研究生: |
劉昊龍 Liu, Hao-Lung |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
適性化之擴增實境教材呈現對不同學習風格學習者之影響分析 Analyzing the Impacts of Adaptive Augmented Reality's Learning Materials on Different Learning Styles Learners |
指導教授: |
張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En 宋曜廷 Sung, Yao-Ting 劉子鍵 Liu, Tzu-Chien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
資訊教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 107 |
中文關鍵詞: | 擴增實境 、個體差異 、視覺型學習風格 、聽覺型學習風格 、適性化教學 |
英文關鍵詞: | FSLSM, Visual Learning Style, Verbal Learning Style |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000046 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:249 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
教師需要在意課堂上學習者的學習風格,針對不同學習風格者給予相符合的 教材,才能幫助他們。亦有研究證實在教學現場使用擴增實境,能有效地幫助學 習者進行學習。但其帶來的教材不靈活性,無法適應學習者變化。
綜上所述,本研究提出適性化擴增實境系統,以此系統作為輔助學習者學習 之工具,讓學習者透過此系統進行學習,並可以接收到與自己學習風格相符合之 教材。
適性化擴增實境組在學習成效方面,是顯著優於非適性化擴增實境組。間隔 一個禮拜的延宕測驗也顯示出,適性化擴增實境組在記憶保留程度,也是顯著優 於非適性化擴增實境組。
除此之外,在皆使用擴增實境的情況下,神馳經驗沒有顯著差異。在滿意度 部分,除了系統穩定性需要有所改善之外,學習者在系統接受及使用上皆有良好 的態度,且在未來皆希望可以透過此類系統進行學習。
Teachers need to care about the learner's learning style in the classroom, and give them a matching textbook for different learning styles to help them. Studies have also confirmed that the use of augmented reality at the teaching site can effectively help learners learn. However, the materials it brings are not flexible and cannot adapt to learner changes.
In summary, this study proposes an adaptive augmented reality system, which is used as a tool to assist learners in learning, allowing learners to learn through this system and receive textbooks that are consistent with their own learning style.
The adaptive augmented reality group was significantly better than the non-adapted augmented reality group in terms of learning outcomes. The one-week delay test also showed that the degree of memory retention in the adaptive augmented reality group was also significantly better than the non-adapted augmented reality group.
In addition, there is no significant difference in the experience of flow in the case of augmented reality. In the satisfaction section, in addition to the improvement of system stability, learners have a good attitude in system acceptance and use, and in the future they hope to learn through such systems.
黃楷升(2006)。網路化適性閱讀理解策略學習環境之建置(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence:Teleoperators and virtual environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality.IEEE computer graphics and applications, 21(6), 34-47.
Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012). Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: A content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers & Education, 58(2), 835-842.
Aisami, R. S. (2015). Learning styles and visual literacy for learning and performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 538-545.
Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334-342.
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
Brusilovsky, P., & Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 13, 159-172.
Brown, E., Brailsford, T., Fisher, T., Moore, A., & Ashman, H. (2006, May). Reappraising cognitive styles in adaptive web applications. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 327-335). ACM.
Balasubramanian, V., & Anouncia, S. M. (2016). Learning style detection based on cognitive skills to support adaptive learning environment–A reinforcement approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Caudell, T. P., & Mizell, D. W. (1992, January). Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on system sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 659-669). IEEE.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review.
Chang, W., & Tan, Q. (2010, December). Augmented reality system design and scenario study for location-based adaptive mobile learning. In 2010 13th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (pp. 20-27). IEEE.
Chen, C. M., & Sun, Y. C. (2012). Assessing the effects of different multimedia materials on emotions and learning performance for visual and verbal style learners. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1273-1285.
Chang, K. E., Chang, C. T., Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., Chao, H. L., & Lee, C. M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers & Education, 71, 185-197.
Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F. K. (2014). A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31-40.
Civelek, T., Ucar, E., Ustunel, H., & Aydın, M. K. (2014). Effects of a Haptic Augmented Simulation on K-12 Students' Achievement and their Attitudes towards Physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(6).
Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students' learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities.Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
Chen, C. H., Chou, Y. Y., & Huang, C. Y. (2016). An Augmented-Reality-Based Concept Map to Support Mobile Learning for Science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 567-578.
Chang, S. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226-239.
Chou, C. Y., Lai, K. R., Chao, P. Y., Tseng, S. F., & Liao, T. Y. (2018). A negotiation- based adaptive learning system for regulating help-seeking behaviors. Computers & Education, 126, 115-128.
Di Serio, Á ., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
Felder, R. M. (1995). Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign language annals, 28(1), 21-31.
Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE prism, 6(4), 18-23.
Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1997). Index of Learning Styles questionnaire.
Retrieved November 27, 2008, from http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html.
Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (2000). Learning styles and strategies.
Ford, N., & Chen, S. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5- 22.
Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International journal of engineering education, 21(1), 103-112.
Franzoni, A. L., Assar, S., Defude, B., & Rojas, J. (2008, July). Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies(pp. 778-782). IEEE.
Filippidis, S. K., & Tsoukalas, L. A. (2009). On the use of adaptive instructional images based on the sequential-global dimension of the Felder-Silverman learning style theory. Interactive Learning Environments,17(2), 135-150.
Graf, S. (2006). Book Review: Adaptable and Adaptive Hypermedia Systems (Sherry Y. Chen and George D. Magoulas). Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 361– 364.
Graf, S., Kinshuk, & Liu, T. C. (2009). Supporting teachers in identifying students' learning styles in learning management systems: An automatic student modelling approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 3-14
Graf, S., & Liu, T. C. (2010). Analysis of learners' navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116-131.
Garcia-Cabot, A., de-Marcos, L., & Garcia-Lopez, E. (2015). An empirical study on m- learning adaptation: Learning performance and learning contexts. Computers & Education, 82, 450-459.
Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1-19.
Hwang, G. J., Sung, H. Y., Hung, C. M., & Huang, I. (2013). A learning style perspective to investigate the necessity of developing adaptive learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 188-197.
Hsiao, K. F. (2013). Using augmented reality for students health-case of combining educational learning with standard fitness. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 64(2), 407-421.
Huang, T. C., Chen, C. C., & Chou, Y. W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72-82.
Hsu, T. C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter?. Computers & Education, 106, 137-149.
Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á ., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
Jee, H. K., Lim, S., Youn, J., & Lee, J. (2014). An augmented reality-based authoring tool for E-learning applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 68(2), 225- 235.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Engle-wood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Keefe, J. W. (1991). Learning Style: Cognitive and Thinking Skills. Instructional Leadership Series.
Karampiperis, P., & Sampson, D. (2005). Adaptive learning resources sequencing in educational hypermedia systems.Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 128-147.
Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3-4), 163-174.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228.
Litzinger, T. A., Lee, S. H., Wise, J. C., & Felder, R. M. (2007). A psychometric study of the index of learning styles© . Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 309-319.
Liu, T. C., & Graf, S. (2009). Coping with mismatched courses: students’ behaviour and performance in courses mismatched to their learning styles.Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(6), 739.
Liu, T. Y., Tan, T. H., & Chu, Y. L. (2009). Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4).
Liu, H., Zhao, W., & Liang, M. (2010). Pedagogical strategy model in adaptive learning system. Focusing on Learning Styles, (3), 156–164.
Lim, S., & Lee, J. (2013). An Immersive Augmented‐Reality‐Based e‐Learning System Based on Dynamic Threshold Marker Method. Etri Journal, 35(6), 1048-1057.
Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525-541.
Lin, W., Lo, W. T., & Yueh, H. P. (2019, March). How the Multimodal Media in Augmented Reality Affects Museum Learning Experience. In 2019 12th Asia Pacific Workshop on Mixed and Augmented Reality (APMAR) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995, December). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies (Vol. 2351, pp. 282-293). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. InPsychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85-139). Academic Press.
McCall, R., Wetzel, R., Löschner, J., & Braun, A. K. (2011). Using presence to evaluate an augmented reality location aware game.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(1), 25-35.
Normadhi, N. B. A., Shuib, L., Nasir, H. N. M., Bimba, A., Idris, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2019). Identification of personal traits in adaptive learning environment: Systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 130, 168-190.
Özpolat, E., & Akar, G. B. (2009). Automatic detection of learning styles for an e- learning system. Computers & Education, 53(2), 355-367.
Olsson, T., Kärkkäinen, T., Lagerstam, E., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2012). User evaluation of mobile augmented reality scenarios. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 4(1), 29-47.
Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British journal of educational psychology, 46(2), 128-148.
Paolucci, R. (1998, June). Hypermedia and learning: The relationship of cognitive style and knowledge structure. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA (Vol. 98).
Park, O., & Lee, J. (2004). Adaptive instructional systems. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 651– 685). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Phobun, P., & Vicheanpanya, J. (2010). Adaptive intelligent tutoring systems for e- learning systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4064-4069.
Rose, C. (1998). Accelerated Learning, New York: Bantam Dell Publishing Group. Reiff, J. C. (1992). Learning styles. Washington, DC: National Education Association
of the United States.
Russell, T. L. (1997). Technology wars: Winners and losers-the no significant difference
phenomenon. Educom Review, 32, 44-47.
Snow, R., & Farr, M. (1987). Cognitive-conative-affective processes in aptitude,
learning, and instruction: An introduction.Conative and affective process analysis, 3(1-10).
Stewart, D. W. (1998). Effects of using a nonverbal (musical) cue on recall and playback of television advertising: Implications for advertising tracking. Journal of Business Research, 42(1), 39-51.
Specht, M., Ternier, S., & Greller, W. (2011). Dimensions of mobile augmented reality for learning: a first inventory.
Sampayo-Vargas, S., Cope, C. J., He, Z., & Byrne, G. J. (2013). The effectiveness of adaptive difficulty adjustments on students' motivation and learning in an educational computer game. Computers & Education, 69, 452-462.
Squires, D. R. (2014). M-Learning: Implications in Learning Domain Specificities, Adaptive Learning, Feedback, Augmented Reality, and the Future of Online Learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 1-8.
Soflano, M., Connolly, T. M., & Hainey, T. (2015). Learning style analysis in adaptive GBL application to teach SQL. Computers & Education, 86, 105-119.
Tseng, S. S., Su, J. M., Hwang, G. J., Hwang, G. H., Tsai, C. C., & Tsai, C. J. (2008). An object-oriented course framework for developing adaptive learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 171-191.
Tseng, J. C., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information. Computers & Education, 51(2), 776-786.
Thalmann, S. (2014). Adaptation criteria for the personalised delivery of learning materials: A multi-stage empirical investigation.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1).
Truong, H. M. (2016). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities.Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1185-1193.
Vandewaetere, M., Desmet, P., & Clarebout, G. (2011). The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 118-130.
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.
Yang, T. C., Hwang, G. J., & Yang, S. J. H. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students' learning styles and cognitive styles. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185.
Zywno, M. S. (2002). Instructional technology, learning styles and academic achievement. age, 7, 1.
Zywno, M. S. (2003). A contribution of validation of score meaning for Felder- Soloman's. In Index of Learning Styles, Proc. 2003 Annual ASEE Conference, ASEE.
Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178-188.
Zhang, J., Ogan, A., Liu, T. C., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2016, September). The influence of using augmented reality on textbook support for learners of different learning styles. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 107-114). IEEE.