本研究旨在探討刑事案件警詢筆錄警察擔任通譯其通譯能力、警察通譯人才培育現況，以及提出具體可行警察通譯能力精進策略供當局參考。本研究方法採立意取樣方式，以質性半結構方式進行深度訪談，32名訪談對象來自三個族群：執行者：1)15名外事警察，及使用者：2)10名分局偵查員及3)7名地檢署主任檢察官。研究發現如下：1)目前通譯定期訓練並未以外事警察專長美日語，只以泰語、印尼語及越南語的通譯培訓為主。2)、目前刑案筆錄案例都已過時不實用。3)通譯培訓應以情境教學為主，線上為輔。4)沒有外事警察通譯獎勵措施。5)地檢署主任檢察官認為外事警察擔任通譯比特約通譯稱職，跟受害人一樣對外事警察較具信任感。6)員警認為外事警察通譯能力佳，警詢筆錄進行很順利。一般通譯有保密的疑慮。綜上所述，研究建議警政署與地檢署針對通譯工作進行人才合作與互動，提升外事警察能見度及警察形象；社會矚目案件成功通譯案例應進行經驗分享；現在擔任地檢署特約通譯之警察可作為外事警察通譯之種子教官，未來應規畫情境教學通譯培訓，另外將線上課程導入通譯知識與技巧。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the interpreting ability of Foreign Affairs Police officers in criminal cases and the current status of police interpreter training, while offering hopefully feasible and tangible strategies to enhance the interpreting ability of Foreign Affairs Police officers, and thereby serve as a reference to the competent authorities. The methodology is a purposive sampling in qualitative semi-structured in-depth interviews. The 32 subjects were divided into three groups: practitioners: a) 15 Foreign Affairs Police officers, and users: b) 10 criminal investigators from the Xinyi Precinct, c) 2 deputy chief prosecutors and 5 head prosecutors of the District Prosecutor’s Office. After data collection, the responses during the interviews were analyzed qualitatively. Based on the data analyses, the findings are summarized as follows:1) Currently, the regular training for interpreters is not provided in English or Japanese for Foreign Affairs Police officers, but focuses only on Thai, Indonesian and Vietnamese for the interpreters. 2) The current criminal interviewing samples are outdated, impractical and infeasible.3) Interpretation training should be Situated-Teaching and supplemented by online courses. 4)There are no specific incentives to reward Foreign Affairs Police interpreters. 5)The head prosecutor of the District Prosecutor’s Office believes that Foreign Affairs Police officers are better interpreters than others, and that Foreign Affairs Police officers are more trustworthy, as are the victims.6) The police officers in the Precinct thought that the Foreign Affairs Police interpreters were skillful and that the interviews were always conducted smoothly. With the other interpreters there was a concern about confidentiality. On the basis of these results, some implications are offered as follows. The National Police Agency and the District Prosecutor’s Office should collaborate and interact with each other in offering the best interpreting candidates in order to enhance the visibility of the Foreign Affairs Police and to improve the image of the police; the Foreign Affairs Police interpreters who completed successful and high-profile cases should be shared with other Foreign Affairs Police; the Foreign Affairs Police who serve as chartered interpreters for the District Prosecutor’s Office can serve as interpreting seed instructors; in the future scenario-oriented interpreting training is to be planned; and online courses are to be introduced to enhance interpreting knowledge and skills.

