簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林欣蓉
Lin, Shin-Rung
論文名稱: 柔能克剛?中高年級學童傷害訊息分析暨其幽默風格、學校適應及幽默回應技巧關係之研究
Could a Soft Answer Turn Away Wrath? Research on Hurtful Messages and the Relationships between Humor Styles, School Adjustment, and Humor Response Techniques among Third to Sixth Graders
指導教授: 陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
章舜雯
Chang, Shun-Wen
口試委員: 林耀南
Lin, Yao-Nan
吳相儀
Wu, Hsiang-Yi
張瓅勻
Chang, Li-Yun
詹雨臻
Chan, Yu-Chen
章舜雯
Chang, Shun-Wen
陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
口試日期: 2022/07/07
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 149
中文關鍵詞: 傷害訊息幽默風格學校適應回應策略幽默回應技巧
英文關鍵詞: hurtful messages, humor styles, school adjustment, response strategies, humor response techniques
研究方法: 調查研究內容分析法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200927
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:102下載:15
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 過去研究發現傷害訊息的普遍性,並已初步探討大學生的傷害訊息類型及其回應方式,但國小學童如何覺察與應對傷害訊息仍不明確,有待進一步釐清。有鑑於前述問題,本研究將進行三項系列研究,茲以探討國小學童覺察及應對傷害訊息的議題。首先,研究一(N = 223)採取歸納研究取徑,經內容分析程序,從而歸納國小學童覺察到的七種傷害訊息類型:「批評」、「越界」、「逗弄」、「誤會」、「疏離」、「介入」及「非語言貶抑」。
    其次,研究二(N = 236)發展國小學童適用的簡版幽默風格衡量工具,並針對簡版幽默風格量表進行驗證性因素分析,爾後再應用具有信、效度的簡版幽默風格量表,探究國小學童的幽默風格組型。結果發現,分量表Cronbach’s α係數為 .69至 .81,重測信度介於 .67至 .73,表示HSQ-TC具有可接受的信度;四個一階因素之組合信度與平均變異萃取量皆為良好,且研究模式具有理想的整體適配度,顯示HSQ-TC-S具有良好效度。於是,據以應用簡版幽默風格量表,並得知中、高年級學童之幽默風格組型:「幽默自謙者」、「粗暴逗弄者」及「幽默隱匿者」。
    最後,研究三(N = 262)探究幽默風格與學校適應之相關程度、幽默風格組型與學校適應之差異情形,以及檢視各組型對其回應策略之關聯情形。研究結果顯示,適應型幽默風格與學校適應呈正相關,攻擊型幽默與學校適應為負相關,而自我貶抑型幽默與同儕適應存有正相關;集群分析揭示幽默自謙者在學校適應四向度之表現,皆顯著優於幽默隱匿者,而幽默自謙者在學習動機、常規適應二向度,顯著優於粗暴逗弄者。此外,國小學童應對傷害訊息之回應策略雙向度模式,以「積極/消極」與「關心他人需求/關心自我需求」向度進行劃分,發現四大回應策略:「積極層面人我取向」、「積極層面他人取向」、「積極層面自我取向」及「消極層面人我取向」,及其九種次級類型:「兼容」、「順應」、「致意」、「詢問」、「約束」、「反擊」、「轉移」、「支援」及「逃避」;幽默自謙者,傾向使用「積極層面自我取向」之「詢問」與「約束」回應策略;粗暴逗弄者,則傾向使用「積極層面自我取向」之「反擊」回應策略;國小學童產出之幽默回應技巧類型:「雙關」、「譬喻」、「仿擬」、「誇飾」、「倒反」、「同異」、「轉化」、「析字」及「飛白」九種,而國小學童在幽默回應(28.6%)使用幽默回應技巧百分比,高於一般回應(6.7%)。
    綜觀而言,本研究釐清了中、高年級學童在校園脈絡中,覺察到的傷害訊息類型、傷害訊息回應類型,及集群組型與回應類型的關聯,有關研究結果之理論層面、實務應用與未來研究方向,亦於文末提出討論。

    Previous studies have found hurtful messages are a common experience, discussed the typology of hurtful messages and addressed the reactions undergraduate students have to hurtful messages. However, how elementary school students can be aware about these hurtful messages and how they cope with them is still unclear and requires further clarification. Thus, we conducted three studies to clarify these issues.
    Study 1 (N = 223) adopted an inductive approach through content analysis process to explore the categories of hurtful messages. Our study classified respondent’s hurtful messages into seven categories, including “criticism,” “transgression,” “teasing,” “misunderstanding,” “alienating,” “intervening” and “nonverbal derogation.”
