簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 趙芷萱
Chao, Chih-Hsuan
論文名稱: 數位機會於行動式擴增實境學習成效之探討
The Effects of Digital Opportunity on Mobile Augmented Reality Learning
指導教授: 王健華
Wang, Chien-Hwa
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 圖文傳播學系
Department of Graphic Arts and Communications
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 90
中文關鍵詞: 擴增實境數位機會數位落差碳足跡
英文關鍵詞: augmented reality, digital opportunity, digital divide, carbon footprint
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:98下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究假設行動式擴增實境學習可以減低數位機會程度對於數位學習的影響。首先透過數位機會指標了解國小高年級學生數位機會程度的現況,並藉由行動式擴增實境學習之活動,探討學生在進行行動式擴增實境學習活動時,數位機會程度差異對學生學習成效的影響情形。研究以與日常生活緊密關切的碳足跡為主題進行教學活動。研究對象募集新北市國民小學五、六年級學生計四十四人,在進行過行動擴增實境學習活動後,再實施問卷調查,以了解學生在此種行動式擴增實境學習的方式之下,不同數位機會的學生在學習成就、學習經驗上是否有所差異以及差異為何。研究結果發現在數位機會程度表現上,六年級的數位機會程度高於五年級生,顯見確實有數位機會程度上的差異。而所有受試學生在運用行動式擴增實境進行學習活動後,皆有效地提升了碳足跡單元的學習成就。並且,不同整體數位機會程度之學生,在學習成就方面並不存在顯著差異,顯示不同數位機會程度的學生在透過行動式擴增實境進行碳足跡學習活動,皆能獲得良好的學習成就。而在學習經驗上高數位機會程度的學生表現優於低數位機會程度的學生,顯示在學習經驗上仍會因為學生的數位程度而造成影響。整體結論可提供教育工作者未來在考量學生數位落差以及運用行動式擴增實境進行教學時之參考。

    This paper aims to investigate the current situation of digital opportunity of 5th- and 6th-grade elementary school students and to examine the learning effect of mobile augmented reality on the students in terms of their personal digital opportunity. Carbon footprint was selected as the topic in accordance with the instruction objective. The research subjects were forty-four (44) 5th- and 6th-grade students in New Taipei city, Taiwan. Carbon footprint was employed as the subject matter. A Personal Digital Opportunity Questionnaire and a subject-matter proficiency test were conducted before the experiment. After receiving the mobile augmented reality learning activity, a parallel proficiency test and a Learning Experience Questionnaire were given for evaluating their progress on subject-matter knowledge and investigating differences on learning experiences among students with various digital opportunities. The results show that 6th-grade students outperformed 5th-grade students with regards to digital opportunity, which clearly indicates differences between these two grades of students existed. Overall, all students have significant improvement on subject-matter knowledge. However, no significant differences were found between students with high and low digital opportunities. It implies that mobile augmented reality could greatly enhance the academic performance regardless of the levels of digital opportunity. With regard to learning experience, students with high digital opportunity outperformed those with low digital opportunity, which signals that learning experience was influenced by digital opportunity. These results could provide pedagogical implications for designing adaptive mobile augmented reality instruction.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 iii 表目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 6 第三節 研究問題 6 第四節 研究範圍與限制 8 第五節 名詞釋義 9 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 擴增實境與教育 11 第二節 數位機會 19 第三節 碳足跡 30 第三章 研究方法 36 第一節 研究架構 36 第二節 研究流程 37 第三節 研究對象 39 第四節 研究工具 40 第五節 教材設計 47 第六節 研究實施 53 第七節 資料處理及分析 55 第四章 研究結果與討論 57 第一節 數位機會程度分析 57 第二節 行動式擴增實境學習活動之學習成效分析 61 第三節 不同數位機會之學習成就分析 62 第四節 不同數位機會之學習經驗分析 65 第五章 結論與建議 67 第一節 研究結論 67 第二節 研究建議 70 參考文獻 72 附錄 77

    一、 中文文獻
