時代一直改變，世界已由「製造經濟」（Manufacturing economy）進入「服務經濟」（Serving economy），大家會發現個人的日常生活與提供各類服務的公司或機構都在設法爭取顧客的眷顧。顧客重視服務品質的意識亦隨生活水準提高而與日俱增，從顧客角度了解自己機構的服務表現的品質，對企業而言極具有價值與重要性，將調查結果回饋給第一線人員，才能使組織的服務導向更上層樓。本研究是以表演藝術圖書館為個案，對其服務之讀者進行研究，調查讀者對圖書館服務之使用情形，及對服務品質之滿意度，以瞭解讀者對服務之重視與對當前服務之滿意情形，提供管理者參考。

本調查研究以國立中正文中心表演藝術圖書館讀者為研究對象，利用問卷調查法及半結構性訪談法進行，問卷主要以LibQUAL+TM量表為基礎。研究顯示：（一）表演藝術圖書館讀者群主要為高學歷且以女性為主；（二）職業以教師、學生及表演藝術從業人員為主；（三）讀者中以對音樂有興趣者佔最多；（四）約半數會員會經常觀賞兩廳院節目。在圖書館館藏使用方面最常利用的資料類型為CD及DVD；其次是表演藝術雜誌 PAR、表演藝術相關書籍。讀者對圖書館服務期望最高的5項服務為：「館藏檢索系統簡單易用讓我能自己查找資料」、「圖書館網站讓我能自行查到所需資訊」、「館藏陳列方式易於瀏覽取用」、「館內空間安靜讓讀者專心於自己的活動」及「館藏資源取得容易便於讀者獨立使用」等。代表讀者對於理想中的表演藝術圖書館，相當重視其資訊控制構面。而期望與認間之差距最的前5項服務項目為：「館藏陳列方式易於瀏覽取用」、「圖書館內各項標示清楚醒目」、「館藏檢索系統簡單易用讓我能自己查找資料」、「圖書館網站讓我能自行查到所需資訊」、「紙本館藏資料（圖書、樂譜）符合我的需求」。

整體來說，讀者對表演藝術圖書館的整體服務滿意度甚高，100%的讀者表示願意再次利用圖書館；98.91%讀者願意向他人推薦表藝術圖書館。館藏內容是吸引讀者使用最大誘因。

Times have changed. The global economy has transformed "manufacturing economy" into "serving economy" nowadays. No matter what types of merchandise or service provided, companies and organizations are all trying their best to win customers' hearts. Along with the rising of living standards, customers today are well aware of the importance of service quality. It is significant as well as valuable for enterprises to find out the quality performance of their own from the perspective of customers and feedback the results of the relevant survey to front-line staffs. Through this way, the overall performance of service quality should be able to new heights. This research thus uses the performance art library as a case and surveys its readers' perception, including their usage and satisfaction toward the service quality of the library, so as to gain a good understanding of how important they deem the service quality and how satisfied they are towards the current service. The result should be able to provide for managers as valuable reference.

The objects of this research are readers of the Performance Art Library of National Theater Concert Hall(NTCH). Meanwhile, this research is conducted by the survey methods of Questionnaire and Semi-structural Interview. The basis of the questionnaire is the LibQUAL+TM Scale mainly. The research indicates the following results: (1) the readers of the library are mainly highly-educated and females; (2) the majority of them are teachers, students and people who are engaged in performance parts; (3) they are interested in music the most; (4) approximately half of the members come to see the NTCH's performances frequently. In the aspect of the library collection, CD and DVD are the types which have been used the most. The performance art magazine PAR and books regarding performance arts are the next. The top five services that readers look forward to fitting their expectation are the following ones: (1) searching information by myself through an easy-to-use collection retrieval system; (2) searching needed information by myself through the library website; (3) easy to browse and find needed materials through a friendly way of display; (4) a space is quiet enough to concentrate on my own activity. All of the above reveal that readers give weight to the structural dimension of information control towards an ideal performance art library. On the other hand, the top five service items show the biggest differences between expectation and perception are the following ones: (1) easy to browse and find needed materials through a friendly way of display; (2) clear and apparent signs in the library are easy to recognize; (3) searching information by myself through an easy-to-use collection retrieval system; (4) searching needed information by myself through the library website; (5) printed materials such as books and music scores fit my needs well.