川路利良（1879）。警察手眼。東京：東京警視局。
內政部警政署（2018）。中華民國警察。臺北市：內政部警政署。
內政部警政署（2021）。涉外治安案件使用遠距傳譯可行性之探討。「2021通譯政策工作坊」發表之論文，臺北市。
內政部警政署（2023）。111年警政工作年報。臺北市：內政部警政署。
王斌華（2012）。從通譯能力到譯員能力：專業通譯教學理念的拓展。外語與外語教學 (6)，頁 75-78。
王雲東（2007）。社會研究方法：量化與質化取向及其應用。台北：威士曼文化事業公司。
朱定初（2004）。談法律專門術語翻譯之雙重功能對等原則。台北：國立編譯館館刊，32（1），頁 60-66。
江世雄 (2018)。論日本涉外刑事案件之通譯選任問題。國土安全與國境管理學報，30，49-90。
何承恩（2013）。台灣通譯研究現況：2004-2013 趨勢與發展。翻譯學研究集刊， 第十三輯，頁111-144。
吳若愚（1984）。「案重初供」刑警辦案千萬馬虎不得！。法律知識，15-16。
吳斯茜 (2013) 從專精取向觀點探討警察在職訓練之架構。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報(9)，127-140。
沈敬慈、廖有祿（2017）。涉外刑案案詢中使用通譯之研究。涉外執法與政策學報，頁 25-39。
林淑馨（2010）。質性研究：理論與實務。巨流圖書 (藍海文化)。
林鈺雄（2015）。2014年刑事程序法裁判回顧：從國際人權公約內國法化的觀點出發。臺大法學論叢，44（S），1535-1566。
孫義雄（2023）。以科學證據為基礎的警政策略—循證警政。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報（19），47-58。
張同瑩(譯)（2019）。雙語法庭：司法程序中的通譯(原作者：Berk-Seligson. Susan)）。臺北市：河中文化(原著出版年：2017)。
張維容、游任白（2023）。我國司法警察機關通譯制度之研究-以內政部警政署為例。「2023年涉外執法政策與實務學術研討會」發表之論文，桃園市。
陳允萍（2017）。司法通譯。新北市：零極限文化。
陳得文 (2022）。尊重多元文化的雙語教學: 由英語定位談起。臺灣教育評論月刊。
陳雅齡（2018）。法庭通譯：理論與實踐）。臺北市：五南。
童國倫、周哲宇、張楷焄（2018）。EndNote & RefWorks論文與文獻寫作管理（五版）（第研究&方法冊）。臺北市：五南。
楊承淑（2000）。通譯教學研究：理論與實踐。 新莊市：輔仁大學。
廖咸浩、郝譽翔（2023）。語言與文化，副刊，聯合報。
廖柏森 (2007)。台灣通譯研究現況之探討。翻譯學研究集刊，191-219。
臺灣研究誠信守則 (2020)。臺灣研究誠信守則。臺灣聯合大學系統。
劉敏華（2012）。逐步通譯與筆記。臺北市：書林。
蔡庭榕（2000）。警察百科全書外事與國境警察。桃園市：中央警察大學。
簡萓靚（2016）。台灣司法通譯專業化與角色認同初探：以台灣司法通譯協會為例。臺灣師範大學翻譯研究所學位論文，2016，1-98。
Abbe, A., & Brandon, S. E. (2014). Building and maintaining rapport in investigative interviews. Police Practice and Research, 15(3), 207-220.
ACPO. (1992). Principles of Investigative Interviewing. London: Home Office.
Alison, L., Giles, S., & McGuire, G. (2015). Blood from a Stone: Why Rapport Works and Torture Doesn’t in ‘Enhanced’Interrogations. Investigative Interviewing: Research & Practice, 7(2).
Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., & Christiansen, P. (2013). Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(4), 411.
Angelelli, C. (2000). Interpretation as a communicative event: A look through Hymes' lenses. Meta, 45(4), 580-592.
Angelelli, C. V. (2004). Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication: Cambridge University Press.
Arjona, E. (1978). Intercultural communication and the training of interpreters at the Monterey Institute of Foreign Studies Language interpretation and communication (pp. 35-44): Springer.
Baker-Eck, B., Bull, R., & Walsh, D. (2020). Investigative empathy: A strength scale of empathy based on European police perspectives. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(3), 412-427.
Baldwin, J. (1993). Police interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof? The British Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 325-352.
Barsky, R. (2001). Arguing and justifying: assessing the Convention refugees’ choice of moment, motive and host country. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 20(1).
Barsky, R. F. J. T. T. (1996). The interpreter as intercultural agent in convention refugee hearings. 2(1), 45-63.
Berk-Seligson, S. (1987). The intersection of testimony styles in interpreted judicial proceedings: Pragmatic alterations in Spanish testimony.
Berk-Seligson, S. (2000). Interpreting for the police: Issues in pre-trial phases of the judicial process. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 7(2), 212-237.
Berk-Seligson, S. (2002). The Miranda warnings and linguistic coercion: The role of footing in the interrogation of a limited-English-speaking murder suspect Language in the legal process (pp. 127-143): Springer.
Berk-Seligson, S. (2009). Coerced confessions: The discourse of bilingual police interrogations. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Berk-Seligson, S. (2017). The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process: University of Chicago Press.
Borum, R. (2006). Approaching truth: Behavioral science lessons on educing information from human sources. Educing information, 18.
Braun, S. (2014). Comparing traditional and remote interpreting in police settings: quality and impact factors.
Braun, S. (2017). What a micro-analytical investigation of additions and expansions in remote interpreting can tell us about interpreters’ participation in a shared virtual space. Journal of Pragmatics, 107, 165-177.
Braun, S., & Taylor, J. (2012a). AVIDICUS comparative studies–part I: Traditional interpreting and remote interpreting in police interviews. Braun, Sabina & Judith. L. Taylor (eds.), 85-100.
