究旨在探討國一學生在生物科的學習興趣、學習動機與學習成就間的關連。應用修改自傅淑卿（2008）的背景資料問卷16題、Yang等人（2010）設計的學習動機問卷81題與研究者開發的生物科興趣問卷68題為工具，對297位臺灣北部縣市國一學生進行調查研究。所收集資料以敘述性統計、項目分析、因素分析、信度分析、皮爾森積差相關、單因子變異數分析與t考驗加以分析。結果發現，學生對生物科主題內容感興趣的高低依次是：化石紀錄與演化、環境保育、科技與社會、科學故事、食物與生態、人體構造與生理、 構造與分類階層、植物構造與生理（α＝.98）。在生物科過程技能興趣高低次序是：實驗操作與推理、記錄與傳達（α＝.96）。在動機分量上得分高低依次是：學習目標、付出、自覺媒介、本質、成就、實用/外在、未來期許、自覺能力、討他人歡心、表現目標、自覺難度與性別（α＝.98）。學生的學業成就與生物科主題內容、過程技能興趣的相關係數r分別為.21、.22；與學習動機的相關係數 r為.19，r值均達顯著差異。學生生物科主題內容興趣受家中藏書量、父母學歷、做功課時間與選擇實驗的傾向有不同的影響。生物科過程技能興趣受到家中藏書量、父母學歷、做功課時間、每週上網時間數與選擇實驗的傾向有不同的影響。學習動機受到性別、家庭收入、家中藏書量、.父母學歷、做功課時間、上網時間與實驗傾向有不同的影響。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between interest, motivation and academic achievement in biology among 7th graders. Three questionnaires were used, the first with 16 items adapted from Fu Shu-Chin (2008) is background information questionnaire, the second with 81 questions designed by Yang et al (2010) is motivation questionnaire and the last with 68 questions is biology interesting questionnaire developed by author. Sample was 297 7th grade students from northern Taiwan. Descriptive statistics, item analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, Correlation, ANOVA and t-test analysis were run. The results showed that students interested order in the biology subject matter are: the fossil record and evolution, environmental conservation, science, technology and society, science stories, food and ecology, human body structure and physiology, structure and classification levels, plant structure and physiology (α =. 98). The order of interest in science process skills: experimental operation and reasoning, record and convey (α =. 96). High to low scores on the motivation components are: learning goal, pay, and consciously media, nature, achievement, practical / external, future expectations, perceived ability, pleasuring other, performance goal, and consciously difficult and gender (α =. 98). Academic achievement and biology subject matter, process skills, interest in the correlation r = .21, .22; and motivation to learn the correlation r =. 19, all r values are significant. Interesting in the biology subject matter was influenced differently by home books holding, parents education level, homework time, and experiments choice tendency. Interesting in science process skills was influenced differently by home books holding, parents education level, homework time, internet time and experiments choice tendency. Motivation was influenced by gender, household income, home books holding, parents education level, homework time, internet time and experiments choice tendency.

中文部分
丁信中（2007）。芬蘭科學教育PISA光環後的另一章-學生科學學習興趣的重視。
行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：NSC 96-2517-S-156-
001），未出版。
丁信中（2009）。芬蘭中學生PISA科學成就優異表現及其相關因素之探討：2007
歐洲科學教育學術參訪反思。科學教育月刊，316，2-19。
王美芬、周錦鐘（1999）。談「九年一貫新課程總綱綱要」與自然科課程教材的編寫。載於中華民國教材研究發展協會（主編），九年一貫課程研討會論文集─邁向課程新世紀（上）（157-166頁）。臺北市：康軒文教。
林煥祥主編（2008）。臺灣參加PISA 2006 成果報告。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 95-2522-S-026-002），未出版。
吳明隆（2008）。論文寫作與量化研究。臺北市：五南。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2008）。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市：五南。
邱美虹（2005)。TIMSS 2003臺灣國中二年級學生的科學成就極其相關因素之探討。科學教育月刊，282，2-40。
邱皓政（2000）。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市：五南。
邱皓政（2006）。量化研究與統計分析（基礎版） ─ SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南。
邱信凱（2009）。青少年網路使用、情緒調節與生活壓力之相關研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
梁家輔（2009）。補習教育對於城鄉學生數學焦慮及成就表現之研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。
教育部（2002）。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要－數學領域。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要自然與生活科技學習領域。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要－數學領域。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2007）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要－數學領域。臺北市：教育部。
張秋男主編（2005）。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查2003。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 93-2511-S-003 -001-）。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心。
張秋男主編（2008）。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查2007。臺北市：國立台灣師範大學科技教育中心。
張春興（1995）。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。
陳幸玫（2004）。九年一貫數學能力指標的詮釋－國小統計。行政院國家科學委員會研究報告（編號：NSC92-2521-S-152-007），未出版。
陳幸玫（2005）。國小統計圖表解讀之教學研究－與「社會」和「自然與生活科學」課程之連結。行政院國科會研究報告（編號：NSC93-2521- S-152-002），未出版。
陳幸玫（2006）。國小統計課程之內涵及教學理念。科學教育月刊，287，2-12。
陳順宇（1997）。統計學（第二版）。臺北市：東華。
黃明福（2009）。高中生生物學習興趣之相關因素研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
傅淑卿（2008）。探討國三學生對自然科學學科內容與學習過程之興趣。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
葛致容（2008）。新竹縣國中學生科學興趣之調查研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
談欽瑋（2009）。臺北市八年級學生喜愛自然科學的相關因素之探究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
劉碧如（2008）。國小六年級學生科學興趣之調查研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。

英文部分
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological
processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 45–561.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. J. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of
ducational Research, 64, 201-252.
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950-967.
Ames, C. A. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A motivational analysis. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 1. Student motivation (pp. 177-207). New York: Academic Press.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
Baron, R. A. (1998). Psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theoryand Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood
Bourdieu, P.（1993）. La Noblesse d'Etat: Grandes ecoles et esprit de corps. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
Brophy, J. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivation students to learn. Educational Leadership, 45(2), 40-48.
Brown, H. D. (1989). A practical guide to language learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brown, H. D. (1990). M & Ms for language classrooms? Another look at motivation. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on language and linguistics (pp. 383–393). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Cuccio-Schirripa, S. (1999). Science question level and its relationship to seventh graders’ interest and achievement in science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 1-13.
Deci, E. L. (1976). The hidden costs ofrewards. Organizational Dynamics, 4, 61-72.
Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
Desforges, C. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievements and adjustment: a literature review. London: DfES
Dweck, C. S.（1986）. Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S., Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (4th ed., pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., and Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In, J. T. Spence (ed.), Achievement and achievement motives. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135-171.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivation beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Feather NT. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-value framework. J. Educ. Psychol, 80,381-91.
Gardner, P. L. (1985). Students’ interest in science and technology: an international overview. In M. Lehrke, L. Hoffmann, & P. L. Gardner (Eds.), Interests in science and technology education (pp. 15-34). Kiel, Germany: Institut fur die Padagogik der Naturwissenschaften.
Garner, R., Brown, R., Sanders, S., & Menke, D. J. (1992). "Seductive Details" and Learning from Text. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), The Role of
Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 239-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Häussler, R, P., Hoffmann, L., Langeheine, R., Rost, J., & Sievers, K. (1998). A typology of students’ interest in physics and the distribution of gender and age within each type. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (2), 223–238.
Herbart, J. F. (1965). General theory of pedagogy, derived from the purpose of education. In J. F. Herbart (Ed.), Writings on education (2), 9-155. Dusseldorf:Kuepper. (Original work published 1806)
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In A. Krapp, S. Hidi & A. Renninger. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Hidi, S., & McLaren, J. (1990). The effect of topic and theme interestingness on the ction of school expositions. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennett, & H. F. rich (Eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context (Vol. 2:2, pp. 295–308). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Hidi, S., ＆ Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.
Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Institution, 12(4), 447–465.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education , 88(1), 28–54.
Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Keith, T. Z., & Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(3), 207-226.
Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classroom. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. (pp. 443-469). Mauwab, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kidman, G. (2009). What is an “Interesting Curriculum” for biotechnology education? students and teachers opposing views. Research in Science Education, 40, 353-373.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1925). Foundations of method: Informal talks on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway. Poetics, 9, 87–89.
Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S.K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 75-102). New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development : theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4),
383-409.
Krapp, A. (2003). Interest and human development - An educationalepsychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology (Monograph Series II, Part 2), 57–84.
Krapp, A., Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K. A.Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.) The role of interest in learning and
development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Laforgia, J. (1988). The affective domain related to science education and its evaluation. Science Education, 72(4), 407-421.
Lee, J., & Cramond, B. (1999). The positive effects of mentoring economically disadvantaged students. Professional School Counseling, 2(3), 172-178.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S.（2005）Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184-196.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313-327.
Maehr, M. L. ( 1984). Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1, pp. 115-144). New York: Academic Press.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., and Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in
International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades.
Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., & Foy, P. (with Olson, J.F., Preuschoff, C., Erberber, E.,
Arora, A., & Galia, J.). (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at
the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 International Report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Munn, N. L., Fernald, D. L., ＆Fernal, P. S. (1969). Introduction to psychology. Bosten: Hougmton Miffin Co.
Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2002). Students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the WorldWideWeb as a research and teaching tool in science learning. Research in Science Education,32(4), 489-510.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 1. Student
motivation (pp. 39-73). New York: Academic Press.
OECD (2007a). PISA 2006：Science competencies for tomorrow's world, Vol.1： Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/30/17/39703267.pdf
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Renninger, K. A., Ewen, L. & Lasher, A. K. (2002). Individual interest as context in expository text and mathematics word problems. Learning and Instruction, 12, 467–491.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Scantlebury, K., & Baker, D. (2007). Gender issues in science education research: Remembering where the difference lies. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.),
Handbook of research on science education (pp. 257-286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schank, R. C. (1979). Interestingness: controlling influences. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 273–297.
Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to science: an update. Studies in Science Ikkation, 11, 26-59.
Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-279.
Schiefele, U., & Rheinberg, F. (1997). Motivation and knowledge acquisition: searching for mediating processes. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 251–301). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224.
Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational Interest: A Review of the Literatureand Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
Smail, B., & Kelly, A. (1984). Sex differences in science and technology among 11-year-old school children II—affective. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2(2), 87-106.
Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G., & Lai, R. Y. C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega, 27(1), 25-37.
Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 47-58.
Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in biology. Science Education International, 17, 31-48.
Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65, 213–243.
Van Voorhis, F.L. (2003). Interactive homework in middle school: Effects on family involvement and science achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 323-338.
Vispoel, W. P., & Austin, J. R. (1995). Success and failure in Junior High School: A critical incident approach to understanding students´ attributional beliefs.
American Educational Research Journal, 32, 377-412.
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A metaanalysisof the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4),387-398.
Weiner. B. (1979), A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 7.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: a theoretical analysis. Dev. Rev. 12:265–310
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Yang, F. Y., Tseng, J. S., & Fu, S. C. (2010). Exploring the Associations between Social Motivational Factors and Science Achievement among 9th Graders. 2010 NARST Annual International Conference. Philadelphia, PA, USA.