本研究的目標主要有兩點：第一，欲透過探討鶯歌各種類陶瓷產業的發展，以概念化其生產網絡。第二，透過全球生產網絡的理論檢驗鶯歌陶瓷產業，使用價值、權力、鑲嵌三個關鍵概念相互交織以揭示生產網絡中的區域，如何獲取價值及運作權力，以及組織其工業地域。
首先透過檢視鶯歌陶瓷產業的歷史背景，瞭解以家族窯廠發跡的鶯歌，如何因豐富原料、交通及技術人才，使工廠逐漸聚集。近年來東亞地區製造業的位移，使陶瓷外銷市場萎縮，並面臨全球化衝擊。因此部分工廠外移中國或東南亞，尋求低生產成本，其中有些公司已形成跨界的生產網絡。而仍在鶯歌營運的陶瓷工廠則以研發設計與技術改良為主，且更致力於開發新製程、提高良率及增加產能；中小型廠則以維持品質、生產專業化及彈性銷售來維持經營。藝術類陶瓷工廠也因為政府政策對文化產業的重視，而進入嶄新階段。
在檢視生產網絡中的權力關係時，必須考慮公司、制度及集體權力等面向，而擁有高階技術的大型企業權力相對較大。在鑲嵌關係中，鶯歌陶瓷工廠的領域鑲嵌源自於家族企業，但網絡鑲嵌則因工廠間的藏私、競爭及仿冒，而關係薄弱。鶯歌陶瓷產業之研發創新已逐漸出現於大型陶瓷企業中，但因廠商間缺乏完善之互動機制，無法厚實地方社會資本，顯示尚未跳脫早期的聚集型態，仍是因生產要素所帶來的空間上而集結與廠商間交易性依賴。並非為廠商與廠商間基於互惠、高度信任與緊密互動學習的水平式結構，因此並非真正的群聚工業地域。

This research has two main aims. Firstly to conceptualize the production networks of Yingge ceramics industry through examining the evolution of ceramics factories. Secondly, to use Global Production Network approaches to elucidate Yingge ceramics industry, three key notions of value, power and embeddedness are used to reveal the most powerful actors in the production network, how they maintain and exercise their power, and how the organization of production is manipulated as a result in Yingge.
The paper starts with investigating the history of Yingge ceramics industry, to know it was initiated by its affluent resources, abundant of talents and convient communications. In recent years, Yingge ceramics industry has encountered a decline problem in ceramics export and the influence of globalization. Hence some factories migrated to China or Southeast Asian nations, and even some of them formed the trans-border production networks. The ceramics factories that still operate in Yingge concentrate upon research and development （R&D）, technology upgrading, developing new production processes, maintaining high yield rates and improving productivity. Large enterprises of toilet ceramics and industrial ceramics innovated toward high technology industry. Small and medium enterprises still keep on producing products with superior quality, and circulate flexibly. Combined with government policy emphasis on the cultural industry, the art ceramics industry enters into a new phase.
When examining the power relations in the production network, it is essential to consider dimensions of corporate power, institutional power and collective power. The research explored the innovation and learning in Yingge every kind of ceramics industry, arguing that the tacit knowledge is accumulated on its technology development and extended on its productive network. Nevertheless, these enterprises didn’t connect with other actors, such as academic research, private or government organizations, so that the industry didn’t enjoy productive network to form their innovation and learning ability. There still is lack of interactive institution among these actors, so that the local social capital is still switch enough. So Yingge ceramics industry is not cluster industrial district.

一、中文文獻
工商時報. 2003. 資訊科技 　
中國砂輪. 2006. 中國砂輪95年度年報.
— — — . 2008. 懷念白榮譽董事長專輯. 23:19-34.
今澤正秋編 . 1997. 鶯歌鄉土誌. 台北: 海山文教工作室.
方天龍. 1996. 淬煉- 登上阿爾卑斯的和成欣業. 臺北: 商周文化.
王世慶. 1996. 淡水河流域河港水運史. 台北: 中央研究院社科所.
台北縣政府. 2000. 「修訂台北縣綜合發展計畫」計畫主持人張金鄂教授.
白永傳. 2005. 感恩的一生：白永傳回憶錄中文版. 台北: 白永傳.
江正文. 2004. 建構文化創意產業之行銷平台探討--以鶯歌陶瓷產業為例.輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文.
江怡薇. 2004. 社會資本對知識流通與文化創意商圈價值創造影響之研究－以鶯歌陶瓷為例.輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文.
米復國. 1988. 台灣的公共住宅政策. 台灣社會研究季刊 1 (2):98-99.
