摘要
近八年來，臺灣的入學測驗增加英語聽力的題型，以測驗國中與高中畢業學生對英語理解的程度。
英語聽力測驗和其他類型英語測驗的差異在於「聽覺訊息」的稍縱即逝，且參加聽力測驗的考生必須在有限的測驗時間內，理解聽力內容，並予以作答，然而，這對考生而言是具有相當難度的，尤其是對於英語非母語的考生而言，因此，當面對具有相當難度且需要高度專注的標準化英語測驗 (如:多益)， 考生極有可能因高壓的考試情境產生負面情緒，尤其是測驗焦慮。鑒於教育上的考量，教育實務工作者及英語學習者實有必要深入瞭解引發聽力測驗焦慮的根本潛在因素。
除了探討聽力測驗焦慮對考生考試表現的影響外，考生在聽力測驗期間，仍有可能受到其他因素影響，如:使用策略的方式及對考試內容的認知等，因此，本研究在探究聽力測驗焦慮對學習者測驗表現的影響之外，亦會探討考生後設認知程度對其測驗表現之影響，及後設認知與聽力測驗焦慮的交互關係。
據文獻定義，測驗焦慮為一種於特定情境中被觸發的焦慮特性，其所包含的面向基本上可分為四個大項: (1) 擔憂(Worry) (2) 情緒性(Emotionality) (3) 無關考試的想法(Test-Irrelevant Thinking) (4) 生理症狀(Bodily Symptoms)，由於研究情境的需求，特將「擔憂」及「情緒性」這兩個項目劃分為特定「情境人格特徵」(Situation-Specific Personality Trait) 此一大項，而將「無關考試的想法」及「生理症狀」歸類為另一大項「認知干擾」(Cognitive Interference)，並分別探究兩個項目對考生聽力測驗表現的影響。
此外，文獻顯示，學習者的後設認知程度，對於其測驗表現有所關聯，因此，本研究依據文獻中的分類，參考現實研究情境，將「後設認知」分為三個向度，分別為「人際知識」(Person Knowledge)、「任務知識」(Task Knowledge)及「策略知識」(Strategy Knowledge)，並分別探討其與聽力測驗焦慮的相互關係，及其對於考生聽力測驗表現的影響。
由於以「英語為外語(EFL)」之大學生為研究對象的文獻資料較少，因此本研究聚焦於臺灣的英語學習環境，及大學生於英語聽力測驗情境下之反應，旨在探討過去文獻中所認定測驗焦慮之概念，是否確實影響聽力測驗之表現，並探討過去文獻中所提及之後設認知與聽力測驗表現之關聯性。
本研究經由改編現有相關文獻中之量表題目，建構一結合聽力測驗焦慮及後設認知之量表，透過皮爾生相關係數(Pearson Correlation Coefficient)、分層回歸(Hierarchical Multiple Regression)進行統計分析。研究結果發現：所得實徵資料能適配研究所建構的模式，支持研究假設，進行量表驗證，以驗明英語聽力測驗焦慮及後設認知對於聽力測驗表現之影響。
研究結果顯示，研究假設之五向度因素結構，包含「情境人格特徵」、「認知干擾」、「人際知識」、「任務知識」及「策略知識」，其中「情境人格特徵」對於考生的聽力測驗表現有著顯著的負面影響，而後設認知中只有「人際知識」及「策略知識」對考生的聽力測驗表現有著顯著的正面影響。
本研究在教學實務上的涵義有二。對於英語學習者而言，得利用聽力測驗焦慮量表，了解構成自身聽力測驗焦慮的成因，並有效利用後設認知及相關策略調整應考模式。其二，對於英語教育者而言，透過了解聽力測驗焦慮可能的成因，可協助學生運用相關策略來降低焦慮程度及適應聽力測驗情境，並可善用學習者的後設認知來擬定適合的應考策略。
未來的研究方向可以本研究為基礎，延續探討聽力測驗焦慮及後設認知相關議題，甚或是延伸此觀點至如何提高學生的測驗表現上。

關鍵字：聽力測驗焦慮、後設認知、聽力測驗、皮爾生相關係數、分層回歸

ABSTRACT
Over the past eight years, Taiwan's educational authorities have adopted comprehensive listening tests as one examination item in the junior high and senior high school entrance tests. The difference between English listening tests and other types of English tests is that listening tests are dependent on the quality of the audio input (e.g., transiency). Moreover, candidates who take the listening test must understand the listening content within a limited amount of time and immediately answer examination questions. However, this is quite difficult for candidates, especially for candidates who are not native English speakers. Therefore, candidates are most likely to experience test anxiety due to high-pressure situations when facing standardized English tests such as the TOEIC test, which are quite difficult and require a high degree of concentration. Given these considerations, education specialists and English learners should understand the underlying factors that cause anxiety during listening tests.