    Study 2 (N = 236) developed a short-form assessment, the traditional Chinese version of the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ-TC), to facilitate the respondent’s willingness to complete the test. Confirmatory factor analyses were used to build an assessment with validity and reliability which would be applied to identifying humor types at a younger age. Reliability results showed that the short-form of the HSQ-TC (HSQ-TC-S) subscales were acceptable, with the Cronbach’s α coefficients ranging from .69 to .81, and the test-retest reliability from .67 to .73. The four factors showed good composite reliability and average variance extracted. Goodness-of-fit indices and confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence for the construct validity of the scale. Via a cluster analysis, they were classified into 3 humor types: “modest humorists,” “cruel teasers” and “humor deniers.”
    Study 3 (N = 262) attempted to understand how humor styles relate to school adjustment and whether these types can be distinguished in terms of school adjustment. This study also examined how each humor style related to its response strategies. The results revealed that the adaptive styles of humor are positively correlated with all the subscales of school adjustment, whereas aggressive humor was negatively correlated with all the subscales of school adjustment. Self-defeating humor was positively correlated with the peer adjustment subscales. A cluster analysis was revealed that modest humorists scored higher in terms of school adjustment than humor deniers and higher in learning motivation and regular adaptation than cruel teasers.
    Based on the research findings, we proposed a two-dimensional model (active/negative, concern for other/concern for self) to explain the mechanisms underlying elementary school students’ response to hurtful messages, including active aspect of concern for other and self, active aspect of concern for other, active aspect of concern for self, and negative aspect of concern for other and self. Our study classified respondent’s response strategies into nine secondary categories, including “intergrating,” “obligating,” “apology,” “inquiry,” “restricting,” “rebuttal,” “diverting,” “support” and “avoiding.” Moreover, modest humorists preferred to use “inquiry” or “restricting” and cruel teasers preferred to use “rebuttal” as main strategies.
    The analysis of humor response techniques has revealed that pun, metaphor/simile, parody/imitation, exaggeration, irony, Tongyi, transformation, Xizi, and Feibai were used to respond to hurtful messages and elementary school students taking the humorous answering perspective (28.6%) tended to use humor response techniques compared to the general answering perspective (6.7%).
    Overall, our study classified not only the typology of hurtful messages and response strategies but also explored the relationships between types and response strategies. We discuss the research findings, theoretical and pedagogical implications, and recommendations for future research in the last section of this paper.

    謝詞i 中文摘要iii 英文摘要v 目次ix 表次xi 圖次xiii 第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究目的6 第三節 名詞釋義6 第二章 文獻探討9 第一節 傷害訊息9 第二節 一般回應與幽默回應18 第三節 幽默風格36 第四節 學校適應40 第五節 傷害訊息暨幽默風格、學校適應及回應類型的相關研究45 第六節 整體研究概述48 研究一 中高年級學童傷害訊息類型探討51 第一節 研究對象52 第二節 研究工具53 第三節 資料處理54 第四節 研究結果56 第五節 討論與建議61 研究二 發展國小學童適用之簡版幽默風格量表暨幽默風格組型探討63 第一節 研究對象65 第二節 研究工具65 第三節 資料處理67 第四節 研究結果67 第五節 討論與建議80 研究三 中高年級學童傷害訊息回應類型暨其相關因素探討 83 第一節 研究對象86 第二節 研究工具86 第三節 資料處理89 第四節 研究結果90 第五節 討論與建議108 綜合討論113 參考文獻121 中文部分121 英文部分129 附錄141 附錄 1 學校生活適應量表授權同意書141 附錄 2 正體中文版幽默風格量表授權同意書142 附錄 3 中文版自尊量表授權同意書143 附錄 4 國小學童傷害訊息調查表 144 附錄 5 國小學童傷害訊息回應調查表145

    李仁豪、鍾芯瑜(2020):〈中文版簡式「五大人格量表」BFI的發展〉。《測驗學刊》,67,271–299。[Li, R.-H., & Chung, H.-Y. (2020). The development of a Chinese shortened version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Psychological Testing, 67, 271–299.]
    李育懃、歐陽誾(2015):〈即時反饋系統應用於國小三年級學生修辭教學之行動研究〉。《師資培育與教師專業發展期刊》,8(3),77–101。[Li, Y.-C., & Ou-Yang, Y. (2015). An action research on interactive response system applied to rhetoric instruction for third graders. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 8(3), 77–101.] https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492015120803004
    李衿綺(2012):《國小學童同儕互動挫折事件與因應研究》(未出版碩士論文),臺北市立教育大學。[Li, J.-C. (2012). Research on peer interaction frustration events and coping of elementary school students (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Taipei.]
    吳相儀、林耀南、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君(2008):〈樂觀就不悲觀嗎?樂觀與悲觀的雙向度理論驗證及量表的發展〉。《測驗學刊》,55,559–589。[Wu, H.-Y., Lin, Y.-N., Chen, H.-C., Chiu, F.-C., & Hsi, C.-C. (2008). The verification and measurement of the bi-dimensional construct of optimism-pessimism. Psychological Testing, 55, 559–589.] https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200812.0006
    吳靜宜、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君(2007):〈國中小學版幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗之編製〉。《應用心理研究》,35,185–210。[Wu, C.-Y., Chen, H.-C., Chiu, F.-C., & Hsi, C.-C. (2007). Development of “Humor comprehension and humor creativity test”. Research in Applied Psychology, 35, 185–210.]
    吳麗珍、黃惠滿、李浩銑(2014):〈方便取樣和立意取樣之比較〉。《護理雜誌》,61,105–111。[Wu, L.-J., Huang, H.-M., & Lee, H.-H. (2014). A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. The Journal of Nursing, 61, 105–111.] https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.61.3.105
    林志哲(2019):〈大學生生活因應量表之編製及其恆等性檢驗〉。《教育與心理研究》,42(2),89–118。[Lin, C.-C. (2019). Development of the “Inventory of college students’ life coping” and assessment of measurement invariance. Journal of Education & Psychology, 42(2), 89–118.] https://doi.org/10.3966/102498852019064202004
    林欣蓉、陳學志、廖崑閔、蔡雅齡(2020):〈科技前導教師教案實作之課程意識探究-以七位國小教師的觀點為例〉。《教育科學期刊》,19(1)1–22。[Lin, S.-R., Chen, H.-C., Liao, K.-M., & Tsai, Y.-L. (2020). Pilot teachers’ curricular consciousness through the lesson plan of technology: The perceptions of 7 elementary school teachers. The Journal of Educational Science, 19(1), 1–22.]
    林美淑(2013):〈九年一貫國語教科書修辭教材編選內容分析之探究-以「南一版」備課教學指引為例〉。《新竹教育大學人文社會學報》,6(1),121–152。[Lin, M.-S. (2013). The content analysis of compiling rhetorical teaching materials on nine-year consistent Chinese language textbook: Teacher's guideline of nan-yi publisher as the sample. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences of NHCUE, 6(1), 121–152.] https://doi.org/10.29895/ATFSAS.201303_6(1).0005
    林美淑(2014):《國小學童辭格創意教學方案設計及其成效之研究》(未出版博士論文),國立臺中教育大學。[Lin, M.-S. (2014). The lesson plan on creative teaching method for figures of speech & its methodological implications in an elementary school context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation thesis). National Taichung University of Education.]
    林純燕、賴志峰(2014):〈國民小學新住民子女學校適應與幸福感相關之研究〉。《學校行政雙月刊》,92,205–230。[Lin, C.-Y., & Lai, C.-F. (2014). A study on the relationship between school adaptation and well-being of new immigrant children in elementary schools. School Administration Research Association, 92, 205–230.] https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002014070092011
    邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲(2003):〈幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實證效果評估〉。《教育心理學報》,34,179–198。[Chiu, F.-C., Chen, H.-C., & Cho, S.-L. (2003). A course design for creative training of humor and the effects of an empirically evaluative study. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 34,179–198.] https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20020628
    邱皓政(2022):《量化研究與統計分析:SPSS與R資料分析範例解析(第六版)》。五南。[Chiou, H.-J. (2022). Quantitative analysis and statistical analysis: SPSS & R data analysis (6th ed.). Wu-Nan.]
    郎亞琴、廖宴雪(2012):〈國小高年級學生同儕衝突與因應策略之研究〉。《休閒運動保健學報》,3,98–114。[Lang, Y.-C., & Liao, Y.-H. (2012). A study of peer conflicts and coping strategies for the 5th and 6th graders. Journal of Recreation Sport and Health Promotion, 3, 98–114.] https://doi.org/10.6204/JRSHP.2012.03.08
    洪福源(2012):〈大學生傷害性情感事件與因應策略關係之調查研究〉。《輔導與諮商學報》,34,68–85。[Hong, F.-Y. (2012). Relationship between emotionally hurtful incidents and coping strategies among Taiwan university students. The Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 34, 68–85.] https://doi.org/10.7040/JGC.201211.0068
    洪福源、邱素玲(2014):〈大學生傷害他人情感事件、受傷害性情感事件與自尊、人格特質關係之研究〉。《輔導與諮商學報》,36,1–20。[Hong, F.-Y., & Chiu, S.-L. (2014). Self-esteem, personality, harmed emotional event and harmful emotional event connective studies in university students. The Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 36, 1–20.]
