研究生: |
何以琳 Ho, Yi-Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
澎湖群島的里海模式探討—以南寮村及北寮村為例 The Sato-umi in Penghu Archipelago -- A case study of Nanliao village and Beiliau village |
指導教授: |
蔡慧敏
Tsai, Huei-Min |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
環境教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Environmental Education |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 169 |
中文關鍵詞: | 里海 、澎湖群島 、南寮村 、北寮村 、先民經驗 |
英文關鍵詞: | Sato-umi, Nanliao Village, Beiliao Village |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GEE.014.2018.F02 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:182 下載:51 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著經濟發展及海洋生態破壞,尋求能永續利用生物資源、保存在地文化並持續維持經濟發展的管理模式成為一個重要課題。本研究應用「里海」概念,探討在沿海地區透過人為介入來維持生物多樣性和健康海域,並同時提高生產量,建構人類與海洋環境的和諧關係之治理模式。
澎湖群島,受惠於東北季風和冷暖流交會的地理位置,海洋生物多樣,且漁業資源富饒。沿海地區的海洋資源最為豐富,當地居民長期與沿海環境互動,發展出與大自然和諧共處的生存模式;今日,位於湖西鄉沿海村落的南寮村及北寮村,依舊傳承著先民與環境互動產生的智慧。隨著當地社區的活絡發展以及在地協力組織與政府資源的注入,該地的發展展露出獨特歷史脈絡,體現人和環境共存共榮的和諧關係,並創造出兼顧在地生活、生產及生態的模式;南寮及北寮村,使里海的精神能夠在此實踐,創造永續的保存價值。
本研究之研究場域為澎湖縣湖西鄉南寮村及北寮村,研究強調里海五大要素:物質循環、生態系、在地互動、地區及主角,探討南北寮村現況與里海間的關係,再以兩村在地居民為研究對象,並採用質性研究中的訪談,透過十三位居民的訪談調查,確立居民如何看待以人為介入的方式與沿海環境互動後,加以調整澎湖群島的里海模式。
除了里海模式中的五大要素,本研究亦發現影響里海的重要要素-「先民經驗」。除了日本省(2011)所提出的里海五大要素外,能維持南寮與北寮村的里海模式條件為「先民經驗」。南寮村及北寮村所發展的里海模式是基於在地居民過去長期與環境互動下的經驗。因此承襲過往所存留下來的經驗,是促進南寮村及北寮村環境永續發展及保持「里海」模式之方向。
Due to advanced development, searching for a management system that enables the sustainable use of biological resources and preserves the local culture, yet maintains economic development has become a crucial issue. Scholar Yanagi in 1998 proposed the "Sato-umi" management system, considered that biodiversity and a healthy sea area can be maintained through human intervention with production still keeping growing, and constructed a harmonious relationship between mankind and the environment.
Penghu Archipelago, thanks to the northeast monsoon and geographic location in the intersection of cold and warm currents, is known for its amazing marine biodiversity as well as fisheries resources. In the coastal area lies the most abundant marine resources, and local residents have developed a way of living in harmony with nature through long-term interaction with coastal environment. Today, Nanliao and Beiliao Villagers, who are located in the coastal villages of Huhsi township, still inherit wisdom owing to interaction with environment by their ancestors. Due to the active community development as well as resources injection from local organization and the government, the development at Nanliao and Beiliao Village demonstrates the unique historical context, embodies the harmonic relation of coexistence and coprosperity between people and environment, showcasing a living model of balancing among life, production and ecology. Nanliao and Beiliao Villages, the incarnation of the spirit of the Sato-umi, create a sustainable preservation.
In this study, Nanliao Village and Beiliao Village, which are located in Huhsi township from Penghu County, were selected as the research field, and the local residents of these two villages were selected as the research object. The study emphasizes five elements of the Satoumi: material circulation, ecosystems, commmunication, field for acctiviry and exectors for activity .The researcher conducted qualitative research to explore the relationship between the current situation of these villages and the Sato-umi, expecting that this study will explore the sustainable development of Sato-umi management system in Nanliao Village and Beiliao Village.A face-to-face interview survey was counducted 13 local resident from Nanliao Village and Beiliao Village. The survey aimed to identify how local residents perceive the role of human intervention in preserving such an environment.
