簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔣英利
Ying-Li Chiang
論文名稱: 中小企業市場導向、企業家精神、創新能力與經營績效關係之研究-以經濟部創新研究獎獲獎企業為例
A Study on Relationship Between Market Orientation, Entrepreneurship,Innovation Capability and Business Performance of the Small and Medium Enterprises:Winners of Innovation and Research Awards of Small and Medium Enterprise of Ministry of Economic Affair
指導教授: 蘇友珊
Su, Yu-Shan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 150
中文關鍵詞: 市場導向企業家精神創新能力經營績效
英文關鍵詞: market orientation, Entrepreneurship, innovation capability, business performance
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:285下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 我國中小企業正面臨技術轉型與產業升級階段,在政府產業創新條例等資源的挹注,及不斷鼓勵產業創新活動及提升產業核心競爭能力,這股動能及風潮在產、官、學、研帶動下所創造之經濟效益漸漸發酵。我國企業在「企業家精神」及「創新能力」的衡量性指標項目中,近年屢獲國際評比佳績機構認同的背景下,尤以中小企業更需再具備對於環境、市場、客戶、競爭者等判斷能力的「市場導向」下才能面面俱觀,進而在競爭激烈環境中求永續經營。本研究旨在探討中小企業市場導向、企業家精神、創新能力與經營績效關係之研究-以經濟部創新研究獎獲獎企業為例,並試圖尋找創新研究有成企業之共通特性。
    本研究以經濟部中小企業創新研究獎歷屆獲獎企業為研究對象,經樣本初步調查與整理,扣除重複獲獎及停止營業之企業後,共453家獲獎企業為調查之樣本,以郵寄問卷方式透過對企業中、高階管理者的填答資料來驗証本研究所推論之假設。回收有效樣本158 份,經由迴歸分析探討整體架構的u影響性;並藉由母群企業現況分析探討其共同特性。本研究結論如下:
    (一)市場導向對企業家精神有正向的影響關係。其中,整體市場導向對創新
    性有顯著正向的影響;競爭導向與跨部門協調則對主動性有顯著正向的
    影響。
    (二)市場導向對創新能力有顯著正向的影響關係。
    (三)在企業所擁有的「市場導向」中,「競爭者導向」及「跨部門協調」程
    度愈高,則愈能提升企業的「經營績效」。
    (四)在企業所擁有的「企業家精神」中,「主動性」程度愈高,則愈能提升
    企業的「經營績效」。
    (五)在企業所擁有的「創新能力」中,「技術創新」程度愈高,則愈能提升
    企業的「經營績效」。
    (六)企業家精神的主動性在市場導向影響經營績效間具有中介效果。
    (七) 創新能力的技術創新在市場導向影響經營績效間具有中介效果。
    (八)由母群現況分析,從事創新研發活動之企業有較一般中小企業長的存活
    率。
    (九)由母群現況分析,從事創新研發活動之企業有集中在產業群聚區之現
    象。

    The small and medium enterprises in our country are confronted with technology transformation and industrial upgrading currently. With the Statute for Industrial Innovation etc. legal resources released by the government, continuous encouragement of industrial innovation and upgrade of industrial core competitive capabilities, the economic benefit resulted from this kinetic energy and trend has fermented gradually under the driving force of the industry, government, academic and research units. In recent years, our enterprises have been recognized by International Rating Agencies in the evaluation index of “entrepreneurship” and “innovation capability”. Under this background, enterprises, especially for the small and medium enterprises, should also possess “market orientation”, the ability to judge the environment, market, customer and competitor, then can seek sustainable operation in the highly competitive environment. This study explored the relationship between market orientation, entrepreneurship, innovation capability and business performance of the small and medium enterprises. Winners of Innovation & Research Awards of Small & Medium Enterprise of Ministry of Economic Affair were taken as examples, attempting to find out the common characteristics of successful innovative enterprises.
    The study objects were previous enterprises winning Innovation & Research Awards of Small & Medium Enterprise of Ministry of Economic Affair . After primary investigation and sorting, enterprises winning the award repeatedly or ceasing operations were excluded. 453 awarded enterprises were taken as study samples. Questionnaires were posted to the middle and high level managers in these enterprises. Their answers were used to verify the hypothesis inferred in this study. 158 effective samples were returned. Analysis of regression was performed to explore the correlation of the overall structures. The common characteristics were explored through analysis of current situation of enterprise population. The conclusions of this study were made as below:
    1.Market orientation has positive impact on entrepreneurship.Furthermore, the overall market orientation have significant positive effect on innovativeness. competition orientation and interfunctional coordination have significant positive effect on proactiveness.
    2.Market orientation has positive and significant effect on innovation capability.
    3.The higher the level of “competitor orientation” and “interfunctional coordination” in market orientation, the more likely to improve “business performance”.
    4.The higher the level of “proactiveness” in “entrepreneurship”, the more likely to improve “business performance”.
    5.The higher the level of “technology innovation” in “innovation capability”, the more likely to improve “business performance”.
    6.Entrepreneurship of proactiveness is proposed as a mediator of the effect of market orientation on business performance.
    7.Innovation capability of technology innovation is proposed as a mediator of the effect of market orientation on business performance.
    8.The analysis of the current situation of enterprise population indicates that enterprises involving in activities of innovation, research and development survive longer than other small and medium enterprises.
    9.The analysis of the current situation of enterprise population indicates that enterprises involving in activities of innovation, research and development have the phenomenon of industry cluster.

    誌 謝………………………………………………………………………i 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………ii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………iv 目 錄………………………………………………………………………vi 表 次………………………………………………………………………viii 圖 次………………………………………………………………………x 第一章、緒論 ……………………………………………………………1 第一節、研究背景 ………………………………………………………1 第二節、研究動機 ………………………………………………………3 第三節、研究目的與預期貢獻 …………………………………………6 第四節、研究流程與範圍 ………………………………………………7 第五節、論文章節架構…………………………………………………11 第二章、文獻探討………………………………………………………13 第一節、中小企業定義與現況…………………………………………13 第二節、中小企業創新研究概況………………………………………16 第三節、市場導向………………………………………………………18 第四節、企業家精神……………………………………………………28 第五節、創新能力………………………………………………………34 第六節、經營績效………………………………………………………41 第七節、假設推論………………………………………………………45 第三章、研究方法………………………………………………………53 第一節、研究架構與假設………………………………………………53 第二節、變數之操作型定義與衡量問卷………………………………58 第三節、專家效度與預試………………………………………………66 第四節、抽樣與分析方法………………………………………………73 第四章、研究分析………………………………………………………81 第一節、基本資料之分布情形…………………………………………81 第二節、各研究變項之現況分析………………………………………86 第三節、共同方法變異檢測……………………………………………92 第四節、各構面間之關聯性分析………………………………………93 第五節、各主要構面之迴歸分析………………………………………99 第六節、中介效果分析…………………………………………………110 第五章、研究結論與建議………………………………………………118 第一節、研究結論………………………………………………………118 第二節、研究貢獻………………………………………………………124 第三節、研究限制………………………………………………………125 第四節、研究建議………………………………………………………127 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………130 中文部份…………………………………………………………………130 英文部分…………………………………………………………………131 網站部分…………………………………………………………………138 附 錄 …………………………………………………………………140 附錄一 經濟部中小企業創新研究獎內容 ……………………………140 附錄二 中小企業認定標準條文 ………………………………………143 附錄三 問卷 ……………………………………………………………145

    一、中文部分
    謝俐勤(1996),「跨文化因素對在臺外商經理人員創業精神影響之研究」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    彼得杜拉克(1998)。創新與創業精神,台北市:麥田出版社
    賴士葆、王秉鈞與黃佑安(1997)。創新能力與新產品研發過程關係之研究。1997中華民國科技管理研討會論文集。
    吳萬益、譚大純、汪昭芬(1999),「企業智價理論在組織創新能力上之應用」,1999中華民國科技管理研討會論文集。
    陳淑芬(2000),「策略型態、市場導向、創新能力與績效關係之研究」,國立雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文,未出版。
    蔡明達(2000),市場資訊處理程序與組織記憶對行銷創新影響之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版。
    范惟翔(2001),顧客知識管理、市場導向與行銷績效之關係研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版。
    蔡啟通(2001)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係,管理學報,第十八卷第四期,527-566。
    林婉玲(2002),零售業多角化策略與市場導向對績效影響之研究-環境不確定性之觀點,國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士論文,未出版。
    榮泰生(2002),價值行銷六大原則,台北:哈佛企管。
    魏聖忠(2002),當代行銷觀念新思維―市場導向理論的回顧與評價,管理評論,第二十三卷第一期, 129-153。
    林義屏、黃俊英、董玉娟(2004)。市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究:以科學園區資訊電子產業為例。管理評論,23(1),101-134。
    陳丁雲(2006)。組織文化與組織創新對組織績效之影響-以高雄地區為例。未出版碩士論文,國立中山大學,高雄市。
    彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救,管理學報,第二十三卷第一期,77-98。
    楊宗儒(2007),市場導向、創業導向、產品創新與組織績效間關係,國立東華大學碩士論文,未出版。
    廖述賢、張文榮(2010),「市場導向、創新能力、行銷能力與經營績效」,商略學報,第二 卷第二 期。
    林建山(2011),「再造經濟社會新境界,中小企業扮先鋒:企業家精神逆境突圍」,創業創新育成雙月刊,第五十六期,4-9。
    經濟部(2011),2011年中小企業白皮書,台北市:經濟部中小企業。
    經濟部(2011),2011年產業技術白皮書,台北市:經濟部中小企業。
    二、英文部分
    Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Pattern of industrial Innovation. Technology Review, 40-47.