Braun, S., & Taylor, J. (2012b). Video-mediated interpreting in criminal proceedings: two European surveys. Videoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings, 69-98.
Braun, S., & Taylor, J. (2012c). Video-mediated interpreting: an overview of current practice and research. Videoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings, 33-68.
Broad, M. (1992). Transfer of training: Action-packed strategies to ensure high payoff from training investments. Assison-Welsey Company.
Bull, R., & Baker, B. (2020). Obtaining from suspects valid discourse ‘PEACE’-fully: What role for rapport and empathy. The discourse of police interviews, 42-64.
Canter, D. (2010). Forensic psychology: A very short introduction (Vol. 235): Oxford University Press.
Canter, D. (2017). Criminal psychology: Routledge.
Cao, D. (1996). Towards a model of translation proficiency. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 8(2), 325-340.
Cherryman, J., & Bull, R. (2001). Police officers' perceptions of specialist investigative interviewing skills. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 3(3), 199-212.
Chiou, J.-c. (2004). A study of job satisfaction/dissatisfaction in Taiwan's police: Sam Houston State University.
Clarke, C. (2005). A national evaluation of PEACE investigative interviewing. University of Portsmouth.
Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). A national evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course: Home office London.
Clarke, S. C. (2006). Doctrine corner: FM 2-22.3-New Doctrine for the new HUMINT collector. Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin, 32(3).
Clifford, A. (2001). Discourse theory and performance-based assessment: Two tools for professional interpreting. Meta, 46(2), 365-378.
Colin, J., & Morris, R. (1996). Interpreters and the legal process: Waterside Press.
Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 116(3), 457.
Collins, R., Lincoln, R., & Frank, M. (2005). The need for rapport in police interviews. Humanities & Social Sciences paper.
Collins, R., Lincoln, R., & Frank, M. G. (2002). The effect of rapport in forensic interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 9(1), 69-78.
Conley, J. M., O'Barr, W. M., & Riner, R. C. (2019). Just words: Law, language, and power: University of Chicago Press.
Cotterill, J. (2000). Reading the rights: A cautionary tale of comprehension and comprehensibility. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 7(1), 4-25.
Dando, C. J., & Oxburgh, G. E. (2016). Empathy in the field: Towards a taxonomy of empathic communication in information gathering interviews with suspected sex offenders. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(1), 27-33.
Davis, M. R., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. M. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time‐critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 75-93.
de Jongh, E. M. (1991). Cultural proficiency and nonverbal communication in court interpreting. Confluencia, 99-106.
Dhami, M. K., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Connor Desai, S. (2017). Development of an information sheet providing rapport advice for interpreters in police interviews. Police Practice and Research, 18(3), 291-305.
Elorza, I. (2012). Empiricism and Analytical Tools for 21 Century Applied Linguistics: Selected Papers From the XXIX International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics, AESLA.
Ericsson, K. A. (2000). Expertise in interpreting: An expert-performance perspective. Interpreting, 5(2), 187-220.
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1997). Cognitive and developmental factors in expert performance.
Europe, C. o. (1988). Convention for the Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Annual review of population law, 15, 149.
Evans, G., & Webb, M. (1993). High profile—but not that high profile: Interviewing of young persons. Issues in Criminological & Legal Psychology.
Evans, J. R., Shaffer, S. A., & Walsh, D. (2019). Interpreters in investigative interviewing contexts The Routledge International Handbook of Legal and Investigative Psychology (pp. 133-148): Routledge.
Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Jo, E., & Fisher, R. P. (2016). The effect of interpreters on eliciting information, cues to deceit and rapport. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(2), 286-304.
Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Jo, E., Shaboltas, A., . . . Houston, K. (2016). Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit from native speakers, non‐native speakers and those talking through an interpreter. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 854-862.
Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2016). Using the reverse order technique with non‐native speakers or through an interpreter. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 242-249.
Facteau, J. D., Dobbins, G. H., Russell, J. E., Ladd, R. T., & Kudisch, J. D. (1995). The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pretraining motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of management, 21(1), 1-25.
Fenton, S. (2004). Expressing a well-founded fear. Paper presented at the Claims, changes and challenges in translation studies: Selected contributions from the EST Congress, Copenhagen 2001.
Finegan, E. (2014). Language: Its structure and use: Cengage Learning.
Fisher, R. P. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C Tomas.
Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Raymond, D. S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(3), 177-185.
Fowler, Y. (2007). Formative assessment: Using peer and self-assessment in interpreter training. Benjamins Translation Library, 70, 253.
