研究生: |
許庭嫣 Hsu, Ting-Yen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以資料探勘方法探究 FACEBOOK 政治人物粉絲專頁網民角色分析 An Analysis of Audiences’ Roles on Politicians’ Facebook Fan Pages using Data Mining |
指導教授: |
謝吉隆
Hsieh, Ji-Lung |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 67 |
中文關鍵詞: | Facebook粉絲專頁 、民眾留言行為 、社群媒體 、資料分析 、資料探勘 |
英文關鍵詞: | roles on Facebook fanpage, roles on social media |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202887 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:214 下載:41 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究嘗試開發出一套可快速分析粉絲專頁中粉絲立場的系統。本論文以三位政治人物粉絲專頁為例,透過Facebook API撈取粉絲留言,並建置支持與不支持的詞彙列表,試圖快速地篩選出在一粉絲專頁中支持與不支持的留言粉絲與其留言。建置詞彙列表的方法為,透過人工標記判斷一留言為支持或不支持,並從該留言中擷取可作為詞彙列表的詞彙,評估方法為觀察準確率與召回率之變化。本研究透過抽樣詞彙列表判斷的結過給予人工進行標記,以來判斷該系統之品質。
實驗結果顯示,在支持方面,本研究所建立的詞彙庫能夠判斷出97.57%的朱立倫支持粉絲數,最少的是蔡英文粉絲團,僅能夠判斷出67.41%的支持粉絲數;在不支持粉絲數方面,則是蔡英文的最多,能夠偵測出32.58%,僅能偵測出朱立倫粉絲中的2.43%為不支持粉絲。比起支持詞彙列表,不支持詞彙列表的建置過程較為困難,原因為表達不支持的方式與詞彙較多,較不能如同支持詞彙般明確且較為固定。另外,不支持的留言往往會運用反諷的方式,留言中雖有支持的詞彙出現,但其語句意思實為不支持,因此提高了不支持詞彙列表增建的困難度。最後,本研究依據研究結果進行討論和提出未來研究相關建議。
This research aims to develop an agile system that can screen out the stands of fans who commented under the post of Facebook fanpage fast. The system contains data collection using Facebook API, data storage in MySQL and process of building supportive and non-supportive keyword lists. This research takes three politicians Facebook fanpages for example, by building up keyword lists from the result of annotation, we can quickly filter out the stands of fans and comments. This research uses recall and precision rate to evaluate the quality of keyword lists, and uses annotation to evaluate the quality of this system.
The result shows that Chu’s supportive keyword lists perform the best, and Tsai’s supportive keyword lists are the opposite. But when it comes to non-supportive keyword lists, Tsai’s keyword list outstands than others. We can refer that the building process of non-supportive keyword list is much more difficult than building up a supportive one. The reasons are the use of ironic wording and the way to express non-supportive stand varies.
Advice is given for the reference of future studies.
Adamic, L. A., Lento, T. M., Adar, E., & Ng, P. C. (2016). Information evolution in social networks. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 473-482). ACM.
Andrejevic, M. (2012). Ubiquitous surveillance. Routledge handbook of surveillance studies, 91-98.
Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9).
Blair, D. C., & Maron, M. E. (1985). An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 289-299.
Bond, R., & Messing, S. (2015). Quantifying social media’s political space: Estimating ideology from publicly revealed preferences on Facebook. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 62-78.
Flaherty, D. H. (1988). The emergence of surveillance societies in the western world: Toward the year 2000. Government Information Quarterly, 5(4), 377-387.
Fuchs, C., Boersma, K., Albrechtslund, A., & Sandoval, M. (2013). Internet and surveillance: The challenges of Web 2.0 and social media (Vol. 16). Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2010). Social software and Web 2.0: Their sociological foundations and implications. In Handbook of research on web 2.0, 3.0, and X. 0: technologies, business, and social applications (pp. 763-789). IGI Global.
Gandy, O. H. (1989). The surveillance society: information technology and bureaucratic social control. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 61-76.
Grohol, J. M. (2014). Emotional contagion on Facebook? More like bad research methods. World of Psychology.
Groshek, J., & Al-Rawi, A. (2013). Public Sentiment and Critical Framing in Social Media Content During the 2012 U.S. Presidential Campaign. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 563-576. doi:10.1177/0894439313490401
Gustafsson, N. (2012). The subtle nature of Facebook politics: Swedish social network site users and political participation. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1111-1127.
Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159-1168.
Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53-78. doi:10.1086/228951
Hille, S., & Bakker, P. (2014, 04). Engaging the Social News User. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 563-572. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.899758
James, M. L., Wotring, C. E., & Forrest, E. J. (1995, 01). An exploratory study of the perceived benefits of electronic bulletin board use and their impact on other communication activities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(1), 30-50. doi:10.1080/08838159509364287
Johnson, T. J., & Perlmutter, D. D. (2010). Introduction: the Facebook election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 554-559.
Ju, A., Jeong, S. H., & Chyi, H. I. (2013, 04). Will Social Media Save Newspapers? Journalism Practice, 8(1), 1-17. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.794022
Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788-8790.
Lazer, D., Pentland, A. S., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A. L., Brewer, D., ... & Jebara, T. (2009). Life in the network: the coming age of computational social science. Science , 323(5915), 721.
Marx, G. T. (2002). What's New About the" New Surveillance"? Classifying for Change and Continuity. Surveillance & Society, 1 (1), 9-29.
Rudder, C. (2014). Dataclysm: Who we are (when we think no one's looking). Random House Canada.
Trottier, D. (2016). Social media as surveillance: Rethinking visibility in a converging world. Routledge.
Trottier, D., & Lyon, D. (2012). Key features of social media surveillance. Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web, 2, 89-105.
Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(3), 107-114.
Quandt, T. (2011, 04). Understanding a New Phenomenon. Participatory Journalism Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, 155-176. doi:10.1002/9781444340747.ch9
Reich, Z. (2011, 04). User Comments. Participatory Journalism Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, 96-117. doi:10.1002/9781444340747.ch6
Williamson, Debra A. (2011), “Worldwide Social Network Ad Spending: A Rising Tide”, eMarketer.com. Retrieved 26-02-2011 from [http://www. emarketer.com/Report.aspx?code=emarketer_2000692]
方念萱,蘇彥豪(1998)。網路傳播中的對話與對峙-以女性主義連線版的言說為例。新聞學研究,56,183-218。
王泰俐(2013)。 臉書選舉?2012年台灣總統大選社群媒體對政治參與行為的影響。東吳政治學報, 31(1), 1-52。
李紹良(2011)。十五萬人的BBS是如何煉成的:批踢踢實業坊技術演變歷程之研究(1995-2008)。國立政治大學社會科學系學位論文。
陳尚群(2011)。 網路匿名性對虛擬社群成員發佈文章之影響--以 Facebook 與 BBS為例。中央大學資訊管理學系學位論文,1-79。
蔡昇峰(2008)。〈PTT 鄉民現象〉。上網日期:2017 年 4 月 20 日。 http://castnet.nctu.edu.tw/view.htm?ar_pk=161。
劉于瑄(2011)。個人圖資部落格回應行為之研究.。臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所學位論文,1-114。