簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李宏盈
Lee, Hung-Ying
論文名稱: 中等體育師資生科技教學內容知識 (TPACK)、設計思維及教師專業發展之研究
Research on TPACK, Design Thinking and Teacher Professional Development of Secondary Physical Education Pre-service Teachers
指導教授: 掌慶維
Chang, Ching-Wei
梁至中
Liang, Jyh-Chong
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 161
中文關鍵詞: 科技輔助教學課程設計資訊素養
英文關鍵詞: Technology-assisted teaching, Curriculum Design, IT literacy
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001053
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:229下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 因應資訊時代的教育浪潮,體育教師在教學時,可藉由 TPACK 整合資訊科技輔助體育教學的知識觀,以面對多元的學習者。由於師資培育階段為師資生建構專業發展之奠基期,且體育師資生亟需具備素養導向及跨領域教學的知能,因而師資生 TPACK 的整合情形將影響教學品質。依此研究透過TPACK、設計思維及教師專業發展問卷工具,探討494位中等體育師資生 TPACK、設計思維及教師專業發展之情形。結果發現:一、TPACK、設計思維及教師專業發展量表能適用於中等體育師資生。二、中等體育師資生在 TPACK、設計思維及教師專業發展的知覺上皆為中等以上。三、TPACK、設計思維與教師專業發展三者呈現高度正相關,且師資生的 TPACK 能透過設計思維預測其教師專業發展,(一) PCK 及 TCK 能透過設計思維預測良好的教師專業發展,且設計思維於其中扮演互補中介效果。(二) TPACK 能透過設計思維預測課程設計與教學、班級經營與輔導、研究發展與進修及敬業精神與態度,且設計思維於其中扮演互補中介效果。(三) TPACK 能透過測設計思維中的測試階段預測教師專業發展,且測試階段於其中扮演完全中介效果。建議未來可針對設計思維進行教學實踐的應用,並在師培課程,增進體育專門科目之科技相關知識。

    In response to the development of education in the information age, physical education (PE) teachers can adopt technical pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in their instructions that integrate information technology to assist PE teaching and also meeting learners’ diverse needs. The PE teacher education (PETE) program plays a crucial role to establish pre-servic PE teachers’ professional development in terms of competency-based education and students’ interdisciplinary curricular experiences. PE teaching quality, however, will be influenced by the pre-servic PE teachers’ TPACK intergration. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate, through three questionnaires, the secondary PE pre-service teachers’ (S-PEPTs) TPACK, design thinking (DT), and teacher professional development (TPD). Results: 1. TPACK, DT and TPD questionnaires could be applied to the S-PEPTs. 2. The S-PEPTs’ perception regarding to TPACK, DT, and TPD were above average. 3. The relationship among TPACK, DT, and TPD were highly significant within a positive correlation, and the S-PEPTs’ TPACK courld be used, through DT, to predict TPD. 3.1 PCK and TCK could predict TPD through DT which played the complementary mediation role between them. 3.2 TPACK could predict the curriculum design and teaching, class management and counseling, and research development and advanced study, as well as the professionalism and attitude through DT as the complementray mediation. 3.3 TPACK could predict TPD through DT, the indirect-only mediation, at the test level. The teaching practices of DT and the consideration of technological knowledge withing the physical education and sport sceicnes department will be needed in the future studies.

    第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究問題 4 第四節 研究範圍與限制 5 第五節 名詞釋義 6 第六節 研究重要性 7 第貳章 文獻探討 8 第一節 TPACK 8 第二節 設計思維 (DESIGN THINKING) 15 第三節 教師專業發展 21 第四節 TPACK對於教師專業發展 25 第五節 TPACK對於設計思維 27 第六節 設計思維對於教師專業發展 28 第參章 研究方法 29 第一節 研究架構 29 第二節 研究對象 30 第三節 研究工具之編製 31 第四節 研究實施程序 40 第五節 資料處理與分析 41 第肆章 結果與討論 43 第一節 中等體育師資生TPACK、設計思維及教師專業發展之量表信效度 43 第二節 中等體育師資生TPACK、設計思維及教師專業發展之知覺情形 57 第三節 中等體育師資生TPACK、設計思維及教師專業發展之關係與結構 63 第四節 中等體育師資生設計思維對TPACK及教師專業發展之中介效果 86 第伍章 結論與建議 96 第一節 結論 96 第二節 建議 99 參考文獻 102 一、中文部分 102 二、英文部分 107 附錄 118 附錄一、專家學者勾選表1 118 附錄二、專家學者勾選表2 127 附錄三、專家學者勾選表3 136 附錄四、專家學者勾選表4 145 附錄五、正式問卷 154

    王玉蓮 (2017)。設計思考法融入環境教育Scratch課程之設計探究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立清華大學,新竹市。
    王全世 (2000)。資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊與教育,80,23-31。
    王佳琪、宋世祥 (2019)。設計思考融入職前師資培育課程之實施與成效:以適性教學為例教育。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),145-173。
    王俊明 (2005)。近年來國於教師角色衝突的研究綜述。教師教育研究,17(3),44-48。
    王俊傑、林啟東、楊總成、王元聖 (2015)。桃竹地區之國中體育教師應用資訊科技教學與創新教學之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,14(1),46-54。
    王炫智 (2010)。「虛擬實境」在體育教學中之應用。學校體育,116,81-86。
    王婉俐 (2015)。運用設計思考模式探討攜手計畫學生之需求-以台中市某國小為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。
    那昇華 (2015)。國民小學教師專業發展量表建構及其驗證性因素分析。雙溪教育論壇,4,1-24。
    朱春林 (2019)。跨域協同教學與設計思考之行動研究:以高等教育課程為例。雙溪教育論壇,8,23-48。
    何千綺 (2012)。臺南市國中小特教教師專業發展與教學效能之相關研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。南台科技大學,台南市。
    李宏盈 (2020)。TPACK與設計思維之關係。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(7),65-69。
    李宏盈、掌慶維、吳采陵 (2020)。體育師資生與科技教學內容知識 (TPACK) 關係之探討。中華體育季刊,34(2),89-98。
    呂秀蓮 (2020)。S2素養課程:以設計思維培育中小學生的基本學力。台灣教育,722,21-27。
    李柏玲 (2012)。實施創意教學在生活領域發展國小教師科技學科教學知識之個案研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。
    李美華、王政華 (2014)。培養學生未來想像與創造能力-簡介 IDEO 設計思考模式。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(6),28-30。
    余姿瑩 (2013)。使用 GeoGebra 動態幾何軟體對國三學生數學學習成效及教師TPACK之影響:以二次函數為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。
    吳明隆、涂金堂 (2011)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北市:五南。
    吳冠億 (2014)。史丹佛創新設計思考對設計教育之學習成效影響 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林市。
    吳清山 (2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),261-293。
    邱憶惠 (2016)。學習去教:在師資培育課堂裡的自我研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(3),81-104。
    林千瑜 (2015)。運用設計思考提升國小四年級學童創造力之行動研究-以幸福校園空間教學方案為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,台北市。
    林氿蘋 (2015)。應用設計思考於補救教育之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。
    林怡君、施登堯 (2018)。虛擬實境輔助國中籃球教學之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,17(2),48-59。
    林延諭、鄭夢慈 (2016)。融入設計思考於嚴肅教育遊戲的設計歷程及對科技學科教學知識的影響:以師資生為例。數位學習科技期刊,8(1),71-94。
    林政逸 (2019)。師資培育白皮書發布後師資職前培育和教師專業發展之省思。教育研究與發展期刊,15(1),1-28。
    林偉文 (2011)。創意教學與創造力的培育-以[設計思考]為例。教育資料與研究雙月刊,100,53-57。
    林湘芸、黃靖文 (2019)。國小教師團體凝聚力與組織效能關係之研究-教師專業發展之中介效果。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,12(1),83-102。
    林舜晨 (2013)。設計思考的應用-以探討高中生參與工作坊的經驗知覺為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。
    林銘烽 (2015)。基本技術學科教學知識 (TPACK) 於十二年國教的前提。中等教育,66 (3),88-101。
    周麗修 (2016)。高級中學校長學習領導、教師專業發展與教師創新教學關係之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。
    施登堯、魏豐閔 (2017)。十二年國民基本教育下的體育師資培育課程革新。學校體育,162,51-59。
