簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林軒亘
Lin, Hsuan-Hsuan
論文名稱: 趣味沉浸對博物館中拍照記憶的影響
Moderating Effects of Self-Relevance and Enjoyment on the Photo-Taking Impairment Effect
指導教授: 郭郡羽
Kuo, Chun-Yu
口試委員: 林思宏
Lin, Szu-Hung
張仁和
Chang, Jen-Ho
郭郡羽
Kuo, Chun-Yu
口試日期: 2024/07/17
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會教育學系
Department of Adult and Continuing Education
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 49
中文關鍵詞: 記憶減損效應自我關聯性趣味性記憶表現
英文關鍵詞: Photo-taking Impairment Effect, Self-Relevance, Enjoyment, Memory Performance
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401108
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:90下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 拍照減損效應意指拍照會使被攝物的記憶變差,過去研究發現在博物館場域中拍攝展品會減損記憶表現,本研究欲透過提升拍照過程中的自我關聯性與趣味性來避免拍照減損效應的發生。實驗一中檢驗觀看展品、拍攝展品、與展品自拍將如何影響記憶表現,結果發現自拍情境的記憶表現優於觀看情境,而拍照情境與觀看情境則沒有差別。實驗二則進一步釐清自我關聯性與趣味性對記憶表現的影響,結果發現高自我關聯或高趣味的互動方式均有助於提升記憶表現,而兩者加乘後將會使觀展者有最高的互動有趣性體驗。本研究結果發現透過自我關聯性及趣味性兩個面向來設計拍照方式,將對記憶表現產生不同的影響,此發現有助於社教場館在策展與推廣活動規劃上的思考。

    The photo-taking impairment effect refers to the phenomenon where taking photos leads to poorer memory of the photographed objects. Previous research has demonstrated that photographing exhibits in museums can impair memory performance. This study aims to mitigate the photo-taking impairment effect by enhancing self-relevance and interest during the photo-taking process. In Experiment 1, we examined how viewing exhibits, photographing exhibits, and taking selfies with exhibits influenced memory performance. The results indicated that memory performance in the selfie condition was superior to that in the viewing condition, whereas there was no significant difference between the photo-taking and viewing conditions. Experiment 2 further elucidated the impact of self-relevance and enjoyment on memory performance. The findings revealed that high self-relevance or high-interest interaction modes both contributed to improved memory performance, and the combination of both factors resulted in the highest interactive engagement experience for visitors. The results of this study suggest that designing photo-taking methods that incorporate elements of self-relevance and enjoyment can differentially affect memory performance. These findings provide valuable insights for the design of exhibitions and promotional activities in educational and cultural venues.

    緒論 1 拍照行為對記憶的影響 3 拍照對於記憶的正向影響 3 拍照對於記憶的負向影響 4 趣味沉浸對觀展體驗的影響 10 研究目的 12 研究目的一:自我關聯性對拍照減損效應的影響 12 研究目的二:自我關聯性與趣味性對拍照減損效應的影響 12 實驗一 14 方法 14 結果與討論 19 實驗二 23 方法 23 結果與討論 27 綜合討論 34 參考文獻 39 中文文獻 39 外文文獻 40 附錄一 47

    林軒亘、蔣家愷(2023):〈前進校園—「故宮校園大使計畫」紀實〉。《故宮文物月刊》,484,116-125。[Lin, H. H. & Chang, C. K. (2023). Journey into the Campus - Documentary of the “National Palace Museum Campus Ambassadors Program”. The National Palace Museum Monthly of Chinese Art, 484, 116-125.]
    陳心方、丁維欣(2020):〈擁抱或拒絕?探討令博物館傷腦筋的「自拍」現象〉。《博物館學季刊》,34,57-73。[Chen, S. F. & Din, W. S. (2020). Embrace or Reject? Discussion of the Impacts of the Selfie Phenomenon on Museums. Museology Quarterly, 34, 57-73.] https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.202004_34(2).0003
    張美珍(2000):〈從認知心理學派觀點探析博物館內學習〉。《科技博物》,4,30-47。[Chang, M. C. (2000). Examine Museum Learning from the Theories of Cognitive Psychology. Technology Museum Review, 4, 30-47.] https://doi.org/10.6432/TMR.200007.0030
    曾靖越(2019):〈從線上到線下:一個虛實整合的觀展想像〉。《現代美術學報》,37,6-44。[Tseng, C. Y. (2019). Online to Offline-An Imagination of Visiting Exhibitions by ways of Virtual and Real Integration. Journal of Taipei Fine Arts Museum, 37, 6-44.]
