研究生: |
劉佳雯 LIU, Chia-Wen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
特教學生助理員輔助無口語自閉症國中生之歷程 Qualitative Case Study of the Paraprofessional to Support the Junior High School Student with Non-Verbal Autism Spectrum Disorder |
指導教授: |
佘永吉
Sher, Yung-Ji |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 96 |
中文關鍵詞: | 無口語自閉症 、特殊教育學生助理員 、融合教育 |
英文關鍵詞: | non-verbal Autism spectrum disorder, paraprofessional, inclusive education |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900515 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:194 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著融合教育積極推展與普遍,特教學生助理員成為普通班級中協助特殊學生融合的關鍵人力資源。本研究目的為探究一特教學生助理員輔助一位無口語自閉症國中生融合之歷程中所扮演之角色、協助融合狀況、及困境與需求。本研究採質性研究之個案研究法、透過12次半結構式訪談、學生助理員與家長之工作聯絡簿、研究者觀察紀錄與訪談省思為主要研究蒐集資料;並使用Nvivo.10進行編碼分析。本研究已申請國立臺灣師範大學倫理委員會並獲核准,案件編號為201810HS013。
研究結果發現特教學生助理員主要困境與需求在於校內行政單位為其事先預備工作不夠充足、學生助理員增進特教知能及獲得實務建議之管道狹隘、工作待遇低廉、與家長及無口語自閉症國中生溝通有礙、工作成就感低落、及有工作壓力釋放之需求。依據以上研究結果,研究者建議相關行政單位應有完善之事前規劃、學生助理員執行輔助過程間應有正式支援會議、積極提供特教學生助理員特教增能訊息與鼓勵參與研習、能創造多贏的普特合作夥伴關係,讓大部分一般教師具備基本特教知能而促進自身與同儕和資源生的融合進展、協助建立家長與學生助理員之溝通橋樑、回到需求者本身所需,傾聽資源生的輔助需求,重視他們才是真正的輔助核心。以上研究發現予相關教育實務工作者、家長及未來研究參考。
關鍵詞:無口語自閉症、特殊教育學生助理員、融合教育
With the prevalence of inclusive education, paraprofessionals became the main resources for disabled students in inclusive environment. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore a paraprofessional’s experiences, roles, problems encountered, and solutions used while assisting a student with non-verbal Autism spectrum disorder being included in a general education classroom. Adopting a case study approach, this study collected data by conducting semi-structured, in-depth interviews daily observations and by gathering relevant documents. Data analysis were used to solve the research questions of this study. This research proposal has been approval by IRB/REC No. 201810HS013, National Taiwan Normal University.
The major findings about the difficulties of the paraprofessional include the administrative preparation is not comprehensive, there are insufficient methods to acquire special education knowledge and relevant suggestions, low hourly pay, communication barriers with parents and non-verbal-autistic students, a sense of defeat and need to de-stress. Additionally, based on the findings, there’re some recommendations for the school administration. The relevant people shall have prior preparation for paraprofessionals, conduct "formal" support meetings during the assisting process, provide paraprofessionals to enhance the methods and encourage participation in special education workshops, create win-win cooperation between general and special education, be a liaison between parents and paraprofessionals, and hold the assisted students in high regard and satisfy their needs. In conclusion, the study findings may serve as a guide for related practice or further research and extended to other studies.