    張民杰(2007):〈實習教師知覺到的校園人際衝突-“個案紀實”的分析〉。《新竹教育大學教育學報》,24(2),93–118。[Chang, M.-C. (2007). An analysis of cases for the student teachers' perceived interpersonal conflict in the placement schools. Educational Journal of NHCUE, 24(2), 93–118.] https://doi.org/10.7044/NHCUEA.200712.0093
    張春榮(2015):《現代修辭學》。萬卷樓。[Chang, C.-R. (2015). Modern Rhetoric. Wan-Juan.]
    張春興(2010):《張氏心理學辭典——簡明版》。東華。[Chang, C.-H. (2010). Concise version of Chang’s Mental Lexicon. Tung-Hua.]
    張景媛、陳學志、黃譯瑩(2004):〈幽默訓練融入綜合活動對國一學生創造思考與人際因應之影響〉。《教育心理學報》,36,13–33。[Chang, C.-Y., Chen, H.-C., & Huang, Y.-Y. (2004). The effect of a humor training curriculum blended into on integrated activities course on 7th-grade students' creative thinking and interpersonal coping skills. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 36, 13–33.] https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20040224
    張慧菊、王建雅、陳學志(2010):〈當禁忌和攻擊變幽默-青少年幽默因應中的禁忌與語文攻擊表現〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》,23,241–269。[Chang, H.-J., Wang C. -Y., & Chen, H.-C. (2010). Taboos and aggression in humor: Taboo violation and verbal aggression as teenager coping strategies. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 23, 241–269.] https://doi.org/10.30074/10.30074/FJMH.201006_23(2).0004
    教育部(2014年11月28日):十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。新課綱推動相關法令規定。https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter=11C2C6C1-D64E-475E-916B-D20C83896343
    [Ministry of Education. (2014, November 28). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: General guidelines. Latest News. https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter=11C2C6C1-D64E-475E-916B-D20C83896343]
    教育部(2019年4月2日):十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域-國語文。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要彙整。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebNews/details.aspx?sid=11&nid=1402&mid=50
    [Ministry of Education. (2019, April 2). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary school and junior high school in Mandarin-Native languages domain. The directory of Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education.
    https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebNews/details.aspx?sid=11&nid=1402&mid=50]
    郭美君(2004):《幽默風格量表編製暨其與因應策略關係之探討》(未出版碩士論文),輔仁大學。[Kuo, M.-C. (2004). The development of humor style scale and it’s relation to coping strategies (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fu Jen Catholic University.]
    許恩婷、程景琳(2014):〈中文版「青少年同儕衝突處理策略量表」之信效度檢驗〉。《教育科學期刊》,13(2),55–74。[Hus, E.-T., & Cheng, C.-L. (2014). Chinese version of peer conflict resolution strategy questionnaire: reliability and validity. The Journal of Educational Science, 13(2), 55–74.]
    許嘉容、吳裕益(2010):〈高雄市國小一般智能與藝術才能資優生在因應策略與學校適應之研究〉。《特殊教育與復健學報》,22,65–95。[Hsu, C.-J., & Wu, Y.-Y. (2010). Comparison of gifted and artistically talented students with respect to coping strategies and adjustment to school. Bulletin of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 22, 65–95.] https://doi.org/10.6457/BSER.201006.0065
    陳淑蓉、陳學志(2005):〈幽默感的定義與測量:多向度幽默感量表之編製〉。《應用心理研究》,26,168–187。[Chen, S.-J., & Chen, H.-C. (2005). Development of the multidimensional sense of humor scale. Research in Applied Psychology, 26, 168–187.]
    陳學志(1991):《幽默理解的認知歷程》(未出版博士論文),國立臺灣大學。[Chen, H.-C. (1991). The humor comprehension process (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Taiwan University.]