In addition to test anxiety, candidates may be affected by other factors during listening tests, such as test-taking strategies and knowledge of test content. Therefore, this study also explores the impact of metacognitive awareness on test-takers’ listening test performance and the interrelation between metacognitive awareness and listening test anxiety. Test anxiety is defined in the study as a certain anxiety triggered by a specific situation, and it can be divided into four phenomena: (1) Worry, (2) Emotionality, (3) Test-Irrelevant Thinking, and (4) Bodily Symptoms. Based on actual testing context, “Worry” and “Emotionality” are considered “Situation-Specific Personality Traits”, while “Test-Irrelevant Thinking” and “Bodily Symptoms” are classified as “Cognitive Interference.” This study focuses on the potential influence of situation-specific personality traits and cognitive interference on test-takers’ listening test performance.
Past studies have shown that a learner's metacognitive awareness was positively related to their test performance. This study divides metacognitive awareness into three subcategories “Person Knowledge”, “Task Knowledge”, and “Strategic Knowledge” based on definitions in previous studies and real-world test data, and discusses the relationship between these three subcategories and test-takers’ listening test performance.
Since few studies on the emotional responses of college students to EFL listening tests exist, this study focuses on the English learning environment in Taiwan and the responses of college students to the English listening tests. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the established concept of test anxiety that previous studies have identified actually affects test performance and to discuss the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening test performances. Adapting items from past studies, this study constructs a scale that includes both “Listening Test Anxiety” and “Metacognitive Awareness”, and analyzes these items through the lens of the Pearson Correlation Coefficient and Hierarchical Multiple Regression. The statistical results show that listening test anxiety, metacognitive awareness and listening test performance are correlated. Moreover, statistical analysis indicates that among the five main independent variables included in this study, only the “Situation-Specific Personality Trait” category exerts a significant negative influence on participants’ listening test performance. However, “Person Knowledge” and “Strategy Knowledge” have significant positive influence on participants’ listening test performance.
This study provides two important implications for higher education. English learners now have the opportunity to understand what is causing their anxiety during listening tests, and now have strategies such as metacognitive awareness that may help them avoid anxiety during listening tests. English-language educators are now able to assist learners in improving their listening test performance with strategies that reduce the anxiety during these kinds of tests and to help learners become familiar with listening test context. Furthermore, educators can also help learners take advantage of their metacognitive awareness to devise appropriate test-taking strategies. Future research should focus on the relevant issues of listening test anxiety and metacognitive awareness and extend this study’s parameters to improve students’ test performance.

Keywords: Listening Test Anxiety, Metacognitive Awareness, Listening Test, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, Hierarchical Multiple Regression

REFERENCES
Anderson, S. B., & Sauser Jr, W. I. (1995). Measurement of test anxiety: An overview.
Abdi, H. M., Bageri, S., Shoghi, S., Goodarzi, S., & Hosseinzadeh, A. (2012). The role of metacognitive and self-efficacy beliefs in students’ test anxiety and academic achievement. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(12), 418-422.
Atasheneh, N., & Izadi, A. (2012). The role of teachers in reducing/increasing listening comprehension test anxiety: A case of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 178.
Ayalp, G. G., & Özdemir, N. (2016). Relationship between Test Anxiety and Learning Styles of Architecture Undergraduates. Creative Education, 7(02), 364.
Ball, S. (1995). Anxiety and test performance. Test anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment, 107-113.
Benesty, J., Chen, J., & Huang, Y. (2008). On the importance of the Pearson correlation coefficient in noise reduction. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 16(4), 757-765.
Bekleyen, N. (2009). Helping teachers become better English students: Causes, effects, and coping strategies for foreign language listening anxiety. System, 37(4), 664-675.
Bang, S., & Hiver, P. (2016). Investigating the structural relationships of cognitive and affective domains for L2 listening. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 7.
Chang, Y. L., Chang, T. S., & Kou, C. H. (1993). Listening difficulties and learner strategies of non-native speakers. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 145-172). Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary educational psychology, 27(2), 270-295.
Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z. B., Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & McCann, N. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of educational Psychology, 97(2), 268.
CHANG, A. C. S., & Read, J. (2006). The effects of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners. Tesol Quarterly, 40(2), 375-397.
Cizek, G. J., & Burg, S. S. (2006). Addressing test anxiety in a high-stakes environment: Strategies for classrooms and schools. Corwin Press.
Chang, A. C. S. (2008). Sources of listening anxiety in learning English as a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(1), 21-34.
Chang, A. C. S., & Read, J. (2008). Reducing Listening Test Anxiety through Various Forms of Listening Support. TESL-EJ, 12(1), n1.
Coskun, A. (2010). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on the Listening Performance of Beginner Students. Online Submission, 4(1), 35-50.
Capan, S. A., & Karaca, M. (2013). A comparative study of listening anxiety and reading anxiety. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1360-1373.
Doctor, R. M., & Altman, F. (1969). Worry and emotionality as components of test anxiety: Replication and further data. Psychological Reports, 24(2), 563-568.
Dalkiliç, N. (2001). The role of foreign language classroom anxiety in English speaking courses. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(8).
Diakidoy, I. A. N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26(1), 55-80.
Everson, H. T., Millsap, R. E., & Rodriguez, C. M. (1991). Isolating gender differences in test anxiety: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Test Anxiety Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 243-251.
Everson, H. T., Smodlaka, I., & Tobias, S. (1994). Exploring the relationship of test anxiety and metacognition on reading test performance: A cognitive analysis. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 7(1), 85-96.
Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). The effect of prelistening activities on listening comprehension in Arabic learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 505-513.
Elkhafaifi H. Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom[J]. The modern language journal, 2005, 89(2): 206-220.
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336.
Ender Durualp&Neriman Aral (2008) The relationship between test anxiety and family support, frequency of the anxiety,factors decreasing and increasing test anxiety and sex factors affecting test anxeity. The Social Sciences, 3(7).
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.
Field, J. (1998). Skills and strategies: Towards a new methodology for listening.
Field, J. (2010). Listening in the language classroom. ELT journal, 64(3), 331-333.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Ablex Publishing.
Goh, C. C. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 124-147.
Guterman, E. (2003). Integrating written metacognitive awareness guidance as a ‘psychological tool’ to improve student performance. Learning and Instruction, 13(6), 633-651.
Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT journal, 60(3), 222-232.
Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC journal, 39(2), 188-213.
Gonen, M. (2009, July). The relationship between FL listening anxiety and FL listening strategies: The case of Turkish EFL learners. In Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS/IASME International conference on educational technologies (pp. 44-49).
Golchi, M. M. (2012). Listening anxiety and its relationship with listening strategy use and listening comprehension among Iranian IELTS learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(4), 115.
Goh, C. C., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255-274.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language journal, 70(2), 125-132.
Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of educational research, 58(1), 47-77.
Hodapp, V., Glanzmann, P. G., & Laux, L. (1995). Theory and measurement of test anxiety as a situation-specific trait.
Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual review of applied linguistics, 21, 112-126.
In’nami, Y. (2006). The effects of test anxiety on listening test performance. System, 34(3), 317-340.
Ismail Çelika, & Hakan Sarıçam (2016). Grit and Test Anxiety in Turkish Children and Adolescents. ERPA International Congresses on Education 2016.
Jennifer Barrows, Samantha Dunn& Carrie A. Lloyd.(2013) Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and College Exam Grades. Universal Journal of Educational Research 1(3).
Kim Joohae.(2002) Anxiety and foreign language listening. English Teaching,57(2),3-34.