吳易蓮. 1999. 地方產業之觀光化與社區營造---以鶯歌陶瓷產業為例.中國文化大學地學研究所碩士論文.
吳威德. 1985. 鶯歌陶瓷工業空間之研究.私立中國文化大學地學研究所地理組碩士論文.
宋光梁. 1975. 陶業製品的分類. 台灣窯業 65:9-12.
宋秉忠. 2007. 向古人學習/越南機會財 製造民生必需 大同奈磁磚. 遠見雜誌 249.
李幸芳. 2002. 鶯歌鎮陶瓷產業對都市空間發展型態變遷之研究.國立台北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文.
李倩如. 2003. 中央與地方文化政策形塑下的產業空間變遷：鶯歌陶瓷老街個案.銘傳大學媒體空間設計研究所碩士論文.
和成欣業. 2006. 和成欣業股份有限公司年報.
林妙玲. 2008. 傳產轉型：和成欣業76歲的轉型從馬桶到防彈衣，跨出新希望. 261:254-257.
徐文琴&周義雄. 1993. 鶯歌陶瓷史. 台北: 台北縣立文化中心.
馬有成. 1997. 戰後鶯歌鎮的陶瓷業與社會變遷.國立中央大學歷史研究所碩士論文.
張挺立、賴守婉、劉政和合編. 1995. 鶯歌巡禮. 台北: 鶯歌鎮公所.
張雯雅. 2003. 文建會振興陶瓷產業計畫-專訪陳郁秀主委. 陶藝 40:150-153.
莊富安. 2007. 冠軍搶攻頂級品市場. 工商時報.
陳向明. 2002. 社會科學質的研究. 台北: 五南.
陳自勉. 1989. 鶯歌、苗栗陶瓷業之空間結構.國立臺灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文.
陳均泓. 2004. 臺灣建築陶瓷材料產業在兩岸間的跨界生產網絡.國立台北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士碩士論文.
陳政均. 2004. 地方產業結構變遷與創新學習能力之研究--以鶯歌藝術陶瓷產業為例.台北大學都市計畫研究所區域組碩士論文.
陳新上. 1996. 日據時期臺灣陶瓷發展狀況之研究.國立臺灣師範大學美術系研究所碩士論文.
陳墀吉. 1993. 鶯歌鎮窯業社會空間結構化之研究.中國文化大學地學研究所博士學位論文.
黃富三. 1990. 台北縣鶯歌鎮陶瓷文化發展之研究（上）. 台北縣立文化中心季刊 26:11.
劉佩真. 2007. 陶瓷玻璃製造業近期觀察. 台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫產業報導:6-7.
劉萍. 2006. 傳統砂輪一哥變工業鑽石王. 理財周刊 295.
蔡佩真. 2004. 陶瓷廠商價值創造之研究--以鶯歌地區為例.輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文.
鄭如婷. 2002. 階級衝突與地方產業發展之研究─以鶯歌陶瓷業發展為例.國立台北大學地政學系碩士論文.
鄧淑慧. 1996. 「仿古時代」--六十年代至七十年代鶯歌外地來的成型師傅.清華大學社會人類學研究所碩士論文.
蕭富隆. 1996. 台灣陶瓷產業發展,1665--1995.國立中興大學歷史研究所碩士論文.
謝慧青. 和成創業七十三年 台灣陶瓷數位典藏計畫 2004
蘇世德. 2004. 鶯歌製陶兩百年特展專輯. 台北縣鶯歌鎮: 台北縣立鶯歌陶瓷博物館.
鶯歌鎮戶政事務所編. 1967-1993. 年終統計.
鶯歌鎮鎮公所. 1979. 鶯歌鎮鎮誌. 台北: 鶯歌鎮鎮公所.

Amin. A., and N. Thrift. 1994. Holding down the global. In Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, eds. A. Amin and N. Thrift, 257-60. Oxford: University Press.
Boyer, R., and D. Drache eds. 1996. States against Markets: The Limits of Globalization. London: Routledge.
Callon, M. 1992. Technological Change And Company Strategies: Economic And Sociological Perspectives. London: Harcout Brace Jovanich.
Castells, M. 2000. End of Millennium. 夏鑄九&黃慧琦等譯. 2001.千禧年之終結. 台北市: 唐山.
Coates, D. 2000. Models of Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Coe, Martin Hess, Henry Wai-chung Yeung,Peter Dicken,Jeffrey Henderson.2004. Globalizing regional development: a global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29:468-484.
Cook, I., and P. Crang. 1996. The world on a plate: culinary culture, displacement and geographical knowledges. Journal of Material Culture 1:131-53.
Czaban. L., and J. Henderson. 1998. Globalisation, institutional legacies and industrial transformation in Eastern Europe. Economy and Society 27 (４):585-613.
Dicken, P. 2007. Global Shift： Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century. 劉衛東等譯. 2007. 全球性轉變--重塑21世紀的全球經濟地圖. 北京: 商務印書館.
Dicken, P., P. F. Kelly, O. , K., and H. W.-C. Yeung. 2001. Chains and networks,territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks 1 (2):89-112.
Gereffi, G. 1994. The organisation of buyer-driven global commodity chains: how US retailers shape overseas production networks. In Commodity Chains and Global Development, eds. G. Gereffi and M. Korzeniewicz, 95-122. Westport: Praeger.
———. 1995. Global production systems and third world development. In Global Change, Regional Response., ed. B. Stallings, 100-42. New York: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1996. Global commodity chains: new forms of coordination and control among nations and firms in international industries. . Competition and Change 1:427-39.
———. 1999. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics 48 (1):37-70.
Grabher, G. 1993. The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In The Embedded Firm: On the Socio-Economics of Inter-firm Relations, ed. G. Grabher, 255-78. London: Routledge.
Harrison, B. 1992. Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles? Regional studies 26:469-83.
Hausner, J., B. Jessop, and K. Nielsen. 1995. Strategic Choice and Path Dependency in Post-Socialism. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Henderson, J., P. Dicken, M. Hess, N. Coe, and H. W.-C. Yeung. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9 (3):436-464.
Hutton, W. ed. 1995. The State We’re In. London: Jonathan Cape.
Jackson, P. 1999. Commodity cultures: the traffic in things. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 24:95-108.
Johns, J. 2006. Video games production networks: value capture, power relations and embeddedness. Economic Geography 6:151-180.
Johnson, B., and B. Lundvall. 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry
Studies 1:23-42.
Knight, R. 1995. Knowledge-based development: policy and planning
implications for cities. Urban Studies 32(2):225-260.
Latour, B. 1999. On recalling ANT. In Actor-Network Theory and After., eds. J. Law and J. Hassard, 15-25. Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, J. 1999. After ANT: complexity, naming and typology. In Actor-network Theory and After. , eds. J. Law and J. Hassard, 1–14. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mishler, E. G. ed. 1986. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nelson, R. 1993. National systems of innovation: a comparative study. Oxford: University Press.
Pike, A., A. Lagendijk, and M. Vale. 2000. Critical refiections on “embeddedness”in economic geography: the case of labour market governance and training in the automotive industry in the North-East region of England. In Restructuring Industry and Territory.The Experience of Europe’s Regions. , eds. A.Giunta, A. Legendijk and A.Pike, 59-82. London: The Stationery OfŽfice.
Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
———. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan.
———. 1996. The competitive advantage of nations. 李明軒&邱如美譯. 1996. 國家競爭優勢. 台北: 天下文化.
Scott, and Storper. 2003. Regions,globalization,development. Regional studies 37:579-93.
Scott, A. J. 1998. Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition and Political Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 1999. The cultural economy: geography and the creative field. Media, Culture and Society 21:807-17.
Stabell, C. B., and O. D. Fjeldstad. 1998. Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: On Chains, Shops, and Networks. Journal of Strategic Management 19:413-437.
Stark, D. 1992. Path dependence and privatization strategies in East-Central Europe. East European Politics and Societies 6 (1):17-51.
Sturgeon, T. J. 2001. How do we define value chains and production networks? IDS Bulletin 32 (3):9-18.
Whatmore, S., and L. Thorne. 1997. Nourishing networks: alternative geographies of food. In Globalizing Food:Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring., eds. D. J. Goodman and M. J. Watts, 287-304. London: Routledge.
Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yeung, H. W.-C. 1998. The social-spatial constitution of business organisation:a geographical perspective. Organization 5 (1):101-28.
Zysman, J. 1983. Governments, Markets and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. Oxford: Robertson.

三、網站資料
台南市政府全球資訊網. 「瓷磚商品標示基準」自96年1月26日正式實施. http://www.tncg.gov.tw/pda_01.asp?id={CF8F9CC0-7FBD-4E08-9E1D-778F0127B011} 2007/4/10 [cited.
行政院經建會. 2008. 中國即將實施勞動合同法. http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0009561&key=%e4%b8%ad%e5%9c%8b%e5%8d%b3%e5%b0%87%e5%af%a6%e6%96%bd%e5%8b%9e%e5%8b%95%e5%90%88%e5%90%8c%e6%b3%95 2007 [cited 0610 2008].
華夏經緯網. 2007. 台灣冠軍瓷磚產品挺進內地. http://big5.huaxia.com/sw/qycf/2007/00700525.html.