    陳學志(2010):〈「幽默與心理衛生」專題導讀:中外古今覓幽默,喚起民族幽默感〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》,23,173–182。[Chen, H.-C. (2011). Introduction to special issue on “humor and mental health”. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 23, 173–182.] https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201006_23(2).0001
    陳寶如(2020):《國小高年級學童幽默風格與創意個人特質——以樂觀解釋風格為中介變項》(碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學),學位論文服務平台,https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000660 [Chen, B.-R. (2020). The effect of sense of humor styles on inventory of personal factors to pupils’ creativity development based on optimistic explanatory style as a mediating factor among elementary students (Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University), Theses & Dissertations Services. https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000660
    區雅倫、翁儷禎、李庚霖(2013):〈「CEEC興趣量表」簡版之編製〉。《測驗學刊》,60,67–96。[Ou, Y.-L., Weng, L.-J., & Lee, K.-L. (2013). Construction of a short form of the CEEC Interest Inventory in Taiwan. Psychological Testing, 60, 67–96.]
    游立宇、吳宗祐、高鳳霞、駱皓正(2021):〈忍一時風平浪靜,退一步海闊天空?華人組織中的人際壓力因應〉。《中華心理學刊》,63,41–72。[Yu, L.-Y., Wu, T.-Y., Kao, F.-H., & Lo, H.-C. (2021). One moment of patience, one hundred years of peace? Strategies of interpersonal stress coping in Chinese organizations. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 63, 41–72.] https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.202103_63(1).0003
    曾嘉悌、蘇琬婷(2021):〈華語回應批評策略差異分析〉。《兩岸職業教育論叢》,5,14–27。[Tseng, C.-T., & Su, W.-T. (2021). A comparison of response to criticism in Chinese. Across-Strait Vocational Education Journal, 5, 14–27.] https://doi.org/10.6685/ASVEJ.202110_5(1).0002
    黃慶萱(2021):《修辭學(第三版)》。三民。[Huang, Q.-X. (2021). Rhetoric (3rd ed.). San-Min.]
    詹雨臻(2015):〈幽默的腦神經機制〉。《教育與心理研究》,38(3),101–135。[Chan, Y.-C. (2015). The neural substrates of humor processing: An integrative review. Journal of Education & Psychology, 38(3), 101–135.] https://doi.org/10.3966/102498852015093803004
    詹雨臻、陳學志、卓淑玲、Martin, R. A.(2011):〈區分良善與有害的幽默——正體中文版「幽默風格量表」的發展〉。《測驗學刊》,58,207–234。[Chan, Y.-C., Chen, H.-C., Cho, S.-L., & Martin, R.-A. (2011). Distinguishing between kindhearted and malicious humor: Development of a traditional Chinese version of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Psychological Testing, 58, 207–234.] https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.201104.0062
    蔡艾倫(2017):《國小學童於師生互動中的氣餒經驗研究》(未出版碩士論文),臺北市立教育大學。[Tsai, A.-L. (2017). A study on discouragement experience of the elementary school students (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Taipei.]
    劉國兆(2009):〈國中生的學校生活適應策略與同儕文化之研究〉。《臺中教育大學學報:教育類》,23(2),167–185。[Liu, K.-C. (2009). A study on adaptation strategies to school living and peer culture of junior high school students. Journal of National Taichung Teachers College: Education, 23(2), 167–185.] https://doi.org/10.7037/JNTUE.200912.0167
    劉慈惠、丁雪茵(2008):〈幼教人看小一生的學校適應及親師之因應〉。《師大學報:教育類》,53(2),131–167。[Liou, T.-H., & Ting, H.-Y. (2008). Exploring first graders’ school adjustment & parents-teachers reactions-the perspectives of early childhood educators. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(2), 131–167.] https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200808.0006
    鄭麗芬(2020):《國小高年級學生學校傷害情感事件、自尊與學校生活適應之相關研究》(未出版碩士論文),大葉大學。[Zheng, L.-F. (2020). Research on the relationships among hurtful feeling events, self-esteem and school life adaptation of senior students in elementary school (Unpublished master’s thesis). Da-Yeh University.]
    賴柔勳(2020):《國中生之幽默風格對復原力與學校適應之調節作用》(碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學),學位論文服務平台,http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000684 [Lai, R.-S. (2020). The moderate effect of humor styles to resilience and school adjustment in junior high students (Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University), Theses & Dissertations. http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000684
    戴汝卉(2017):《良善與惡意幽默因應對負向情境之情緒轉換效果:功能性磁振造影研究》(博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學),臺師大機構典藏系統,http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/90657 [Da, R.-H. (2017). The differential mechanisms of beneficial and detrimental humorous coping: Evidences from neuroimaging studies (Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University), DSpace at National Taiwan Normal University. http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/90657]
    謝曼盈(2020):〈簡版社交技巧提升系統青少年評量表的信度與效度研究〉。《教育心理學報》,51,505–529。[Hsieh, M.-Y. (2020). Reliability and validity of the short-form Chinese-version social skills improvement system rating scales for adolescent students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51, 505–529.] https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202006_51(4).0001
    魏聰祺(2011):《辭格分類及其辨析研究》。臺中教育大學。[Wei, T.-C. (2011). A classification and analysis of rhetoric figures. National Taichung University.]