Kim, J. (2005). The reliability and validity of a foreign language listening anxiety scale. 영어학, 5(2), 213-235.
Kraha, A., Turner, H., Nimon, K., Zientek, L., & Henson, R. (2012). Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 44.
Liebert, R. M., & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychological reports, 20(3), 975-978.
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal 53(3) ,168-176.
Liu, M. (2006). Anxiety in Chinese EFL students at different proficiency levels. System, 34(3), 301-316.
Lewis, M. (2007). Stepwise versus hierarchical regression: Pros and cons. Online Submission.
Lowe, P. A., Lee, S. W., Witteborg, K. M., Prichard, K. W., Luhr, M. E., Cullinan, C. M., & Janik, M. (2008). The test anxiety inventory for children and adolescents (TAICA) examination of the psychometric properties of a new multidimensional measure of test anxiety among elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(3), 215-230.
Leung, S. O. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412-421.
Mandler, G., & Sarason, S. (1952). A study of anxiety and learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 166-173.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language learning, 44(2), 283-305.
Matthews, G., Hillyard, E. J., & Campbell, S. E. (1999). Metacognition and maladaptive coping as components of test anxiety. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 6(2), 111-125.
Meijer, J. (2001). Learning potential and anxious tendency: Test anxiety as a bias factor in educational testing. Anxiety, stress and Coping, 14(3), 337-362.
Morley, J. (2001). Aural comprehension instruction: Principles and practices. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3, 69-85.
Miller, L. (2003). Developing listening skills with authentic materials.
Miller, M., Morton, J., Driscoll, R., & Davis, K. A. (2006). Accelerated Desensitization with Adaptive Attitudes and Test Gains with 5th Graders. Online Submission.
Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self‐efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign language annals, 39(2), 276-295.
MacIntyre, P., & Gregersen, T. (2012). Affect: The role of language anxiety and other emotions in language learning. In Psychology for language learning (pp. 103-118). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Madhankumar, M. P., & Sathyanarayan, K.(2014). TESTING DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF RECOVSAT SCALE.
Nist, S., & Diehl, W. (1990). Test Anxiety Questionnaire. Retrieved June, 1, 2013.
Nunan, D. (2002). Listening in language learning. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 238-241.
Nunan, D., & Carter, R. (Eds.). (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
O’Bryan, A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2009). Using a mixed methods approach to explore strategies, metacognitive awareness and the effects of task design on listening development. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 12(1), 9-38.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Hierarchical multiple regression in counseling research: Common problems and possible remedies. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 36(1), 9-22.
Putwain, D. W., Connors, L., & Symes, W. (2010). Do cognitive distortions mediate the test anxiety–examination performance relationship?. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 11-26.
Putwain, D. W., Woods, K. A., & Symes, W. (2010). Personal and situational predictors of test anxiety of students in post‐compulsory education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 137-160.
Pae, T. I. (2013). Effects of Skill-based L2 Anxieties on Learners' Affective Variables and Their Factorial Similarity Across Gender. English Teaching, 68(4).
Poggensee, A. (2016). The effects of globalization on English language learning: Perspectives from Senegal and the United States. (Master's thesis), Western Michigan University.
Pan, Y., Cai, W., Dong, W., Xiao, J., Yan, J., & Cheng, Q. (2017). Behavior characteristics of the attention network of military personnel with high and low trait anxiety. Medicine, 96(17).
Rost, M. (1991). Listening in action. London : Prentice Hall International Ltd.
Rasti, I. (2009). Iranian candidates’ attitudes towards IELTS. Asian EFL Journal, 11(3), 110-155.
Rezazadeh, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2009). Investigating the relationship among test anxiety, gender, academic achievement and years of study: A case of Iranian EFL university students. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 68.
Ramirez, G., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom. science, 331(6014), 211-213.
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: an overview. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73-81.
Rezaabadi, O. T. (2016). The Relationships between Social Class, Listening Test Anxiety and Test Scores. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(5), 147-156.
Sarason, I. G. (1961). Test anxiety and the intellectual performance of college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(4), 201.