    郭芷榕 (2015)。應用設計思考策略於餐飲服務業創新經營模式之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。義守大學,高雄市。
    高英捷 (2012)。臺南市國中體育教師專業發展與教學效能關係之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。南台科技大學,台南市。
    陳佩英 (2018)。跨領域素養導向課程設計工作坊之構思與實踐。課程研究,13(2),21-42。
    陳律盛、侯銀華、王建畯 (2006)。中等學校體育教師專業能力現況之研究。輔仁大學學刊,5,31-44。
    陳淑卿 (2007)。國民小學英語教師專業發展之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
    陳國泰 (2018)。提升中小學教師的TPACK之有效策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,7 (1),227-235。
    陳琦媛 (2016)。「平板電腦補救教學計畫」執行情形之探討。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(2),113-140。
    陳棟樑、黃明一、周瓊瑤 (2017)。臺中市教師專業學習社群與教師專業發展之研究。管理資訊計算,6,34-43。
    秦聖翔、掌慶維 (2019)。技能導向與素養導向在體育課程。教學與評量之概念分析與實踐。臺中教育大學體育學系系刊,14,1-14。
    陳萩慈、掌慶維 (2017)。中學體育師資生實施理解式教學法之探究。教育研究與發展期刊,13(2),35-64。
    陳萩慈、掌慶維 (2015)。職前體育教師實施理解式教學之探討。中華體育季刊,29(4),265-272。
    唐儀君 (2015)。臺北市國民小學教師在資訊科技應用於教學的TPACK專業知能情形之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,台北市。
    許文凌 (2012)。樣本選擇的方法。家庭教育雙月刊,38。88-95。
    教育部 (2016)。高級中等以下學校教師專業發展評鑑規準。台北市。
    張偉豪 (2011)。 SEM 論文寫作不求人。三星統計發行。
    張祿純、徐偉庭 (2010)。體育教師反思專業發展之探討。臺灣體育論壇,創刊號,53-60。
    張媛甯、邱美雲 (2010)。台南市國民小學教師專業成長與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,69,63-82。
    張德銳、林縵君 (2016)。PBL在教學實習上的應用成效與困境之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(2),1-26。
    童羽薇 (2015)。探討設計思考如何應用於創新醫療照護服務-以遠距照護服務創新為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣大學,台北市。
    黃正杰(2016)。高中職體育教師教學信念及教學承諾之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
    黃品齊、葉錦樹、簡桂彬、梁至中 (2020)。體育教師教學自我效能與科技教學內容知識關係之探討。數位學習科技期刊,12(1),83-108。
    黃建翔、吳清山 (2013)。提升教師專業學習社群之可行策略研究:[資料導向決定]觀點。教育研究學報,47(1),39-58。
    黃嘉莉 (2013)。標準本位師資培育理念與實踐。國立臺灣師範大學出版中心。
    掌慶維 (2018)。體育教師專業學習社群 [推動素養導向體育教學的核心關鍵下]。學校體育,165,92-102。
    掌慶維、蔡瑀琳 (2018)。擴增實境於體育教學之應用。學校體育,169,103-112。
    楊松諺 (2018)。以教師專業發展評鑑指標試探師資生發展-某校教育系學生為例。臺灣教育評論月刊,7 (1)。206-213。
    楊俊鴻 (2016)。以核心素養為導向的體育課程與教學。學校體育,153,7-18。
    楊詠翔 (2012)。國民小學校長知識領導、教師專業發展與學校智慧資本關係之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。
    鄭淑文 (2011)。高雄市國小教學視導、教師專業發展評鑑與教師專業發展關係之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東市。
    漢寶德 (2012)。設計型思考。台北:聯經。
    潘玉龍 (2017)。智慧型手機的行動學習在體育教學應用之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(8),177-206。
    潘玉龍、陳五洲 (2016)。論我國資訊科技融入體育教學之應用。大專體育,138,40-54。
    蔡政宏、謝文惠 (2011)。應用科技內容教學知識 (TPACK) 理論架構發展資訊科技融入教學創新教學模式之啟示。新竹縣教育研究集刊,11。43-76。
    蔡威德 (2015)。設計思考導入地方體驗設計-以坪林為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。臺北科技大學,台北市。
    劉美慧、張玉山、練哲佑 (2016)。師培雲平臺設置之成效-以師培2020行動學習APP為例。教育脈動,8,106-119。
    劉庭吟 (2015)。運用設計思考探討化妝品專櫃人員工作之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。
    賴光真 (2019)。師資生教學實務能力檢測指標評量基準用後評析與修訂。雙溪教育論壇,8,1-21。
    謝麗媛 (2011)。國小數學教師使用萬用揭示板發展 TPACK 之行動研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。
    顏志龍、鄭中平 (2017)。傻瓜也會寫論文 (量化+質化增訂版):社會科學學位論文寫作指南,台北市,五南。
    簡桂彬、梁至中、陳素芬 (2017)。教學信念、年齡及科技教學與內容知識關係之探討。科學教育學刊,25(1),1-19。
    二、 英文部分
    Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2019). Auditing the TPACK confidence of pre-service teachers: The case of Saudi Arabia. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 1-21.
    Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2019). Auditing the TPACK confidence of pre-service teachers: The case of Saudi Arabia. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3393-3413.