Keywords: non-verbal Autism spectrum disorder、paraprofessional、inclusive education
于承平 (2016):臺灣融合教育教師師資供需現況及問題探究。學校行政,102,140-160。
王惠俐 (2002):特殊教育教師助理員工作滿意度之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
李嬬玉 (2017):教師助理員適用勞動基準法後之勞動權益、工作滿意度及工作績效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
沈佑真、林惠芬 (2015):特殊教育學校教師助理員工作現況與特殊教育專業訓練需求之研究。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,223-245。
林正昌(譯) (2015):研究設計:質化、量化及混合方法取向(中文二版)(John W. Creswel著: Research Design 4th)。臺北:學富文化。(原著出版年:2014)
林翠英 (2013):自閉症學生的行為問題介入策略。特殊教育季刊,128,35-40。
吳武典 (2014):臺灣特殊教育綜論 (二) : 現況分析與師資培育。特殊教育季刊,130,1-10。
姜義村 (2011):不想成為班上的小白兔:以符號詮釋自閉症學童在融合教育中友誼建立之挑戰。特殊教育研究學刊,36 (3),87-114。
柯雅齡 (2012):國內融合教育支援服務運作之評析。臺灣教育評論月刊,1 (8),38-41。
洪儷瑜 (2014):[特殊教育法立法三十年專文]邁向融合教育之路-回顧特殊教育法立法三十年。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,103,21-31。
洪榮照、黃翠琴 (2010):國小普通班學生對自閉症同儕接納態度之研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,24 (1),177-194。
特殊教育法 (2019):中華民國一百零八年四月二十四日總統華總(一)義字第 10800039361號令發布。
張正芬、林迺超、王鳳慈、羅祥妤 (2012):數位社會性課程教學攻略:在高功能自閉症與亞斯伯格症之應用。臺北市 : 心理。
張喜凰、林惠芬 (2011):國小普通班自閉症學生學校適應與學校支持之研究-以中部地區為例。特殊教育與復健學報,25,25-46。
教育部特殊教育通報網 (2019):107學年度國中小教育階段各縣市安置班別學生數統計(身障)【原始數據】。取自
https://www.set.edu.tw/Stastic_WEB/sta2/stuA_city_All_cls.asp
教育部特殊教育通報網 (2019):縣市教育局特教研習活動(學生助理員)【原始數據】。取自
https://www.set.edu.tw/actclass/act/default.asp
莫少依、張正芬 (2014):不共脈絡性 : 輕症自閉症學生的人際互動特徵。特殊教育研究學刊,39 (2),33-59。
莊妙芬 (2001):替代性溝通訓練對低功能自閉症兒童溝通能力與異常行為之影響。特殊教育與復健學報,9,181-212。
郭淑玲 (2004):臺灣現行融合教育國中普通生與身心障礙生同儕關係之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。私立輔仁大學,臺北市。
陳怡如 (2016):特殊教育學生助理人員服務品質之探討 —以臺中市國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立大葉大學,彰化縣。
陳琪媚 (2018):國中特教班助理員培訓課程架構及內涵之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立中原大學,桃園市。
陳鳳儀 (2010):特殊教育教師助理員工作壓力與工作滿意之研究-以臺灣北區主要特教學校及特教班為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立中國文化大學,臺北市。
陳慧茹 (2010):自閉症兒童同儕接納態度相關研究之探討。臺東特教,31,1-4。
陳玫如 (2019):框框下的融合教育如何進行。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(5),90-93。
許瑛珊 (2019):特殊教育學校教師助理工作壓力、工作滿意度與因應策略之研究―以高屏地區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東市。
鈕文英 (2016):質性研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
鈕文英、施安琪 (2014):我國特殊教育助理員聘任培訓及服務內涵的現況與建議。南屏特殊教育,5,31-44。
黃綉雯、張恒豪、唐文慧 (2016):性別與專業交織的照顧工作:特殊教育助理員的建制民族誌分析。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,39,1-58。
楊詠雯、林宏熾、林示安、周穎馨、柯馨絜 (2005):自閉症青年自我決策狀況之分析-以臺灣中部地區為例。身心障礙研究季刊,3 (2),102-112。
潘淑滿 (2003):質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理。
蔡昕璋 (2015):特殊教育學校學生事務專業的理想與實踐。學生事務與輔導,54 (2),76-80。
蔡淑娟 (2009):許孩子一個美麗的未來-從國中教學現場談融合教育。中等教育,60 (4),20-31。
衛生福利部統計處 (2019):身心障礙者人數統計【原始數據】。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-2976-13815-113.html
鄭津妃 (2011):普通班中障礙學生的同儕關係:融合與隔離的差異觀。特殊教育季刊,120,19-26。
鄭津妃 (2012):臺灣普教與特教的現況與未來-繼續統合或行動融合。特殊教育季刊,124,21-28。
鄭津妃、 張正芬 (2014):融合教育的績效:SNELS資料庫國中障礙學生的學校適應與滿意。特殊教育研究學刊,39 (3),81-109。
盧麗茹 (2016):聽聽他的聲音 :一位輕度自閉症青年情緒調適歷程之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
蕭雁文、趙家琛 (2017):自閉症類群障礙症同理心問題之回顧。特殊教育季刊,142,25-33。
簡意玲 (2014):依然真摯與忠誠:談成人亞斯伯格症與自閉症。臺北市:心靈工坊。
顏瑞隆、張正芬 (2012):從生態系統理論談自閉症學生的學校適應。特殊教育季刊,124,11-19。
羅丰苓、盧台華 (2015):國中融合教育中身心障礙受凌學生遭受普通班同儕霸凌現況及原因之研究-以一所國中為例。中華輔導與諮商學報,42,1-34。
顧心怡 (2016):我國學前集中式特殊教育班教師助理員工作需求之調查(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
Auyeung, B, Allison, C., Wheelwright, S., & Baron-Cohen, S.(2012). Brief Report: Development of the Adolescent Empathy and Systemizing Quotients. Journal Of Autism And Developmental Disorders, 42(10), 2225-2235.
