簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 阮氏碧欣
Nguyen Thi Bich Han
論文名稱: 英語學習者的認知策略和後設認知策略 - 單模態和多模態之線上聽力測驗
EFL Learners' Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies in Processing Single-Modal and Multimodal Listening Materials in an Online Setting
指導教授: 劉宇挺
Liu, Yeu-Ting
口試委員: 劉宇挺
Liu, Yeu-Ting
李宜倩
Lee, Yi-Chien
陳湄涵
Chen, I-Shan
口試日期: 2022/05/11
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 134
中文關鍵詞: 單模態多模態認知策略和後設認知策略聽力策略
英文關鍵詞: single-modal, multimodal, cognitive and metacognitive strategies, listening strategies
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200648
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:128下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨於探討英語學習者之認知策略和後設認知策略,在單模態及多模態線上英聽測驗中所扮演的角色。立基於第二語言聽力認知過程及多媒體學習認知理論,本研究探討兩種不同型態(單模態及多模態)的聽力輸入,是否在英聽過程中影響學習者使用認知策略及後設認知策略。過去文獻顯示英語聽力策略和學習者之語言程度有關聯。因此,本研究亦將探討學習者之英聽程度是否在單模態及多模態情境中,影響學習者使用聽力策略。
    本研究採用組內及組間設計並透過問卷方式搜集數據資料。來自北台灣一所大學之30名英語學習者參與本次實驗。受試者依據其英語聽力程度分成兩組:低成就組與高成就組。兩組受試者皆於不同時間點進行單模態和多模態之線上英聽測驗。本研究採用成對樣本t檢定和獨立樣本t檢定進行資料分析,探討英聽高成就學習者及低成就學習者是否採取不同的認知策略和後設認知策略。
    研究結果顯示,不同型態之線上英聽測驗,對英語學習者之認知策略和後設認知策略的使用,並無太大影響。然而,研究結果發現英語學習者之英聽程度和其英聽策略(認知策略及後設認知策略)之使用有顯著關聯。據此,本研究認為英語學習者應了解單模態及多模態聽力認知過程之差異,且教師可提供學習者在線上單模態及多模態聽力測驗中適合使用的策略。本研究亦建議教師在進行聽力課程時,將學習者之英語聽力程度納入考量。更多教學建議將於論文中提出。

    The current study was conducted to investigate the role of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in EFL learners’ processing of single-modal and multimodal listening materials in an online setting. Grounded in the model of Cognitive Processes of L2 Listening and the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, the study aimed to explore whether the two types of input, single-modal and multimodal texts, would influence learners’ employment of cognitive and metacognitive strategies during their listening process. As L2 listening strategies were reported by previous scholars to be correlated with learners’ language proficiency levels, this study also took into account L2 listening proficiency levels to explore whether prior findings will hold true in both single-modal and multimodal listening contexts. The study adopted a within-subjects and between-subjects design with data being collected through a questionnaire of cognitive and metacognitive listening strategies. A total of 30 EFL learners from a university in northern Taiwan were involved in the study. The participants were divided into two different groups based on their listening proficiency levels, namely low and high listening proficiency groups. Each level group was involved in two treatments of single-modal and multimodal listening at two different time points. Multiple paired-samples and independent-measures T-tests were conducted to investigate whether learners at low and high listening proficiency levels differed in their use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in the two different listening conditions. The result shows that learners’ exposure to two types of input at two different time points did not seem to have strong influences on their adoption of all cognitive and metacognitive strategies in an online setting. However, the low- and high-level listeners demonstrated a statistical difference in some particular cognitive and metacognitive strategies they employed in both listening conditions. The findings of the study underline the need to raise L2 learners’ awareness of the differences of cognitive processes operated in single-modal and multimodal listening as well as provide them with instruction on appropriate strategies they can use when processing online texts in those two different listening contexts. The study also suggests the need for L2 instructors to take into account learners’ aural proficiency levels when implementing L2 listening lessons. Pedagogical implications regarding teaching L2 listening will also be provided.