    Alharbi, H. E. (2019). An Arabic Assessment Tool to Measure Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge. Computers & Education, 142, 103650.
    Andersen, H. V., & Pitkänen, K. (2019). Empowering educators by developing professional practice in digital fabrication and design thinking. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction,21, 1-16.
    Archambault, Leanna & Barnett, Joshua. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education. 55. 1656-1662.
    Armour, K., Quennerstedt, M., Chambers, F., & Makopoulou, K. (2017). What is ‘effective’CPD for contemporary physical education teachers? A Deweyan framework. Sport, education and society, 22(7), 799-811.
    Armstrong, T., & Johnson, I. L. (2019). Redesigning the Assessment Experience with Design Thinking: Using the Creative Process to Break Assessment Barriers: Column Editor: Anthony Parish. Strategies, 32(3), 41-48.
    Arslan, Y. (2015).Determination of technopedagogical content knowledge competencies of preservice physical education teachers: A Turkish sample. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(2), 225-241.
    Backman, E., & Barker, D. M. (2020). Re-thinking pedagogical content knowledge for physical education teachers–implications for physical education teacher education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1-13.
    Baser, D., Kopcha, T. J., & Ozden, M. Y. (2016). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 749-764.
    Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., & Huck, S. W. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 18(6), 1-13.
    Braga, L., Jones, E., Bulger, S., & Elliott, E. (2017). Empowering teachers to implement innovative content in physical education through continuous professional development. Teacher Development, 21(2), 288-306.
    Brent Heidorn (2015). Professional Development in Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance, 86(1), 3-5.
    Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86, 84-92.
    Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: HarperCollins e-books.
    Byrne, B. M. (2010). Multivariate applications series.Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
    Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37-53.
    Cengiz, C. (2015). The development of TPACK, Technology Integrated Self-Efficacy and Instructional Technology Outcome Expectations of pre-service physical education teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 411-422.
    Cetin-Berber, D., & Erdem, A. R. (2015). An investigation of Turkish pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Computers, 4(3), 234-250.
    Çeviker-Çınar, G., Mura, G., & Demirbağ-Kaplan, M. (2017). Design thinking: A new road map in business education. The Design Journal, 20(1), 977-987.
    Chai, C. S., Hwee Ling Koh, J., & Teo, Y. H. (2019). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360-384.
    Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193.
    Chang, Y., Jang, S. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2015). Assessing university students' perceptions of their Physics instructors' TPACK development in two contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1236-1249.
    Chen, N., Hong, H.Y., Chai, C.S., Liang, J.C., & Lin, P.Y. (2019). Developing a Scale for Preschool Teachers’ Design Thinking Engagement. American Educational Research Association. American.
    Chin, D. B., Blair, K. P., Wolf, R. C., Conlin, L. D., Cutumisu, M., Pfaffman, J., & Schwartz, D. L. (2019). Educating and measuring choice: A test of the transfer of design thinking in problem solving and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(3), 337-380.
    Diaz-Maggioli, G. (2004). Teacher-centered professional development. ASCD.
    Dong, Y., Chai, C. S., Sang, G. Y., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Exploring the profiles and interplays of pre-service and in-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in China. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 158-169.
    Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’and its application. Design studies, 32(6), 521-532.
    Duke, D. L. (1990). Developing teacher evaluation systems that promote professional growth. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 131-44.
    Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512-523.
    Edginton, C. R., Kirkpatrick, B., Schupbach, R., Phillips, C., Chin, M. K., & Chen, P. (2010). A Dynamic Pedagogy of Physical Education Teacher Preparation: Linking Practice with Theory. Asian Journal of Physical Education & Recreation, 16(2), 7-24.
    Essays, UK. (November 2018). Professional Development for Physical Education Teacher. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/personal-development/professional-development-for-physical-education-teacher.php?vref=1
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
    Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.
    Guskey, T. R., & Sparks, D. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
    Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
    Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229.
    Harris, J. B., Phillips, M., Koehler, M. J., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2017). TPCK/TPACK research and development: Past, present, and future directions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 1-8.
    Henriksen, D., Gretter, S., & Richardson, C. (2020). Design thinking and the practicing teacher: addressing problems of practice in teacher education. Teaching Education, 31(2), 209-229.
    Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking skills and Creativity, 26, 140-153.
    Hilton, J. T. (2016). A case study of the application of SAMR and TPACK for reflection on technology integration into two social studies classrooms. The Social Studies, 107(2), 68-73.
    Hooper. D., Coughlan. J., & Mullen. M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
    Hung, G. T., & Hong, H.-Y. (2017). Fostering innovation-oriented cultural views among college students through idea-centered, design-based knowledge-building pedagogy. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 168-182.
    Hwang, M. Y., Hong, J. C., & Hao, Y. W. (2018). The value of CK, PK, and PCK in professional development programs predicted by the progressive beliefs of elementary school teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 448-462.
    IDEO.org. (2011). The field Guide to Human-centered design. Retrieved from designkit: http://www.designkit.org/resources/1
    Jennrich, R. I., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Exploratory bi-factor analysis: The oblique case. Psychometrika, 77(3), 442-454.
    Johansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and innovation management, 22(2), 121-146.
    Kelley, D. (2002). Human-centered design. Retrieved from TED Talks: https://www.ted.com/talks/david _kelley_on_human_centered_design#t-1004674
    Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486-507.
    Kiray, S. A. (2016). Development of a TPACK self-efficacy scale for preservice science teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 527-541.
    Kline, R. B. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences.Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
    Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of design dispositions, lesson design practices, and their relationships with technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 378-391.
    Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer.
    Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of educational computing research, 32(2), 131-152.
    Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
    Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulatedlearning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434-447.
    Leandre R., Fabrigar L. R., Wegener D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Liang, J. C. (2015). Exploring the Relationships Between In-Service Preschool Teachers’ Perceptions of Classroom Authority and Their TPACK. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 471-479.
    Liang, J. C., Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Yang, C. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Surveying in-service preschool teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4).581-594.
    Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Shen, S. (2020). From Knowledge and Skills to Digital works: An Application of Design Thinking in the Information Technology Course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36,100646.
    Lin, P. Y., Hong, H. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Fostering college students’ design thinking in a knowledge-building environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 949-974.
    Liu, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R. E., & Chen, H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement goals among preservice physical education teachers. European Physical Education Review, 26(2), 375-391.
    Lorente-Catalán, E., & Kirk, D. (2016). Student teachers’ understanding and application of assessment for learning during a physical education teacher education course. European Physical Education Review, 22(1), 65-81.
    Luik, P., Taimalu, M., & Suviste, R. (2018). Perceptions of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) among pre-service teachers in Estonia. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 741-755.
    Luka, I. (2019). Design thinking in pedagogy: Frameworks and uses. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 499-512.
    Lund, J. L., & Veal, M. L. (2013). Assessment-driven instruction in physical education: A standards-based approach to promoting and documenting learning. Human Kinetics.
    Lynch, M., Kamovich, U., Longva, K. K., & Steinert, M. (2019). Combining technology and entrepreneurial education through design thinking: Students' reflections on the learning process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119689.
    MacPhail, A., Tannehill, D., & Karp, G. G. (2013). Preparing physical education preservice teachers to design instructionally aligned lessons through constructivist pedagogical practices. Teaching and teacher education, 33, 100-112.
    Martin, R., & Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press. Cambridge.
    Mercado, M. G. M., & Ibarra, F. P. (2019). ICT-Pedagogy Integration in Elementary Classrooms: Unpacking the Pre-service Teachers’ TPACK. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 3(1), 29-56.
    Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
    Mosely, G., Wright, N., & Wrigley, C. (2018). Facilitating design thinking: A comparison of design expertise. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 177-189.
    Moy, B., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2016). The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 517-538.
    Naaz, S., & Khan, Z. (2018). Measuring the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of Pre-service Teachers in relation to their Gender and Streams. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 22(1) 50-55.
    Nicholls, G. (2001). Professional development in higher education: New dimensions & directions. London, UK: Kogan.
    Nielsen, S. L., & Stovang, P. (2015). DesUni: university entrepreneurship education through design thinking. Education Training, 57(8/9), 977-991.
    Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking–A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637.
    Pasco, D. (2013). The potential of using virtual reality technology in physical activity settings. Quest, 65(4), 429-441.
    Phelps, A. (2018). Professional Development in Physical Education: University and K–12 Partnerships. Strategies, 31(4), 54-56.
    Pill, S., Penney, D., & Swabey, K. (2012). Rethinking sport teaching in physical education: A case study of research based innovation in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8),117-138.
    Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research, 82(3), 330-348.
    Redmond, P., & Peled, Y. (2018). Exploring TPACK among pre‐service teachers in Australia and Israel. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2040-2054.
    Sachs, J. (2003). Teacher professional standards: controlling or developing teaching?. Teachers and teaching, 9(2), 175-186.
    Sato, T., Tsuda, E., Ellison, D., & Hodge, S. R. (2020). Japanese elementary teachers’ professional development experiences in physical education lesson studies. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(2), 137-153.
    Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2017). On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model. Computers & Education, 112, 1-17.
    Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
    Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. psychology press.
    Semiz, K., & Ince, M. L. (2012). Pre-service physical education teachers´ technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructionaltechnology outcome expectations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1248-1265.
    Shih, C. L., & Chuang, H. H. (2013). The development and validation of an instrument for assessing college students' perceptions of faculty knowledge in technology-supported class environments. Computers & Education, 63, 109-118.
    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Education Researcher, 15(2), 4-21.
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
    Silverman, S., & Mercier, K. (2015). Teaching for physical literacy: Implications to instructional design and PETE. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 150-155.
    Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş:(temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları). Ekinoks.
    Tannehill, D., Demirhan, G., Čaplová, P., & Avsar, Z. (2020). Continuing professional development for physical education teachers in Europe. European Physical Education Review, 26(3) 1-18.
    Tou, N. X., Kee, Y. H., Koh, K. T., Camiré, M., & Chow, J. Y. (2020). Singapore teachers’ attitudes towards the use of information and communication technologies in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 26(2), 481-494.
    Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
    Wei Wang, Denise Schmidt-Crawford & Yi Jin (2018) Preservice Teachers' TPACK Development: A Review of Literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234-258.
    Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374-385.
    Wu, M. L. (2009). Structural equation model-the operation and application of AMOS. Chongqing: Chongqing People's Publishing House.
    Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2025/08/19
    QR CODE