The study found that the development of the Sato-umi in Nanliao Village and Beiliao Village was based on past experience of local people interacting with the environment.Therefore, inheriting the past experience is the way to promote sustainable development of the environment in Nanliao Village and Beiliao Village.
一、 中文文獻
王文科&王志弘(1994)。教育研究法。五南。臺北市。303-302
王志弘&徐苔玲(譯)(2006)。地方:記憶、想像與認同(原作者:Tim Cresswell)。群學。19。(原著出版年:2004)
王昭正、朱瑞淵(譯)(1999)。參與觀察法 (原作者:Jorgensen, D. L)。台北市: 弘智。(原著出版年:1989)。
王嵩山(1999)。 集體知識、信仰與工藝。稻鄉。236
江佩珊(2018)。【描述底繩釣】。未出版之原始之史料。
余光弘(1996)。澎湖的移民與開發。西瀛風物,12,45-61。
吳佳其(2015年8月3日)。人與沿海自然環境的共生-日本的里海案例。取自www.wetland.org.tw/hope/PDF/9502.pd
吳佳其(譯)(2014)。獵殺海洋:一部自我毀滅的人類文明史(原作者:Callum Roberts)。臺北市:我們出版。(原著出版年:2007)。
吳佳其(譯)(2017)當水母佔據海洋:失控的海洋與人類的危機(原作者:Lisa-Ann Gershwin)。八旗文化。104-113。(原著出版年:2013)
李光中&李宜謹(2013)。日本里山-里海評估-影響因素害因應對策。取自https://www.forest.gov.tw/MagazineFile.aspx?fno=6106
李光中(2011)。鄉村地景保育的新思維-里山倡議。台灣林業期刊。37:59-64
李佳佩(2014)。 社區生活行為與生活空間使用之特質-以台南市中西區銀同里、萬昌里、開山里為例。成功大學建築學系學位論文。10
李明儒(2009)。漁滬文化的起源與分布 - 一個跨國際觀點的探索。澎湖:澎湖縣政府文化。
李嘉禾(2011)。推動漁業政策:傳承海洋思想。漁業推廣月刊。276,4-7
赤嶺淳&童琳、陳佳欣(譯)(2011)。海參戰役:從在地思考生物多樣性與文化多樣性。群學。105
冼宜樂、鐘金水、林綉美、黃文卿、正靜宜、歐麗榛、蔡萬生(2011)。澎湖海草的分類與分布之調查。水試專訊。34。7-31
冼宜樂、鐘金水、林綉美、黃文卿、正靜怡、歐麗榛、蔡萬生。澎湖海草的分類與分佈之調查。取自https://www.tfrin.gov.tw/dl.asp?fileName=27171146371.pdf
周素卿、蔡慧敏、盧鏡臣(2000)。離島建設條例施行細則研究。內政部營建署委託研究
林文鎮(1997)。湖西鄉土誌略志。澎湖縣:澎湖采風文化學會。
林長興(1991)。澎湖群島之地質與地形。台中:臺灣省政府教育廳。
林寶安(2017)。從核廢料廠到自然保留區:澎湖南方四島的漁村變遷。澎湖縣文化局。硓石古石季刊。(87) 8
邱文彥(2003)。海岸管理與理論實務。臺北市:五南。
邱郁文&吳欣儒&梁世雄(2015年2月)。從里山到里海-尋找台灣的里海行動。取自https://www.forest.gov.tw/MagazineFile.aspx?fno=6297
邵廣昭 (1998)。由國際海洋年談台灣的海洋生態保育。科學月刊,348,978-984
邵廣昭(2016年9月23日)。里海-人與海的結合。取自http://www.swan.org.tw/pg.php?pgid=266
邵廣昭、王惟芬(2008)。挑戰海洋盡頭行動議程。臺北市:五南。
邵廣昭、鄭又華(2011)。愛知目標中的海洋保育是進是退?。大自然季刊,110,56-63
洪國雄(1986)。 澎湖產業印象:走過潮間帶。澎湖縣立文化中心。
洪國雄(1999b)。澎湖的石滬。澎湖縣:澎胡縣立文化中心。
胡建偉 (1961)。 澎湖紀略。 臺灣銀行。
徐震(1985)。社區發展-方法與研究。臺北市:中國文化大學出版部。
張玉璜、徐明福、王麒富(2010)。澎湖菜宅的地理分佈與組構型態探討。澎湖研究第9屆學術研討會論文輯
莊凱証(1995)。澎湖魚灶生態初探。西瀛風物,12,18-45。
莊凱証(2015)。 澎湖人的時空記憶與生活場域之重建.。文史台灣學報。(9),43-92.
