本研究以實驗研究法探討「文化刺激」與「任務限制」對創造力的影響，並討論以Amabile共識評量技巧評量國中生創造力之實用性及適當性。實驗參與者為42名七年級國中學生，其中一元文化刺激組與二元文化刺激組實驗參與者各半。研究工具使用多數共識評量研究採用之拼貼畫作及研究者於赴美旁聽創造力課程時，授課教師使用的線條隨想。評分者為四名國中美術教師及兩名具有資優教育專長之特殊教育系研究生，使用李克特氏五點量表獨立評量每個作品的四個向度:創意、美感、技巧、主題新穎。所得資料以混合設計二因子變異數分析、t考驗、Pearson積差相關、Cronbach α、Kendall’s ω等統計考驗法進行分析，主要研究發現如下:
一、 在具備適合受試者程度之任務及合適評分員的條件下，共識評量技巧為經濟、簡便且有效的創造力評量方式。
1. 研究選取之國中美術教師及特殊教育研究所研究生為適合評量國中學生美術創意作品之評分員。
2. 研究選取之拼貼畫作及線條隨想為適合國中學生發揮創意之任務。
3. 評分向度間的高相關可能反應當代對創造力及美感莫衷一是的觀點，抑或是文化背景造成之評分差異，即具東方文化內涵的評審可能偏向以整體的角度來觀察事物。
二、 「任務限制」變項對國中學生創造力表現並無影響，學生的創造力表現並未因為題目限制的有無而有所差異。
三、 「文化刺激」變項對創造力有實質的影響，二元文化刺激實驗參與者的創造力表現高於一元文化刺激實驗參與者，其效果量可以解釋學生創意表現19%的變異量(Partial η²=.19)。以不同任務限制水準觀之，在無任務限制的條件下，二元文化刺激組的創造力表現高於一元文化刺激組，得分差異具有大的效果量；在任務加入主題限制時，兩組之創造力表現則無顯著差異。

此外，研究者根據研究過程及結果提出對未來相關研究及文化構面創造力教育之建議。

This study examined whether cultural differences or task limits had influences upon secondary school students’ creativity performance. Also, the accessibility and the implementation of applying Amabile’s Consensus Assessment Technique (1996) on the evaluation of secondary school students’ creativity performance were examined. Forty-two students were recruited into this experiment. Half of them lived at least one year in western countries, and the rest lived in Taiwan mainly. Common-used collage and the draft-drawing were selected as the tasks for participants to perform their creativity. Six judges were using Likert scale, which contained creativeness, technique, aesthetics and innovation of the title, to quantify all of the participants’ outputs. The collected data were analyzed by mix-designed two-way ANOVA, t-test, product-moment correlation, Cronbach α and Kendall’s ω. Main findings were:

1. Consensus Assessment Technique could be a viable, efficient and economic way of assessing creativity performance while adequate tasks and appropriate judges were chosen.
(1) Secondary school art teachers and graduate students with an expertise with gifted education were proper gate keepers for judging the art products of secondary school students.
(2) Both collage and draft-drawing were good for assessing secondary students’ creativity performance.
(3) High correlations between all dimensions of the scale might reflect the divergence of modern-day tastes or be consequent on judges’ innate cultural background. In this meaning, judges with a background of Eastern culture might have the inclination of viewing things in a holistic way.
2. There were no differences existing between the creativity performances of with-limit task or without-limit task. It indicated that binding topics to task had no impact on participants’ creativity performance.
3. Creativity performances of the students with dual-culture living experiences were significantly better than those with uni-culture living experiences. Nineteen percent of the variation could be attributed to this cultural variable. When task-limit variable was taken into account, dual-culture group was more creative than uni-culture group under none task-limit situation while no difference existed at the opposite situation.

Additionally, the researcher provided several suggestions and implications for future studies and creativity education field based on the study process and the findings of this study.