Fowler, Y., Vaughan, M., & Wheatcroft, J. (2015). The Interpreter‐Mediated Police Interview. Communication in investigative and legal contexts: Integrated approaches from forensic psychology, linguistics and law enforcement, 315-333.
Gabrych, M. (2020). Quality assessment of interpreting in Polish-English police-suspect interviews. A multi-method study. University of Surrey.
Gaiba, F. (1998). The origins of simultaneous interpretation: The Nuremberg Trial: University of Ottawa Press.
Gallai, F. (2013a). " I'll just intervene whenever he finds it a bit difficult to answer" Exploding the myth of literalism in interpreter-mediated interviews. Investigative Interviewing: Research & Practice, 5(1).
Gallai, F. (2013b). Understanding discourse markers in interpreter-mediated police interviews: University of Salford (United Kingdom).
Gallai, F. (2017). Pragmatic competence and interpreter-mediated police investigative interviews. The Translator, 23 (2), 177–196.
Gamal, M. Y. (2014). Police interpreting: A view from the Australian context. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 2(2), 77.
Garavaglia, P. L. (1993). How to ensure transfer of training. Training & Development, 47(10), 63-69.
Garcés, C. V., & Martin, A. (2008). Crossing borders in community interpreting: Definitions and dilemmas (Vol. 76): John Benjamins Publishing.
Garzone, G., & Viezzi, M. (2002). Interpreting in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities (Vol. 43): John Benjamins Publishing.
Giambruno, C. (2008). The role of the interpreter in the governance of sixteenth-and seventeenth-century Spanish colonies in the" New World. Crossing borders in community interpreting. definitions and dilemmas, 27-49.
Gile, D. (1995). Fidelity assessment in consecutive interpretation: An experiment. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 7(1), 151-164.
Gile, D. (2003). Quality assessment in conference interpreting: Methodological issues. La evaluación de la calidad en interpretación: Investigación, 109-124.
González, R. D., Vásquez, V. F., & Mikkelson, H. (1991). Fundamentals of court interpretation. Theory, policy, and practice.
Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Howes, L. M. (2016). Social persuasion to develop rapport in high-stakes interviews: Qualitative analyses of Asian-Pacific practices. Policing and Society, 26(3), 270-290.
Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Howes, L. M. (2019). High-stakes interviews and rapport development: Practitioners’ perceptions of interpreter impact. Policing and Society, 29(1), 100-117.
Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Martschuk, N. (2016). Risks and Benefits of Interpreter-Mediated Police Interviews. Varstvoslovje: Journal of Criminal Justice & Security, 18(4).
Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., Hale, S. B., & Brandon, S. E. (2020). Interpreted police interviews: A review of contemporary research. Advances in Psychology and Law: Volume 5, 83-136.
Goodman‐Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Dhami, M. K. (2014). Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 883-897.
Grbić, N. (2008). Constructing interpreting quality. Interpreting, 10(2), 232-257.
Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2008). Rapport-building behaviors used by retail employees. Journal of Retailing, 84(3), 308-324.
Griffiths, A. (2008). An examination into the efficacy of police advanced investigative interview training? , University of Portsmouth Portsmouth, UK.
Griffiths, A., & Milne, B. (2013). Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain 1 Investigative interviewing (pp. 167-189): Willan.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: John Wiley & Sons.
Hale, S. (2007a). The challenges of court interpreting: Intricacies, responsibilities and ramifications. Alternative Law Journal, 32(4), 198-202.
Hale, S. (2007b). Community interpreting: Springer.
Hale, S. (2008). Controversies over the role of the court interpreter. Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting/John Benjamins.
Hale, S. (2011). The need to raise the bar: court interpreters as specialised experts. Paper presented at the Judicial Review: Selected Conference Papers: Journal of the Judicial Commission of New South Wales, The.
Hale, S. (2018). Specialist legal interpreters for a fairer justice system Discourse in translation (pp. 47-66): Routledge.
Hale, S., Garcia, I., Hlavac, J., Kim, M., Lai, M., Turner, B., & Slatyer, H. (2012). Improvements to NAATI testing: Development of a conceptual overview for a new model for NAATI standards, testing and assessment. Retrieved October, 4, 2019.
Hale, S., & Gibbons, J. (1999). Varying realities: Patterned changes in the interpreter's representation of courtroom and external realities. Applied linguistics, 20(2), 203-220.
Hale, S., & Gonzalez, E. (2017). Teaching legal interpreting at university level: A research-based approach Teaching dialogue interpreting (pp. 200-216): John Benjamins.
Hale, S., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Martschuk, N. (2019). Interpreter performance in police interviews. Differences between trained interpreters and untrained bilinguals. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 13(2), 107-131.