    曾靖越(2022):〈一種基於視點與時間變動雙軸的新影像空間:論「teamLab 無界」展覽中的個人自拍〉。《清華藝術學報》,4,39-56。[Tseng, C. Y. (2022). A New Image Space with Different Perspective: Selfies in "teamLab Borderless". Tsing Hua Journal of Art Research, 4, 39-56.] https://doi.org/10.6922/THJAR.202212_(4).0003
    溫家瑋(2020):〈博物館特展媒體行銷策略之研究-以故宮「悠遊風景繪畫-俄羅斯普希金博物館特展」為例〉。《藝術學報》,106,131-150。[Wen, C. W. (2020). Media Marketing Strategy of a Museum's Special Exhibition-Taking the National Palace Museum “Masterpieces of French Landscape Paintings from The Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow" as an Example. Journal of National Taiwan College of Arts, 106, 131-150.]
    廖世璋(2016):〈後博物館概念的都市藝術策展-以基隆黃色小鴨為例〉。《博物館學季刊》,30(4),73-97。[Liao, S. C. (2016). Post-museum Art Exhibitions: A Case Study of the Rubber Duck in Keelung City. Museology Quarterly, 30(4), 73-97.] https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.201610_30(4).0004
    Atkinson,R. (2012). Snap Happy. Museums Journal, 12, 30-33.
    Barasch, A., Diehl, K., Silverman, J., & Zauberman, G. (2017). Photographic memory: The effects of volitional photo taking on memory for visual and auditory aspects of an experience. Psychological Science, 28, 1056-1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617694868
    Bargh, J. A. (1982). Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.425
    Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., & Camos, V. (2004). Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.83
    Brédart, S., Delchambre, M., & Laureys, S. (2006). Short article: One's own face is hard to ignore. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500343678
    Brieber, D., Nadal, M., & Leder, H. (2015). In the white cube: Museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art. Acta Psychologica, 154, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.004
    Broz, M. (2023, October 31). How many pictures are there (2023): Statistics, trends, and forecasts. Photutorial. https://photutorial.com/photos-statistics/
    Constable, M. D., Rajsic, J., Welsh, T. N., & Pratt, J. (2019). It is not in the details: Self-related shapes are rapidly classified but their features are not better remembered. Memory & Cognition, 47, 1145-1157. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00924-6
    Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., Macdonald, L. M., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 312-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.003
    Davis, T. M., & Bainbridge, W. A. (2023). Memory for artwork is predictable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120, e2302389120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302389120
    Diehl, K., & Zauberman, G. (2022). Capturing life or missing it: How mindful photo-taking can affect experiences. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101334
    Diehl, K., Zauberman, G., & Barasch, A. (2016). How taking photos increases enjoyment of experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000055
    Docter, P. (Director). (2015). Inside Out [Film]. Walt Disney Pictures; Pixar Animation Studios.