    王國政、柯炳式、程麗華(2012)。建構公平數位機會。研考雙月刊,36(6),80-89。
    王等元(2009)。E時代教育機會均等的新挑戰-數位賦能觀點。課程與教學,12(4),1-29。
    王維洸(2015)。連動式多影像擴增實境之潮汐模擬教學系統開發(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺灣師範大學。臺北市。
    朱乙仲(2010)擴增實境介紹與應用於數位學習環境分析。數位典藏與學習電子報,9(1)。取自於:http://newsletter.teldap.tw/news/HaveYourSayContent_en.php?nid=2876&lid=341
    行政院研究發展考核委員(2006)。中小學生數位能力與數位學習機會調查報告。取自: http://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/10/relfile/0/1000/774935671.pdf
    行政院研究發展考核委員(2012)。101年個人家戶數位機會調查報告。取自: http://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/10/relfile/0/1000/312113493071.pdf
    行政院研究發展考核委員(2012)。建構我國數位機會發展指標體系之研究。取自: http://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/10/relfile/0/1000/2768593071.pdf
    行政院研究發展考核委員(2014)。專題報導-102年數位機會調查摘要。政府機關資訊通報,(315),http://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=6B589C6880971817。
    行政院研究發展考核委員(2015)。專題報導-103年數位機會調查。政府機關資訊通報,(327),http://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=FB819F0C10104C0A。
    行政院環保署台灣產品碳足跡資訊網(2015)。何謂碳足跡。取自: http://cfp.epa.gov.tw/carbon/ezCFM/Function/PlatformInfo/FLConcept/FLFootIntroduction.aspx
    余國頌(2010)。臺北縣國小五年級學童碳足跡相關概念認知與態度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 臺北市立教育大學。臺北市。
    吳清山、林天佑(2009)。教育名詞-數位包容。教育資料與研究雙月刊,86,199-200。
    呂智惠(2014)。科普閱讀指導。取自: http://140.122.127.190/vjs/vj-attachment/103advanced_e/1-2-4%E5%91%82%E6%99%BA%E6%83%A0%E5%B8%AB(%E6%9B%B4%E6%96%B0).pdf
    林欣玫(2007)。影響數位學習學習成效之相關因素探討。台北市資訊教育人員國際交流論文集,台北:臺北市教師研習中心。
    邱美虹(2013)。科學教學的新典範—行動科技、擴增實境與 3D 實驗影片教學。台灣化學教育,取自: http://chemed.chemistry.org.tw/?p=3267
    孫維新、張俊彥、劉德祥、卓詠欽(2013)。科學素養白皮書。教育部提升國民素養專案辦公室。
    康國裕(2001)。落實能源教育的重要性。技術及職業教育,62,2-4。
    張聖麟(2005)。從過去到未來:科技的進化與進步。生活科技教育月刊,38(1),36-46。
    張懷文(2002)。數位落差初探。美國資訊科學與技術學會台北學生分會會訊,15,75-96。
    許維容(2013)。數位能力對應用延伸式擴增實境學習科普知識成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺灣師範大學。臺北市。
    陳年興、楊錦潭(2006)。數位學習理論與實務,博碩文化公司,台北市。
    陳志銘(2009)。創新數位學習模式與教學應用。臺北市:文華。
    曾淑芬(2002)。數位落差。資訊社會研究,2,234-237。
    項靖(2003)。邁向資訊均富:我國數位落差現況之探討。東吳政治學報,16,127-180。
    黃昭銘、宋順亨、張至文、鄭文玄(2014)。行動科技融入國小數學「分數」學習活動之研究。教育科技與學習,2(2),189-206。
    楊正宏、林燕珍、張俊陽、曾憲雄(2008)。台灣高等教育數位學習現況與展望。數位學習科技期刊,1(1),1-12。
    楊淑如(2007)。影響數位學習之因素:互動性與知覺娛樂性(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立台北大學。臺北市。
    資策會FIND(2014)。2014臺灣消費者行動裝置暨APP使用行為研究調查報告。取自: http://www.iii.org.tw/m/News-more.aspx?id=1475
    鄒壯翼、王燕超(2009)。影視科技之創新與發展:擴增實境應用與評析。在銘傳大學傳播學院/銘報新聞社主辦,2009傳播管理學術研討會:數位傳播產業創新與挑戰,台北市。
    廖金培(2014)。國民小學數位落差影響機制之研究-多層次模式的檢驗(未出版之博士論文)。 國立臺北教育大學。臺北市。
    劉正達、李孝先(2010)。國中小教師資訊素養與數位落差現況之研究。學校行政,(66),61-83。
    劉俊庚、邱美虹(2012)。我國小學科學課程演進與回顧(上)。科學教育月刊,351,2-14。
    劉雯瑜(2006)。偏遠社區縮短數位落差之歷程研究(未出版之博士論文)。 國立雲林科技大學。雲林縣。
    蔡穎(2015)。環署長:台灣科普教育出問題 民眾要有警覺性。自由時報。生活版。取自: http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1362707
    薛文珍(2002)。實則虛、虛則實。科學人雜誌,4,45。

    二、 英文文獻
    AAAS 2061 (1989). Science for all Americans online Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm
    Asai, K., Kobayashi, H., & Kondo, T. (2005). Augmented instructions-a fusion of augmented reality and printed learning materials. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2005. ICALT 2005: Fifth IEEE International Conference on (pp. 213-215)
    Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
    Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 21(6), 34-47.