    魏聰祺(2016):〈善用笑話提升教學效果〉。《語文教育論壇》,8,11–15。[Wei, T.-C. (2016). Make good use of jokes to improve teaching effectiveness. Language Education Forum, 8, 11–15.] https://doi.org/10.6750/LEF.201606_(8).03
    魏聰祺(2017):〈論語音類型辭格辨析〉。《語文教育學報》,3,21–58。[Wei, T.-C. (2017). Discriminating rhetorical figures of phonetic types. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 3, 21–58.]
    魏聰祺(2019):〈語義類型辭格辨析〉。《臺中教育大學學報:人文藝術類》,33(2),1–23。[Wei, T.-C. (2019). Discriminating rhetorical figures of semantic types. Journal of National Taichung University: Humanities & Arts, 33(2), 1–23.]
    魏聰祺、曾瑞媛(2015):〈語序類型辭格辨析〉。《語教新視野》,3,5–21。[Wei, T.-C., & Tseng, J.-Y. (2015). An analysis on rhetorical figures of word order typology. New Vision of Language Arts, 3, 5–21.] https://doi.org/10.6751/NVLA.201509_(3).0002
    Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X
    Altshuler, J. L., & Ruble, D. N. (1989). Developmental changes in children’s awareness of strategies for coping with uncontrollable stress. Child Development, 60, 1337–1349. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130925
    Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
    Anli, G. (2021). Reliability and validity studies of the Turkish version of Humor Styles Questionnaire for children. Current Psychology, 40, 4416–4426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00387-7
    Attardo, S., Hempelmann, C. F., & Di Maio, S. (2002). Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 3–46.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
    Ben-Ari, R., & Hirshberg, I. (2009). Attachment style, conflict perception, and adolescents’ strategy of coping with interpersonal conflict. Negotiation Journal, 25, 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00208.x
    Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
    Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
    Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1981). The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844267
    Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1984). Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 887–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.877
    Bosman, R. J., Roorda, D. L., Veen, I. V. D., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2018). Teacher-student relationship quality from kindergarten to sixth grade and students’ school adjustment: A person-centered approach. Journal of school psychology, 68, 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.006
    Brich, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5
    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). SAGE Publications.
    Buckley, K. E., Winkel, R. E., & Leary, M. R. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00064-7
    Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Nance, J. T. (2000). Exposure to humor before and after an unpleasant stimulus: Humor as a preventative or a cure. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 13, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2000.13.2.177
    Cann, A., Norman, M. A., Welbourne, J. L., & Calhoun, L. G. (2008). Attachment styles, conflict styles and humour styles: Interrelationships and associations with relationship satisfaction. European Journal of Personality, 22, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.666
    Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352
    Chan, Y. C., Hsu, W. C., Liao, Y. J., Chen, H. C., Tu, C. H., & Wu, C. L. (2018). Appreciation of different styles of humor: An fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33715-1
    Chang, H. J., Wang, C. Y., Chen, H. C., & Chang, K. E. (2014). The analysis of elementary and high school students' natural and humorous responses patterns in coping with embarrassing situations. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27, 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2013-0059
    Chang, J. H., Chen, H. C., Hsu, C. C., Chan, Y. C., & Chang, Y. L. (2015). Flexible humor styles and the creative mind: Using a typological approach to investigate the relationship between humor styles and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 9, 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039527
    Cheng, C. (2001). Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 814–833. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.814
    Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Compas, B. E. (1987). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.3.393
    Cornett, C. E. (1986). Learning through laughter: Humor in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
    Craik, K. H., & Ware, A. P. (2010). Humor and personality in everyday life. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 63–94). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804607-005
    DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
    Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., McGovern, A., Qualter, A., & Smarsh, B. (1996). Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of veral irony. Child Development, 67, 3071–3085. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131767
    Dhensa-Kahlon, R. K., & Woods, S. A. (2022). Humor styles as markers of personality facets: An examination of the personality structural foundation of humor. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, 111336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111336
    Dunnett, C. W. (1980). Pairwise multiple comparisons in the unequal variance case. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 796–800.
    Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1994). Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotion, and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 6, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.1.50
    Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). Norton.
    Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
    Fox, C. L., Dean, S., & Lyford, K. (2013). Development of a humor styles questionnaire for children. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 26, 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2013-0018
    Fox, C. L., Hunter, S. C., & Jones, S. E. (2016a). Children's humor types and psychosocial adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.047
    Fox, C. L., Hunter, S. C., & Jones, S. E. (2016b). Longitudinal associations between humor styles and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12, 377–389. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1065
    Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (2004). Adolescents least able to cope: How do they respond to their stresses? British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880310001648094
    Galloway, G. (2010). Individual differences in personal humor styles: Identification of prominent patterns and their associates. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.007
    Haberman, S. J. (1973a). Log-linear models for frequency data sufficient: Sufficient statistics and likelihood equations. The Annals of Statistics, 1, 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176342458
    Haberman, S. J. (1973b). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics, 29, 205-220. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529686
    Hammock, S. H., Richardson, D. R., Pilkington, C. J., & Utley, M. (1990). Measurement of conflict in social relationships. Personal and Individual Differences, 11, 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90040-X
    Hardecker, D. J. K., & Haun, D. B. M. (2020). Approaching the development of hurt feelings in childhood. New Ideas in Psychology, 59, 100796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100796
    Heintz, S., & Ruch, W. (2018). Can self-defeating humor make you happy? Cognitive interviews reveal the adaptive side of the self-defeating humor style. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 31, 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0089
    Hong, F. Y., Chiu, S. I., & Huang, D. H. (2012). A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2152–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.020
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
    Hwang, K. K. (1997). Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 8, 17–38.
    James, L. A., & Fox, C. L. (2016). Children's understanding of self-focused humor styles. Europe's journal of psychology, 12, 420–433. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1067
    Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structure. Biometrika, 57, 239–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334833
    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. SPSS Inc.
    Keenan, A., & Newton, T. J. (1985). Stressful events, stressors and psychological strains in young professional engineers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030060206
    Kowalski, R. M., Howerton, E., & Mckenzie, M. (2001). Permitted disrespect: Teasing in interpersonal interactions. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships (pp. 177–202). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10365-006
    Koo, J. E., & Lee, G. U. (2015). An effect of physical activity-based recreation programs on children’s optimism, humor styles, and school life adjustment. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 11, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.150210
    Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
    Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
    Lazarus, R.S., & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L. A. Pervin, & M. Lewis (Eds), Perspectives in interactional psychology (pp. 287–327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3997-7_12
    Leary, M. R., & Springer, C. (2001). Hurt feeling: The neglected emotion. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships (pp. 151–175). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10365-006
    Leary, M. R., Springer, C., Negel, L., Ansell, E., & Evans, K. (1998). The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1225–1237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1225
    Leist, A. K., & Müller, D. (2013). Humor types show different patterns of self-regulation, self-esteem, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9342-6
    Lepore, S. J., & Smyth, J. M. (2002). The writing cure: An overview. In S. J. Lepore, & J. M. Smyth (Eds), The writing cure: How expressive writing promotes health and emotional well-being (pp. 3–14). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10451-000
    Leung, K., Brew, F. P., Zhang, Z. X., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Harmony and conflict: A cross-cultural investigation in China and Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110363474
    Loeb, M., & Wood, V. (1986). Epilogue: A nascent idea for an Eriksonian model humor. In L. Nahemow, K. A. McCluskey-Fawcett, & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), Humor and Aging (pp. 279–284). Academic Press.
    Malloy, C., Cuda, J., Kim, S. Y., & Bottema-Beutel, K. (2020). “They can even make waiting in line fun”: A quantitative content analysis of autistic children's friendship conceptualizations. Psychology in the Schools, 57, 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22362
    Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier.
    Martin, R. A., & Ford T. E. (2018a). Introduction to the psychology of humor. In R. A. Martin, & T. E. Ford (Eds.), The psychology of humor: An integrative approach (2nd ed., pp. 1–32). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812143-6.00001-1
    Martin, R. A., & Ford T. E. (2018b). The developmental psychology of humor. In R. A. Martin, & T. E. Ford (Eds.), The psychology of humor: An integrative approach (2nd ed., pp. 205–246). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812143-6.00007-2
    Martin, R. A., Kuiper, N. A., Olinger, L. J., & Dance, K. A. (1993). Humor, coping with stress, self-concept, and psychological well-being. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 6, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.1.89
    Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual difference in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
    McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor, its origin and development. W. H. Freeman & Company.
    McLaren, R. M., & Solomon, D. H. (2008). Appraisals and distancing responses to hurtful messages. Communication Research, 35, 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208315961
    Mills, R. S. L., Nazar, J., & Farrell, H. M. (2002). Child and parent perceptions of hurtful messages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 731–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502196001
    Mussen, P., & Rutherford, E. (1961). Effects of aggressive cartoons on children's aggressive play. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 461–464.
