研究生: |
曾曉柔 Tseng, Hsiao-Jou |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
臺北市十二年國民基本教育下高中校長政策領導之個案研究 A Case Study of Senior High School Principal Policy Leadership in Taipei Under the National 12-Year Basic Education System |
指導教授: |
黃乃熒
Whang, Nai-Ying |
口試委員: |
陳木金
Chen, Mu-Jin 陳玉娟 Chen, Yu-Chuan 黃乃熒 Whang, Nai-Ying |
口試日期: | 2022/05/13 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育政策與行政研究所 Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Administration |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 144 |
中文關鍵詞: | 十二年國民基本教育 、政策領導 、校長政策領導 、校長領導 |
英文關鍵詞: | national 12-year basic education, policy leadership, principal policy leadership, principal leadership |
研究方法: | 個案研究法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200488 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:115 下載:13 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討十二年國教下高中校長政策領導之現況、所面臨之影響因素及其所採取之行動策略。為達研究目的,本研究透過個案研究設計,選取臺北市一所具研究代表性的高中為個案學校。並且,透過訪談個案學校校長及相關重要人士,以及相關文件之蒐集來獲取研究資料。最後,將研究資料進行分析與統整後,提出本研究結論與建議,以作為改善十二年政策實務之參考,並供相關教育人員政策領導之借鏡。
本研究之結論歸納如下:
一、校長政策領導,能轉化十二年國教變革挑戰為學校發展契機
二、校長政策領導,能催化十二年國教高中職社區化及108課綱目標的實現
三、校長政策領導採取「政策溝通」行動策略,能緩解政策文本不清及規劃不全之影響,強化成員及家長對政策的掌握
四、校長政策領導採取「資源整合」行動策略,能應對教學空間及師資經費不足之影響,有效化解資源不足的困境
五、校長政策領導採取「士氣激勵」行動策略,能化解成員壓力及投入意願低落之影響,有效提升成員執行的意願
六、校長政策領導採取「專業支持」行動策略,能尊重成員專業並鼓勵社群發展,有效提升成員應對政策變革的能力
七、校長政策領導採取「組織認同」行動策略,能改善教師文化偏消極之影響,增強成員對實現學校組織目標的投入
八、校長政策領導採取「樹立典範」行動策略,能以身作則成為成員學習典範,有效取得成員追隨與信任
九、校長政策領導採取「衝突管理」行動策略,能預防政策多元利害關係衝突之影響,促進政策執行的順利
十、校長政策領導採取「關係經營」行動策略,能增進與鄰里社區及其它教育單位的連結,有效提高學校能見度與競爭力
關鍵詞:十二年國民基本教育、政策領導、校長政策領導、校長領導
The purpose of this study is to explore the present state of senior high school principal policy leadership under the national 12-year basic education system, the factors that influence this and action strategies that have been adopted. To achieve these objectives a case-study model is employed, using a representative senior high school in Taipei. Research data has been obtained through interviews with the principal of the school and other relevant and important figures, and through the collection of relevant documents. Finally, after analyzing and synthesizing the research data, this study puts forward its conclusions and suggestions as a reference for policy practice, and as a model for related education personnel to build policy leadership upon.
The conclusions from this study are summarized below:
1. The Principal's policy leadership can transform the challenges of the 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines Reform into opportunities for school development.
2. The Principal's policy leadership can catalyze the high school integration with the local community for the 12-year Basic Education and achieve the 2019 Curriculum Guidelines goals.
3. The Principal's policy leadership is a strategic action of "policy communication", which can alleviate the impact of unclear policy text and incomplete planning, and strengthen members' and parents' mastery of policies.
4. The Principal's policy leadership is a strategic action of "resource integration", which can address the impact of inadequate teaching space and funding while effectively resolving the dilemma of insufficient resources.
5. The Principal's policy leadership is a strategic action of "giving a boost to the morale", which can address the impact of low members' stress and commitment while effectively enhancing members' willingness to perform.
6. The Principal's policy leadership is a strategic action of "professional support" that respects members' professionalism and encourages community development, effectively enhancing members' ability to respond to policy change.