    Billinghurst, M. (2002). Augmented reality in education [New Horizons for Learning]. Retrieved from http://www.solomonalexis.com/downloads/ar_edu.pdf
    Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, (7), 56-63.doi:10.1109/MC.2912.111.
    Binks, T. (2003). The impact and potential future impact of augmented reality on education.
    Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536-544.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017
    Chang, H. -Y., Wu, H. -K., & Hsu, Y. -S. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socioscientific issue. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 95-99.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01379.x
    Chen, C. H., Howard, B. (2010). Effect of live simulation on middle school students' attitudes and learning toward science. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 133-139.
    Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618-1627.doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.004
    Cocciolo, A. & Rabina, D. (2013). Does place affect user engagement and understanding? Mobile learner perceptions on the streets of New York. Journal of Documentation, 69(1), 98-120.doi:10.1108/00220411311295342
    Cohen, P. (2007). Macworld Expo Keynote Live Update. Retrieved from http://www.macworld.com/article/1054764/liveupdate.html
    Cuendet, S., Bonnard, Q., Do-Lenh, S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Designing augmented reality for the classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 557-569.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.015
    DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
    Edwards, R. (2003). GNS and other matters of role-playing theory [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://www.indie-rpgs.com/articles/3/
    Egboka, P. N., Anadi, C. C., & Ofojebe, W. (2010). Information Use for Staff Collegiality in Public Secondary Schools in Nigeria: Barriers and Enhancement Strategies. Lwati: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 7(2).
    El Sayed, N. A., Zayed, H. H., & Sharawy, M. I. (2011). ARSC: Augmented reality student card. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1045-1061.
    Erkan, S., Akkoyunlu, B. Ve Tuğrul, B. (2010). Internet usage of teachers and heir digital empowerment. International Educational Technology Conference, Istanbul: Bosphorous University
    Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. doi:10.2791/82116
    Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., & Sánchez, A. (2014). Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 434-445.
    Frank, M., Reich, N., & Humphreys, K. (2003). Respecting the human needs of students in the development of e-learning. Computers & Education, 40(1), 57-70.doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00095-7
    Gentes, A., Guyot-Mbodji, A., & Demeure, I. (2010). Gaming on the move: urban experience as a new paradigm for mobile pervasive game design. Multimedia Systems, 16(1), 43-55.
    ITU (2005). Measuring digital opptunity. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/itu-wsis/2005/DOI%20V2.pdf
    Juan, C., Beatrice, F., & Cano, J. (2008, July). An augmented reality system for learning the interior of the human body. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on (pp. 186-188)
    Kelley, T, L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1),17–24.
    Kesim, M., & Ozarslanb, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia - Social And Behavioral Sciences. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.654
    Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New media & society, 9(4), 671-696.doi:10.1177/1461444807080335
    Mason, J., & Pillay, H. (2015). Opening Digital Learning for Deeper Inquiry. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=zHnABgAAQBAJ&lr=&hl=zh-TW
    Matsutomo, S., Miyauchi, T., Noguchi, S., & Yamashita, H. (2012). Real-Time Visualization System of Magnetic Field Utilizing Augmented Reality Technology for Education. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 48(2), 531-534.doi:10.1109/TMAG.2011.2174208
    McCall, R., Wetzel, R., Löschner, J., & Braun, A-K. (2011). Using presence to evaluate an augmented reality location aware game. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(1), 25–35.
    Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the reality-Virtuality Continuum. elemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, SPIE 2351, 282-292.
    Natriello, G. (2001). Bridging the Second Digital Divide: What Can Sociologists of Education Contribute. Sociology of Education, 260-265.doi:10.2307/2673278
    OECD (2001). Understanding the digital divide OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf
    Pea, R. D., & Maldonado, H. (2006). WILD for learning: Interacting through new computing devices anytime, anywhere. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 852-886.
    Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
    Riel, J., Christian, S., & Hinson, B. (2012). Charting digital literacy: A framework for information technology and digital skills education in the community college. Presentado en Innovations. Retrieved from http://jeremyriel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/ChartingDigitalLiteracy.pdf
    Sema Altun-Yalçln, Sibel AçıŞlı, Ümit Turgut. (2011). Determining the levels of pre-service science teachers’ scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the education faculties about developing scientific literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 783-787.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.185.
    Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. Proceedings of The First IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop, 1-8.
    Solak, E., & Cakır, R. (2015). Exploring the effect of materials designed with augmented reality on language learners’ vocabulary learning. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2).
    Trucano, M. (2014). Bad practices in mobile learning [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://blogs.worldbank.org/edutech/bad-practices-mobile-learning
    Van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide Inequality in the information society. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=-k12AwAAQBAJ&source=ge-web-app
    Zhong, Z. J. (2011). From access to usage: The divide of self-reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers & Education, 56(3), 736-746.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.016

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE