本研究的目的有三：（一）探討並統整社會動機理論與動機調整理論，建構「國中學生動機調整社會化歷程模式」，並考驗其適配度。（二）考驗本研究者所設計的「動機調整策教學方案」對國中八年級學生動機調整策略的效果。（三）考驗本研究者所設計的「動機調整教學方案」對國中八年級學生理化科學習成就的效果。
為完成前述研究目的，本研究進行研究一和研究二，共兩個研究。所使用的工具包括：家庭經驗量表、學校經驗量表、同儕經驗量表、動機調整策略量表、理化科第一次、第二次和第三次成就測驗，以及「快樂魔法教室」光碟和學習手冊等。
在研究一裡，本研究者首先提出一個以理化科為特定領域，包含家庭經驗、學校經驗、同儕經驗、動機調整策略、和理化科學習成就等五個成份的「動機調整社會化歷程模式」，並以臺灣地區北、中、南三區共609名國中八年級學生為研究對象。蒐集所得的資料先以PRELRS2.50版統計套裝軟體進行多變項常態分配假設的考驗，再使用LISREL8.50版統計套裝軟體，以一般加權最小平方法( generally weighted least –squares ,WLS )進行模式參數的估計。結果發現初始模式無法合理解釋國中學生的動機調整社會化歷程。因此，本研究再進行模式的修改，並重新對修改後的模式進行參數估計。修正的結果發現除了易受樣本數影響的卡方考驗外，在基本適配度、整體模式適配度和模式內在結構適配度等方面，都顯示出良好的適配度指數。然而本修正模式是經過數次模式再界定的過程而得的，未來應再以其他觀察資料進行本模式的考驗，以探討模式通則化的可能性。
研究二主要目的在教導國中學生科學學習動機調整的各種重要策略，並探討動機調整教學方案對國中生動機調整和理化學業成就的效果。在動機調整的效果研究方面，本研究採2（實驗組、控制組）× 2（前測、後測）受試者間、受試者內混合設計來考驗動機調整策略的教學效果。受試者來自台北市文山區景興國中共154名的八年級學生，其中實驗組78人，控制組76人。所蒐集的資料以二因子混合設計變異數分析進行考驗。實驗組接受十二週，共27小時的「動機調整教學方案」，控制組則不接受任何實驗處理，只接受一般綜合活動的教學。
在學業成就的效果評估方面，研究二另採準實驗設計，蒐集兩組受試第一次、第二次及期末理化科成就測驗的成績，做為本研究之前測（共變量）、中測和後測的依變量。研究結果發現實驗處理六週後，兩組受試者在理化科成就測驗的中測（第二次段考）表現上沒有差異。但在十二週的「動機調整教學方案」結束後，立即實施後測（理化期末考），發現實驗組和控制組在理化科的學業成就表現有顯著差異。這顯示本研究者所設計的「動機調整教學方案」之各種成份可以透過長期且有計劃的教學方式教給國中學生，而且也支持動機調整策略對提升國中學生理化科成績有不錯的促進效果。
最後，研究者針對研究結果加以討論，且提出幾點建議，做為學習輔導、親職教育以及未來研究的參考。

The purposes of this study were to: (1)explore and integrate social motivation model and motivational regulation theory , and construct the Socialization Process Model of Motivational Regulation for Junior High School Students (2) to evaluate the quality of aforemodification model with empricial data (3) to evaluate the effects of Motivational Regulation Teaching Program (MRTR, for short) developed by the author.
In order to accomplish these purposes, the whole study was divided into study Ⅰ, and Ⅱ. The instruments employed in this study include: Family Experience Inventory, School Experience Inventory, Peers Experience Inventory, Intristic Motivation Regulation Inventory, Extrinsic Motivation Regulation Inventory, Emotion Regulation Inventory, Volition control Inventory, Environment Resource Management Inventory, Defensive Strategy Inventory, and Science Achievements Tests.
In study Ⅰ, the researcher proposed the Motivational Regulation Socialization Process Model which included the components of family experience, school experience, peers experience, motivational regulation, and science performance , and then verified the goodness of fit of the motivational regulation socialization process. The Participants were 609 eighth-grade students from nineteen junior high schools in Taiwan northern, central and southern area. The researcher first tested of acquired data the hypothesis of multivariate normality distribution with PRELES 2.50 and then estimated the parameters of model by means of generally weighted least –squares( WLS ) with LISREL 8.50.
The result showed that the initial model could not give a good account of the motivational regulation socialization process for high school students, and the statistic results did not seem reasonable, either. Therefore, the researcher revised the model, and evaluated the parameters of the revised model. After revision, the evaluation results showed that the Motivational Regulation Socialization Process Model of Science Performance for Junior high school students showed good fit index in preliminary, overall, and internal structure model fit criteria. Though the process of model generation, however, has been revised, the model should be tested with other observation data in future, to see if the model could further be generalized.