Suinn, R. M. (1969). The STABS, a measure of test anxiety for behavior therapy: Normative data. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 7(3), 335-339.
Sarason, I. G. (1975). Test anxiety and the self-disclosing coping model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(2), 148.
Sieber, J. E., O'Neil Jr, H. F., & Tobias, S. (1977). Anxiety, learning, and instruction. Routledge.
Sarason, I. G. (1977). The Test Anxiety Scale: Concept and research (No. SCS-CS-003). WASHINGTON UNIV SEATTLE DEPT OF PSYCHOLOGY.
Spielberger, C. D., Gonzalez, H. P., Taylor, C. J., Algaze, B., & Anton, W. D. (1978). Examination stress and test anxiety. Stress and anxiety, 5, 167-191.
Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Test Anxiety Inventory: Sampler Set: Manual, Test Scoring:" test Attitude Inventory": Preliminary Professional Manual. Mind Garden.
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (form Y)(" self-evaluation questionnaire").
Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: reactions to tests. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(4), 929.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
Spielberger, C. D., & Vagg, P. R. (1995). Test anxiety: A transactional process model. Taylor & Francis.
Spielberger, C. D. & Vagg, P. R. (Eds.) (1995)., Test anxiety: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis
Sub, A., & Prabha, C. (2003). Academic performance in relation to perfectionism, test procrastination and test anxiety of high school children. Psychological Studies.
Stöber, J. (2004). Dimensions of test anxiety: Relations to ways of coping with pre-exam anxiety and uncertainty. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17(3), 213-226.
Shomoosii, N., Kassaian, Z., & Ketabi, S. (2009). Variation of Test anxiety over Listening and Speaking Test Performance. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 3(1).
Spielberger, C. D. (2010). State‐Trait anxiety inventory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Sabet, M. K., & Mahsefat, H. (2012). The impact of authentic listening materials on elementary EFL learners’ listening skills. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(4), 216-229.
Szafranski, D. D., Barrera, T. L., & Norton, P. J. (2012). Test anxiety inventory: 30 years later. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25(6), 667-677.
Teng, H. C. (1998). The effects of text types and task types on English listening
comprehension. English Teaching Journal, 23, 5-18.
Taylor, J., & Deane, F. P. (2002). Development of a short form of the Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI). The Journal of general psychology, 129(2), 127-136.
Tannenbaum, R. J., & Wylie, E. C. (2009). Using Standard-Setting Methodology for Linking Assessment Scores to Proficiency Scales: TOEFL iBTTM and TOEIC® Assessment Exemplars. Research Spotlight, 10.
Vadhan, V., & Stander, P. (1994). Metacognitive ability and test performance among college students. The Journal of Psychology, 128(3), 307-309.
Vandergrift, L. (2004). 1. Listening to Learn or Learning to Listen?. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.
Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied linguistics, 26(1), 70-89.
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language learning, 56(3), 431-462.
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language teaching, 40(3), 191-210.
Rezazadeh, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2009). Investigating the Relationship among Test Anxiety, Gender, Academic Achievement and Years of Study: A Case of Iranian EFL University Students. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 68-74.
Valizadeh, M. R., & Alavinia, P. (2013). Listening comprehension performance viewed in the light of emotional intelligence and foreign language listening anxiety. English Language Teaching, 6(12), 11.
Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological bulletin, 76(2), 92.
Young, A., & Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.
Yousefi, F., Talib, M. A., Mansor, M. B., Juhari, R. B., & Redzuan, M. (2010). The relationship between test-anxiety and academic achievement among Iranian adolescents. Asian Social Science, 6(5), 100.
葉靜怡. (2011). 餐旅學群學生大一英文能力分班聽力學習成效之研究-以國立
高雄餐旅大學為例。高雄餐旅學院餐飲管理研究所在職專班學位論文, 1-69.
陳淑嬌. (2014). 全球化下的臺灣英文教育: 政策, 教學及成果.全球化下的臺灣英文教育：政策、教學及成果。教育人力與專業發展專論 ，31(2)，7-20.
吳妙姬, & 陳怡均. (2010). 旅館系學生英語學習動機與聽說能力學習困難之關
係研究。 餐旅暨家政學刊, 7(1), 55-79.