研究生: |
陳姿均 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
兒童繪本網站使用性研究 A Study on the Usability of Children's Picture Book Websites |
指導教授: | 謝建成 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 69 |
中文關鍵詞: | 使用性 、繪本網站 |
英文關鍵詞: | Usability, Picture book website |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:212 下載:17 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
兒童使用網路情形越來越普遍,接觸網路的年齡也有提早的趨勢,使用的時間也越來越長,兒童在數位環境下的閱讀也愈顯重要。網路上的閱讀跳脫紙本,結合了文字、圖像、聲音、動畫以及影像等多媒體(Multimedia),數位閱讀強調自主性的閱讀環境,兒童使用者由於接觸網路較少對於網頁的結構特性都不是很熟悉,可能在網頁瀏覽與閱讀過程中會產生一些迷失、不適當的控制等潛在問題影響閱讀與學習。提供兒童使用的網站不只是花俏可愛,更需要針對兒童的認知理解來設計來增加網站的使用性。
本研究之目的為透過對繪本網站進行使用性研究觀察瞭解兒童族群使用繪本網站的使用反應與理解,進而探討兒童對繪本網站的使用性需求,瞭解怎樣的繪本網站設計能夠讓兒童使用者輕易的瞭解與使用。
研究結果顯示兒童使用者在繪本形式上偏好有聲動畫播放,相較於成年人,在判斷網頁內容之位置、圖示代表意含、何為主要內容等上容易有困難,導致對一般使用者有幫助的資訊與設計對於兒童使用者來說使用性上並不佳。在提供兒童相關讀物之網站應該根據兒童使用者之需求進行設計,本文根據研究結果對相關網站提出針對兒童者之設計建議。
Children’s digital reading has become more important while children's usage of internet has spread extensively. Reading on internet break away from paper, integrates text and multimedia such as image, sound, and video. This reading environment emphasizes reader’s initiative while children are unfamiliar to web pages’ structure. Design a website for children can’t only look more childish and colorful, but also have to refer to children’s cognition and the way children comprehend information. This research observe children’s usage of picture book website through perform usability test on the picture book website with elementary school student and try to figure out how to design a picture book website that friendly and easy to use for children. The research discloses that children prefer to picture book with animation and sound. It’s different from adult that children are hardly to tell webpage’s content position, meaning of images and the main content of site. It leads to frustrations while some designs are useful to common user. By observing how children use picture book webpage and analyzing result of usability test, we make usability suggestions about making interrelated site for children.
一、 中文文獻
祝佩貞(民92)。電子童書與紙本童書對國小學童閱讀理解及閱讀態度之比較研究。國立臺中師範學院語文教育學系碩士論文。
洪美珍(民89)。電子童書閱聽型態及其對兒童閱讀影響之研究。國立台東師範學院兒童學研究所碩士論文。
陳慧卿(民92)。國小二年級學童對電子童書與紙本童書之閱讀能力研究。朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系碩士論文。
黃羨文(民86)。紙本書與電子書的比較。台北市:漢美。
劉信卿(民93)。資訊融入小組合作學習在國小一年級閱讀與認字之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
蕭淑美(民96)。紙本繪本與電子繪本對學童語文創造力的差異性影響。高雄師範大學,工業科技教育學系碩士論文。
鍾敏華(民92)。兒童繪本與兒童語文創造力之教學行動研究。國立台東師範學院兒童文學研究所碩士論文。
二、 西文文獻
Als, B. S., Jensen, J. J., & Skov, M. B. (2005). Comparison of think-aloud and constructive interaction in usability testing with children. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children.
Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications: Fourth Edition. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
Clarke, J. (2005). Cross-Cultural Design for Children in a Cyber Setting. In N. Aykin (Ed.), Usability and Internationalization of Information Technology , 253-276.
Doty, D. E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). “Interactive CD-ROM Storybooks and Young Readers' Reading Comprehension.”
Harrison, B.L. (2000). "E-Books and the future of reading", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(3), p.p. 32~39.
ISO/IEC 9241-11 (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT)s—Part II Guidance on Usability.
Jeng J. (2005). Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: Effectiveness, effi ciency, satisfaction, and learnability. Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Services, 55(2/3), 96–121.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1988). Meeting the information needs of children and young adults: basing library media programs on developmental states. Journal of Youth Services in Libraries, 2:1.
Large, A., Beheshti, J. and Rahman, T. (2002), “Gender differences in collaborative web searching behavior: an elementary school study”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 38,No. 3, pp. 427-43.
Moore, D.A. (1999). Order effects in preference judgments: evidence for context dependent in generation of preferences. Organizational behavior and human decision process, 78, pp.146-165.
Nielsen, J. (1993) “Usability Engineering”, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
Nielsen, J. (2000). Why You Only Need to Test With 5 Users, Alert Box. Retrieved on February 15, 2008, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html
Nielsen. J, (2002). Kid's corner: Website usability for children. Retrieved May 21, 2005, from http://wvi-w.useit.com/alert box/20020414.html.
Pearrow,M.(2000).Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Rasmussen, K., & Davidson-Shivers, G. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: can performance be influenced? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 291-308.
Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., & Koutstaal, W. (1998). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 49, 289-318.
Shackel, B. (1991). Usability & mdash; context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Human factors for informatics usability, Cambridge University Press: 21-37.