    Aiken, M. , Bacharach, S. B., & French, J. L. (1980). Organizational Structure, Work Process, and Proposal Making in Administrative Bureaucracies. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.23, December, 631-652.
    Baldridge, J. V., & Burnham, R.(1975). Organizational Innovation: Industrial, Organizational and Environmental Impact. Administrative Science Quarterly,20, 165-176.
    Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in socialpsychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Barringer, B. R., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). The Relationship between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 421-444.
    Becherer, R. C., & Maurer, J. G. (1997). The moderating effect of environmental variables on the entrepreneurial and marketing orientation of entrepreneur-led firms: ET&P. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,22(1): 47-58.
    Bhuian, S. N. (1997). Exploring market orientation in banks: An empiricalexamination in Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Services Marketing,Vol.11, No.5,317-328.
    Brown, M. G., & Svenson, R. A. (1988). Measuring R&D productivity. Research Technology Management, 31(4),11-15.
    Capaldo, G. , Iandoli, L. , Raffa, M., & Zollo, G.( 2003). The evaluation of innovation capabilities in small Software firms: A methodological approach. Small Business Economics, 21, 343-354.
    Capon, N. , Farley, J. U., & Lehmann, D. R. (1992). Profiles of Product Innovators among Large U.S. Manufacturer. Management Science, 38(2),157-169.
    Cervantes, M. (1997). Diffusing Technology to Industry. OECD Observer, Aug./Sep.,Vol. 207, 20-23.
    Chacke, G. K. (1998). Technology Management. Applications to Corporate Markets and Military Mission,125-130.
    Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal,Vol.7,437-458.
    Chenhsl, J. C., & Langfield, S. (1998). Companies: A Comparative Longitudinal Analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 15(6/7),761-780.
    Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P.(1986). The development and testing of an organizational level entrepreneurship scale. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship.
    Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal,10(1),75-87.
    Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity : a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1) , 128-142.
    Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organization innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21,193-210
    Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of Organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3),392-409.
    Damanpour, F. (1987). The Adoption of Technological, Administrative, and Ancillary Innovations: Impact of Organizational Factors. Journal of Management, Vol.13,No.4, 675-688.
    Damanpour, F. , Szabat, K. A., & Evan, W. M. (1989). The Relationship Between Types of Innovation and Organizational Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26(11), 587-601.
    Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3,555-590.
    Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organ. Stud., Vol.13, No.3, 375-402.
    Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: A framework fordiagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1-20.
    Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 58, No. 4, 37-52.
    Deng, S., & Dart, J. (1994). Measuring market orientation: A multi-factor,multi-item approach. Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 10, No. 8, 725-742.
    Deshpandé, R. , Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate culturecustomer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 1, 23-37.
    Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. MA, USA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Reprinted 2004.
    Eckhardt, T. J., & Shane, A. S. (2003). Opportunities and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333-349.
    Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. MA, USA:Cambridge, MIT Press.
    Gilder, G. (1998). The Revitalization of Everything: The Law of the Microcosm. Harvard Business Review, 66(2),49-61.
    Gotteland, D., & Boulé, J. M. (2006). The Market Orientation–New Product Performance Relationship: Redefining the Moderating Role of Environmental Conditions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.33, No.2,171-185.
    Gronhaug, K., & Kaufmann, G. (1988). Innovation: A cross disciplinary perspective. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
    Guth, W. D., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 5-15.
    Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the Revolution. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
    Han, J. K. , Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link?. Journal of Marketing,62(10), 30-45.
    Henderson, R., & Clark, K. (1995). Architectural Innovation: The Configuration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol35, No1,9-30.
    Homburg, C., & Pflesser, C. (2000). A Multiple-layer Model of Market-oriented Organizarional Culture: Measurement Issues and Performance Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37,449-462.
    Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory ofcompetition. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, No. 2, 1-15.
    Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning:An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
    Hult, T., & Ketchen, D. J. Jr. (2001). Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 9, 899-906.
    Inzerilli, G. (1990). The Italian Alternative: Flexible Organization and Social Management. International Studies of Management & Organization, Vo1.20 ,No.4,6-21.
    Im, S. , Hussain, M., & Sengupta, S. (2008). Testing interaction effects of the dimensions of market orientation on marketing program creativity, Journal of Business Research, 61(8), 859-867.
    Kaplan, R. S. (1983). Measuring Manufacturing Performance: A New Challenge for Managerial Accounting Research. Accounting Review, Vol. 58(4), 686-705.
    Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using The Balanced Scorecard As a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review,74(1),75-85.
    Kirzner, I. M. (1999). Creativity and /or Alertness: A Reconsideration of the Schumpeterian Entrepreneur. Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 11, 5-17.
    Kirca, A. H. , Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24-41.
    Knight, G. (2000). Entrepreneurship and Marketing Strategy: The SME Under Globalization. Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 8, No. 2, 12-32.
    Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct,research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, No. 2, 1-18.
    Kohli, A. A. , Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, 467-477.
    Kuratko, D. F. , Montagno, R. V., & Hornsby, J. S. (1990). Developing an ntrepreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 49-58.
    Kwaku, A. A., & Ranchhod, A. (1998). Market orientation and performance in the biotechnology industry: an exploratory empirical analysis. Technical Analysis and Strategic Management, 10,197-210.
    Kwaku, A. A. (1997). Market Orientation and Performance: Do the Findings Established in Large Firms Hold in the Small Business Sector?. Journal of Euro- Marketing, Vol. 6 (3), 1-26.
    Kwaku, A. G. , Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2005). The Contingent Value of Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations for New Product Program Performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2Vol.22, No.6, 464-482.
    Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation,and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 4, 35.
    Lee, T. S., & Tsai, H. J. (2005). The effects of business operation mode on marketing orientation, learning or ientationand innovativeness. Industrial Management and Data System, 105(3), 325-348.
    Li, T., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination. Jouranl of Mark, 62(4), 13-29.
    Low, D. R. , Chapman, R. L., & Sloan, T. R. (2007). Inter-relationships between innovation and market orientation in SMEs. Management Research News,30(12), 878-891.
    Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, 135-172.
    Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1998). Entrepreneuial Strategy Making and Firm Performance. Strategy Management Journal, Vol.18 (9), 677-693.
    Luo. X. , Zhou. L., & Liu S. S. (2005). Entrepreneurial firms in the context of China’s transition economy: an integrative framework and empirical examination. Journal of Business Research, 58, 277-284.
    MacCrimmon, K. R. , Wehrung, A. D., & Stanbury, W. T. (1988). Taking risks:the management of uncertainty. New York: Free Press.
    Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F.(1990). The Effect of A Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing,Vol.54, No.4,20-35.
    Matear, S. , Osborne, P. , Garrett, T., & Gray, B. J. (2002). How does market orientation contribute to service firm performance?. European Journal of Marketing,36(9), 1058-1075.
    Matsuno, K. , Mentzer, J. T., & Özsomer, A. (2002). The effects ofentrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 3, 18-32.
    Mavondo, F. T., & Farrell, M. A. (2000). Measuring market orientation: Are there differences between business markets and consumer marketers?. Australian Journal of Management,25(2), 223-244.
    Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63-73.
    Miler, S. M. (1990). The Strategic Management to Technological R&D ─An Ideal Process for the 1990’s. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.5(2), 63-153.
    Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.3, No.1, l-25.
    Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 7, 770-791.
    Miles, M. P., & Arnold, D. R. (1991). The Relationship Between Marketing Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,49-65, Summer.
    Morris, M. H., & Jones, F. F. (1999). Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector: ET&P. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 71-91.
    Moon, M. J. (1999). The Pursuit of Managerial Entrepreneurship: Does Organization Matter?. Public Administration Review ,59(1),31-43.
    Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1998). Additional thoughts on the measurementof market orientation: A comment on Deshpandé and Farley. Journal of Market Focused Management, Vol. 2, No. 3, 233-236.
    Narver, J. C. , Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New-product Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management,21(5),334-347.
    Ngai, J. C. H., & Ellis, P. (1998). Market orientation and business performance:Some evidence from Hong Kong. International Marketing Review, Vol.15, No.2, 119-139.