中文部分

王鴻祥 (無日期)：工業設計與文化競爭力。檢索日期：2005年11月3日。取自World Wide Web：http://www.ntut.edu.tw/~wanghh/culture.htm
史鎮康 (2006年3月21日)：看走眼!淘汰畫作勇奪國際銅牌。檢索日期：2006年3月21日。取自World Wide Web：http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/070321/8/buct.html
朱琇慧 (2003)：創意、分析與實用的目標要求對大學生視覺設計表現的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
李田樹、李芳齡 (譯) (2000) ：G.. Hamel 著。啟動革命 (Leading the revolution)。台北市：天下文化。
李健光 (2005年10月14日)：創意可以賺大錢 新加坡力圖2012年創意產值倍增。檢索日期：2005年10月14日。取自World Wide Web：http://tw.news.yahoo.com/051006/195/2dqec.html
何芳川、萬明 (1998)。古代中西文化交流史話。北京：商務。
何畏、易家詳 (譯) (2005)：J. A. Schumpeter 著。經濟發展理論 (The Theory of Economic Development)。台北市：左岸文化。
佚名 (2005年7月24日)：中國創造力分析報告。檢索日期：2005年10月28日。取自World Wide Web：http://www.ynceo.cn/Article/qyzl/jzhl/200507/22193.html
林偉文 (2002)：國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。(未出版)
吳靜吉 （2002a）：創造力的研究取向之回顧與展望。創造能力課程開發學術研討會發表論文，2002年10月。台北：國立台北師範學院。
吳靜吉 （2002b）：華人創造力的研究和教育從分享開始。應用心理研究，15，頁92-104。
吳靜吉 （2002c）：華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究，15，頁17-42。
吳靜吉、林偉文、林士郁、陳秋秀、曾敬梅、王涵儀、徐悅淇 （2002）：國際創造力教育發展的趨勢。資優教育研究，2，1，頁1-25。
吳靜吉 （2004）：創意氛圍與創造力的培育。2004瀋陽創造教育國際學術研討會。2004.9.22-9.24。中國瀋陽：東北大學。
吳靜吉等 （2002）：國際創造力教育趨勢及其對我國創造力教育的啟示。學生輔導通訊，79，頁80-97。
邱皓政 (2002):「通情」才能「達理」?創造歷程的社會文化影響與人際互動機制之探討。第六屆華人心理與行為科技學術研討會，中央研究院民族學研究所，台北南港。(NSC 90-2511-S-128-001)
施建農 （2002）：創新教育何為先。應用心理研究，15，頁53-59。
洪蘭 (譯) (2004)：M. Ridley 著。天性與教養 (Nature via Nurture)。台北市：商周。
徐興、呂應鐘 (譯) (1975)：J. Bronowski 著。人類文明的演進 (The ascent of man)。台北市：世界文物。
郭有遹（2001）。創造心理學。台北：正中。
郭奕龍 (2002年10月22日)：對華人學生創造力研究之淺見。檢索日期：2005年10月27日。取自World Wide Web：http://residence.educities.edu.tw/ylk/p2.doc
黃奕光 （2002）：培養獨斷的創造者以喚起臥虎藏龍。應用心理研究，15，頁87-92。
陳姳蓁 (2006):東西方文化國小學生的快樂及創造力自我效能之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文 (未出版) 。
黃奕光 (2003)。Asian創造力－為什麼西方人比東方人有創造力。台北：培生。
鄒川雄 (1997)：和諧型與張力型思維—《老子》與《聖經》思維之比較。本土心理學研究, 7, 頁30-38。
張武升 （2002）：開發與培育學生創造力的理論與實踐。應用心理研究，15，頁43-53。
張忠仁、苑景亮 (2000年2月)：影響創造力發展的社會環境因素。檢索日期：2005年10月28日。取自World Wide Web：http://www.pep.com.cn/200406/ca442398.htm
張世慧 (2002)：創造力評量的共識技巧。創造思考教育，12期，頁 15-27。
張秋政 （2002）：華人學生創造力缺乏之問題與解決之道。應用心理學，15期，頁78-87。
詹志禹 (2002)：科學發現與知識成長。應用心理學，15期，頁105-127。
趙淑妙 (譯) (1995)：R. Dawkins 著。自私的基因 (The Selfish Gene)。台北市：天下文化。