Overall speaking, readers own high satisfaction towards the overall service of the performance art library; 100% of readers demonstrate their willingness of revisiting the library while 98.91% of them also show willingness of recommending it to others. Among all, the collection of the library is the biggest incentive to lure readers.

于良芝, 谷松, & 趙崢. (2005). SERVQUAL與圖書館服務質量評估_十年研究述評. 大學圖書館學報(1), 51-57.
王京山. (2006). 國外圖書館信息服務評價的理論模型及其應用 -- 以服務導向質量理論到LibQUAL+評價模型. 圖書館學研究, 2006(1), 84-88.
史繼紅. (2008). 論LIBQUAL作為圖書館服務質量評價工具的局限性. 情報科長, 26(3), 414-417.
任馨, 章云蘭, & 金中仁. (2002). 圖書館服務質量評價新模式_從SERVQUAL到LibQUAL+. 情報雜誌(7), 47-48.
朱宗慶. (2005). 行政法人對文化機構營運管理之影響─以國立中正文化中心改制行政法人為例 . 台北市: 傑優文化.
余泰魁. (2005). 科技大學圖書館服務品質評量指標之分析. 教育資料與圖書館學, 43(1), 1-28.
余泰魁, & 吳桂森. (2005). 科技大學圖書館服務品質評量指標之分析. 教育資料與圖書館學, 43(1), 1-28.
吳美美. (1996). 演進中的圖書評薦工作與評鑑研究. 教育資料與圖書館學, 34(1), 35-166.
吳美清. (2003). 表演藝術圖書館角色功能之研究：以國立中正文化中心表演藝術圖書館為例. , 淡江大學.
李純瑩. (2008). 大學圖書館服務品質與滿意度研究_以大同大學為例. , 大同大學.
林育云. (2008). 大學圖書館資源利用及服務品質之研究---以臺灣師範大學圖書館為例. , 國立臺灣師範大學.
林鈺雯. (2006). 從LibQUAL+TM探討我國大學圖書館服務品質評量. , 國立中興大學.
邱雅暖. (1999). 國立中正文化中心表演藝術圖書室服務品質改善之研究. , 國立臺灣大學.
阿爾布萊特, & 詹克. (1998). 服務管理 . 台北市: 長河.
苗蕙芬. (1990). 台北市立圖書館讀者整體滿意調查研究. 臺北市立圖書館館訊, 8(1), 59-66.
翁崇雄. (2000). 服務品質評量模式之比較研究. 中山管理評論, 8(1), 108.
袁莉婷. (2006). 由SERVQUAL模式探討大學圖書館服務品質與讀者滿意度之研究—以南亞技術學院為例. , 玄奘大學.
馬新蕾, & 周鳳飛. (2007). 關於LIBQUAL+TM項目的分析與思考. 情報雜誌(3), 137-139.
國家圖書館. (2010). 藝術暨視聽資料中心簡介 ( Vol. 2010).
張保隆, & 謝寶煖. (2006). 大學圖書館服務品質評估之研究. 中國圖書館學會學報(56), 49-68.
張慈玲, & 韓竹平. (2009).從使用者角度評估大學圖書館之服務品質：以臺大圖書館為例. 大學圖書館(13-2)
張蕙美. (1998). 大學圖晝館使用者調查:以交通大學圖書館為例. 教育資料與圖書館學, 36(2), 171-196.
曹培培. (2008). LibQUAL+TM服務質量評價方法的思考與改進 - 以高校圖書館為例. 圖書情報工作, 52(4), 100-103.
莊芳榮. (1984). 專門圖書館管理理論與實際 . 台北市: 台灣學生.
陳汎瑩. (2005). 國立臺灣藝術大學圖書館服務品質評量模式之研究. , 國立臺灣師範大學.
陳慧倫. (2006).大學音樂系教師對音樂性非書資料館藏檢索需求之研究-以東吳大學為例. ,國立臺灣師範大學.
陳麗娜. (2004). 圖書館服務品質、顧客滿意度與忠誠度衡量與管理模式建立之研究--以華夏技術學院圖書館為例. , 國立臺灣師範大學.
黃麗純. (2002). 圖書館整體服務品質之探討--以長榮管理學院圖書館為例. , 長榮管理學院.
傳統藝術中心. (2010). 傳統藝中心-中心簡介 ( Vol. 2010).
溫琳琳. (2006). 應用模糊理論探討國家圖書館服務品質之研究. , 國立臺灣師範大學.
董麗, 周虹, & 趙熊. (2004). 讀者滿意度調查分析系統的設計與實現. 現代圖書情報技術(118), 72-76.
劉錦源. (2007). LibQUAL+AM (TM)的信度與效度檢驗_來自本土大學圖書館的證據. 圖書情報工作, 51(9), 96-99.
蔡佳霖. (2004). 輔仁大學圖書館服務品質研究：LIBQUAL+(TM) 之運用實證. , 輔仁大學.
謝寶煖. (1998). 從顧客觀點來談圖書館的績效評估. 國立成功大學圖館館刊, 87(4), 10-22.

