簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 徐雪芳
Hsueh - Fang Hsu
論文名稱: 高中資優生與普通生個人風格與寫作風格之比較研究
Personal Style and Writing Style of Senior High School Gifted and Regular Students
指導教授: 吳武典
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:184下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究之目的在探討國內高一數理資優生與普通生個人風格的差異外,並以自編寫作風格評量表,藉著分析其寫作風格類型,再和個人風格類型做相關性比較,希望「寫作風格評量表」,能作為日後教學與輔導之參考。
    本研究採實驗研究法,以台北市高一數理資優生和普通生共155人為研究對象,學生自填「個人風格量表」,以二因子變異數分析、百分比統計、皮爾遜積差相關等統計方法加以考驗外,再以命題寫作「角色扮演」一篇,以自編的「寫作風格量表」及評量標準為依據,經評量分析其寫作風格,並將其風格類型與學生自填個人風格類型作比較,以卡方考驗比較其差異性。
    本研究分析高中數理資優生與普通生的個人風格與寫作風格,主要研究發現如下:
    一、個人風格方面
    (一)就智力而言:資優組和普通組在理性、感性上有顯著差異。資優組在理性的得分上顯著高於普通組。
    (三)就性別而言:不論資優組或普通組,男女生在內向性-外向性的個人風格上有顯著差異。資優組男生多偏於內向,資優組女生多偏於外向。
    二、寫作風格方面
    (一) 資優生和普通生在寫作風格方面沒有顯著差異。
    (二) 男女生在寫作風格的宏觀-微觀有所差異。
    (三) 資優男生和資優女生在寫作風格宏觀-微觀,慎思-果斷 方面有很顯著的差異。
    三、個人風格與寫作風格之相關性考驗方面
    個人風格內向-外向與寫作風格沉穩-活潑有明顯相關,個人風格理性-感性與寫作風格理性-感性間有明顯相關。
    根據上述研究結果,本研究對資優生與普通生的輔導及未來研究提供建議。

    The purposes of this study were (a) to develop a writing style evaluation form, (b) to understand the personal style of senior high school gifted and regular students, (c) to compare personal style and writing style between senior high school gifted and regular students.
    The personal style has four dimensions: introversion-extroversion, thinking-feeling, sensation-intuition, and judging-perceiving, while the writing style has four compatible dimensions: vivid-calm, thinking-feeling, micro- macro, and judgment-perception. One hundred and fifty–five senior high school gifted and regular students were selected from Taipei city. The Personal Style Inventory and Writing Style Evaluation Form were administered to the subjects and analyzed by MANOVA and authentic evaluation with a composition entitled “Role Play”, respectively. The personal style and writing style between the two groups were compared by chi-square test.
    The major findings of this study were as follows:
    I. Personal style
    1. There was a significant difference between senior high gifted and regular students on thinking–feeling, the gifted tended to be more rational than the regular.
    2. There was a significant difference between senior high male and female students on introversion-extroversion, males tended to be more introvert than females.
    II. Writing style
    1. There were no significant differences between gifted and regular students on all writing style dimensions.
    2. There was a significant difference between males and females on
    micro-macro, males were more macro than females.
    3. There were significant differences between gifted males and gifted females on micro- macro and judgment-perception, gifted males were more macro and judge than gifted females.
    III. The relationship between personal style and writing style
    The personal style introversion-extroversion has significant compatible relationship with writing style vivid-calm. The personal style thinking-feeling has significant compatible relationship with writing style thinking-feeling.
    According to the present research findings, some suggestions for personal guidance and future studies were discussed.

    中文摘要…………………………………………………………… I 英文摘要……………………………………………………………III 目錄……………………………………………………………………V 表次………………………………………………………………… VII 圖次………………………………………………………………… XI 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究動機與目的………………………………………… 3 第三節 研究問題與假設………………………………………… 6 第三節 名詞界定………………………………………………… 8 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 個人風格之分類及相關研究………………………………11 第二節 寫作風格之分類及相關研究………………………………24 第三節 個人風格與寫作風格之相關研究…………………………37 第四節 省思與啟示…………………………………………………46 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究設計……………………………………………………53 第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………54 第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………58 第四節 研究程序……………………………………………………80 第五節 資料處理與分析……………………………………………84 第四章 結果與討論 第一節 資優生與普通生個人風格之比較…………………………86 第二節 資優生與普通生寫作風格之比較…………………………90 第三節 個人風格與寫作風格的比較分析………………………98 第四節 研究結果綜合討論………………………………………139 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論………………………………………………………153 第二節 本研究之限制……………………………………………154 第三節 建議………………………………………………………156 參考文獻………………………………………………………………160 附錄 附錄一 個人風格問卷……………………………………………168 附錄二 寫作風格量表……………………………………………172 附錄三 專家效度考驗資料………………………………………174
    無法下載圖示
    QR CODE