Anderson, A. H., Stephenson, J., & Carter, M. (2017). A systematic literature review of the experiences and supports of students with autism spectrum disorder in post-secondary education. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 39, 33-53.
Brock, M. E., & Carter, E. W. (2016). Efficacy of teachers training paraprofessionals to implement peer support arrangements. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 354-371.
Baio, J. (2018). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. Surveillance Summaries, 67(6), 1–23.
Cresswell, L., Hinch, R., & Cage, E. (2019). The experiences of peer relationships amongst autistic adolescents: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 61, 45-60.
Carter, E., O'Rourke, L., Sisco, L. G., & Pelsue, D. (2009).Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education,30(6), 344-359.
Carter, E. W., Common, E. A., Sreckovic, M. A., Huber, H. B., Bottema-Beutel, K., Gustafson, J. R., ... & Hume, K. (2014). Promoting social competence and peer relationships for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 35(2), 91-101.
Clarke, T. C., Black, L. I., Stussman, B. J., Barnes, P. M., & Nahin, R. L.(2015). National health statistics reports. Hyattsville MD:National Center for Health Statistics, 2002-2012.
Cassady, J. M. (2011). Teachers' attitudes toward the inclusion of students with autism and emotional behavioral disorder. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 2(7), 5.
Causton-Theoharis, J. N., & Malmgren, K. W. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with severe disabilities via paraprofessional training. Exceptional children, 71(4), 431-444.
Causton-Theoharis, J., & Malmgren, K. (2005). Building bridges: Strategies to help paraprofessionals promote peer interaction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(6), 18.
Causton-Theoharis, J. N. (2009). The golden rule of providing support in inclusive classrooms: Support others as you would wish to be supported. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(2), 36-43.
Causton-Theoharis, J. N., Giangreco, M. F., Doyle, M. B., & Vadasy, P. F. (2007). The “sous-chefs” of literacy instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 56-62.
Carter, E. W., Sisco, L. G., Melekoglu, M. A., & Kurkowski, C. (2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(4), 213-227.
French, N. K., & Chopra, R. V. (1999). Parent perspectives on the roles of paraprofessionals. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24(4), 259-272.
Giangreco, M. F., Broer, S. M., & Edelman, S. W. (2002). " That Was Then, This Is Now!" Paraprofessional Supports for Students With Disabilities in General Education Classrooms. Exceptionality, 10(1), 47-64.
Giangreco, M. F., Yuan, S., McKenzie, B., Cameron, P., & Fialka, J. (2005). “Be careful what you wish for…”: Five reasons to be concerned about the assignment of individual paraprofessionals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(5), 28-34.
Giangreco, M. F., Suter, J. C., & Doyle, M. B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of educational and psychological consultation, 20(1), 41-57.
Giangreco, M. F. (2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong?. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 1-13.
Giangreco, M. F., Broer, S. M., & Suter, J. C. (2011). Guidelines for selecting alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals: Field-testing in inclusion-oriented schools. Remedial and Special Education, 32(1), 22-38.
Giangreco, M. F., Doyle, M. B., & Suter, J. C. (2012). Constructively responding to requests for paraprofessionals: We keep asking the wrong questions. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 362-373.
Giangreco, M. F., Suter, J. C., & Hurley, S. M. (2013). Revisiting personnel utilization in inclusion-oriented schools. The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 121-132.
Giangreco, M. F. (2013). Teacher assistant supports in inclusive schools: Research, practices and alternatives. Australasian journal of special Education, 37(2), 93-106.
Horne, M. D. (2012). Attitudes toward handicapped students:Professional,peer, and parent reactions. Routledge.
Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., & Kim, S. (2017). Training Paraprofessionals to Target Socialization in Students With ASD: Fidelity of Implementation and Social. Journal Of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 102.
Kowalski, R. M., & Fedina, C. (2011). Cyber bullying in ADHD and Asperger Syndrome populations. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(3), 1201-1208.
Koegel, R. L., Kim, S., & Koegel, L. K. (2014). Training paraprofessionals to improve socialization in students with ASD. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 44(9), 2197-2208.
Lyons, G. L., Huber, H. B., Carter, E. W., Chen, R., & Asmus, J. M. (2016).Assessing the social skills and problem behaviors of adolescents with severe disabilities enrolled in general education classes. American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 121(4), 327-345.
McKenzie, B. (2011). Empowering paraprofessionals through professional development. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 77(4), 38-41.
Orsmond, G. I., Krauss, M. W., & Seltzer, M. M. (2004). Peer relationships and social and recreational activities among adolescents and adults with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 34(3), 245-256.
Scheef, A. R., Hollingshead, A., & Voss, C. S. (2019). Peer Support Arrangements to Promote Positive Postschool Outcomes. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(4), 219-224.