    Acknowledgements i 摘要 iii Abstract iv List of Tables viii List of Figures ix Chapter One - Introduction 1 1.1. Background and Issues 1 1.2. Overview of Previous Studies 7 1.3. Rationale of the Study 10 1.4. The Scope of the Study 13 1.5. Significance of the Study 14 1.6. Research Questions 15 Chapter Two - Literature Review 16 2.1. Listening Comprehension 16 2.1.1. Definition of Listening Comprehension 16 2.1.2. Factors that Affect L2 Listening 17 2.2. Cognitive Processes in L2 Listening 20 2.3. Language Learner Strategies 27 2.3.1. Definition of Language Learner Strategies 27 2.3.2. Classifications of Language Learner Strategies 29 2.3.3. The Role of Language Learner Strategies 31 2.4. Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies 31 2.4.1. Cognitive Strategies 32 2.4.2. Metacognitive Strategies 35 2.4.3. Common Ground and Differences between Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies 37 2.4.4. Existing Studies on Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies 41 2.5. Multimodal Listening 49 2.5.1. Theoretical Model of Multimodal Listening 49 2.5.2. Existing Studies on Multimodal Listening 52 2.6. Strategy Use in Online Settings 56 2.7. Conclusion 57 Chapter Three - Methodology 60 3.1. Participants 60 3.2. Materials 61 3.3. Design of the Study 64 3.4. Instrument 66 3.5. Procedure 66 3.5.1. Pilot Study 66 3.5.2. Main Study 67 3.6. Data Analysis 68 Chapter Four - Results 69 4.1. Learners’ Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies in the Single-modal and Multimodal Conditions 70 4.2. Comparisons of EFL Learners’ Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies in the Single-modal and Multimodal Conditions 72 4.3. Comparisons of Low- and High-Proficiency Learners’ Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies in the Single-modal and Multimodal Conditions 77 Chapter Five - Discussion 83 Chapter Six - Conclusion 97 6.1. Summary of Major Findings 97 6.2. Pedagogical Implications 98 6.2.1. The Process-based Approach to Teaching L2 Listening 98 6.2.2. Teaching Single-modal and Multimodal L2 Listening 101 6.2.3. Teaching L2 Listening to Learners of Different Proficiency Levels 102 6.2.4 Teaching Listening Strategies in Online Settings 103 6.3. Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Future Research 104 References 108 Appendix A 122 Appendix B 129

    Alhaisoni, E. (2017). Metacognitive listening strategies used by Saudi EFL medical students. English Language Teaching, 10, 114-122.
    Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). Freeman and Company.
    Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A., & Hew, S.H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: A one decade review. Education and Information Technologies, 1-28.
    Arola, K. L., Sheppard, J., & Ball, C. E. (2014). Writer/designer: A guide to making multimodal projects. Bedford/St. Martin's.
    Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of human memory. Psychology Press.
    Baker, M. C. (2017). Syntax. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller, (Eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 255-278). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Bao, D., & Guan, C. (2019). Listening strategies. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons.
    Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Longman.
    Becker, S. R. (2021). Metacognitive instruction in L2 French: An analysis of listening performance and automaticity. Foreign Language Annals, 54, 9-26.
    Becker, S. R., & Sturm, J. L. (2017). Effects of audiovisual media on L2 listening comprehension: A preliminary study in French. CALICO Journal, 34(2), 147-177.
    Bodie. G. D. (2016). Listening. In C. R. Berger & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
    Bidabadi, F. S., & Yamat, H. (2014). Strategies employed by Iranian EFL freshman university students in extensive listening: A qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(1), 23-41.
    Bloomfield, A., Wayland, S., Rhoades, E.A., Blodgett, A., Linck, J., & Ross, S. (2010). What makes listening difficult? Factors affecting second language listening comprehension.