7. The Principal's policy leadership is a strategic action of "organizational identification", that can improve the negative attitude of a teacher culture and enhance members' full commitment to achieving the school's organizational goals.
8. The Principal's policy of leadership is a strategic action of "setting a good example" for members to learn from and follow, effectively gaining their followers and trust.
9. The Principal's policy leadership is a strategic action of "conflict management" that prevents policy stakeholders from conflicts of interest and promotes smooth policy implementation.
10. The Principal's policy leadership is a strategic action of "managing interpersonal relationships", which can enhance the connection with the neighborhood community and other educational units while effectively improving the school's visibility and competitiveness.
Key words: national 12-year basic education, policy leadership, principal policy leadership, principal leadership
Yukl, G.(2013)。組織領導學(宋秋儀譯:第8版)。華泰文化。(原著出版年:2002)
Yukl, G.(2013)。組織領導學(宋秋儀譯:第8版)。華泰文化。(原著出版年:2002)
吳定(2008)。公共政策。五南文化。
吳建華、謝發昱、黃俊峰、陳銘凱(2004)。個案研究。高等教育。
吳政達(2004)。教育政策分析。心理。
吳振福(2007)。國民小學校長變革領導策略與教師變革接受度之研究——以屏東縣小校裁併政策為例。教育經營與管理研究集刊,1,51-72。
吳清山(2004)。學校行政。心理。
吳清山(2018)。近50年來國民教育發展之探究:九年國民教育與十二年國民基本教育政策之分析。教育研究集刊,64(4),1-36。
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。人口少子化。教育研究月刊,151,56-69。
宋修德、蘇景進(2010)。高中職社區化之學生就近入學成效及其影響因素。教育政策論壇,13(4),1-32。
李允傑、丘昌泰(2003)。政策執行與評估。元照出版。
林天祐(2005)。教育研究倫理準則。教育研究月刊,132,70-86。
林水波(2010)。政策領導。T&D飛訊,89,1-28。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2),122-136。
林政逸(2005)。從政策執行觀點思考如何提高教育執行力。學校行政雙月刊,37(5),36-49。
林紘生(2016)。小校裁併政策下——校長領導風格、策略規劃與創新之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東海大學。
林清江(1983)。文化發展與教育革新。五南文化。
施琇瑩(2019)。從前導學校經驗看新課綱的試行與推動。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(8),1-4。
柯三吉(1990)。政策執行:理論與我國經驗。時英。
洪雯柔(2018)。邁向未來取向、專業治校、學習者中心的十二年國教新課綱—談新課綱對普通高中的衝擊。臺灣教育,710,065-072。
范兆寅(2014)。國民小學校長政治領導行為之研究——以桃竹苗四縣市為例。新竹教育大學教育學報,32(1)。
秦夢群(2013)。教育領導理論與應用。五南文化。
張世旺(2012)。少子化的教育政策因應——論國民中小學校長對少子化知覺及學校經營策略——以苗栗縣為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺中教育大學。
張民杰(2018)。運用問題導向學習設計與實施素養導向教學可行性之探究。課程研究,13(2),043-058。
張芬芬、張嘉育(2015)。十二年國教「議題融入課程」規劃芻議。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(3),26-33。
張芳全(2004)。教育政策分析。心理。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。東華書局。
張炳煌(2019)。會考成績對就近入學影響之研究:多層次分析的取向。教育與心理研究,42(2),39-69。
教育部(2011)。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫核定本。http://12basic.tn.edu.tw/UpLoadFiles/C41B163A2A.pdf