    Nevo, O., & Nevo, B. (1983). What do you do when asked to answer humorously? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.188
    Noakes, M. A., & Rinaldi, C. M. (2006). Age and gender differences in peer conflict. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 881–891.
    Phelps, C. E. R. (2001). Children's responses to overt and relational aggression. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3002_11
    Pincus, D. B., & Friedman, A. G. (2004). Improving children’s coping with everyday stress: Transporting treatment interventions to the school setting. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 7, 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-004-6087-8
    Rafnsson, F. D., Jonsson, F. H., & Windle, M. (2006). Coping strategies, stressful life events, problem behaviors, and depresses affect. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 19, 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800600679111
    Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/255985
    Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 5–18.
    Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2013). Humour styles, personality and psychological well-being: What’s humour got to do with it? European Journal of Humour Research, 1, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.4.ruch
    Salavera, C., Usán, P., & Jarie, L. (2020). Styles of humor and social skills in students. Gender differences. Current Psychology, 39, 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9770-x
    Samson, A. C., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Humour as emotion regulation: The differential consequences of negative versus positive humour. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.585069
    Selman, R. L. (1980). The development of interpersonal competence: The role of understanding in conduct, Developmental Review, 4, 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90034-4
    Shapiro, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Kessler, J. W. (1991). A three-component model of chilren’s teasing: Aggression, humor and ambiguity. Journal of Social Clinical Psychology, 10, 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1991.10.4.459
    Shek, D. T. L., & Lin, L. (2017). Use of foul language among chinese adolescents: Developmental change and relations with psychosocial competences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60, 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.10.010
    Sherman, L. W. (1988). Moderating influence of gender on the relationship between humor and peer acceptance in elementary school children. Paper presented at the National Conference on Humor: WHIN (7th, Lafayette, In April 1–4, 1988) (ERIC No. ED295738)
    Shingala, M. C., & Rajyaguru, A. (2015). Comparison of post hoc tests for unequal variance. International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering, 2(5), 22–33.
    Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
    Silvia, P. J., & Rodriguez, R. M. (2020). Time to renovate the humor style questionnaire? An item response theory analysis of the HSQ. Behavioral Sciences, 10, 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10110173
    Staunton, T. V., Alvaro, E. M., Rosenberg, B. D., & Crano, W. D. (2020). Controlling language and irony: Reducing threat and increasing positive message evaluations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 42, 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1789464
    Tellegen, A., & Briggs, P. F. (1967). Old wine in new skins: Grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024963
    Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199301)49:1<13::AID-JCLP2270490103>3.0.CO;2-S
    Tobin, D. L., Holroyd, K. A., Reynolds, R. V., & Wigal, J. K. (1989). The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173478
    Turashvili, T., & Japaridze, M. (2013). Coping strategies of university students in Georgian context. Problems of Education in the 21 Century, 56, 144–149. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/13.56.144
    Vangelisti, A. L. (2007). Communicating hurt. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 121–142). Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
    Vangelisti, A. L. (2015). Hurtful Communication. In C.R. Berger, M.E. Roloff, S.R. Wilson, J.P. Dillard, J. Caughlin, & D. Solomon (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–9). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic178
    Vangelisti, A. L., & Crumley, L. P. (1998). Reactions to messages that hurt: The influence of relational contexts. Communication Monographs, 65, 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759809376447
    Vangelisti, A. L., & Young, S. L. (2000). When words hurt: The effect of perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 393–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500173005
    Vangelisti, A. L., Young, S. L., Carpenter-Theune, K. E., & Alexander, A. L. (2005). Why does it hurt? The perceived causes of hurt feelings. Communication Research, 32, 443–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205277319
    Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11, 161–215. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1998.11.2.161
    Veiga, F., & Leite, A. (2016). Adolescents’ self-concept short scale: A version of PHCSCS. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.079
    White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55, 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
    Wrench, J. S., Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., & Thweatt, K.S. (2020). The dark side of interpersonal communication. In J. S. Wrench, N. M. Punyanunt-Carter, & K.S. Thweatt (Eds.), Interpersonal communication: A mindful approach to relationships (pp. 499–520). Open SUNY Textbooks.
    Young, S. L. (2004). Factors that influence recipients’ appraisals of hurtful communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504042833
    Young, S. L., & Bippus, A. M. (2001) Does it make a difference if they hurt you in a funny way? Humorously and non‐humorously phrased hurtful messages in personal relationships. Communication Quarterly, 49, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385613
    Youngman, M. B. (1979). Assessing behavioural adjustment to school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1979.tb02424.x

    下載圖示
    QR CODE