In Study Ⅱ, the researcher first designed a motivational regulation teaching program and examined the effects of the program. The subjects were selected from an junior high school in Taipei City. They were students of eighth grade and were randomly assigned to the experimental group or control group. The experimental group received twelve units( 27 hours ) MRTP( which was named Happy Magic Lessons in the study)developed by the present author, while the control group just received general instruction.
In Study Ⅱ, the researcher adopted 2 (treatment) × 2 (statge) pretest-posttest experimental design. Four instruments were used in this study. They were Happy Magic Lesson Disks, worksheets, Science Achievements Tests and Motivation Regulation Inventory (which included Intristic Motivation Regulation Inventory, Extrinsic Motivation Regulation Inventory, Emotion Regulation Inventory, Volition control Inventory, Environment Resource Management Inventory, and Defensive Pessimism Strategy Inventory).Both of two groups were administred the pre-test one week before the experimental teaching, and the post-test one week after the experimental teaching. The results showed that the MRTP could promote motivation regulation of the experimental group.The experimental group performed better than the control group in the majority of motivation regulation variables on the post-test .But the experimental group did not find differences in aforementioned variables on the post-test.
In addition, both of two groups were administered the per-test(the first mothly examination ) one week before the experimental treatment , the mid-test ( the second mothly examination ) six weeks after the experimental teaching, and the final test ( the third mothly examination )
one week after the experimental teaching. The obtained data on the Science achievements were analyzed by one-way Covariate statistics to test the MRTR performance progress effect on the second mothly examination score and the third mothly examination score .
The findings were as follow:
1.There was no significant effect on the second mothly examination score.
2.The MRTP made the experimental group and control group significantly different on the third mothly examination score.
To sum, based on the results of study Ⅰand Ⅱ, the effects of Motivational Regulation teaching program is supported mostly. The researcher also provided a discussion on the results of the study and some suggestions about the program. Some recommendations have made regarding instructional assistance ,parent education and future research.

Key words： motivational regulation 、self-regulation 、
social motivation 、science learning

參考書目
一、中文部分
公克晨華譯（1991）。成功者的十大行動指南。台北：方智。
王明傑（2003）。國小學生自我調整學習模式之驗證暨應用性向與事件評量融入社會領域之自我調整閱讀理解教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文。
米山正信（2002）。理科資優生. 1, 20位科學家的研究精神與成長故事。台北：林鬱文化。
吳宗遠譯（2000）。（Susan V. Bosak著）。發現科學. 11, 應用科學。台北 : 遠哲基金會。
吳明燁（2002）。比較家庭系統中結構性與關係性資源對於青少年學業成就影響（初稿）。家庭系統量化實徵研究學術研討會。中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所主辦。
李旻樺。（2002）。高中學生之自我效能、成功期望、學習策略、學習任務價值與課業學習動機調整策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文。
李淑珺譯。（2004）。（Cyndi Crother & The Crew of world Famous Pike Place Fish作）。小魚舖,大奇蹟。台北 : 張老師
何權峰（2002）。別扣錯第一顆扣子。台北：高寶國際。
金毅泉、邱賢淑譯（1998）。世界科學家。台北 : 國際少年村。
林松齡。（1999）。母親對子女學業成就的影響：文化資本、經濟資源、與監督角色的比較。台大社會學刊，27期，頁71-105。
林桑瑜。（2002）。高中生自我調整學習策略之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林清山、程炳林（1997）。國中生學習行動控制模式的建構與驗證暨教學輔導策略實施方案效果之研究（I）。國科會專案研究報告。NSC86-2413-H-003- 010-G10。
林清文（2003）。高中高職學生基礎學科自我調整課業學習策略研究。中華輔導學報，13期，頁1-44。
林瓊瑤（2002)英語科學習動機調整訓練團體對高中生自我效能、學習動機及課業成就之影響。國立彰化師大諮商與輔導研究所碩士論文。
幸倉光輝（2003）。墨菲成功法則。台北 : 新潮社。
洪寶蓮（1996）。內在動機與情意學習方案之發展及其團體輔導效能。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文。
洪蘭譯（1997）。學習樂觀.樂觀學習～提升EQ的ABCDE法則。（Martin E. P. Seligman著）。台北：遠流。
徐筱春譯（2003）。突破你的極限 : 邁向成功的動機培訓。（Jurgen Holler著）。台北 : 聯經。
張文亮（1999）。電學之父 : 法拉第的故事。台北 : 文經。
張易久（2003）不是不可能～思路決定出路。台北：海鴿。
張景媛（1991）。大學生認知風格、動機與自我調整因素、後設認知與學業成就關係之研究。教育心理學報，24，頁141-165。
張景媛（1994）國中生數學學習歷程統整模式的驗證與應用：學生建構數學概念的分析及數學文字提數學教學策略之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