History of The New York Public Library. Available: http://www.nypl.org/admin/pro/history.html. 22 Dec. 2010.
Membership. (2010). Available: http://www.mpdsf.org/PAGES/MAIN/membership.html. 22 Dec. 2010.
Michelle Smith Performing Arts Library . (2010). Available: http://www.lib.umd.edu/PAL/about.html. 22 Dec. 2010.
About the Music Division (2010). Available: http://www.loc.gov/rr/perform/div-intro.html. 22 Dec. 2010.
Introduction (Library of Congress - Music, Theater, Dance). Available: http://www.loc.gov/rr/perform/guide/intro.html. 22 Dec. 2010.
Invitation to the Dance. (2010). Available: http://www.loc.gov/rr/perform/guide/dance.html. 22 Dec. 2010.
LibQUAL+® General Information. (2010). Available: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/general_info. 22 Dec. 2010.
History of LibQUAL+®. (2010). Available: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/history_lq. 22 Dec. 2010.
The Origins/Birth of LibQUAL+®. (2010). Available: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/birth_lq. 22 Dec. 2010.
LibQUAL+® Services and Fees. (2010). Available: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/birth_lq. 22 Dec. 2010. Available: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/fee_schedule. 22 Dec. 2010.
Blixrud, J. C. (2003). Library Quality Assessment: LibQUAL+TM. Statistics in Practice-Measuning & Managing, 2002, 155-161.
Calvert, P. J. (2001). International Variations in Measuring Customer Expectations. Library Trends, 49(4), 732-757.
Dole, W. (2002). LibQUAL+TM and the Small Academic Library. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 3(3), 85-95.
Edwards, S., & Browne, M. (1995). Quality in Information Services: Do Users and Librarians Differ in Their Expectations. Library & Information Science Research, 17, 163-182.
Garvin, D. A. (1984). What Does Product Quality Really Mean?. Sloan Management Review, 26:1(1984), 25-29.
Gatten, J. (2004). The OhioLINK LibQUAL+TM 2002 experience : a concsortium looks at service quality. Journal of Library Administration, 40(3/4), 19-48.
Kyrillidou, M. (2008). LibQUAL+® and beyond: library assessment with a focus on library improvement. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 9(3), 155-230.
Kyrillidou, M., Plum, T., & Thompson, B. (2010). Evaluating Usage and Impact of Networked Electronic Resources through Point-of-Use Surveys: A MINES for Libraries ™ Study. The Serials Librarian, 59, 15-183.
Others, V. C. A. (1997). Toward a TQM Paradigm: Using SERVQUAL Measure Library Service Quality. College & Research Libraries(May 1997), 237-251.
Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry. (1988). SERVQUAl : A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64:1(Spring 1988), 15-17.
Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry. (1994). Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality : Implications for Further Reasearch. Journal of Marketing, 58:1(January 1994), 111-124.
Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry. (1991). Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing, 67:4, 420-450.
Seay, T., Seaman, S., & Cohen, D. (1996). Measuring and Improving the Quality of Public Services: A Hybrid Approach. Library Trends, 4, 464-489.
Thompson, B. The Origins/Birth of LibQUAL+®. Available: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/birth_lq. 22 Dec. 2010.
White, M. D., & Abels, E. (1995). Measuring Service Quality in Special Libraries: Lessons From Services Marketing. Special Libraries, 86(Winter 1995), 36-45.