許文東(2014)。走過北寮。澎湖縣:澎湖縣文化局。
許自由(2015年12月)。澎湖地質地形-教學資源調查研究及其數位化教材之推廣。取自140.127.36.251/95project/95年科教專案成果報告/95成果-NO53.pdf
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。
陳建軍、羅燚英(譯)(2018)。海洋與文明 世界航海史(原作者:Lincoln Paine)。廣場出版。689。(原著出版年:2013)
陳添壽(2015年5月10日)。農業診斷漁業發展。取自
http://lovegeo.blogspot.tw/2018/03/l2_37.html
陳憲明(1991)。澎湖北海一帶無人島紫菜採集的領域管理。國立臺灣師範大學地理研究報告。
陳憲明(1992)。一個珊瑚礁漁村的生態。 國立臺灣師範大學地理研究報告。
陳憲明(1996)。澎湖群島石滬之研究。國立臺灣師範大學地理研究報告。118-126
陳錦玉(2016)。金門之社區發展探討。區域與社會發展研究,7, 3-26。
曾蘭淑(2011)。地方居民對於節慶活動的效益認知與認同感對活動支持度之研究-以鳳荔文化季為例。亞洲大學休閒與遊憩管理研究所碩士論文。
黃瑞琴(2001)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理。
黃聲威(1999)。淺探海洋文化 (上)。農委會漁業署出版品 漁業推廣,170,(89.11)
楊弘任(2011)。何謂在地性?“ 從地方知識與在地範疇出發。思與言 49(4), 5-29
楊玉齡(譯)(2002)。生物圈的未來(原作者:Edwaed O.Wilson)。臺北市: 天下遠見。(原著出版年:2001 )。
楊金燕(1997)。湖西鄉社區資源集錦。澎湖縣:縣立文化中心。
臧振華(1989)。從澎湖群島上的遠古文化。歷史月刊,21,12-22。
歐用生(1989)。質的研究。師大書苑。
潘慧玲(2003)。 教育研究的取徑:概念與應用。臺北市:高等教育。
澎湖廳水產會(1932)。澎湖廳水產基本調查報告。澎湖:澎湖廳。
蔡慧敏(1998)。島嶼生物地理學研究的發展與應用。國立台灣大學地理學系地理學報,24,85-98。
蔡慧敏(2000)「海島永續發展議題」永續台灣通訊,行政院國家科學委員會永續發展研究推動委員會,2(2):33-37。
蔡慧敏(2001)地方永續發展指標的選擇:離島地區指標初探,永續台灣通訊,行政院國家科學委員會永續發展研究推動委員會發行3(4).
鄭克強(2002)。澎湖天然紫菜的利用管理及導入文化創意產業之研究。國立海洋大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文。
顏德福(2012)。澎湖紫菜產業發展策略之研究(碩士論文)。取自碩博士論文系統。
蘇益田(1998)。生態條件對澎湖傳統聚落型態之影響。澎湖縣:澎湖縣立文化中心。
鐘金水(2006)。澎湖北寮灣魚類群聚時空變化之研究(碩士論文)。取自http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/987654321/15725
二、 英文部分
Akimichi, T. (2012). Satoumi ecosystems and a new commons: ecological and institutional linkages between human and nature. Global Environmental Research, 16, 163-172.
Albert, J. A., Olds, A. D., Albert, S., Cruz-Trinidad, A., & Schwarz, A. M. (2015). Reaping the reef: provisioning services from coral reefs in Solomon Islands. Marine Policy, 62, 244-251.