Hale, S., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Martschuk, N. (2020). Interactional management in a simulated police interview. The discourse of police interviews, 200.
Hale, S., Martschuk, N., Ozolins, U., & Stern, L. (2017). The effect of interpreting modes on witness credibility assessments. Interpreting, 19(1), 69-96.
Hale, S., & Napier, J. (2020). Research methods in interpreting: A practical resource (3rd ed. ed.): Bloomsbury Acdemic.
Hale, S. B. (2004a). The discourse of court interpreting discourse practices of the law, the witness, and the interpreter. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
Hale, S. B. (2004b). The discourse of court interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness, and the interpreter (Vol. 52): John Benjamins Publishing.
Hale, S. B. (2011). Interpreter policies, practices and protocols in Australian courts and tribunals: A national survey: Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration Incorporated Melbourne.
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (2014). Discourse and the Translator: Routledge.
Hertog, E. (2015). Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Right to Interpretation and Translation in Criminal Proceedings: Transposition Strategies with regard to Interpretation and Translation. MonTI. Monografías de traducción e interpretación(7), 73-100.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2011). The motivation to work (Vol. 1): Transaction publishers.
Heydon, G., & Lai, M. (2013). Police interviews mediated by interpreters: An exercise in diminishment. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 5(2), 82-98.
Hlavac, J. (2013). A cross-national overview of translator and interpreter certification procedures. Translation & Interpreting: The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 5(1), 32-65.
Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S. Å. (2002). Murderers' and sexual offenders' experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral sciences & the law, 20(1‐2), 31-45.
Holmberg, U., & Madsen, K. (2014). Rapport operationalized as a humanitarian interview in investigative interview settings. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(4), 591-610.
Hope, L., & Gabbert, F. (2019). Interviewing witnesses and victims. Psychological science and the law, 130-156.
Houston, K. A., Russano, M. B., & Ricks, E. P. (2017). ‘Any friend of yours is a friend of mine’: investigating the utilization of an interpreter in an investigative interview. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(5), 413-426.
Howes, L. M. (2019). Community interpreters’ experiences of police investigative interviews: how might interpreters’ insights contribute to enhanced procedural justice? Policing and Society, 29(8), 887-905.
Ibrahim-Bell, Z. (2008). The folktale of translation: making sense of an'alien'culture.
Institute, C. Q. (2024). What is quality? https://www.quality.org/what-quality
Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, crime and law, 5(1-2), 3-27.
Kaczmarek, L. (2016). Towards a broader approach to the community interpreter’s role: On correspondence between role perceptions and interactional goals. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 18(1), 57-88.
Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and human behavior, 34, 3-38.
Kebbell, M., Hurren, E., & Mazerolle, P. (2006). Sex offenders’ perceptions of police interviewing: Implications for improving the interviewing effectiveness. The Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 4(1), 28-36.
Kebbell, M. R., & Davies, G. M. (2006). Future Directions for Applying Psychology to Forensic Investigations and Prosecutions. Practical psychology for forensic investigations and prosecutions, 219.
Kelly, C. E., Miller, J. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kleinman, S. M. (2013). A taxonomy of interrogation methods. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 165.
Kelly, C. E., Redlich, A. D., & Miller, J. C. (2015). Examining the meso-level domains of the interrogation taxonomy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(2), 179.
Kelly, N. (2008). Telephone interpreting: A comprehensive guide to the profession: Trafford Publishing.
Kidwell, M., & González Martínez, E. (2010). ‘Let me tell you about myself’: A method for suppressing subject talk in a ‘soft accusation’interrogation. Discourse Studies, 12(1), 65-89.
Kieckhaefer, J. M., Vallano, J. P., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2014). Examining the positive effects of rapport building: When and why does rapport building benefit adult eyewitness memory? Memory, 22(8), 1010-1023.
Kirchhoff, H. (1976). Simultaneous interpreting: Interdependence of variables in the interpreting process, interpreting models and interpreting strategies. The interpreting studies reader, 111-119.
Knapp, K., & Knapp-Potthoff, A. (1986). Interweaving two discourses. The difficult task of the non-professional interpreter. Interlingual and intercultural communication: Discourse and cognition in translation and second language acquisition studies, 151-168.
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development: Routledge.
Knutsson, J., & Tompson, L. (2017). Advances in evidence-based policing: Routledge Abingdon.
Ko, L. (2006). The need for long-term empirical studies in remote interpreting research: A case study of telephone interpreting. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series–Themes in Translation Studies, 5.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development: FT press.