英文部分

Anonymous (2005, August 23). Study: Asians, North Americans see world differently. Retrieved August 23, 2005, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166500,00.html
Allen, F. R. (1971). Socio-cultural dynamics. New York: MacMillan.
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
Amabile, T. M. (1983).The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CL: Westview.
Amabile, T. M., & Giltomer, J. (1984). Children’s artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task material. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 209-215.
Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: American Book.
Baer, J. (1994). Why you still shouldn’t trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 52, 72-73.
Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 113-117.
Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press.
Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721-735.
Besemer, S. & O’Quin, K. (1993). Assessing creative products: progress and potentials. In S. Isaksen, M. Murdock, R. Firestien, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Nurturing and developing creativity: The emergency of a discipline (pp. 331-350). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111-1119.
Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity：Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185-195.
Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A. J., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2002).Creativity in drawing of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171-187.
Cheng, S. K. (1999). East-west difference in views on creativity: Is Howard Gardner correct? Yes, and no. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 112-123.
Chua, H. F., Leu, J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Culture and diverging views of social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 925-934.
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 12629-12633.
Clapham, M. M. (2004). The convergent validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking and creativity interest inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 828-841.
Clück, J., Ernst, R., & Unger, F. (2002). How creatives define creativity: Reflect different types of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 55-67.
Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, A. J. (1999). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 511-524). New York: Academic Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of creativity (pp.325-339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Innovation. New York: Harper Collins.
Dacey, J. S., & Lennon, K. H. (1998). Understanding creativity: The interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dollinger, S. J., & Shafran, M. (2005). Note on consensual assessment technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 592-598.
Eisenberg, J., & Thompson, W. F. (2003). A matter of taste: Evaluating improvised music. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 287-296.
Fiskin, A. S., & Johnson, A, S. (1998). Who is creativity? Identifying children’s creative abilities. Roeper Review, 21, 40-46.
Fox, C. (2005, Oct 06.). Singapore's first design festival to kick off in Novenmber. Retrieved October 06, 2005, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/172050/1/.html
Galton, F. (1978). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. New York : St. Martin’s Press.
Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. (1983). Adjective checklist manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (1999).The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1985). The structure-of-intelligent model. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. New York: Wiley.
Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the structure-of-intelligent model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1-4.
Hekkert, P. & Wieringen, P. (1998). Assessment of aesthetic quality of artworks by expert observers: An empirical investigation of group decisions. Poetics, 25, 282-292.
Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationships between rating of product and process. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193-208.
Hennessey, B. A. (2004). The social psychology of creativity: The beginnings of a multicultural perspective. In S. Lau, N. N. Hui, & Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: When east meets west. (pp. 201-226). Singapore: World Scientific.
Herbig, P., & Dunphy, S. (1998). Culture and innovation. Cross Cultural Management, 5, 13-21.
Herbig, P., & Miller, J. C. (1992). Culture and technology: Does the traffic move in both directions? Journal of Global Marketing, 6, 75-104.
Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 234-244.
Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450-464.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taoconomy and critique of measurement used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glouer, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75). NY: Plenum Press.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
James, W. (1880). Great men, great thoughts and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441-459.
Kroeber, A. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Landis, R. J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
Lubart, T. I. (1990).Creativity and cross-cultural variation. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 39-59.
Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339-350). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308.
Ludwic, A. M. (1992). Culture and creativity. American Journal of Psychothepory, XLVI, 454-469.
Marcus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
May, R. (1975). The courage to create. New York: Norton.
Michael, W. B. (1999).Guilford’s view. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 785-797). New York: Academic Press.
Mooney, R. L. (1963). A conceptual model for integration four approach to the identification of creative talent. In C. W. Taylor, & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 331-340). New York: Wiley and Sons.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. G. (1988). Creativity syndrom: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cogniton. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
Niu, W. H., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225-241.
Noppe, L. D. (1999). Unconscious. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 673-679). New York: Academic Press.
O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1990).The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 267-278.
Parnes, S. J. (1967). Education and creativity. In J. C. Gowan, G. D. Demos, & E. P. Torrance (Eds.), Creativity: Its educational implications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Perry, M. (2005, Oct 14.). Singapore's creative industries to be in global spotlight next month. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/171878/1/.html
Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future direction in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39.
Richards, R. (1999). Four ps of creativity. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 733-742). New York: Academic Press.
Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 47, 3, 273-290.
Rudowicz, E., & Yue, X. D. (2000). Concepts of creativity: Similarities and differences among Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwanese chinese. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 175-192.
Runco, M. A. (1993). Cognitive and psychometric issues in creativity research. In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, M. L. Firestien, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds), Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline. (pp. 331-368). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Runco, M. A. (1994). Conclusions concerning problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 271-290). Norwood, NY: Ablex.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Personal creativity and culture. In S. Lau, N. N. Hui, & Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: When east meets west. (pp. 9-22). Singapore: World Scientific.
Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1987). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93-98.
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40-76). New York: Ablex.
Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427-438.
Saeki, N., Fan, X., & Dusen, L. V. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college studendts. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 24-36.
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Foreign influence and national achivement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 86-94.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311-322.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-627.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197-224.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Testing of abilities and achievement. In G. B. Esquivel & J. C. Houtz (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness in culturally diverse students (pp. 105-123). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crows. New York: Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & O’hara, L. A. (2000). Intelligence and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 611-630). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Torrance, E. P., & Goff, K. (1989). A quiet revolution. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 136-145.
Tran, N. (2004). Cultural dimensions in creativity: A preliminary study about creativity among the Vietnamese people in America. Education and Society, 22, 71-81.
Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.
Triffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 301-312.
Triffinger, D. J., Isaksen S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (1994). Creative problem solving: An overview. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 223-236). New York: Ablex.
Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Westwood, R., & Low, D. R. (2003). The multicultural muse. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3, 235-259.
Weiner, R. P. (2000). Creativity & beyond: Cultures, values, and change. New York: State University of New York Press.
White, L. A. (1949). The science of culture. New York: Farrar Straus.
Wilson, E. O. (1978). On hunman nature. Cambridge：Harvard University Press.
Wu, J. J. (2004). Recognizing and nurturing creativity in chinese students. In S. Lau, N. N. Hui, & Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: When east meets west. (pp. 169-200). Singapore: World Scientific.