet/SearchResultServlet?searchText=chinese+recorder&imprint=745®ion=9&go.x=7&go.y=9
32. Lodwick, K. L. (1986). The Chinese Recorder Index: a guide to Christian Missions in Asia, 1867-1941. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc.
33. Miller, E. (2005). An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework Retrieved 06.16, 2008, from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/109860962/HTMLSTART
34. Noy, N. F., & Hafner, C. D. (1998). Representing Scientific Experiments: Implications for Ontology Design and Knowledge Sharing. AAAI/IAAI, 615-622.
35. Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology Retrieved 06.19, 2008, from http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology-tutorial-noy-mcguinness-abstract.html
36. Price, C., & K.Spackman. (2000). SNOMED clinical terms. BJHC&IM-British Journal of Healthcare Computing & Information Management, 17(3), 27-31.
37. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of Categorization. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
38. Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 1-69.
39. Widyantoro, D., Ioerger, T. R., & Yen, J. (2002). An Incremental Approach to Building a Cluster Hierarchy. Paper presented at the in Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM-02).