    Bozorgian, H., & Alamdari, E.F. (2017). Multimedia listening comprehension: Metacognitive instruction or metacognitive instruction through dialogic interaction. ReCALL, 30, 131-152.
    Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.
    Campoy-Cubillo, M. C., & Querol-Julián, M. (2015). Assessing multimodal listening. In B. C. Camiciottoli & I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings (pp. 193-212). Routledge.
    Chang, C., & Chang, C. K. (2014). Developing students' listening metacognitive strategies using online videotext self-dictation-generation learning activity. The EUROCALL Review, 22(1), 3-19.
    Chen, A. (2013). EFL listeners' strategy development and listening problems: A process-based study. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 10(3), 81-101.
    Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2014). Listening strategy use and influential factors in Web-based computer assisted language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 207-219.
    Chen, X., Wang, C., & Kim, D. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategy profiles among English as a foreign language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 54, 234-251.
    Chou, M. (2016). Strategy use for listening in English as a foreign language: A comparison of academic and vocational high school students. TESOL Journal, 7, 513-539.
    Cohen, A. D. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). Pearson.
    Craven, M. (2019). Wide Angle (Level 3B). Oxford University Press.
    Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal, 65, 408-416.
    Cross, J. (2015). Metacognition in L2 listening: Clarifying instructional theory and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 883-892.
    Cross, J., & Vandergrift, L. (2018). Metacognitive listening strategies. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-5). John Wiley & Sons.
    Educational Testing Service. (n.d.). Mapping the TOEIC tests on the Common European Framework of Reference for languages. https://www.ets.org/s/toeic/pdf/toeic-cefr-flyer.pdf
    Educational Testing Service. (n.d.). Setting score requirements. https://www.ets.org/s/toefl-essentials/score-users/scores-admissions/set/
    Fathi, J., Derakhshan, A., & Torabi, S. (2020). The effect of listening strategy instruction on second language listening anxiety and self-efficacy of Iranian EFL learners. SAGE Open, 1-13.
    Ferlazzo, L., & Sypnieski, K. H. (2018). The ELL teacher's toolbox: Hundreds of practical ideas to support your students. John Wiley & Sons.
    Fernández-Pacheco, N. N. (2018). The impact of multimodal ensembles on audio-visual comprehension: Implementing vodcasts in EFL contexts. Multimodal Communication.
    Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
    Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence (pp. 231-235). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34, 906-911.
    Fortanet-Gómez, I., & Camiciottoli, B. C. (2015). Introduction. In B. C. Camiciottoli & I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings (pp. 1-14). Routledge.
    Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
    Fung, D., & Macaro, E. (2021). Exploring the relationship between linguistic knowledge and strategy use in listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 25(4), 540–564.
    Goh, C. (2010). Listening as process: Learning activities for self-appraisal and self- regulation. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
    Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Learner strategies. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching (pp. 68-76). Cambridge University Press.
    Goh, C. C. M. (2016). Cognition, metacognition, and L2 listening. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (Vol. 3, pp. 214-228).
    Goh, C. C. M. (2018). Metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MALQ): (Vandergrift, Goh, Mareschal, & Tafaghodtari, 2006). In D. L. Worthington & G. D. Bodie (Eds.), The Sourcebook of Listening Research: Methodology and Measures (1st ed., pp. 430-437). John Wiley & Sons.
    Goh, C. C. M. (2018). Metacognition in second language listening. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-7). John Wiley & Sons.
    Goh, C. C. M. (2019). Comprehending speech genres for the listening classroom. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, Springer International Handbooks of Education (pp. 847-859). Springer, Cham.
    Goh, C. C., & Hu, G. (2013). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255-274.
    Graesser, A.C., & McNamara, D.S. (2012). Coh-Metrix 3.0. http://cohmetrix.com
    Graham, S., & Santos, D. (2015). Strategies for second language listening. Current scenarios and improved pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, 36, 52-68.
    Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.
    Gu, Y. (2018). Two-way listening. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
    Halone, K. K., Cunconan, T. M., Coakley, C. G., & Wolvin, A. D. (1998). Toward the establishment of general dimensions underlying the listening process. International Journal of Listening, 12(1), 12-28.
    Hardison, D., & Pennington, M. (2021). Multimodal second-language communication: Research findings and pedagogical implications. RELC Journal, 52(1), 62-76.
    Harley, T. A. (2014). The psychology of language: From data to theory (4th ed.). Psychology Press.
    Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019). Multimodal language processing in human communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 639-652.
    Hubbard, P. (2009). Computer assisted language learning. Routledge.
    Hubbard, P. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 listening. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro S. (Eds.), The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 93–106). John Wiley & Sons.
    IELTS. (n.d.). IELTS in the CEFR scale. Retrieved September, 2021, from https://www.ielts.org/about-ielts/ielts-in-cefr-scale
    Jewitt, C. (2009). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Routledge.
    Joaquin, A. D. (2018). Automaticity in listening. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
    Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
    Kassem, H. M. (2015). The relationship between listening strategies used by Egyptian EFL college sophomores and their listening comprehension and self-efficacy. English Language Teaching, 8(2), 153-169.
    Kobayashi, A. (2018). Investigating the effects of metacognitive instruction in listening for EFL learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), 310-328.
    Kök, İ. (2017): Relationship between listening comprehension strategy use and listening comprehension proficiency. International Journal of Listening, 32(3), 1-17.
    Krashen, S. (2011). Academic proficiency (language and content) and the role of strategies. TESOL Journal, 381-393.
    Li, C.-H. (2015). A comparative study of video presentation modes in relation to L2 listening success. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-14.
    Liu, M. (2016). Interrelations between foreign language listening anxiety and strategy use and their predicting effects on test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 647-655.
    LTTC. (n.d.). GEPT – CEFR alignment. Retrieved September, 2021, from https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/e_lttc/e_gept/alignment.htm
    Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 320-337.
    Malmir, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). The socio-pragmatic, lexico-grammatical, and cognitive strategies in L2 pragmatic comprehension: The case of Iranian male vs. female EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 1-23.
    Matlin, M. W. (2002). Cognition (5th ed.). Harcourt College Publishers.
    Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
    Medina, A., Socarrás, G., & Krishnamurti, S. (2020). L2 Spanish listening comprehension: The role of speech rate, utterance length, and L2 oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 104, 439-456.
    Milliner, B., & Dimoski, B. (2021). The effects of a metacognitive intervention on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ listening comprehension and listening self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research, 1-35.
    Mirzaei, M., Meshgi, K., Akita, Y., & Kawahara, T. (2017). Partial and synchronized captioning: A new tool to assist learners in developing second language listening skill. ReCALL, 29(2), 178-199.
    Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326.
    Namaziandost, E., Neisi, L., Mahdavirad, F., & Nasri, M. (2019). The relationship between listening comprehension problems and strategy usage among advance EFL learners. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1-19.
    Ngo, N. T. H. (2015). Some insights into listening strategies of learners of English as a foreign language in Vietnam. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(3), 311-326.
    O’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
    O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
    Othman, J., & Vanathas, C. (2017). Topic familiarity and its influence on listening comprehension. The English Teacher, 14, 19-32.
    Otto, S. E. K. (2017). From past to present. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro S. (Eds.), The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 10–25). John Wiley & Sons.
    Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Learning Styles & Strategies. GALA, 1-25.
    Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Applied Linguistics in Action Series. Pearson Education Limited.
    Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. A dual-coding approach. Oxford University Press.
    Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 1-19.
    Pan, Y., & In’nami, Y. (2015). Relationships between strategy use, listening proficiency level, task type, and scores in an L2 listening test. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18, 45-77.
    Pawlak, M. (2019). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 1-19.
    Perez, M. M. (2020). Multimodal input in SLA research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 653-663.
    Porter-Szucs, I. (2018). Process approach versus product approach. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-7). John Wiley & Sons.
    Pujadas, G., & Muñoz, C. (2020). Examining adolescent EFL learners’ TV viewing comprehension through captions and subtitles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 551-575.
    Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). The role of metacognitive listening strategies awareness and podcast-use readiness in using podcasting for learning English as a foreign language. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1153-1161.
    Renandya, W. (2012). Five reasons why listening strategy instruction might not work with lower proficiency learners. ELTWorldOnline.com, 4, 1–11.
    Rodgers, M., & Webb, S. (2017). The effects of captions on EFL learners’ comprehension of English-Language television programs. CALICO Journal, 34(1), 20-38.
    Romero, E., & Arévalo, C. (2010). Multimodality and listening comprehension: Testing and implementing classroom material. Language Value, 2(1), 100-139.
    Rost, M. (2016). Teaching and researching listening (3rd ed.). Routledge.
    Safa, M. A., & Motaghi, F. (2021). Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research, 1-24.
    Sakai, H. (2018). Working memory in listening. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
    Saks, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2018). Cognitive and metacognitive strategies as predictors of language learning outcomes. Psihologija, 1-17.
    Sherman, K. D., & Watkins, F. (2019). Wide Angle (Level 6). Oxford University Press.
    Shi, Y. (2019). Effect of input mode on EFL free-recall listening performance: A mixed-method study. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 1-22.
    Siegel, J. (2014). Exploring L2 listening instruction: examinations of practice. ELT Journal, 68, 22-30.
    Smidt, E., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). Effects of online academic lectures on ESL listening comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, and strategy use. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 517 - 556.
    Smith, F. (1983). The role of prediction in reading. In Essays into Literacy. Heinemann, (pp. 35-39).
    Sueyoshi, A., & Hardison, D. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55, 661-699.
    Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387-409.
    Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53, 168-176.
    Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463-496.
    Vandergrift, L. (2008). Learning strategies for listening comprehension. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings (pp. 84-102). Multilingual Matters.
    Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390-416.
    Vandergrift, L., & Cross, J. (2018a). Cognitive listening strategies. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons.
    Vandergrift, L., & Cross, J. (2018b). Listening to learn versus learning to listen. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons.
    Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening. Metacognition in action. Routledge.
    Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431-462.
    Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60(2), 470-497.
    Wagner, E. (2010). The effect of the use of video texts on ESL listening test-taker performance. Language Testing, 27(4), 493-513.
    Wagner, E. (2013). An investigation of how the channel of input and access to test questions affect L2 listening test performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(2), 178-195.
    Wagner, E. (2014). Assessing listening. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The Companion to Language Assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
    Wang, W. (2016). Learning to listen: The impact of a metacognitive approach to listening instruction. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 79-88.
    Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Prentice Hall Europe.
    White, C. (2008). Language learning strategies in independent language learning: An overview. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.). Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings (pp. 84-102). Multilingual Matters.
    Wildmo, L. (2014). Auditory discrimination. In C. R. Reynolds, K. J. Vannest, & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education. John Wiley & Sons.
    Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 65–86.
    Wolvin, A. D. (2018). Listening processes. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-7). John Wiley & Sons.
    Worthington, D. L., & Bodie, G. D. (2018). Defining listening: A historical, theoretical, and pragmatic assessment. In D. L. Worthington & G. D. Bodie (Eds.), The Sourcebook of Listening Research: Methodology and Measures (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
    Yeldham, M. (2016). Second language listening instruction: Comparing a strategies‐based approach with an interactive, strategies/bottom‐up skills approach. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 394-420.
    Zeng, Y., & Goh, C. (2018). A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its impact on listening achievement and metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 193-218.
    Zhou Y., & Wei, M. (2018). Strategies in technology-enhanced language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 471-495.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE