本論文之比較分為三大部分：(一)樂曲背景--包含作曲家生平及兩曲之創
作經過。(二)作品內容比較--包含外在的樂曲分析及內在的創作內涵。創
作內涵又從樂曲的文學背景，進一步討論戲劇性及固定樂念的設計。(三)
指揮法的比較--基本的指揮法與作品風格及內涵的指揮比較。以此三大部
分為主幹，構成比較的架構，再將各部份研究所獲得的結論，匯集成總結
。文中所探討的各部份，其結論有的為證實而成，有的為歸納所得，有的
為研究發現。乞盼藉由樂曲比較，能為學術研究方法拓展新視野。

This essay's argument can be divided into three parts:
1.Musical Composition Background-Included composer's life and
the story of composing on the two pieces of original work.
2.Comparison of Works'Content-Included body musical analysis
and inner original works'content.Furthermore,original works'
content discussed the dramatization and the design of the fixed
reading technique from the literature background of the music.3.
Comparison of Conductors'Style-Comparison of the conductors'
style between the basic and the interpretat- ion of the work.
In summary, these three elements form the framework of the
comparison,and the results of comprehensive study for each part
form a whole.In the paper, part of the investigation focuses
on confirming conclusions,part focuses on the impressions one
receives, and part focuses on research findings.Comparative
analysis of musical work is enlighten- ing:resourceful
scholarly research can expand the field of vision.
This essay's argument can be divided into three parts: