隨著近年來網路科技的快速發展與成熟，人們的學習方式不斷的在改變，透過網路進行線上學習已經成為熱門的學習管道之一。因此本研究主要探討運用情境模擬式網路輔助教材對國小學生學習態度的影響，本研究的研究目的有三：
一、探討情境模擬式網路輔助教材教學對國小學生自然科學習態度的影響。
二、比較傳統情境模擬教學和接受情境模擬式網路輔助教材教學對國小學生的自然科學習態度影響。
三、探討國小學生在接受情境模擬式網路輔助教材教學後的意見與看法。
本研究根據國內外情境模擬相關的文獻與學習理論製作情境模擬式網路輔助學習教材，研究工具包含自然科學習態度量表、情情模擬網路輔助教材與晤談單，並以國小高年級的學生為研究對象進行施測，實驗時間為期三個星期，透過本研究結果發現：
1.實施情境模擬式網路輔助教材的教學，能夠有效提昇國小學生的自然科學習態度，包含對自然科的學習態度、對自然科教師的態度、對自然科的學習動機與對自然科的學習策略。
2.實施情境模擬式網路輔助教材教學的學生，在自然科學習態度的總成績與對自然科課程的態度、對自然科教師的態度、自然科的學習策略各分量的成績，雖未達顯著性差異，但平均成績均高於接受一般傳統情境模擬教學學生的平均成績。
3.情境模擬式網路輔助教材教學比一般傳統情境模擬教材教學更能引起學習者的學習動機。

The aim of this research was to investigate the natural science learning attitude of elementary school students in web scenario-based learning.

The main purposes of this study were as follows:
1. To understand the effects of web scenario-based learning in science learning attitude of elementary school students.
2. To compare science learning attitude of elementary school students in different kinds of teaching approach.
3. To understand the opinions and suggestions of elementary school students in learning web scenario-based material.

The research instrument in this study includes the scale of natural science attitude, interview survey, and web scenario-based material. The experimental group accepted web scenario-based teaching approach; the control group accepted traditional scenario-based teaching approach. There were 31 subjects in each group. The research period was 3 weeks, 90 minutes per week. Before and after experiment, both experimental group and control group accepted the test of the natural science attitude scale. Besides, 6 students of experimental group accepted the interview survey after experiment.

The conclusions were as follows:
1. The web scenario-based learning could effectively improve the primary school students’ science learning attitudes, including the attitudes to nature science, the attitudes to their nature science teachers, the motivation in nature science, and the learning strategy in nature science.
2. The experiment group got higher mean score than the control group in the natural science attitude, the natural science teachers’ attitude, and the learning strategy.
3. The web scenario-based learning could encourage learner’s learning motivation.