Kolb, W., & Pöchhacker, F. (2008). Interpreting in asylum appeal hearings: Roles and norms revisited Interpreting in legal settings (pp. 26-50): Gallaudet University Press.
Kopczyński, A. (1994). Quality in conference interpreting: Some pragmatic problems. Translation studies: An interdiscipline, 189-198.
Kurz, I. (2001). Conference interpreting: Quality in the ears of the user. Meta, 46(2), 394-409.
Lai, M., & Mulayim, S. (2014). Interpreter linguistic intervention in the strategies employed by police in investigative interviews. Police Practice and Research, 15(4), 307-321.
Lang, R. (1976). Interpreters in local courts in Papua New Guinea. O’Barr, William M. & Jean F. O’Barr (eds.), 327-365.
Lassiter, G. D. (2010). Videotaped interrogations and confessions: What’s obvious in hindsight may not be in foresight.
Lebese, S. J. (2013). The undefined role of court interpreters in South Africa. University of South Africa.
Lee, J. (2008). Rating scales for interpreting performance assessment. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 2(2), 165-184.
Lee, J. (2009). Conflicting views on court interpreting examined through surveys of legal professionals and court interpreters. 11(1), 35-56.
Lee, J. (2017). A case study of interpreter-mediated witness statement: Police interpreting in South Korea. Police Practice and Research, 18(2), 194-205.
Lewin, K. (2013). Principles of topological psychology: Read Books Ltd.
Licoppe, C., Verdier, M., & Veyrier, C.-A. (2018). Voice, power and turn-taking in multi-lingual, consecutively interpreted courtroom proceedings with video links. Here or There. Research on Interpreting via Video Link.
Liu, X., & Hale, S. (2018). Achieving accuracy in a bilingual courtroom: The effectiveness of specialised legal interpreter training. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 12(3), 299-321.
Liu, Z. (2016). Legal interpreters’ self-perceptions of their roles and responsibilities in the British judicial system. University of York.
Llewellyn-Jones, P., & Lee, R. G. (2014). Redefining the role of the community interpreter: The concept of role-space: Sli Press.
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 13(5), 585-589.
Loftus, E. F., Schooler, J. W., Boone, S. M., & Kline, D. (1987). Time went by so slowly: Overestimation of event duration by males and females. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1(1), 3-13.
Lum, C., & Koper, C. S. (2017). Evidence-Based Policing: Translating Research into Practice (2017): Oxford University Press.
Mack, G. (2002). Die Beurteilung professioneller Dolmetschleistungen. Übersetzen und Dolmetschen. Eine Orientierungshilfe, UTB, 2329, 110-119.
Madon, S., More, C., & Ditchfield, R. (2019). Interrogations and confessions. N. Brewer & AB Douglass, Psychological science and the law, 54-78.
Martínez-Gómez, A. (2015). Non-professional interpreters The Routledge handbook of interpreting (pp. 417-428): Routledge.
Mason, I. (2012). Gaze, positioning and identity in interpreter-mediated dialogues. Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting, 102, 177.
Matu, P. M., Odhiambo, K., Adams, Y., & Ongarora, D. (2012). The court interpreters’ role perception: The case of English-Dholuo interpreters in Subordinate Courts in Nyanza Province, Kenya. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), 121-126.
McGurk, B. J., Carr, M. J., & McGurk, D. (1993). Investigative interviewing courses for police officers: An evaluation: Citeseer.
Mehrabian, A. (2017). Nonverbal communication: Routledge.
Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of consulting psychology, 31(3), 248.
Mehrabian, A., & Wiener, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communications. Journal of personality and social psychology, 6(1), 109.
Meissner, C. A., Kelly, C. E., & Woestehoff, S. A. (2015). Improving the effectiveness of suspect interrogations. Annual review of law and social science, 11(1), 211-233.
Meissner, C. A., Surmon-Böhr, F., Oleszkiewicz, S., & Alison, L. J. (2017). Developing an evidence-based perspective on interrogation: A review of the US government’s high-value detainee interrogation group research program. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(4), 438.
Mellinger, C. D., & Hanson, T. A. (2019). Meta-analyses of simultaneous<? br?> interpreting and working memory. Interpreting, 21(2), 165-195.
Memon, A., & Gawrylowicz, J. (2018). The cognitive interview. The handbook of communication skills, 511-530.
Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340.
Merlini, R. (2009). Seeking asylum and seeking identity in a mediated encounter: The projection of selves through discursive practices. Interpreting, 11(1), 57-93.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation: John Wiley & Sons.
Mezirow, J. (2014). A critical theory of adult learning and education Education for adults (pp. 124-138): Routledge.
