研究生: |
張豐文 Chang, Feng-Wen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
辦公室員工個人擺飾行為與工作認知關係之研究-以台灣為案例 The Relationship between Employees’ Personal Office Objects and Their Work Consciousness |
指導教授: |
賴香菊
Lai, Hsiang-Chu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 51 |
中文關鍵詞: | 個人化 、辦公空間 、辦公環境 、符號象徵 、人際關係 、自我管理 |
英文關鍵詞: | personalization, office space, office environment, symbol, relationship, self-regulation |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203188 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:171 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的主要為探討企業員工在辦公室環境擺飾的個人化行為與認知,包含擺置內容品項、擺置原因以及其所帶來的效果。採用線上問卷調查進行資料收集。研究結果發現,普遍最受國人上班族員工青睞的辦公室擺飾是生活上的實用物品,例如行事曆與杯具,次為植栽、照片等,玩偶公仔以及宗教器物次知;在擺置原因方面,以查看日期/行程、典藏欣賞為主,其次為生活記憶、砥礪自己和風水磁場等。另外,這些擺置所產生的效果則以放鬆紓壓、自我管理為主,沉靜心靈、開運納福和展現自我次之。此外,就擺置物品、擺置原因與效果的關連性來看,為了查看日期/行程最主要的擺置項目是行事曆,所造成的影響效果則以自我管理為主;此外,植栽及玩偶公仔常被用來典藏欣賞,而杯具及照片則常被用來作為生活記憶用途,因典藏欣賞及生活記憶而擺置的物品最能產生放鬆紓壓的效果。
The purpose of this research is to explore the behavior and cognition of personalize for the employees in the office environment, including the contents, causes, even the effects of the items. The data collection using the online questionnaire survey. We discovered that the most popular items for office workers favored are the life practical items, such as the calendars and cups for the first of all, the potted plants and photos are the secondly, and the dolls, religious artifacts are the third priority. In the reason for the show of ornaments, it’s based on “date/trip schedule check” and “collection appreciation”, and the “life memories”; “temper yourself” and “feng-shui” are the following up items. In addition, the effect of these arrangements is to “ease the relief”, “self-management” based; “mind release”, “fortune open” and “self-expression” just for secondly.Beside above, the main items for the relationship of the reasons and effects are calendars because of “date/trip schedule check” and “self-management” for the effect impact. In addition, potted plants and dolls are often used for “classical collection”; the cups and photos are often used as a memory for life purpose, because of the “classical collection” and “life memories” are the most relaxing relief effect for office ornaments.
引用參考文獻
一、中文部分
AidUV.com,2016。只有企業文化才能夠給員工提供精神動力,薪酬激勵不可能做到這點。http://www.gvm.com.tw/webonly_content_5883.html。搜尋日期:2016年12月18日。
ETtoday,2016。辦公桌上東西怎麼擺? 從擺設習慣看你的個性。http://www.ettoday.net/news/20160522/701942.htm#ixzz4YXuc9z1P
Lawrence,2011。Facebook矽谷新總部曝光,辦公室驚見中華民國國旗。http://www.techbang.com/posts/7941-facebook-new-workplace-exposure-was-shocked-to-see-the-roc-flag。搜尋日期:2017年2月13日
Peggy,2013。Google全球辦公室大集合,你最想去哪一間上班? http://www.techbang.com/posts/12722-google-office-collection-in-the-world-would-you-most-like-to-go-to-that-one-work。搜尋日期:2017年2月13日
Pervin, L.A.,1995。人格心理學(洪光遠等人譯)。台北: 桂冠。(原作出版於西元1993年)。
王震武,1985。選擇歷程中屬性訊息的選取與組合研究。國立台灣大學心理學研究所 博士論文。
江學華,2002。國籍飛航機師組織文化、人格特質與飛航安全績效之關係研究。國立成功大學/工業管理科學系 碩士論文。
宅宅新聞,2015。辦公桌反映人的性格˙座位凌亂的人其實意外是個完美主義者。https://news.gamme.com.tw/1354443。搜尋日期:2016年8月5日。
李青芬,1995。大學生人格特質與職業興趣之研究。大葉大學 碩士論文。
林欣儀,2009。站著開會比坐著好。臉譜出版社,城邦文化事業有限公司。
周惠莉,2002。五大人格特質、性別角色與轉換型領導關聯性之研究。中原大學企業管理研究所 未出版碩士論文。
孫景文(譯),2000。心理學-思維、大腦及文化。Drew Westen著。台北:台灣西書公司。
淺田晴之/上西基弘/池田晃一/林欣怡,2009。站著開會比坐著好! 打造知識創造型辦公室的50個提案,臉譜出版。城邦文化事業股份有限公司。
張芳菊,半導體產業從業人員華人人格對工作壓力知覺之影響-以情緒智力為調節變項。南台科技大學/技職教育與人力資源發展研究所 碩士論文。
黃堅厚,1999。人格心理學。心裡出版社。
楊幼妃,2003。人格特質、工作性質與工作績效關係之研究-以實施行動辦公室之企業為例。逢甲大學企業管理研究所 碩士論文。
詹芷嫻,2013。我國工時狀況與國際比較分析。勞動部主計處。(http://www.mol.gov.tw/media/2688327/我國工時狀況與國際比較研析pdf)。搜尋日期:2016年12月30日。
鄭勝泰,2002。人格特質對工作績效影響之探討-以某運輸服務業之T公司為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所 碩士論文。
蔡景仁,2013。個人與主管關係品質對於工作投入與工作績效之影響。國立東華大學企業管理學系 碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Allport, G.W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
Allport, G.W., & Odbert, H.S. (1936). Trait names: A psycho-lexical Study. Psychological Monographs, 47(Whole No.211).
Brook, P. P., Russell, D. W., & Price, J. L. (1988). Discriminate Validation of Measures of Job Statisfaction, Job Involvement, and Organizational Commitment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), pp. 139-145.
Brouther, K. D. (2002). Institutional, Cultrual and Transcation Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies. 33(2), pp.203-223.
Brown, S. P. (1996). A Meta-Analysis and Review of Organizational Research on Job Involvement, Psychological Bulletin, 120(2). Pp. 235-255.
Byron K. & Laurence G.A. (2015). Diplomas, photos, and tchotchkes as symbolic self-representations: understanding employees’ individual use of symbols, Academy of Management Journal Vol. 58, No. 1, 298–323.
Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B. & Oswald, F., (1996), The Substantive Nature of Job Performance Variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations, 258-299.
Cattell, R.B. (1943). The Description of Personality: Basic Trait Resolved Into Cluster. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, No. 38, PP.476–506
Costa, P.T., & McCare, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Draganidis, F., & Mentzas, G. (2006). Competency based management: aeview of systems and approaches. Information Management & Computer Security, 14(1), 51-65.
Dubin, R. (1958). The World of Work. Engle woodcliffs, N. J., Prentice-Hall.
Elsbach, K. D. (2003). Relating physical environment toself-categorizations: Identity threat and affirmationin a non-territorial office space. Administrative Scienceuarterly, 48: 622–654.
Galton, F. (1884). Measurement of Character. Fortnightly Review, No.36, PP.179–185.
Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An Alternative Description of Personality: The Big Five Factor, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, No/ 59, PP.1216-1229.
Gomez-Mejja, L. R. , Balkin, D.B. , Cardy, R. L. & Dimick, D. E.(1995).Managing Human Resources, Prentice-Hall Inc.
Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42.
Guilford T.P. (1959). Personality, New York: Megraw-Hill.
Hockwater, WA. , Witt & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). Perceptions of Organizational Polities as Moderator of the relationship between Conscientiousness and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology. 85, 472-478.
Holli-Hofstetter, H. & Mannheim, B. (1999).Managers’ Coping Resources, Preceived Organizational Patterns and Responses During Organizational Recovery from decline, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 665-685.
Jex, S. M. (1998). Stress and Job Performance, London: Sage Publications.
Kassarijan, H. (1971). The Big-Five Personality Performance. Personnel Psychology, 44,1-26.
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349, 86(1), 80-92.
Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The Social Psychology of organizations. New York Wiley Lawler, E. E. & Hall, D. .T., “Relationship of Job Characteristic to Job Involvement, Satisfaction, and Intrinsic Motivation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 1970, pp. 305-312.
Lawler, E. E., & Hall, D. T. (1970). Relationship of job characteristic to job involvement, Satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 305-312.
Lodahl, T. M.,& Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
Katz, R. & Kahn, D. (1960). Leadership Practices in Relation to Productivity and Morale. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (eds.), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, NY: Row, Paterson. Mark J. Schmit, Jenifer A. Kihm, and Chetrobei. (2000).“Development of a global measure of personality” Personnel.Psychology, 53, 153-193
Maslow A. H. (1943) . A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, Vol 50.
McCare, R.R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
Motowidlo, S. J. & VanScotter, J. R. (1994), Evidence that Task Performance Should Be Distingushed from Contextual Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
Paullay, Alliger, G. M.,& Stone-Remero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 224-228.
Robbins, S.P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
Robinowitz, S. & Hall, D. T. (1977). Organizational research on job involvement, Psychological Bulletin, 8(42), 265-288.
Robert, T. K. (1997). Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment as Longitudinal Predictors of Job Performance : A Study of Scientists and Engineers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 539-545.
Saleh, S. D. , & Hosek, J.(1976). Job Involvement: Concepts and Measurements. Academy of Management Journal, 2(6), 229-253.
Schermerhorn, J. R. , Hunt, J. G. & Osborn , R. N.(1999). Managing Organizational Behavior (3rd.), NY: John Wikey and Sons Inc.
Tian & Belk (2005). Extended Self and Possessions in the Workplace. Journal of Consumer Research, Inc.
Venkatraman, N. & Ramanujam, V. (1986). “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches”, Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.