梁雲霞譯（2003）。大腦知識與教學。（Eric Jensen著）。台北：遠流。
黃芳銘（2003）。結構方程模式─理論與應用。台北：五南。
黃沼元（2004）。台灣科學教室. [1]。台北: 稻田。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2003）。多變量分析方法—統計軟體應用。台北：五南。
陳秀娟譯（1996）。夢想，改造一生。（Les Brown著）。台北：天下。
陳嘉皇、郭順利、黃俊傑、蔡玉慧、吳雅玲、侯天麗譯（2003）。自我調整學習─教學理論與實務。(D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman編)台北：心理。
陳嘉成（2002）。成就目標、行動控制取向與數學能力知覺的中介效果對國中生數學學習行為組型之關係研究。教育與心理研究，25期，頁629-656。
彭一昌編著（2001）。社會新鮮人必修的70個學分。台北：世茂。
黑幼龍、黑立言（2002）。一根弦的小提琴 : 36個讓你想快樂就快樂的生命智慧。台北：平裝本。
程炳林（1995）自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
程炳林（2000）。行動或狀態導向、目標層次、工作複雜度對國中生行動控制策略與工作表現之影響。教育心理學報，31卷，1期，頁67-92。
程炳林（2002）。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報，47卷1期，頁39-58。
程炳林、林清山（1999）。國中學習行動控制模式之驗證及行動控制變項與學習適應之關係。教育心理學報，31卷1期，頁1-35。
程炳林、林清山（2002）。學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報，34卷1期，頁43-60。
葉永烈編著（1991）。科學家故事100個。台北: 富春。
楊岫穎（2003）。國中生自我設限的情境及歷程因素之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
楊國樞（1992）。中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦編：「中國人的心理與行為：理念及方法篇（一九九二）」。台北：桂冠。
楊慶鎂、葉莉齡譯。（2002）（竹內均編著）。不可思議的自然界 : 蜻蜓如何「洗澡」。台北 : 新自然主義。
趙丁編著（2004）。讀懂人生～一部關於成長的人生啟迪。台北：培育文化。
趙世洲（2000）。不知道的世界.物理篇。新竹：凡異。
賓靜蓀、王悅懌譯（2001）。(James M. Banner, Jr., ＆ Harold C. Cannon著)。 Learning，跳出井底看天下。台北：天下。
蔣恩芬（2000）。學習動機相關因素探討與學習動機方案成效研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
劉兆明（2001）。工作動機的整合模式：概念架構的發展與初步分析。中華心理學刊，43卷2期，頁189-206。
劉宗寅、呂志清（2000）。不知道的世界.化學篇。新竹：凡異。
劉傑主編（2003）。目標,是成功的起點。台北：達觀。
鄭燿男、陳怡靖（1999）。台灣地區家庭背景對就讀公/私立學校與受教育年數的影響：並檢證文化資本論、財務資本論、社會資本論之適用性。國民教育研究學報，6期，頁103-140。
賴爾柔（1989）。家庭親職功能及其青少年學業成就關係之研究。思與言，26卷6期，頁606-627。
戴晨志（1999）。激勵高手 : 戰勝挫折、讓夢想永不停航。台北 : 時報文化。
戴晨志.（2001）。受用一生的智慧。台北 : 圓神。
薛承泰（1996）。影響國中教育分流的實徵分析：性別、省籍、與家庭背景的差異。台灣社會學刊，20期，頁49-84。
嚴立楷譯（2002）。（Guy Fineley Dr. Ellen Dickstein合著）。遠離親密敵人。台北：檢書堂。
蘇嘉玲（2004）。國中生行動/狀態導向、目標導向與動機調整策略之關係。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部分
Ailly, H. (2003). Children’s autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 84-96.
Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., & Paker, D. (1997). College instruction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 125-146.
Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerrantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 111-123.
Ames, C. (1990). The relationship of achievement goals to student motivation in classroom setting. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Ames, C. (1992a). Classroom: Goal, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-272.
Ames, C. (1992b). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp.327-348). Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1987). Mothers’ Belief about the role of ability and effort in school learning. Journal of Education Psychology, 79(4), 409-414.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Anderman, E. M., & Maechr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287-309.
Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 811-831.
Anderman, E. M., Maechr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131-147.
Anderman, L. H. (1999). Classroom goal orientation, school belonging, and social goals as predictors of students’ positive and negative affect following the transition to middle school. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 89-103.
Andersson ,E. (2003). Who is a successful student from the perspective of university teachers in two developments? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research.47:5,543-559.
Austin, A. B., & Draper, D. C. (1984). The relationship among peer acceptance, social impact, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 597-604.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Baker, A. J. (1997). Improving parent involvement programmes and practice: A qualitative study of teacher perceptions. The School Community Journal, 7, 27-55.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficiency: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Education Research Journal, 32, 627-658.
Beach, S. R. H., Tesser, A., Fincham, F. D., Jones, D. J., Johnson, D. & Whitaker, D. J. (1998). Pleasure and pain in doing well, together: Am investigation of performance-related affect in close relationships. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 74, 923-938.
Beardlee, W. R., Jacob-son, A. N., Hauser, S. T., Noam, G. G., & Powers, S. (1985). An approach of evaluating adolescent adaptive processes: Scale development and reliability. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychuatry, 24(5),637-642。
Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education. 19(2),151-161.
Berger, E. H. (1995). Parents as partners in education: families and schools working together. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Berndt, T. J. (1999). Friends’ influence on students’ adjustment to school. Educational Psychologist, 34(1), 15-28.
Berndlt, T. J. (1999). Friends’ influence on students’ adjustment to school. Educational Psychology, 15, 608-616.
Berndlt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312-1329.
Berndlt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1996). Friends’ influence on school adjustment: A motivational analysis. In J. Juvonen & K. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: understanding children’s school adjustment (pp.248-278). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berndlt, T. J., Laychak, A. E., & Park, K. (1990). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ academic achievement motivation: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 664-670.
Berndlt, T. J., Miller, K. E., & Park, K. (1989). Adolescents’ perceptions of friends’ and parents’ influence on aspects of their school adjustment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 9, 419-435.
Berndt, T. J. (1999). Friends’ influence on students’ adjustment to school. Educational Psychologist, 34, 15-28.
Berndt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312-1329.
Berndt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1996). Friends’ influence on school adjustment: A motivational analysis. In J. Juvonen & K. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp.248-278). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berndt, T. J., & Perry, T. B. (1986). Children’s perceptions of friends as supportive relationships. Development Psychology, 82, 664-670.
Berndt, T. J., Hawkins, J. A. & Jiao, Z. (1999). Influence of friends and friendships on adjustment to junior high school. Merrill-palmer Quarterly, 45, 13-41.
Berndt, T. J., Laychak, A. E., & Park, K. (1990). Friends’ influence on adjustments’ academic achievement motivation: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 664-670.
Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992). Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 272-281.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy, makers, educator, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
Boekaerts, M. (2005). Self-regulation: With a focus on the self-regulation of motivation and effort. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.), & I. E. Sigel & K. A. Renninger (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 4, Child Psychology in practice (6th edn.). New York: Wiley.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317-329.
Boyle, E. A., Duffy, T., & Dunleavy, K. (2003) Learning styles and academic outcome: The validity and utility of Vermunt’s inventory of learning styles in British higher education setting. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 267-290.
Brady, K. L., & Eisler, R. M. (1999). Sex and gender in the college classroom: Analysis of faculty-student interactions and perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 127-145.
Brten, I. & Olaussen, B. S. (1998). The relationship between motivational beliefs and learning strategy use among Norwegian college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 182-194.
Brich, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Interpersonal relationships in the school environment and children’s early school adjustment: The role of teachers and peers. In J. Juvonen & K. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 199-225). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, B. B. (1989). The role of peer groups in adolescents’ adjustment to secondary school. In T. J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp.188-215). New York: Wiley.
Brown, B. B., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S. D., Steinberg, L. (1993). Parented practices and peer group affliliation in adolescence. Child development, 64, 467-482.
Burrell, K., Tao, Simpson & Mendez-Berrueta, H. (1997). How do you know what we are preparing our students for? A reality check of one university’s academic literacy demands.
Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1998) Learning styles: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 427-441.
Carr, S., Weigand, D. A., & Jones, J. (2000). The relative influence of parents, peers, and sporting heroes on goal orientations of children and adolescents in sport. Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 6(2), 34-54.
Carpenter, P. (1986). The education of professionals. Education and Society. 3(4),38-51. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education,13,55-70.
Cauce, A. M., Felner, R. D., & Primavera, J. (1982). Social support in high-risk adolescents: Structural components and adaptive impact. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 417-428.
Christenson, S. L., Rounds, T., & Gorney, D. (1992). Family factors and student achievement: An avenue to increase students; success. School Psychology, 7, 178-206.
Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43-55.
Clasen, D. R., & Brown, B. B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peer pressure in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 451-468.
Coam, R. W. (1980). Psychology of adjustment: Personal experience and development. N. Y.: John Wiley & Sous.
Cohen, J. M. (1983). Peer influence on college aspirations with initial aspirations controlled. American Sociological Review, 48, 728-734.
Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 493-506.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system process. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: The Minnesota symposia on child development (Vol. 23, pp. 43-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, Influences, and practices. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp.229-251). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd edn., pp.191-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grades: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1994). Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Educational Psychology, 86(3), 423-438.
Csikszentmihalyi,M.(1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper.
Cunningham, J., Krull, C., Land, N., & Russell, S. (2000). Motivating students to be self-reflective learners through goal-setting and self-evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. Ed446872).
Davies, M., & Kandel, D. B. (1981). Parental and peer influences on adolescents’ educational plans: Some further evidence, American Journal Sociology, 87, 363-387.
Deslandes, R., Potvin, P., & Leclerc, D. (1999). Family characteristics presictors of school achievements: Parent involvement as a mediator. McGill Journal of Education, 34(7), 133-151.
Deslandes, R., Royer, E., Turcotte, D., & Bertrand, R. (1997). School achievement at the secondary level: Influence of parenting style and parent involvement in schooling. McGill Journal of Education, 32(3), 191-208.
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (1994). Family behavior and learning in informal science settings: A review of the research. Science Education, 78(1), 57-72.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychology Review, 95, 256-273.
Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1996). Family involvement in children’s and adolescents’ schooling. In A. Booth & J. Dunn (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcome? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eccles, J.S., Roeser, R., Wigfield,A., & Freedman-Doan,C. (1999). Academic and motivational pathways through middle childhood. In L. Balter & C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 287-317). Philadephia: Psychology Press.
Editorial. (2001). Predicting academic performance of college students in the United States and in Estonia. International. Journal of Educational Research, 35, 353-355.
Ee, J., Moore, P., & Atputhasamy, L. (2001). Low-achieving students: Their goals, self-regulation and achievement and, their teachers’ goals and strategy-based instruction. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 4(2), 115-134.
Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153-1166.
Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2001). 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
Epstein, J. E. (1982). Student reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement (Parent Involvement Rep. No. p-21). Baltimore: The Johns Hoopkins University Center for Reasearch on Elementary and Middle Schools.
Epstein, J. L. (1989). Family structure and student motivation: A development perspective. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp.259-295). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Epstein, J. L. (1990a). School and family connections: Theory, research, and implications for integrating sociologies of education and family. Marriage and Family Review, 15, 99-126.
Epstein, J. L., & Conner, L. J. (1992). School and family partnership in middle grades and high schools. Practitioner, 18(4). ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 347-638.
Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement adolescents’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22.
Fehrmann, P. G., Keith, T. Z., & Reimers, T. M. (1987). Home influence on school learningL Direct and indirect effects of parent involvement on high school grades. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 330-337.
Fleer, M., & Rillero, P. (1999). Family involvement in science education: What are the outcomes for parents and students? Studies in Science Education, 34, 93-114.
Flores, P. V. (1993). Using Total Quality Mangement (TQM) to ameliorate motivational levels of Ninth through twelfth grade students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED367655 )
Frome, P. M., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 435-452.
Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp.127-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.
Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 477-486.
Geake, J. G. (1993). Parents as a resource for science and technology education. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39, 52-54.
George, R., & Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eight graders: evidence from NELS: 88. Science Education, 82, 93-109.
Ginsberg, G. S., & Bronstein, P. (1993). Family factors related to children’s intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation and academic performance. Child Development, 64, 1461-1474.
Gonzales, N. A., Cauce, A. M., Friedman, R. J., & Mason, C. A. (1996). Family, peer, and neighborhood influences on academic achievement among African American adolescents: 1-year prospective effects. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(3), 368-387.
Gonzalez-Pienda, J. A., Nunez, J. C., Gonzalez-Pumariega, S., Alvarez, L., Roces, C., & Garcia, M. (2002). A structural equation model of parental involvement, motivational and aptitudinal characteristics, and academic achievement. The Journal of Experimental Equation, 70, 257-287.
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Role of parental motivational practices in children’s academic intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 104-113.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1998). Role of cognitively stimulating home environment in children’s academic intrinsic motivation: A Longitudinal study. Child Development, 69, 1448-1460.
Gottfried, A. W., & Gottfried, A. E. (1984). Home environment and cognitive development in young children of middle-socioeconomic-status families. In A. W. Gottfried (Ed.), Home environment and early cognitive development: Longitudinal research (pp.57-115). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 187-195.
Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C. O., & Apostoleris, N. H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children’s schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 1-11.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143-154.
Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508-517.
Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 64, 237-252.
Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski C. O., & Apostoleris N. H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children’s schooling. Educational Psychology, 3, 538-548.
Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C. O., & Apostoleris, N. H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children’s schooling. Educational Psychology, 89(3), 538-548.
Grolnick, W. S., Gehl, K., & Mazno, C. (1997). Longitudinal effects of parent involvement and autonomy support on children’s motivation and school performance. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.
Grolnick, W. S., Kurowski, C. O., & Gurland, S. T. (1999). Family processes and the development of children’s self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 3-14.
Grolnick, W. S., Weiss, L., McKenzie, L., & Wrightman, J. (1996). Contextual, cognitive, and adolescent factors associated with parenting in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 33-54.
Guay, F., & Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Social contect, students’ motivation, and academic achievement: Toward a process model. Social psychology of Education, 1, 211-233.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Harter, S. (1981). A new self report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 300-312.
Harter, S. (1992). The relationship between perceived competence, affect, and motivational orientation within the classroom: Processes and patterns of change. In A. K. Boggiano & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation. A social-developmental perspective (pp.77-114). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harter, S. (1996). Teacher and classmate influence on scholastic motivation, self-esteem, and level of voice in adolescents. In J. Juvonen & K. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 11-42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effect of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99-136.
Hickman, G. P., Bartholomae, S., & McKenry, P. C. (2000). Influence of parenting styles on the adjustment and academic achievement of traditional college freshman. Journal of College Student Development, 41(1), 41-54.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1993). Relational orientational in Asian social psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 240-259). Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
Holohan, C. J., Valentiner, D. P., & Moos, R. H. (1994). Parental support and psychological adjustment during the transition to young adulthood in a college sample. Journal of Family Psychology.,8, 215-223.
Hong, S., & Ho, H. (2005). Direct and indirect longitudinal effects of parental involvement on student achievement: Second-order latent growth modeling across ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 32-42.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M. T., Reed, R. P., Dejong, J. M., & Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 195-209.
Hymel, S., Comfor, C., Schonert-Reichl, K., & McDougall, P. (1996). Academic failure and school dropout: The influence of peers. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 313-345). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ide, J. K., Parkerson, J., Haertel, G. D. & Walberg, H. J. (1981). Peer group influence on educational outcomes: A quantitative synthesis, Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 472-484.
Jreskog, K. G.., & Srbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
Juvonen, J., & Wentzel, K. (1996). Social motivation : understanding children's school adjustment Cambridge. ; New York : Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom goal structure and early adolescents’ affect in school: The mediating role of coping strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 187-212.
Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 221-230.
Karabenick, S. A., & Sharma, R. (1994). Perceived teacher of student questioning in the college classroom: Its relation to student characteristics and role in the classroom questioning process. Educational Psychology, 86(1), 90-103.
Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Troutman, G. M., Bicklet, P., Trivette, P. S., & Singh, K. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth grades student achievement? Structure analysis of national data. School Psychology Review, 22, 474-496.
Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M., & Aubey, L. W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 373-380.
Kellaghan, T., Sloane, K., Alvarez, B., & Bloom, B. S. (1993). The home environment and school learning: Promoting parent involvement in the education of children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Kenny, M. E., & Donaldson, G. A. (1991). Contributions of parental attachment and family structure to the social and psychological functioning of first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 479-486.
Kochanska, G. (1994). Beyond cognition: Expanding the search for the early roots of internalization and conscience. Developmental Psychology, 30, 20-22.
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognitive behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control (pp.101-128). New York: Springer.
Kuhl, J. (1987). Action control: The maintenance of motivational state. In F. Halische & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp.279-291). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lapsley, D. K., Rice, K. G., & FitzGerald, D. P. (1990). Adolescent attachment, identity and adjustment to college: Implications for the continuity of adaptation hypothesis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 561-565.
Lapsley, D. K., Rice, K. G., & Shadid, G. E. (1989). Psychological separation and adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling and Development, 36, 286-294.
Larose, S., & Roy, R. (1995). Test of reactions and adaptation in college (trac): a new measure of learning propensity for college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 293-306.
Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (1997). Attachment to parents, social support expectations, and socioemotional adjustment during the high school-college transition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 1-27.
Lemos, M. S. (1999). Students’ goals and self-regulation in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 471-485.
Lepper, M. R., Henderlong, J., & Gingrads, I. (1999). Understanding the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation—Uses and abuses of meta-analysis: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 669-676.
Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (1998). Self-regulation behaviors in underprepared (developmental) and regular admission college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 42-64.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27-52.
Lobel, T. E. (1992). Socialization of achievement: Influence of mothers’ need for approval on children’s achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 529-537.
Main, J. D., & Rowe, M. B. (1993). The relation of locus-of-control orientation and task structure to problem-solving performance of sixth-grade student pairs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 401-426.
Maqsud, M., & Coleman, M. F. (2001). The role of parental interaction in achievement motivation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(6), 859-861.
Marjoribanks, K, & Mboya, M. (2001). Family capital, goal orientations and South African adolescents’ self-concept: a motivation-mediation model. Educational Psychology, 21(3), 333-350.
McCann, E. J., & Garcia, T. (1999). Maintaining motivation and regulating emotion: Measurning individual differences in academic volitional strategies. Learning and Individual Difference, 11(3), 259-279.
Meter, P. V., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 323-338.
Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement . Goals and self-regulatory process (Vol. 7, pp.261-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, a., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
Midgley, C. M., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61-75.
Muller, C. (1993). Parental involvement and academic achievement: An analysis of family resources available to the child. In B. Schneider & J. S. Coleman (Eds.), Parents, their children, and schools (pp.77-113). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Muller, C., & Kerbow, D. (1993). Parent involvement in the home, school and community: A introduction, In B. Schneider & J. S. Coleman (Eds.), Parents, their children, and schools (pp.13-42). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Neckerman, H. J. (1996). The stability of social groups in childhood and adolescence: The role of the classroom social environment. Social Development, 5, 131-145.
Nelson, J. M., Hruda, L. Z., & Miggley, C. (2000). The importance of parent achievement goals for their children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Personal and environment influences on students’ beliefs about effective study strategies. Contemporary Education Psychology, 15, 116-130.
O’Connor(2000).making sense of the complexity of social identity in Educational to achievement: A sociological challenge in the new millennium. Scope of Education,159-168.
Okun, M. A., Ruehlman, L., & Karoly, P. (1991). Application of investment theory to predicting part-time community college student intent and institutional persistence/departure behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 212-220.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). Relationship between peer orientation and achievement in cooperative learning-based research methodology courses. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, 164-170.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Intruction, 1, 117-175.
Paris, S., & Paris, A. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self regulated learning. Educational Psychology, 36, 89-101.
Parsons, J. E., Adler, T. E., & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53, 310-321.
Patrick, H., Hicks, L., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Relations of perceived social self-efficacy and social goal pursuit to self-efficacy for academic work. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 109-128.
Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K., & Midgley, C. (2002). Teachers’ communication of goal orientation in fourth and fifth-grade classroom. Elementary School Journal, 102, 35-58.
Paulson, S. E. (1994). Relations of parenting style and parental involvement with ninth-grade students’ achievement. Journal of early adolescence, 14, 250-267.
Perry, N .E.(2002).Introduction: Using Qualitative methods to enrich understanding of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1),1-3.
Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., & Pelletier, S. T. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 776-789.
Perry, N .E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K. & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 5-15.
Peverly, S. T., Brobst, K. E., Graham, M., & Shaw, R. (2003). College adults are not good at self-regulation: A study on the relationship of self-regulation, note taking, and test taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 335-346.
Piata, R. C. (1992). Beyond the parent: The role of other adults in children’s lives. New directions in child development (Vol. 57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990b). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The Role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. Eceles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp.249-284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 511-554.
Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Larose, S., & Sencal, C. (2004). Family correlates of trajectories of academic motivation during a school transition: A semiparametric group-based approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 743-754.
Raty, H., Leinonen, T. & Snellman L. (2002) Parents’ educational expectations and their social-psychological patterning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(2), 129-144.
Reed,M-E.B.(1986). Management strategies to assist student in improving learning learning skills. Journal of Development Education, 9(3), 2-4.
Reynolds A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 97-107.
Richaedson, J. T. E., & Woodley, A. (2003). Another look at the role of age, gender and subject as predictors of academic attainment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 475-493.
Richman, J. M. & Brown, G. L. (1997). School Failure: An Ecological international Developmental Perspective. pp95-116. In Mark W. Fraser (Eds.) Risk and Resilience in Childhood: An Ecological Perspective. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child Psychology: Vol 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th edn, pp.619-700). New York: Wiley.
Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 101-111.
Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72, 1135-1150.
Ryan, B. A., Adams, G. R., Gullotta, T. P., Weissberg, R. P., & Hampton, R. L, (1995). The family-school connection: Theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ryan, R. M., & Stiller, J. (1991). The social contexts of internalization: Parent and teacher influences on autonomy, motivation, and learning. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 86-114). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Robinson,J. P.,Shaver, P.r.,& Wrightsman,L. S. (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: academic Methuen.
Salili, F., Hau, T. (1994). The effect of teachers’ evaluative feedback on Chinese Students’ perception of ability: A cultural and situational analysis. Educational studies, 20, 223-236.
Saloman, G. (1998). Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: Some issues to be concerned with. Research Dialogue, 1(1), 3-12.
Schaps, E., Battictich, V., & Solomon, D. (1997). School as a caring community: A key to character education. In A. Molnar (Ed.), Ninety-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 127-139). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goals setting and self efficacy during self regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71-86.
Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1989). Influence of peer model attributes on children’s beliefs and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 431-434.
Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R., & Cox, P. D. (1987). Peer model attributes and children’s achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 54-61.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1996). Modeling and self-efficacy influences on children’s development and self-regulation. In J. Juvonen. & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 154-180). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schutz, P. A., & Davis, H. A. (2000). Emotions and self-regulation during test taking. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 243-256.
Scott-Jones, D. (1984). Family influences on cognitive Development and school achievement. In E. W. Gordon (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 11, pp.259-304). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Simpson, M., Hynd, C., Nist, S. & Burrell, K. (1997). College academic assistance programs and practices. Educational psycholoy Review,9,39-87.
Stright, A. D. Neitzel, C., Sears, K. G., & Hoke-Sinex, L. (2001). Instruction begins in the home: Relations between parental instruction and children’s self-regulation in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 456-466.
Stevenson, D., & Baker, D., (1987). The family-school relation and the child’s school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348-1357.
Stright, A. D. Neitzel, C., Sears, K. G., & Hoke-Sinex, L. (2001). Instruction begins in the home: Relations between parental instruction and children’s self-regulation in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 456-466.
Synder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., Pulvers, K. M., Adams III, V. H., & Wiklund, C. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820-826.
Sui-Chu, E., & Willms, J. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eight grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126-141.
Taylor, S. E., Wayment, H. A., & Carrillo, M. (1996). Social comparison, self-regulation, and motivation. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp.3-27). New York: Guilford Press.
Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2002) Are parents’ gender schemes related to their children’s gender-related cognitions? A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 615-630.
Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities? Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 34-47.
Thompson, T., & Richardson, A. (2001). Self-handicapping status, claimed self-handicaps and reduced practice effort following success and failure feedback. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 151-170.
Townsend, M., & Hicks, L. (1997). Classroom goal structures, social satisfaction, and the perceived value of academic tasks. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 1-12.
Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410-441.
Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106, 1759-1785.
Urberg, K. A. (1992). Locus of peer influence: Best friends and social crowd. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 430-450.
Urberg, K. S., Degirmencioglu, S. M. & Pilgrim, C. (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Development Psychology, 33, 834-844.
Urdan, T. (1997). Achievement goals and the orientation of friends toward school in early adolescence. Journal of Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 165-191.
Urdan, T., & Hicks, L. (1995, April). What adolescents say about the interface if peer relationships and motivation in school. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisci, CA.
Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524-551.
Urdan, T., Kneisel, L., & Mason, V. (1999). Interpreting message about motivation in the classroom: Examining the effects of achievement goal structures. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 11). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in the students’ use self-handicapping strategies. American Education Research, 35(1), 101-122.
Vanderstoep, S. W., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345-362.
Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., & Lodewijks, H. G.. (1999). A longitudinal perspective on learning strategies in higher education: Different viewpoint towards development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 221-242.
Wahlistrom,C. & William, B. K. (1996). Learning success:Being your best at college life.Wadworth Publishing Company.
Wang, J., & Wildman, L. (1995). Empirical examination of the effects of family commitment in education on student achievement in seventh grade science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 833-837.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. N. Y.: Springer-Verlag.
Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Students at risk for academic failure: Learning to learn class. In K. W. Prichard & R. M. Sawyer (Eds.), Handbook of college teaching: Theory and applications (pp.375-385). Westport, CT : Greenwood Press.
Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social competence at school: Relations between social responsibility and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 61, 1-24.
Wentzel, K. R. (1992). Motivation and achievement in adolescence: A multiple goals perspective. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 287-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Social and academic goats at ashool: Motivation and achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 4-20.
Wentzel, K. R. (1994). The relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behavior and perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 173-182.
Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Motivation in context: Social relationships and achievement in middle school. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 226-247). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411-419.
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social support and adjustment in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209.
Wentzel, K. R (1998) Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Educational Psychologist, 33(2), 202-209.
Wentzel, K. R. (1999a). Social influences on school adjustment: Commentary. Educational Psychologist, 34(1), 59-69.
Wentzel, K. R. (1999b). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76-97.
Wentzel, K. R. & Berndt, T. J. (1999) Social influences and school adjustment: Overview. Educational Psychologist, 34(1), 1-2.
Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198-1209.
Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 114-125.
Wentzel, K. R., & Watkins, D. E. (2002). Peer relationship and collaborative learning as contexts for academic enablers. School Psychologt Revies, 31(3), 366-377.
Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (1998). Academic and social motivational influences on students’ academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 155-175.
Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influence on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195-203.
Wintre, M. G., & Yaffe, M. (2000). First-year students’ adjustment to university life as a function of relationships with parents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(1), 9-38.
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224-235.
Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and individual Difference, 11(3), 281-304.
Wolters, C.A. (2004). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-206.
Wolters, C. A. (1998) Regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Educational Psychology, 2, 224-235.
Wolters, C. A., Yu, S., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self regulated learning. Learning and individual Differences, 8, 211-238.
Wyatt, S. A., & Medway, F. J. (1984) Causal attributions of students and student-proctors for performance on a university examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 25-37.
Yager,R.E., & Yager,S.O.(1995). Changes in perceptions of science for third,seventh,and eleventh grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(4),347-358.
Youciss, J., & Smollar, J. (1989). Adolescents’ interpersonal relationships in social context. In T. J. Berndt & G. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 300-316). New York: Wiley.
Youlden, A., & Chan, L. (1994). Motivation, self-regulated learning and academic achievement in Year 7 and Year9 students. Paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference, Newcastle, Australia, November.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychological, 30(4), 845-862.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives (2nd) Mahwah, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A Social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp.13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.