Alcamo, J., Ash, N.J., Butler, C.D., Callicot, J.B., Capistrano, D.,Carpenter, S.R., 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Assessment, J. S. S. (2010). Satoyama-Satoumi ecosystems and human well-being: Socio-ecological production landscapes of Japan–Summary for decision makers. UNU Tokyo, Japan.
Bernard, J. (1973). The socioloby of community. Glenview. IL: Scott, Foresman
Berque, J., & Matsuda, O. (2013). Coastal biodiversity management in Japanese satoumi. Marine Policy, 39, 191-200.
Cetinkaya, G. (2009). Challenges for the maintenance of traditional knowledge in the Satoyama and Satoumi ecosystems, Noto Peninsula, Japan. Human Ecology Review, 27-40.
Change, E. P. (2013).Sustainable tourism&the millennium development goals.p231-248
Colbert-Sangree, N., & Suter, J. F. (2015). Community based fishery management within the Menai Bay conservation area: A survey of the resource user. Marine Policy, 60, 171-177.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.
Eliot Stein(2018,5 23). The renaissance of northern Irelands forgotten seafood.Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/travel/gallery/20180522-the-renaissance-of-northern-irelands-forgotten-seafood
Engleson, D. C., & Yockers, D. H. (1994). A guide to curriculum planning in environmental education. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
FAO(1995) Food and Agriculture Organization. Code of conduct for responsible fisheries.Retrieve from http://www.fao.org/3/a-v9878e.pdf
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). The art of science. The handbook of qualitative research, 361-376.
Gross, M. G. (1977). Oceano graphy: A view of the Earth.370.
Huei-Min(2002)SuIn Hsiao,H.H,Liy,C.H.,and Tsai,H.M.(eds)Sustainable Development for Island Societies:Taiwan and the World,Asia-Pacific Research Program of Academia Sinica and SRTCS Secretariat at National Central University.395-408.
Inoue, Y. (2001). Choshi design of coastal selective trawl net (CD-STN)[Japan]. Technical Report of National Research Institute of Fisheries Engineering (Japan).
Jackson,J.B.C. et al.(2001).Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystem.Science 293:629-638
James A.Ferguson&John H. Bounds (2018,5 10). Turks and Caicos Islands .Retrieced from https://www.britannica.com/place/Turks-and-Caicos-Islands
Joannes Berque & Osamu Matsuda. (2011). Synthesis:Emerging Satoumi practice for biodiversity management in human inflfuenced coastal ecosystems.Biological and cultural diversity in coastal communities ,103-113.
Kakuma, S., & Kamimura, M. (2011). Okinawa: Effective conservation practices from Satoumi in a coral reef ecosystem. Biological and cultural diversity in coastal communities, 134.
Kikuzawa, K. (2010). Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment: Experiences and Lessons from Clusters,13.
Kishaba, E. (1977). Traditional fishery in Yaeyama. Yaeyama folk history, 1.
Liou, F. M., & Ding, C. G. (2004). Positioning the non least-developed developing countries based on vulnerability-related indicators. Journal of International Development, 16(6), 751-767.
Makino,M., and H.Matsuda.(2005).Co-management in Japanese coastal fisheries:institution features and transaction costs.Marine Policy 29:441-450
Matsuda, O., & Kokubu, H. (2016). Recent coastal environmental management based on new concept of Satoumi which promotes land-ocean interaction: A case study in Japan. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 183, 179-186.
Mizuta, D. D., & Vlachopoulou, E. I. (2017). Satoumi concept illustrated by sustainable bottom-up initiatives of Japanese Fisheries Cooperative Associations. Marine Policy, 78, 143-149.
Morimoto, J., Kondo, T., & Miyauchi, T. (2009). Satoyama–satoumi sub-global assessment in Japan and involvement of the Hokkaido Cluster. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 5(1), 91-96.
Murai,Y.(2001)Wisdom for the conservation of coastal sea.In”Ocean in Asia 3 –Dynamism of Island People”,ed. By K. Omoto et al.,Iwanami Publisher,Tokyo,29-57(in Japanese).