Mikkelson, H. (2010). Consecutive or simultaneous? An analysis of their use in the judicial setting. Across the Board, Australian Sign Language Interpreters Association, 5(1), 4-7.
Mikkelson, H. (2016). Introduction to court interpreting: Routledge.
Mikkelson, H. J. B. T. L. (2008). Evolving views of the court interpreter's role: Between Scylla and Charybdis. 76, 81.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change: Guilford press.
Milne, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing-psychology and practice: Wiley.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. N. (2008). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis: Pearson Education Australia.
Mitchell, R. J. (2019). A light introduction to evidence based policing. Evidence based policing: An introduction, 3-14.
Monteoliva-Garcia, E. (2018). The last ten years of legal interpreting research (2008-2017): A review of research in the field of legal interpreting. Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito, 5(1), 38-61.
Monteoliva-Garcia, E. (2020). Interpreting or other forms of language support?: Experiences and decision-making among response and community police officers in Scotland. Translation & Interpreting: The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 12(1), 37-54.
Morris, R. J. T. t. (1995). The moral dilemmas of court interpreting. 1(1), 25-46.
Moser-Mercer, B. (1996). Quality in interpreting: Some methodological issues: Edizioni LINT Trieste.
Moston, S., Stephenson, G. M., & Williamson, T. M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. The British Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 23-40.
Mulayim, S., & Lai, M. (2016). Ethics for police translators and interpreters: Routledge.
Mulayim, S., Lai, M., & Norma, C. (2014). Police investigative interviews and interpreting: Context, challenges, and strategies: CRC Press.
Nadler, J. (2004). Rapport in legal negotiation: How small talk can facilitate e-mail dealmaking. Harv. Negot. L. Rev., 9, 223.
Nahari, G., Ashkenazi, T., Fisher, R. P., Granhag, P. A., Hershkowitz, I., Masip, J., . . . Taylor, P. J. (2019). ‘Language of lies’: Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24(1), 1-23.
Nakane, I. (2014). Interpreter-mediated police interviews: A discourse-pragmatic approach: Springer.
O'barr, W. M. (2014). Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom: Elsevier.
Orr, G. (1994). Interpreters and the Legal System: HeinOnline.
Ottoson, J. (1995). Use of a Conceptual Framework to Explore Multiple Influences on the Application of Learning Following a Coninuing Education Program. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 9(2), 1-18.
Ozolins, U. (2009). Social workers, the law and interpreters In the shadow of the law: The legal context of social work practice (pp. 20-35): Federation press.
Ozolins, U. (2011). Telephone interpreting: Understanding practice and identifying research needs. Translation & Interpreting: The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 3(2), 33-47.
Pöchhacker, F. (2001). Quality assessment in conference and community interpreting. Meta, 46(2), 410-425.
Pöchhacker, F. (2022). Introducing interpreting studies: Routledge.
Pergnier, M. (1978). Language-meaning and message-meaning: Towards a sociolinguistic approach to translation Language interpretation and communication (pp. 199-204): Springer.
Pochhacker, F. (2015). Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies: Routledge.
Pochhacker, F. (2016). Introducing Interpreting Studies. New York: Routledge.
Powell, M. B., Manger, B., Dion, J., & Sharman, S. J. (2017). Professionals’ perspectives about the challenges of using interpreters in child sexual abuse interviews. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(1), 90-101.
PYM, A. (2014). Nicole Slapped Michelle. Dialogue Interpreting, 5, 265.
Ratcliff, J. J., Lassiter, G. D., Jager, V. M., Lindberg, M. J., Elek, J. K., & Hasinski, A. E. (2010). The hidden consequences of racial salience in videotaped interrogations and confessions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(2), 200.
Richardson, B. H., McCulloch, K. C., Taylor, P. J., & Wall, H. J. (2019). The cooperation link: Power and context moderate verbal mimicry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 25(1), 62.
Roberts, R. P. (1997). Community interpreting today and tomorrow The critical link: Interpreters in the community (pp. 7): John Benjamins.
Roghanizad, M. M., & Bohns, V. K. (2017). Ask in person: You're less persuasive than you think over email. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 223-226.
Rombouts, D. (2011). The police interview using videoconferencing with a legal interpreter: a critical view from the perspective of interview techniques. Videoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings, 159-166.
Rosenberg, B. A. (2007). A data driven analysis of telephone interpreting. Benjamins Translation Library, 70, 65.
Royce, T. D. (2013). Serving a high-risk warrant: The role of context in police crisis negotiations. Discourse and crisis: Critical perspectives, 101-129.
Russano, M. B., Narchet, F. M., & Kleinman, S. M. (2014). Analysts, interpreters, and intelligence interrogations: Perceptions and insights. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 829-846.
Russano, M. B., Narchet, F. M., Kleinman, S. M., & Meissner, C. A. (2014). Structured interviews of experienced HUMINT interrogators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 847-859.
Russell, S. (2002). ‘Three’s a crowd’: Shifting Dynamics in the Interpreted Interview Language in the legal process (pp. 111-126): Springer.
Salaets, H., & Balogh, K. (2012). ImPLI: Improving Police and Legal Interpreting: Final report JLS/2010/JPEN/AG.
Schweda-Nicholson, N. (1989). Ad hoc court interpreters in the United States: equality, inequality, quality? Meta, 34(4), 711-723.
Seeber, K. G. (2011). Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Existing theories—new models. Interpreting, 13(2), 176-204.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College.
Shaffer, S. A., & Evans, J. R. (2018). Interpreters in law enforcement contexts: Practices and experiences according to investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 150-162.
Shepherd, E., & Griffiths, A. (2021). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach: Oxford University Press.
Shepherd, E., & Kite, F. (1989). Teach ‘em to talk. Policing, 5(1), 33-45.
Sherman, L. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing: Targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime and justice, 42(1), 377-451.
Simon, H., & Chase, W. (1988). Skill in chess Computer chess compendium (pp. 175-188): Springer.
Skinner, R., & Monteoliva-García, E. (2022). Interpreting in police settings The Routledge Handbook of Sign Language Translation and Interpreting (pp. 359-374): Routledge.
Skinner, R., & Napier, J. (2023). Police settings as an (in) accessible institution in the UK through sign language interpreting. Deconstructing Sign Language Interpreting as a Social Institution: Politics, Ethics and Ideologies. John Benjamins e-Platform: The Journal of the American Translation and Interpreting Studies Association, 455-477.
Skinner, R., Napier, J., & Braun, S. (2018). Interpreting via video link: Mapping of the field. Here or there: Research on interpreting via video link, 11-35.
Skinner, R. A. (2020). Approximately there–Positioning video-mediated interpreting in frontline police services. International Journal of Interpreter Educatio n, 82, 82.
Staggs, D. R. (1985). Police job satisfaction: a study of two agencies in Texas. Sam Houston State University.
Stern, L. (2011). Courtroom interpreting.
Taylor-Bouladon, V. (2011). Conference interpreting: Principles and practice.
Tebble, H. (2012). Interpreting or interfering. Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting, 102, 23-44.
Teng, W., Burn, J. A., & Crezee, I. (2018). I’m asking you again! Chinese student interpreters’ performance when interpreting declaratives with tag questions in the legal interpreting classroom. Perspectives, 26(5), 745-766.
Thomas, J. A. (2014). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics: Routledge.
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological inquiry, 1(4), 285-293.
Vallano, J. P., & Compo, N. S. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport‐building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock‐crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 960-970.
Van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Steenaert, B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(4), 393-398.
Vanderhallen, M., Vervaeke, G., & Holmberg, U. (2011). Witness and suspect perceptions of working alliance and interviewing style. Journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling, 8(2), 110-130.
Viezzi, M. (2013). Simultaneous and consecutive interpreting (non-conference settings) The Routledge handbook of translation studies (pp. 377-388): Routledge.
Vrij, A., & Leal, S. (2020). Proportion of complications in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(1), 155-164.
Wadensjö, C. (2014). Telephone interpreting & the synchronization of talk in social interaction Dialogue Interpreting (pp. 247-264): Routledge.
Wadensjo, C. (2014). Interpreting as interaction: Routledge.
Wakefield, S. J., Kebbell, M. R., Moston, S., & Westera, N. (2015). Perceptions and profiles of interviews with interpreters: A police survey. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(1), 53-72.
Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2012). Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27, 73-84.
Wang, J. (2018). ‘Telephone interpreting should be used only as a last resort.’Interpreters’ perceptions of the suitability, remuneration and quality of telephone interpreting. Perspectives, 26(1), 100-116.
Windle, K., & Malmkjaer, K. (2011). The Oxford handbook of translation studies: Oxford University Press.
Wlodkowski, R. J., & Ginsberg, M. B. (2017). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults: John Wiley & Sons.
Xu, H., Hale, S., & Stern, L. (2020). Telephone interpreting in lawyer–client interviews: An observational study. Translation & Interpreting, 12 (1), 18–36.
Yeschke, C. L. (2003). The art of investigative interviewing: A human approach to testimonial evidence: Butterworth-Heinemann.