一、中文部分
王宜珍（1999）。應用網路資源於國中地理科教學研究。國立台灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文。
王貴春（2000）。STS教學與小學學生創造力及學習態度之研究。臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文。
朱則剛（1993)。教學設計核心理念－學習理論與教學理論知識基礎的研究。視聽教育雙月刊，35(2)，1-32。
朱則剛（1994）。建構主義知識論與情境認知的迷思：兼論其對認知心理學的意義。教學科技與媒體，2，3-14。
朱則剛（1996）。建構主義對教學設計的意義。教學科技與媒體，26，3-27。
朱湘吉（1992）。新觀念、新挑戰---建構主義的教學系統。教學科技與媒體，2，15-20。
李佳穗（2003）。數位學習平台對不同年資之員工學習成果探討－以國內某公司為例。銘傳大學管理科學研究所在職專班碩士論文。
李美誼（2005）。多媒體英語歌曲教學對提昇國小學童學習動機與學習成效之研究。屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文。
官淑如 (1997) 。綜合高中學生學習態度及其相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
林奇賢（1997）。全球資訊網輔助學習系統網路與國小教育。資訊與教育，58，2-11。
邱貴發(1996)。情境學習理念與電腦輔助學習─學習社群理念探討。台北：師大書苑。
邱貴發、鍾邦友（1993）。情境學習理論與電腦輔助學習軟體設計。台灣教育，510，23-29。
黃貝玲（2001）。從線上學習的發展看企業線上訓練。電子化企業：經理人報告，12~23。
金清文（2002）。以學生為主體的教學活動對學生學習態度的影響。國立臺灣師範大學物理研究所碩士論文。
施良方（1996）。學習理論。高雄：麗文文化。
施信華 (2001)。綜合高中學生學習態度、教師效能與學校效能關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系研究所碩士論文。
柯奉孝（2000）。「模擬教學情境遠距輔導」促進國中理化科實習教師教學能力成長之研究。國立高雄師範大學物理研究所碩士論文。
洪榮昭、劉明洲（1997）。電腦輔助教學之設計原理與應用。台北：師大書苑。
張春興（2000）。心理學。台北：東華書局。
陳盈秀（2006）。『K12數位學校』之關鍵成功因素探討。國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。
陳美怡（2005）。遊戲化音樂欣賞教學策略運用國小六年級學童後設認知與學習態度之研究。國立臺南大學音樂教育學系碩士論文。
陳郁雯（2004）。電腦模擬對學生學習成效影響之後設分析。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
曾玉玲（1993）。台北市高智商低成就國中學生學習信念與相關因素之探討。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
楊家興（1993）。超媒體：一個新的學習工具。教學科技與媒體，12，28-39。
楊家興（1995）。情境教學理論與超媒體學習環境。教學科技與媒體，22，40-48。
楊智強（2005）。透過線上家教對國中生數學解題能力及學習態度影響之行動研究。國立交通大學理學院碩士在職專班網路學習學程。
蔡竺君（2000）。網路輔助自然科學習對國小學生學習成就及態度影響之個案研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
謝沛珊（2005）。情境模擬數位教材設計之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。
蘇佳瑜（2000）。利用電腦來幫助學童學習「星星」。臺北市立師範學院自然科學教育研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部分
Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (1991). Computer-Based Instruction: Methods and Development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A.（1996）.Situated Learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25（4）,5-11.
Bateson, M.（1994）. Peripheral visions. New York: Haper Collins.
Beal, T. T. (2003). Simulations on a Shoestring. ASTD’s Online Magazine. All About E-Learning. Retrieved October, 2006, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2003/may2003/beal.htm
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R .D., Hasselbring T.S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990) . Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In M. Spector, M. C. Polson, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: concepts and issues (pp. 115- 141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.（1989）. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18（1）, 32-42.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, reading, and mathematics. In Resnick(Ed.), Cognition and instruction: Issues and agedas. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Choi, J. & Hannafin, M.(1995).Situated Cognition and learning enviroments：Roles,Structures,and implications for design. Educational Technology Research & Development,43(2),53-69.
Dennis, J. R.,& Kansky, R.J.(1984).Electronic slices of reality: The instructional role of computerized simulations. In J. R. Dennis and R. J. Kansky (Eds.),Instructional computing: An acting guide for educators. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
Driscoll, M., & Carliner, S. (2005). Advanced web-based training strategies: Unlocking instructionally sound online learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer-John Wiley & Sons.
Driscoo, M. P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Edelson, D. C.(2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen.I.(1975).Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison Wesley.
Freiberg, H. J.& Driscoll, A.(1992). Universal teaching strategies. Needham Heights. MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Gredler, M. E. (1996). Educational games and simulations: a technology in search of a (research) paradigm. In D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (p.521-540). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Gustason, G. & Zawolkow (1993). Signing Exact English. Los Alamitos, CA: Modern Signs Press
Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD and learning environments: Critical perspectives. Educational Technology Research & Development, 40(1), 49-63.
Harley, S.（1993）. Situated learning and classroom instruction. Educational Technology, 33(3), 46-51.
Hay, K. E.（1996）. Legitimate peripheral participation, instructionism, and constructivism：Whose situation is it anyway. In McLellan, H.,（Eds.）, Situated Learning Perspectives（pp.89-99）. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.：Educational Technology Publications.
Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C.(2000). Teaching science through online peer discussion: speakeasy in the knowledge integration environment. International journal of Science Education, 22(8), 839-857.
Keirns, J. L. (1999). Designs for self-instruction: Principles, processes, and issues in developing self-directed learning. Mass: Allyn and Bacon.
Keller, J. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10, 2-10.
Kindley, R. W. (2002). Scenario-Based E-Learning: A step beyond traditional e-Learning . ASTD’s Online Magazine. All About E-Learning. Retrieved October, 2006, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/
Koballa, T. R.(1988).Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72(2),115-126.
Krajcik, J. S.（2000）. Advantages and challenges of using the World Wide Web to fosters sustained science inquiry in middle and high school classrooms. 8th International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLellan, H.（1996）. Situated learning：Multiple perspectives. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 5-17). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
Mizelle, N. B., Hart, L. E., & Carr, M. (1993). Middle grade students' motivational processes and use of strategies with expository text. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA, April 12-16, 1993.
Raygor, A. L., & Wark, D. M. (1970). Systems for study. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). A new paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology, 36(3), 13-20.
Robert, N., Anderson, D., Deal, R., Garet, M, & Shaffer, W. (1983). Introduction to computer simulation: A system dynamics modeling approach. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Rosenberg, M. J.(2001). E-learning strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Swan, M. (1992). The Language of Functions and Graphs. Nottingham, UK: Shell Centre for Mathematical Education.
Tessmer, M. & Richey, R. C. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85-115.
Towel, M.（1982）. Learning how to be a student when you have a learning disability. Journal of learning disability ,15 ,90-93.
Vargas. J. S. (1986). Instructional design flaws in computer-assisted instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 738-744
Webb, N. M.(1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
Winn, W. D. (1991). The assumption of constructivism and instructional design, Educational Technology, 31(9), 38-40.
Winn, W.（1993）. Instructional design and situated learning：paradox or partnership. Educational Technology, 33(3), 16-21.