摘 要
本研究旨在探討高中物理教師教學能力與專業成長之現況調查，為達成研究目的，本研究主要採問卷調查之研究方法，並藉由召開學者專家與現職高中物理教師座談，以提高問卷之信效度。在問卷方面，利用自編之研究工具抽取全國90所公私、立高級中學之物理教師進行調查，以了解當前高中物理教師之教學能力與專業成長之現況與意見。本研究依據實際施測結果，有效樣本共計149位教師。調查資料使用SPSS for Windows 12.0套裝統計程式，進行資料分析後，得到2項研究結論如下：1.高中物理教師曾利用Flash或EasyJava 軟體製作物理動畫教材比例偏低（24.8﹪）。2.由本研究的結果顯示，高中物理教師對指標項目「9.我認為我的學生至少有一半適合科技生涯」的看法，在常理上的認知與實際上的調查結果，兩者差異頗大。最後提出3項建議如下：1.本研究建構發展的四項指標類別等16項指標項目，是一信度佳、效度佳的測量項目，適合做為高中物理教師提升自我教學能力與專業成長之工具。2.建議現職高中物理教師重新思考物理教師的角色，做一個全方位的良師，作育英才、提攜後進。3.對未來研究者的建議：研發高中物理教師教學評鑑指標。在研究對象方面：建議未來研究可以擴大取樣範圍，涵蓋任教於全國公、私立高職等之物理教師，以增加研究的代表性及推掄性，並增加訪談資料的蒐集與分析，以提高研究的客觀性。在研究內容方面：未來研究可進一步就物理教師之教案編製、著作、論文發表篇數、比賽獲獎次數與經歷等，設計物理教師之評鑑項目，做深入之研究與探討。

Abstract
This research aims at investigating the present status of high school physics teachers’ teaching ability as well as their expertise. To reach the purpose, this research adopts mainly the research method of questionnaire survey. A symposium of scholars, experts and high school physics teachers is held to ensure the credibility and effectiveness of the questionnaire survey.
Questionnaires exploring the present status of teaching ability, expertise and opinions of high school physics teachers are given out to physics teachers in 90 public and private high schools. The effective samples are from 149 teachers. All materials are analyzed by SPSS for Windows 12.0.
The conclusion is as follows:
1. The physics teacher of high school has utilized Flash or EasyJava software to make physics teaching materials in a low proportion of 24.8%.
2. Shown by the result of this research, high school physics teachers hold very different views toward indicator 9, “ I think at least half of my students are suitable to have scientific and technological careers.” There is great difference between conventional cognition and the investigation result.
Hence, 3 suggestions are proposed as follows:
1. This research constructs 16 indicators of 4 indicating categories of development, which are effective and credible measurement items and they are suitable for high school physics teachers to use as tools to promote their teaching ability as well as improve their expertise.
2. It is suggested that high school physics teachers ponders over their roles again. They are encouraged to become an omni-directional good teacher to educate talents and to guide and support the less advanced .
3. The suggestions for the future researcher are: First, research and develop the assessment indexes for physics teaching in high schools. In terms of research subject, the coverage is suggested be inclusive of the physics teachers in public and private high schools nationwide in order to ensure the inference and representativeness. Then, enhance the collection and analysis of the interview materials in order to improve the objectivity. Finally, in research content, further researches are encouraged to work on designing indication items for assessment in terms of numbers of theses, papers, writings, awards, or even the manufacturing of teaching materials.

參考文獻
一、中文部份：
1.林清山（1992）：心理與教育統計學。台北：東華書局。
2.張春興（1994）：教育心理學。台北：東華書局。
3.李遠哲（1996）：教育改革審議委員會教育改革總諮議報告書摘
要。教改通訊，27期，12-15頁
4.沈青嵩（1992）：物理科教學評量。台北：台灣師範大學學術研
究委員會，五南圖書公司。
5.教育部（1998）：國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。
臺北：教育部。
6.高強華（1995）：論提升教師專業成長的教師評鑑。
台北：師大書苑。
7.黃耀輝（2002）：教學健檢。台北：問津堂。
8.黃坤錦（1995）：從教師專業論教師評鑑。
中國教育學會主編。教育評鑑。
頁229-246。台北：師大書苑。
9.黃福坤（1999）：資訊素養與教學，資訊素養與終身學習社會
國際研討會。
10.王文科（1986）：教育研究法。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
160-223頁、357-374頁。
11.王美芬（1998）：自然科教師成長與專業輔導的可行性探討。
12.王家通（1996）：教師法與教師專業。教師天地，83期，
22-26頁。
13.李俊湖（1995）：專業成長含意之分析。竹縣文教，第八期，
85-90頁。
14.歐用生（1996）：教師專業成長。台北：師大書苑。
15.張盈婷（1997）：落實在職進修，提昇教師專業素養。
中等教育，48卷，3期，頁73-77。
16.江新合（1998）：理化教師專業知能複檢模式及評鑑工具之
研究。
17.黃政傑（1997）：教學原理。台北：師大書苑。
18.陳章正（2003）：高中物理學習困難原因之初探性研究。
中華民國第19屆科學教育學術研討會。
19.簡茂發（1993）：心理測驗與統計方法（4版）。
台北：心理出版社。
20.劉佳育（2002）：教師專業成長：不同領導類型下個案教師成長
分析。台北：台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論
文。
21.許榮富（1994）：物理教學。載於教學法研究，頁541-566。
台北：台灣師範大學學術研究委員會。
22.張德銳（2002）：協同教學：理論與實務。台北：五南。
23.林惠賢（2001）：輔英科技大學專題研究計畫成果報告：
檢定評定量表之係數。
24.王保進（1999）：視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。
台北：心理出版社。
25.張德銳（1999）：師資培育與教師評鑑。台北：師大書苑。
26.溫明麗 (1997)：批判性思考教學-哲學之旅，台北:師大書苑
27.黃光雄主編（1995）：教學原理。台北：師大書苑。
28.簡茂發主編（1995）：高中學生興趣測驗編製報告。
台北：中國測驗學會
29.郭重吉等著（1992）：大學入學考試物理試題分析與命題設計
研究。大考中心。
30.邱佳椿等著（2002）：技職教育研究教戰手冊-SPSS基礎篇。
台北：師大書苑。
31.楊文金、許榮富（1987）：物理教育中實驗的角色。
台北：科學月刊，18卷2期，頁103-105。
32.連坤德、周進祥（1998）：物理科教師教學能力評鑑模式
及工具之研究。
33.張霄亭、朱則剛（1998）：教學媒體。臺北：五南圖書
出版公司。
34.台灣師大物理系物理教學示範實驗教室http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/demolab/index.htm
35.Flash4 國中理化地科輔助教材教具王健忍老師個人網頁http://www.hgjh.hlc.edu.tw/~drop/
二、英文部份：
1. Cochran, K. F.,& DeRuiter, J. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing:An integrative model for teacher preparation.Journal of Teacher Education,1993,44（4）, 263-272.
2. Peacock, D. (1992). Operational brief for the development of national competency and standards for the teaching profession. National Project on the Quality of Teaching and learning , Cantberra.
3. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who undersatnd：Knowledge Growth in Teaching Stanford University. American Educational Research,15（2）,4-14
4. Gazden, C.B. (1998). The Language of Teaching and Learning.
5. Henderson, J.G. (1992). Reflecting Teaching：Becoming an Inquiring Educator.Macmillan Publishing Co.
6. Paris,S.G. & Ayres,L.R. (1994). Becoming Reflective Students and Teaching. American Psychological Association.
7. Richard,Berg (1998).The University of Maryland Physics Lecture Demonstration Facility from http://www.physics.umd.edu/deptinfo/facilities/lecdem/
8. Ellis, N.E. (1984). The work-life experience of teachers and orientation toward professional growth and development.Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research association.
9. Gage, N.L. (1961). The Appraisal of College Teaching. Journal of Higher Education.
10.Duke, D.L. (1990). Teaching An Introduction.New York.
11. Duke, D.L. (1993). Removing Barriers to Professional Growth.
12. Cronbach, L.J. (1983).Course improvement through evaluation.In G.F. Madaus, M.Scriven,& D.L. Stufflebeam,(Eds.),Evaluation models-Vievpoints on educational and human services evalytion.(pp.102) Boston:Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
13. Barton, J.,& Collins, A.(1993). Portfolios in teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education.44,200-211.
14. Hill, J.C. (1986).Curriculum evalution for school improvement IL:Charles C Thomas Publisher.
15. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
16. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans (Project 2061). New York:Oxford University Press.
17. Burden, P.R. (1980). Teachers' perceptions of the characteristics and influences on their personal and professional development( Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University,1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 5404A.
18. Fuller, F. F., & Brown, O.H. (1975). becoming a Teacher. In K. Ryan(Ed.), Teacher Education. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
19. National Science Foundation (1998). Teacher preparation and NSF collaboratives for excellence in teacher preparation. [Online]. Avalaible: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1998/nsf9899/start.htm.
20. Duschl, R.A.(1990). Restructuring Science Education: The role of theories and their importance. New York: Teacher College Press.
21. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards.
22. Adams, R. D. (1982). Teacher development: A look at change in teacher perceptions and behaviors across time. Journal of Teacher Education, 33(4). 40-43.
23. Jones,M.G.,Rua,M.J. & Carter,C.(1998) Science teacher`s conceptual growth ithin Vygotsky`s zone of proximal development.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 35, No.9,pp967-985
24. Anderson, R. S. & Speck, B. W.(1998)”Oh what a difference a team makes”:Why team teaching marks a difference.Teaching and Teacher Education,14(7),671-686.
25. Washington，D.C.，National Science Teachers Association。
26. Shulman. L. S.，P. Tamir.（1973）：Research on Teaching in the Natural Sciences，in Second Handbook of Research on Teaching Robert M. W. Travers. Chicago，Rand McNally & Co. 。