教育部(2013)。教育部人才培育白皮書。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/RelFile/6315/6919/%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E4%BA%BA%E6%89%8D%E5%9F%B9%E8%82%B2%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8.pdf
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf
教育部(2018)。高級中等學校課程規會及實施要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001729&KeyWord=%E9%AB%98%E7%B4%9A%E4%B8%AD%E7%AD%89%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E8%A6%8F%E5%8A%83%E5%8F%8A%E5%AF%A6%E6%96%BD%E8%A6%81%E9%BB%9E
陳木金、吳春助(2011)。優質學校文化:卓越校長的觀察。教育研究月刊,202,36-52。
陳李綢(2000)。個案研究。心理。
陳幸仁(2013)。微觀政治及其在學校領導之應用。教育學報,41(1-2),125。
陳建銘(2017)。普通高中面對新課綱是否能夠成功推動。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(5),46-48。
陳盛賢(2008)。十二年國民教育之政策論述〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。
陳聖謨(2013)。教育政策與學校對策——偏鄉小學轉型優質計畫實施之個案研究。教育研究學報,47(1),19-38。
陳錦麗、曾榮豐(2008)。績效管理、組織認同與組織學習關係之研究——以國立大學公務人員為例。屏東教育大學學報,教育類(31),129-155。
陳麗珠(2014)。教育財政制度與改革。心理。
陳麗珠(2017)。從全自費到免學費:十二年國民基本教育學生收費政策之探討。教育行政論壇,9(2),43-60。
黃乃熒(2011)。教育改革實踐倫理與教育政策領導。教育資料與研究,103,1-26。
黃宗顯(2005)。國民小學校長推動九年一貫課程教改政策時所遭遇的行政困難問題、因應方式及其意涵探討。教育經營與管理集刊,1,51-72。
黃宗顯(2008)。學校領導:新理論與實踐。五南文化。
黃昆輝(2002)。教育行政學。東華書局。
黃致誠(2020)。高中學生學習歷程檔案與校訂課程發展之關聯。臺灣教育, 722,103-110。
黃偉立(2020)。普通型高級中等學校校訂必修課程規劃與實施。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(9),127-131。
黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。心理。
黃慧芬(2020)。新課綱學生「學習歷程檔案」於普通高級中學實踐現場之觀察。臺灣教育,724,25-32。
楊思偉(2006)。推動十二年國民教育政策之研究。教育研究集刊,52(2),1-31。
楊朝祥(2014)。釐清十二年國教政策爭議。教育資料與研究,109,1-22。
溫宥基(2017)。高級中等學校特色招生對學校組織之影響探究。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(12),15-19。
劉小華(2016)。十二年國教政策下花蓮縣校長教學領導之個案研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立東華大學。
劉世閔(2005)。社會變遷與教育政策。心理。
劉德宏(2020)。教育政策視角下的校長領導力培養。教育家,6(4),23-25。
潘慧玲(2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊,11(1),115-143。
潘慧玲、黃曬莉、陳文彥、鄭淑惠(2020)。學校準備好了嗎?國高中教育人員實施108課綱的變革準備度。教育研究與發展期刊,16(1),65-100。
蔡進雄(2000)。轉型領導與學校效能。師大書苑。
蔡進雄(2020)。從校長領導脆弱性探析新課綱的變革行動:兼論領導的轉運力。臺灣教育研究期刊,1(2),183-198。
蔡銘津(2008)。少子女化的教育政策走向與應變。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(5),1-7。
鄭崇趁(2001)。「實施十二年國民基本教育」策略分析。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,261-286。
鄭淵全、陳殷哲(2016)。析論學校本位課程發展。教育脈動,7,4-20。
鄭燕祥(2004)。教育領導與改革:新範式。高等教育。
鄭燕祥(2020)。教育新範式:第三波教育改革。元照出版。
魯炳炎(2019)。Dvora Yanow「詮釋性的政策分析」。文官制度季刊,11(2),121-128。
薛曉華(2020)。十二年國教新課綱實施與地方學的相遇:高中「地方學」校訂課程的實踐意義。臺灣教育,721,51-60。
謝金城(2018)。校長推動十二年國民基本教育新課綱的領導作為。中等教育, 69(3),97-110。
羅清水(1999)。從公共政策的形成模式探討教育政策制定的合理性。技術及職業教育,51,7-14。
羅清俊(2020)。公共政策:現象觀察與實務操作(第2版)。揚智文化。(原著出版年:2015)
Ammeter, A. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. Leadership Q, 13(6), 751-769.
Anderson, J. E. (1974). Public Policy-Making. Praeger.
Andersson, R. (2020). Policy and identification: Exploring the influence of identity perceptions on school leader sense-making in the Swedish school-age Educare. Management in Education, 36(2), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0892020620953594
Azahari, I. (1994). Policy leadership and school administrators in Florida: Towards a reconceptualization. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Florida State University.
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A. & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy subjects and policy actors in schools: some necessary but insufficient analyses. Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601564
Banfield, E. C. (1961). Political influence. The Free Press of Glencoe.
Banton, M. (1965). Roles: an introduction to the study of social relations. Tavistock.
Barnett, E. P. & Maarman, R. (2020). Principals' Views on the Implementation of the No-fee Policy through the Lens of Capability Theory. South African Journal of Education, 40(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n3a1673.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership Theory, Research, and Managerial Application (3rd ed.). Free Press.
Bennis, W. G. (1984). On becoming a leader. Addison-Wesley.
Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Bolman, L. G.&Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations:Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed. ). Jossey-Bass.
Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M. & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601555
Brown, C., & Cooney, T. (1982). Research on teacher education: A philosophical orientation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15(4), 13-18.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Happer & Row.
Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: theory, policy, and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391-406.
Carraway, J. H. & Young, T. (2015). Implementation of a Districtwide Policy to Improve Principals’ Instructional Leadership: Principals' Sense-making of the Skillful Observation and Coaching Laboratory. Educational Policy, 29(1), 230-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814564216
Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Principal's leadership as a critical indicator of school performance: Evidence from multi-levels of primary schools. School effectiveness and School Improvement : An International Journal of Research, Policy, and Practice, 5(3), 299-317.
Cohen, J., Loeb, S., Miller, L. C. & Wyckoff, J. H. (2020). Policy Implementation, Principal Agency, and Strategic Action: Improving Teaching Effectiveness in New York City Middle Schools. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 42(1), 134-160. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719893338.
Crick, B. (1993). In Defence of Politics. University of Chicago Press.
Derrington, M. L. (2014). Teacher Evaluation Initial Policy Implementation: Superintendent and Principal Perceptions. Planning & Changing, 45(1/2), 120-137.
Drago-Severson, E. & Maslin-Ostrowski, P. (2018). In Translation: School Leaders Learning in and from Leadership Practice While Confronting Pressing Policy Challenges. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1-44.
Dyson, T. (2007). The politics of German defense and security – policy leadership and military reform in the post-cold war era. Berghahn Books.
Easton, D. (1953). The Political System an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. Alfred A.
Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Eyestone, R. (1971). The Threads of Public Policy: A Study in Policy Leadership. Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Flessa, J. J. (2012). Principals as Middle Managers: School Leadership During the Implementation of Primary Class Size Reduction Policy in Ontario. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 11(3), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2012.692429.
Fowler, F. C. (2004). Policy Studies for Educational Leaders: An Introduction (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
French, W. L. (1978). The Personnel Management Process. Houghton Miflin Company.
Gilmetdinova, A. (2019). Principals as Gatekeepers of Language Policy Implementation in Kazan, Russia. International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 22(2), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1231772.
Hadjithoma‐Garstka, C. (2011). The Role of the Principal's Leadership Style in the Implementation of ICT Policy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01014.x.
Haiyan, Q. & Walker, A. (2011). The ‘Gap’ Between Policy Intent and Policy Effect: an Exploration of the Interpretations of School Principals In China. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 15, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3679(2011)0000015011
Heimans, S., Singh, P. & Glasswell, K. (2017). Doing education policy enactment research in a minor key. Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(2), 185-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1074428
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, G. G. (1987). Educational Administration Theory, Research, and Practice. Random House Trade.
James, C. (2004). The work of educational leaders in building creative and passionate schools and colleagues. In H. Tomlinson (Ed.), Educational Management: Volume I (pp. 263-276). Routledge Falmer.
Johnson, S. M. (1996). Leading to change: The change of the new superintendence. Jossey-Bass.
Jones, C. O. (1977). An introduction to the study of public policy. Duxbury Press.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. Wiley.
Kaufman, H. (1973). Administrative Feedback. Brookings .
Lamm, K. W., Randall, N. L., Lamm, A. J. & Carter, H. S. (2019). Policy Leadership: A Theory-Based Model. Journal of Leadership education, 18(3), 185-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/V18/I3/T1
Lasswell, H. D. & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. Yale University Press.
Lawson, H., Durand, F. T., Wilcox, K. C., Gregory, K. M., Schiller, K. S. & Zuckerman, S. J. (2017). The Role of District and School Leaders' Trust and Communications in the Simultaneous Implementation of Innovative Policies. Journal of School Leadership, 27(1), 31-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461702700102.
Leithwood, K. (2018). Postscript: Five Insights About School Leaders’ Policy Enactment. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(3), 391-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1496342
Leithwood, K., Harris, A. & Hopkins, D. (2019). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Liljenberg, M. (2015). School Leaders as Coupling Agents – Mediating Between External Demands and Internal Values. Education Inquiry, 6(4), 457-479. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.25527
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lispsky, M. (1980). Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.
Mael, F. A. & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2019). Headship as policy narration: generating metaphors of leading in the English primary school. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 51(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2018.1563531
Mavrogordato, M. & White, R. S. (2020). Leveraging Policy Implementation for Social Justice: How School Leaders Shape Educational Opportunity When Implementing Policy for English Learners. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), 3-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18821364.
Mazmanian, D. A. & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Scott Foresman.
Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: theory and practice (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Noryati, A. & Azahari, I. (2017). The Construct of Policy Leadership: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7 (3), 624-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2764.
Noryati, A. (2015). Developing a policy leadership behaviors scale: an exploratory factor analysis[Paper presentation].AeU-International Research Conference. http://ur.aeu.edu.my/id/eprint/38
OECD. (2020). Back to the Future of Education: Four OECD Scenarios for Schooling. https://www.oecd.org/education/back-to-the-future-s-of-education-178ef527-en.htm
Paige, G. D. (1988). The scientific study of political leadership. Sage.
Pont, B., Nusche, D. & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving School Leadership Volume 1: Policy and Practice. OECD.
Rein, M. & Rabinnovitz, F. (1978). Implementation: A theoretical perspective. In Burnham, W. D. & Weinberg, M. W. (Eds.), American Politics and Public Policy. The MIT Press.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational Identification: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358-384.
Rutledge, S. A., Harris, D. N. & Ingle, W. K. (2010). How Principals "Bridge and Buffer" the New Demands of Teacher Quality and Accountability: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Teacher Hiring. American Journal of Education, 116(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/649492
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1984). Leadership and excellence in schooling. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 4-13.
Shaked, H. & Schechter, C. (2017). School principals as mediating agents in education reforms. School Leadership & Management, 37(1-2), 19-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1209182
Singh, P., Thomas, S. & Harris, J. (2013). Recontextualising policy discourses: a Bernsteinian perspective on policy interpretation, translation, enactment. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.770554
Smith, T. B. (1973). The policy implementation process. Policy Science, 4, 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405732
Spillane, J. M. (2005). Standards Deviation: How Schools Misunderstand Education Policy. CPRE Policy Briefs. https://doi.org/10.12698/cpre.2005.rb43
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J. & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Free Press.
UNESCO (2015). Education 2030 Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-2030-incheon-framework-for-action-implementation-of-sdg4-2016-en_2.pdf
Van Meter, D. S. & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration and society, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F009539977500600404
Vekeman, E., Devos, G. & Tuytens, M. (2015). The Influence of Teachers' Expectations on Principals' Implementation of a New Teacher Evaluation Policy in Flemish Secondary Education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability, 27(2), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-014-9203-4.
Wallis, J., & Dollery, B. (2002). Styles of policy leadership and local government reform. Economics Discussion Papers Series, 206.
Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational Actions. Georgetown University.
Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice-Hall.