    Eliseev, E. D., & Marsh, E. J. (2021). Externalizing autobiographical memories in the digital age. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25, 1072-1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.005
    Fandakova, Y., & Gruber, M. J. (2021). States of curiosity and interest enhance memory differently in adolescents and in children. Developmental Science, 24, e13005. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13005
    Fastrich, G. M., Kerr, T., Castel, A. D., & Murayama, K. (2018). The role of interest in memory for trivia questions: An investigation with a large-scale database. Motivation Science, 4(3), 227-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000087
    Gillet, S., Schmitz, P., & Mitas, O. (2016). The snap-happy tourist: The effects of photographing behavior on tourists’ happiness. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 40(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348013491606
    Gruber, M. J., & Ranganath, C. (2019). How curiosity enhances hippocampus-dependent memory: The prediction, appraisal, curiosity, and exploration (PACE) framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 1014-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.003
    Hartmann, J., Heitmann, M., Schamp, C., & Netzer, O. (2021). The power of brand selfies. Journal of Marketing Research, 58, 1159-1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211037258
    Henkel, L. A. (2014). Point-and-shoot memories: The influence of taking photos on memory for a museum tour. Psychological Science, 25, 396-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504438
    International Council of Museums (2022). Museum Definition. ICOM. https://icom.museum/en/resources/standards-guidelines/museum-definition/
    Jacques, P. L., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Modifying memory: Selectively enhancing and updating personal memories for a museum tour by reactivating them. Psychological Science, 24, 537-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457377
    Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195800
    Kesner, L. (2006). The role of cognitive competence in the art museum experience. Museum Management and Curatorship, 21, 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770600302101
    Kim, K., Jeon, Y. A., Banquer, A. M., & Rothschild, D. J. (2018). Conscious awareness of self-relevant information is necessary for an incidental self-memory advantage. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.09.004
    Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Johnson, M. K., Angell, K. E., & Gross, M. S. (1998). Post-event review in older and younger adults: improving memory accessibility of complex everyday events. Psychology and Aging, 13, 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.13.2.277
    Lurie, R., & Westerman, D. L. (2021). Photo-taking impairs memory on perceptual and conceptual memory tests. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10, 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.11.002
    Lux, M., Kogler, M., & Del Fabro, M. (2010). Why did you take this photo: a study on user intentions in digital photo productions. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Workshop on Social, Adaptive and Personalized Multimedia Interaction and Access, 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878061.1878075
    Marsh, E. J., & Rajaram, S. (2019). The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001
    MacKenzie, G., Powell, T. F., & Donaldson, D. I. (2015). Positive emotion can protect against source memory impairment. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.911145
    McGillivray, S., Murayama, K., & Castel, A. D. (2015). Thirst for knowledge: The effects of curiosity and interest on memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 30, 835-841. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039801
    Madan, C. R., Scott, S. M., & Kensinger, E. A. (2019). Positive emotion enhances association-memory. Emotion, 19, 733-740. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000465
    Pallud, J. (2017). Impact of interactive technologies on stimulating learning experiences in a museum. Information & Management, 54, 465-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.10.004
    Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677
    Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2003). Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 96-103. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196472
    Rubenking, B. (2017). Boring is bad: Effects of emotional content and multitasking on enjoyment and memory. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 488-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.015
    Schacter, D. L., Koutstaal, W., Johnson, M. K., Gross, M. S., & Angell, K. E. (1997). False recollection induced by photographs: a comparison of older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.203
    Serrell, B. (1997). Paying attention: The duration and allocation of visitors' time in museum exhibitions. Curator: The Museum Journal, 40, 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01292.x
    Simon, N. (2010). The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839422854.391
    Soares, J. S., & Storm, B. C. (2018). Forget in a flash: A further investigation of the photo-taking-impairment effect. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 154-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.10.004
    Soares, J. S., & Storm, B. C. (2022). Does taking multiple photos lead to a photo-taking-impairment effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 2211-2218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02149-2
    Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
    Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371-394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
    Talarico, J. M., Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2009). Positive emotions enhance recall of peripheral details. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 380-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930801993999
    Tröndle, M. (2014). Space, movement and attention: Affordances of the museum environment. International Journal of Arts Management, 17, 4-17.
    Turk, D. J., Brady-Van den Bos, M., Collard, P., Gillespie-Smith, K., Conway, M. A., & Cunningham, S. J. (2013). Divided attention selectively impairs memory for self-relevant information. Memory & Cognition, 41, 503-510. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0279-0
    Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Self-memory biases in explicit and incidental encoding of trait adjectives. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1040-1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.004
    Whittaker, S., Bergman, O., & Clough, P. (2010). Easy on that trigger dad: a study of long term family photo retrieval. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0218-7
    Yegiyan, N. S., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2011). Encoding details: Positive emotion leads to memory broadening. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1255-1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.540821
    Xie, W., Ye, C., & Zhang, W. (2023). Negative emotion reduces visual working memory recall variability: A meta-analytical review. Emotion, 23, 859-871. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001139

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2027/08/01
    QR CODE