Tanaka, T., & Ota, Y. (2015). Reviving the Seto Inland Sea, Japan: applying the principles of Satoumi for marine ranching project in Okayama. In Marine Productivity: Perturbations and Resilience of Socio-ecosystems .291-294. Springer, Cham.
Thorburn,c.c.(2000).Changing Customary Marine Resource Management Practice and Institution:The Case of Sasi Lola in the Kei Islands,Indonesia.World Development 28(8) ,461-1479
Thorne-Miller, B. (1999). The living ocean: understanding and protecting marine biodiversity. Island Press ,41-58.
Tsai, H. M. (2009). Co-evolution and beyond: landscape changes in the Penghu archipelago (the Pescadores), Taiwan. Asia-Pac. Reg, 197(44), 193-214.
Tsai,Huei-Min(2009)’Co-ecolution anf Beyond:Landscape Change in the Penghu Archipelago(the Prescadores),Taiwan’.Asia-Pacific Forum,44:193-213.
Tsukamoto, K., Kawamura, T., Takeuchi, T., Beard Jr, T. D., & Kaiser, M. J. (2008). “Sato-Umi”—A New Concept for Sustainable Fisheries. Fisheries for Global Welfare and Environment, 351.
Tutty, L. M., Grinnell, R. M., & Rothery, M. (1996). Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps, and tasks. Allyn and Bacon.
UNCED (1992). Agenda 21. New York:United Nations Dept of Public Information.
United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030 Agenda for Sustainable Development web.pdf
United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies Operating unit Ishikawa/Kanazawa.(2011).Biological and cultural Diversity in Coastal Communities,Exploring the Potential of Satoumi for Implementing the Ecosystem Approach in the Japanese Archipelago.Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity,Montreal,Technical Series no.61.
United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO).(2002).Projected average yeaerly growth 1995-2020 study.Madrid,Spain:Author
Vierros, M. (2008). Relevance of Satoumi to the CBD mandate. Biological and cultural diversity in coastal communities, 5.
Wilson,J.Q.,&Kelling,G.L.(1982)The police and neighborhood safety:Broken window.The Atlantic Monthly,12729-38.
World Wildlife Fund of Japan (2009), ―Umigaki fukugen ni kansuru kankyo chosa hokokusho‖ [―Report on an Enviromental Survey Regarding Restoration of Stone Fishing Weirs]. WWF Coral Reef Conservation and Research Centre: Okinawa
Wu,Chia-Chi and Huei-Min Tsai*(2014)A Capital-Based Framework for Assessing Coastal and Marine Social-Ecological Dynamics in Penghu Archipelago,Taiwan.Journal of Marine and Island Cultures,Elsevier.3(2)60-68.(*correspondent author) doi:10.1016/j. imic.2014.10.001.
Yanagi, T. (2005). " Sato-Umi"; New Concept for the Coastal Sea Management. 九州大学応用力学研究所所報, (129), 109-111.
Yanagi, T. (2008). Sato-Umi': a new concept for sustainable fisheries. In Fisheries for global welfare and environment. Memorial book of the 5 th World Fisheries Congress 2008.Terrapub, Tokyo(Japan).
Yanagi, T. (2012). Japanese commons in the coastal seas: How the satoumi concept harmonizes human activity in coastal seas with high productivity and diversity. Springer Science & Business Media.
Yanagi, T.(2007).Sato-Umi:a new concept for coastal sea management.Terrapib,Tokyo.
Yanagi, T., & Nakajima, M. (1991). Change of oceanic condition by the man-made structure for upwelling. Marine pollution bulletin, 23, 131-135.
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications.
Yu,shyi-Liang,Ying-Chien Chu and Huei-Min Tsai(2016)Environmental Changes and Building Resilient Community in Pengh Island.Journal of Marine and Island Culture.2016(5)126-132.
Zhang, W., T. H. Ricketts, C. Kremen, K. Carney, and S. M. Swinton (2007) Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 64(2): 253-260.
三、 日文文獻
瀨戶內海保全協會(2011)。里海づくりの手引書。環境省。
國外參考網站:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations:http://www.fao.org/fishery/code/en
Agenda21:https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
Sustainable Development Goals:https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative:http://satoyama-initiative.org/