    Nystrom, H. (1990). Technological and Market Innovation Strategies for Product and Company Development. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
    Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing,10, 425-438.
    Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D. T. (1996). A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,Vol. 24, No. 1, 27-43.
    Pelham, A. M.(2000). Market Orientation and other Potential Influences on Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms‖. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.38, 48-67.
    Pitt, L. F., & Kannemeyer, R. (2000). The role of Adaptation in Microenterprise Development: A Marketing Perspective. Journal of development Entrepreneurship, Aug., Vol. 5, No. 2, 137-155.
    Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4),531-544.
    Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
    Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, USA: Free Press.
    Rickards, T., & Moger, S. (1991). Innovation Questionnaire Used in EURPOACE Study. UK: Manchester Business School.
    Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational Behavior: Concepts,Controversies and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice –Hall.
    Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press: New York.
    Ruekert, R. W. (1992).Developing a market orientation: An organizational strategy perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing,Vol.9, No.3, 225-245.
    Santomero, A. M., & Trester, J. J. (1998). Financial Innovation and Bank Risk Taking. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35 (1), 25-37.
    Savioz, P., & Sannemann, E. (1999). The Concept of the IntegratedInnovation Process. IEEE, Vol. 2, 137-143.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry intom Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Translated from the German by Redvers Opie.Souder, W.E.(1987). Managing New Product Innovation, MA: Lexington Books.
    Schollhamer, H. (1982). Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship. Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (pp.209-223). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Shapiro, B. (1988). What the hell is ‘market-oriented’?. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66, No. 6, 19-25.
    Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of management Review,Briarcliff Manor, Vol.25, No., 217-226.
    Shane, S. , Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human resource management review, 13, 257-279.
    Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). Intelligence Generation and Superior Customer Vaule. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Vol 28, No.1, 120-127.
    Smart, D. T., & Conant, J. S. (1994). Entrepreneurial Orientation,Distinctive Marketing Competencies and Organizational Performance. Journal of Applied Business Research ,10(3) , 28-38.
    Steer, R. M. (1975). Problem in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.20 (4), 546-558.
    Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local Search and Evolution of Technological Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21-38.
    Stern, S., & Porter, M. E. (2001). Innovation: Location Matters. Sloan Management Review, 42,No.3, 25-36.
    Szilagyijr, A. D. (1984). Management and Performance,2nd ed, New Jersey :Scott. Foresman and company.
    Tomala, F., & Senechal, O. (2004). Innovation management: A synthesis of academic and industrial points of view. International Journal of Project Management,22(4),281-287.
    Trist, E. L. (1981). The Evolution of Socio-Techniocal Systems as a Conceptual framework and as an Action Research Program. in Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, A.H. Van de Ven and W. F. Joyce, ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Van de Ven, Andrew H., & Diane L. Ferry (1980). Measuring and Assessing Organizations, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprise:The construct,dimensionality,and measurement. Management Science, Vol.35, 942-962.
    Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 4,801-814.
    Vecchio, P. R. (2003). Entrepreneurship and leadership: common trends and common threads. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 303-327.
    Webster, F. E. Jr. (1988). The rediscovery of the marketing concept. BusinessHorizons, Vol. 31, No. 3, 29-39.
    Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24,37-48.
    Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation,and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24,1307-1314.
    Woo, C. Y., & Willard, G. (1983). Performance Representation in Business Research: Discussion and Recommendation. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual National Meetings of the Academy of Management, Dallas.
    Wood, V. R., Bhuian, S. ,& Kiecker, P. (2000). Market Orientation and Organization Performance in Not-for-Profit Hospitals. Journal of Business Research, 213-226.
    Yang, J. , Rui, M., & Wang, J. J. (2006). Enhancing the firm's innovation capability through knowledge management: A study of high technology firms in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(4), 305-317.
    Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of BusinessVenturing ,6(4), 259-285.
    Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing ,10(1), 43-58.
    Zaltman, G. , Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and Organizations, New York: Wiley.
    Zahra, S. A. , Jennings, D. F., & Kuratko, D. F. (1999). The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: The state of the field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(2), 45-65.
    三、網站部分
    GEDI 官方網站:http://www.thegedi.org/
    經濟部工業局,網址:http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/indexl.htm#
    經濟部中小企業處,網址:http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
    工業技術研究院,網址:http://www.itri.org.tw
    經濟建設委員會,網址:http://www.cepd.gov.tw/
    經濟部中小企業創新研究獎,網址:http://tsia.moeasmea.gov.tw/moeasmea/wSite/mp?mp=00203

    下載圖示
    QR CODE